Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-tf8b9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-23T04:40:55.092Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Great Plains cropping system studies for soil quality assessment

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 February 2007

G. Varvel ,
W. Riedell ,
E. Deibert ,
B. McConkey ,
D. Tanaka ,
M. Vigil  and
R. Schwartz
G. Varvel*
Affiliation:
USDA-ARS, Lincoln, NE 68583, USA.
W. Riedell
Affiliation:
USDA-ARS, Brookings, SD 57006, USA.
E. Deibert
Affiliation:
North Dakota State University, Fargo, ND 58105, USA.
B. McConkey
Affiliation:
Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada, Swift Current, SK, Canada, S9H 3X2.
D. Tanaka
Affiliation:
USDA-ARS, Mandan, ND 58554, USA.
M. Vigil
Affiliation:
USDA-ARS, Akron, CO 80720, USA.
R. Schwartz
Affiliation:
USDA-ARS, Bushland, TX 79102, USA.
*
*Corresponding author: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Interactions between environmental conditions and management practices can significantly affect soil function. Soil quality assessments may improve our understanding of how soils interact with the hydrosphere and atmosphere. This information can then be used to develop management practices that improve the capacity of the soil to perform its various functions and help identify physical, chemical, and biological soil attributes to quantify the present state of a soil and detect changes resulting from management. In protocols established by the Great Plains cropping system network, sampling and testing procedures were selected to identify physical, chemical, and biological soil attributes responsive to management that may serve as useful indicators in assessing the effects of management on the soil resource. Eight existing long-term studies from throughout the Great Plains in the central USA were used to make these assessments because, (1) many years are required for certain soil properties to change measurably; (2) annual weather causes variation in system performance; and (3) the soil pools of interest are spatially variable. This paper includes detailed descriptions of the treatments and sites, and both long-term and short-term (1999–2002) data on precipitation, temperature, and yields for each location.

Keywords

crop rotationtillageno-tillageconventional managementalternative managementsoil resource
Type
Research Article
Information
Renewable Agriculture and Food Systems , Volume 21 , Issue 1 , March 2006 , pp. 3 - 14
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2006

