Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-q99xh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-23T06:49:11.607Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Innovation in urban agricultural practices: Responding to diverse production environments

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  22 January 2014

Anne Pfeiffer ,
Erin Silva  and
Jed Colquhoun
Anne Pfeiffer*
Affiliation:
Department of Horticulture, University of Wisconsin-Madison, 1575 Linden Drive, Madison, WI 53706, USA.
Erin Silva
Affiliation:
Department of Agronomy, University of Wisconsin-Madison, 1575 Linden Drive, Madison, WI 53706, USA.
Jed Colquhoun
Affiliation:
Department of Horticulture, University of Wisconsin-Madison, 1575 Linden Drive, Madison, WI 53706, USA.
*
* Corresponding author: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Although discussion of the role of urban agriculture in developing nations has occurred over the past decade, dialogue relating to urban agriculture in industrialized countries, including the United States (US) has only recently begun to attract significant attention. The unique factors that influence urban agriculture, including limited and non-traditional land access, use of reclaimed soils and alternative growing mediums, local legal and political environments, social and community-based missions, and involvement of non-traditional farmers, create a production system distinct from rural agricultural enterprises. In many cases, specific local environmental and external factors drive urban farms to develop unique innovations for space-intensive production systems, often creating a dominant paradigm for urban farming for a given location. Furthermore, non-production-related organizational goals are often the primary focus of urban agricultural operations, with the food production becoming a secondary objective. In order to address this information gap regarding the status of urban agriculture in the US, our project, centered at the University of Wisconsin-Madison, gathered data through site visits to and interviews of organizations in seven cities, examining how structural and strategic food system factors shape urban agricultural efforts. A broad range of operations are considered, including diverse business and production models based on both commercial and community-based management strategies and production in parking and vacant lots, warehouses, public land and peri-urban locations. Based on these observations, the unique innovations in space-intensive agricultural production that have arisen in response to urban food system factors are discussed. We conclude with an assessment of the most significant challenges continuing to face urban agriculture.

Keywords

urban agricultureurban farmingurban productionvalue-addedfood systemsalternative agriculture
Type
Research Papers
Information
Renewable Agriculture and Food Systems , Volume 30 , Special Issue 1: Innovations and Trends in Sustainable Urban Agriculture , February 2015 , pp. 79 - 91
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2015 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 Golden, S. 2013. Urban Agriculture Impacts: Social, Health, and Economic: A Literature Review [Internet]. UC Sustainable Agriculture Research and Education Program Agricultural Sustainability Institute at UC Davis. Available at Web site http://asi.ucdavis.edu/sarep/sfs/UA%20Lit%20Review-%20Golden%20Reduced%2011-15.pdf Google Scholar
2 Horst, M. 2011. A Review of Suitable Urban Agriculture Land Inventories [Internet]. American Planning Association. Available at Web site http://www.planning.org/resources/ontheradar/food/pdf/horstpaper.pdf (accessed December 29, 2013).Google Scholar
3 Wortman, S.E. and Lovell, S.T. 2013. Environmental challenges threatening the growth of urban agriculture in the United States. Journal of Environmental Quality 42(5):1283–1294.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
4 Hendrickson, M.K. and Porth, M. 2012. Urban Agriculture—Best Practices and Possibilities [Internet]. University of Missouri Extension. Available at Web site http://extension.missouri.edu/foodsystems/documents/urbanagreport_072012.pdf (accessed December 29, 2013).Google Scholar
5 Goldstein, M., Bellis, J., Morse, S., Myers, A., and Ura, E. 2011. Urban Agriculture—A Sixteen City Survey of Urban Agriculture Practices Across the Country [Internet]. Emory Law, Turner Environmental Law Clinic. Available at Web site http://georgiaorganics.org/wp-content/themes/GeorgiaOrganics/Downloads/SiteMoveOver/urbanagreport.pdf (accessed December 29, 2013).Google Scholar
6 Ventura, S. 2010. Evaluating Innovation and Promoting Success in Community and Regional Food Systems. Grant proposal to the United States Department of Agriculture, National Institute of Food and Agriculture, USDA Award 2011-68004-30044.Google Scholar
7 United States Census Bureau/American FactFinder. 2011. DP05: ACS Demographic and Housing Estimates [Internet]. U.S. Census Bureau's American Community Survey Office. Available at Web site http://factfinder2.census.gov (accessed December 29, 2013).Google Scholar
8 United States Census Bureau/State & County QuickFacts. 2010. 2010 Census [Internet]. Available at Web site http://factfinder2.census.gov (accessed December 29, 2013).Google Scholar
9 United States Census Bureau/American FactFinder. 2011. DP03: Selected Economic Characteristics [Internet]. U.S. Census Bureau's American Community Survey Office. Available at Web site http://factfinder2.census.gov (accessed December 29, 2013).Google Scholar
10 United States Census Bureau/American FactFinder. 2011. DP02: Selected Social Characteristics in the United States [Internet]. U.S. Census Bureau's American Community Survey Office. Available at Web site http://factfinder2.census.gov (accessed December 29, 2013).Google Scholar
11 United States Department of Agriculture. 2012. USDA Plant Hardiness Zone Map [Internet]. [cited November 19, 2013]. Available at Web site http://planthardiness.ars.usda.gov/PHZMWeb/ (accessed December 29, 2013).Google Scholar
12 Taylor-Powell, E. and Renner, M. 2003. Analyzing Qualitative Data [Internet]. University of Wisconsin-Extension. Available at Web site http://learningstore.uwex.edu/assets/pdfs/g3658-12.pdf (accessed December 29, 2013).Google Scholar
13 Hagey, A., Rice, S., and Flournoy, R. 2012. Growing Urban Agriculture: Equitable Strategies and Policies for Improving Access to Healthy Food and Revitalizing Communities [Internet]. PolicyLink. Available at Web site http://www.policylink.org/atf/.../URBAN%20AG_FULLREPORT_WEB1.PDF (accessed December 29, 2013).Google Scholar
14 De Kimpe, C.R. and Morel, J.L. 2000. Urban soil management: A growing concern. Soil Science 165(1):31–40.Google Scholar
15 City of Milwaukee. 2013. Seasonal Garden Plot License [Internet]. Available at Web site http://city.milwaukee.gov/ImageLibrary/Groups/cityDCD/realestate/pdfs/SeasonalGardenPlotPermit.pdf (accessed December 29, 2013).Google Scholar
16 LaCroix, C.J. 2010. Urban agriculture and other green uses: Remaking the shrinking city. Urban Lawyer 42:225.Google Scholar
17 Mukherji, N. and Morales, A. 2010. Zoning for Urban Agriculture [Internet]. American Planning Association. Available at Web site http://www.planning.org/zoningpractice/2010/pdf/mar.pdf (accessed December 29, 2013).Google Scholar
18 Boston Redevelopment Authority. 2013. Draft Article 89 as of 5.22.13 [Internet]. Available at Web site http://www.bostonredevelopmentauthority.org/planning/PlanningInitsIndividual.asp?action=ViewInit&InitID=152 Google Scholar
19 Cedar Rapids, Iowa. 2012. Code of Ordinances, Section 32.04 [Internet]. [cited July 25, 2013]. Available at Web site http://library.municode.com/index.aspx?clientId=16256&stateId=15&stateName=Iowa (accessed December 29, 2013).Google Scholar
20 City of Chicago Department of Housing and Economic Development. 2011. Chicago Zoning Ordinance [Internet]. 2011. Available at Web site http://www.cityofchicago.org/content/dam/city/depts/zlup/Sustainable_Development/Publications/Urban_Ag_Ordinance_9-1-11.pdf (accessed December 29, 2013).Google Scholar
21 Jackson, J., Rytel, K., Brookover, I., Efron, N., Hernandez, G., Johnson, E., Jackson, J., Rytel, K., Brookover, I., Efron, N., Kim, G., Lai, W., Navarro, M., Pena, A., Rehm, Z., Yoo, H., and Zabel, Z. 2013. Cultivate L.A.: An assessment of urban agriculture [Internet]. University of California Cooperative Extension—Los Angeles. Available at Web site http://cultivatelosangeles.files.wordpress.com/2013/07/cultivate-l-a-an-assessment-of-urban-agriculture-in-los-angeles-county-june-11-2013.pdf (accessed December 29, 2013).Google Scholar
22 Petersen, E. 2011. Urban Gardens lead the way for water policy in Milwaukee [Internet]. ThirdCoastDaily.com. Available at Web site http://thirdcoastdaily.com/2011/04/urban-gardens-lead-the-way-for-water-policy-in-milwaukee/ (accessed December 29, 2013).Google Scholar
23 City of Diamond Bar, CA. 2009. Garage and Yard Sales [Internet]. Available at Web site https://www.ci.diamond-bar.ca.us/Index.aspx?page=1251 (accessed December 29, 2013).Google Scholar
24 Lee, J. 2012. Urban farming thrives after changes to Minneapolis' urban agriculture plan, but farmers want more [Internet]. Twin Cities Daily Planet [cited August 6, 2013]. Available at Web site http://www.tcdailyplanet.net/news/2012/10/02/urban-farming-thrives-after-changes-minneapolis-urban-agriculture-plan-farmers-want (accessed December 29, 2013).Google Scholar
25 Minneapolis, Minnesota. 2013. Minneapolis Code of Ordinances, §535.360 (8) [Internet; cited August 6, 2013]. Available at Web site http://library.municode.com/showDocumentFrame.aspx?clientID=11490&jobId=204810&docID=3 Google Scholar
26 Mogk, J.E., Wiatkowski, S., and Weindorf, M.J. 2010. Promoting urban agriculture as an alternative land use for vacant properties in the city of Detroit: Benefits, problems and proposals for a regulatory framework for successful land use integration. Wayne Law Review 56:1521.Google Scholar
27 Stovin, V., Dunnett, N., and Hallam, A. 2007. Green Roofs—getting sustainable drainage off the ground. In 6th International Conference of Sustainable Techniques and Strategies in Urban Water Management (Novatech 2007), Lyon, France. p. 11–18.Google Scholar
28 Despommier, D. 2009. The rise of vertical farms. Scientific American 301(5):80–87.Google Scholar
29 Ehrenberg, R. 2008. Let's get vertical: City buildings offer opportunities for farms to grow up instead of out. Science News 174(8):16–20.Google Scholar
30 Oxenham, E. and King, A.D. 2010. School gardens as a strategy for increasing fruit and vegetable consumption. School Nutrition Association [Internet]. Spring 34(1). Available at Web site http://www.pf-group.net/files/QuickSiteImages/journalchildnutrition.pdf Google Scholar
31 Alexander, R. 2004. Green roofs grow… with brown compost. Biocycle 45:55–57.Google Scholar
32 Atiyeh, R.M., Subler, S., Edwards, C.A., Bachman, G., Metzger, J.D., and Shuster, W. 2000. Effects of vermicomposts and composts on plant growth in horticultural container media and soil. Pedobiologia 44(5):579–590.Google Scholar
33 Brown, K.H. and Jameton, A.L. 2000. Public health implications of urban agriculture. Journal of Public Health Policy 21(1):20–39.Google Scholar
34 Donnell, J., Biermacher, J.T., and Upson, S. 2011. Economic potential of using high tunnel hoop houses to produce fruits and vegetables. Selected Paper, Southern Agricultural Economic Association Annual Meeting, Corpus Christi, TX.Google Scholar
35 Carey, E.E., Jett, L., Lamont, W.J., Nennich, T.T., Orzolek, M.D., and Williams, K.A. 2009. Horticultural crop production in high tunnels in the United States: A snapshot. HortTechnology 19(1):37–43.Google Scholar