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

01Doran, J.W. and Parkin, T.B. 1994. Defining and assessing soil quality. In Doran, J.W., Bezdicek, D.F., Coleman, D.C. and Stewart, B.A. (eds). Defining Soil Quality for a Sustainable Environment. Soil Science Society of America Publication no. 35. Soil Science Society of America, Madison, WI p. 3–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
02Doran, J.W. and Parkin, T.B. 1996. Quantitative indicators of soil quality: a minimum data set. In Doran, J.W., Jones, A.J. (eds). Methods for Assessing Soil Quality. Soil Science Society of America Special Publication no. 49. Soil Science Society of America, Madison, WI. p. 25–37.Google Scholar
03Karlen, D.L. and Stott, D.E. 1994. A framework for evaluating physical and chemical indicators of soil quality. In Doran, J.W., Bezdicek, D.F., Coleman, D.C., Stewart, B.A. (eds). Defining Soil Quality for a Sustainable Environment. Soil Science Society of America Special Publication no. 35. Soil Science Society of America, Madison, WI p. 53–72.Google Scholar
04Andrews, S.S., Karlen, D.L. and Mitchell, J.P. 2002. A comparison of soil quality indexing methods for vegetable production systems in northern California. Agricultural Ecosystems and the Environment 90: 25–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
05Gajda, A.M., Doran, J.W., Kettler, T.A., Wienhold, B.J., Pikul, J.L. Jr and Cambardella, C.A. 2001. Soil quality evaluations of alternative and conventional management systems in the Great Plains. In Lal, R., Kimble, J.M., Follett, R.F., Stewart, B.A. (eds). Assessment Methods for Soil Carbon. Lewis Publishing, Boca Raton, FL. p. 381–400.Google Scholar
06Anderson, R.L., Bowman, R.A., Nielsen, D.C., Vigil, M.F., Aiken, R.M., and Benjamin, J.G. 1999. Alternative crop rotations for the central Great Plains. Journal of Production Agriculture 12: 95–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
07Bowman, R.A., Vigil, M.F., Nielsen, D.C. and Anderson, R.L. 1999. Soil organic matter changes in intensively cropped dryland systems. Soil Science Society of America Journal 63: 186–191.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
08Riedell, W.E., Schumacher, T.E., Clay, S.A., Ellsbury, M.M., Pravecek, M. and Evenson, P.D. 1998. Corn and soil fertility responses to crop rotation with low, medium, or high inputs. Crop Science 38: 427–433.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
09Gelderman, R., Neal, R., Swartos, S., and Anderson, L. 1987. Soil testing procedures in use at the South Dakota State Soil Testing Laboratory. Pamphlet 101, Plant Science Department, South Dakota State University, Brookings, SD.Google Scholar
10Maursetter, J.M., Schumacher, T.E., Lemme, G.D. and Linstrom, M.J. 1992. Final report on the initial soil properties of the Eastern South Dakota Soil and Water Research Farm. Plant Science Department, South Dakota State University, Brookings, SD.Google Scholar
11Pikul, J.L. Jr, Carpenter-Boggs, L., Vigil, M., Schumacher, T.E., Lindstrom, M.J. and Riedell, W.E. 2001. Crop yield and soil condition under ridge and chisel-plow tillage in the northern Corn Belt, USA. Soil and Tillage Research 60: 21–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
12Carpenter-Boggs, L., Pikul, J.L. Jr, Vigil, M.F. and Riedell, W.E. 2000. Soil nitrogen mineralization influenced by crop rotation and nitrogen fertilization. Soil Science Society of America Journal 64: 2038–2045.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
13Jones, O.R. and Popham, T.W. 1997. Cropping and tillage systems for dryland grain production in the southern High Plains. Agronomy Journal 89: 222–232.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
14Jones, O.R., Hauser, V.L., and Popham, T.W. 1994. No-tillage effects on infiltration, runoff and water conservation on dryland. Transactions of the American Society of Agricultural Engineers 37: 473–479.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
15Deibert, E.J. 1989. Soybean cultivar response to reduced tillage systems in northern dryland areas. Agronomy Journal 81: 672–676.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
16Deibert, E.J. 1995. Dry bean production with various tillage and residue management systems. Soil and Tillage Research 36: 97–109.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
17Deibert, E.J. and Utter, R.A. 1990. Tillage system, crop rotation and environmental stress on spring wheat development and yield. North Dakota Farm Research 47: 5 7–12.Google Scholar
18Deibert, E.J. and Utter, R.A. 1989. Growth and NPK uptake by soybean cultivars in northern U.S.A. under reduced tillage systems. Canadian Journal of Plant Science 69: 1101–1111.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
19Deibert, E.J. 1989. Reduced tillage system influence on sunflower hybrids. Agronomy Journal 81: 274–279.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
20Deibert, E.J. and Utter, R.A. 1989. Sunflower growth and nutrient uptake: response to tillage system, hybrid maturity and weed control method. Soil Science Society of America Journal 53: 133–138.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
21Deibert, E.J. and Utter, R.A. 2002. Edible dry bean plant growth and NPK uptake in response to different residue management systems. Communications in Soil Science and Plant Analyses 33 (11&12): 1959–1974.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
22Black, A.L. and Tanaka, D.L. 1997. A conservation tillage-cropping systems study in the northern Great Plains of the United States. In Paul, E., Paustian, K., Elliott, T., Cole, V. (eds.) Soil Organic Matter in Temperate Agroecosystems. CBC Press Boca Raton, FL p. 335–342.Google Scholar
23Halvorson, A.D., Black, A.L., Krupinsky, J.M., Merrill, S.D., Wienhold, B.J. and Tanaka, D.L. 2000. Spring wheat response to tillage system and nitrogen fertilization with a crop-fallow system. Agronomy Journal 92: 288–294.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
24Halvorson, A.D., Black, A.L., Krupinsky, J.M., Merrill, S.D., Wienhold, B.J., and Tanaka, D.L. 2000. Spring wheat response to tillage and nitrogen fertilization in rotation with sunflower and winter wheat. Agronomy Journal 92: 136–144.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
25Wienhold, B.J. and Halvorson, A.D. 1999. Nitrogen mineralization responses to cropping, tillage, and nitrogen rate in the Northern Great Plains. Soil Science Society of America Journal 63: 192–196.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
26Halvorson, A.D., Wienhold, B.J., and Black, A.L. 2002. Tillage, nitrogen and cropping system effects on soil carbon sequestration. Soil Science Society of America Journal 66: 906–912.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
27Peterson, T.A. and Varvel, G.E. 1989. Crop yield as affected by crop rotation and N rate. I. Soybean. Agronomy Journal 81: 727–731.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
28Peterson, T.A. and Varvel, G.E. 1989. Crop yield as affected by crop rotation and N rate. II. Sorghum. Agronomy Journal 81: 731–734.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
29Peterson, T.A. and Varvel, G.E. 1989. Crop yield as affected by crop rotation and N rate. III. Corn. Agronomy Journal 81: 735–738.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
30Varvel, G.E. and Peterson, T.A. 1990. Nitrogen fertilizer recovery by corn in monoculture and rotation systems. Agronomy Journal 82: 935–938.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
31Varvel, G.E. and Peterson, T.A. 1991. Nitrogen fertilizer recovery by grain sorghum in monoculture and rotation systems. Agronomy Journal 83: 617–622.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
32Varvel, G.E. and Peterson, T.A. 1992. Nitrogen fertilizer recovery by soybean in monoculture and rotation systems. Agronomy Journal 84: 215–218.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
33Varvel, G.E. and Peterson, T.A. 1990. Residual soil N as affected by continuous, two-year and four-year crop rotation systems. Agronomy Journal 82: 958–962.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
34Varvel, G.E. 1994. Rotation and nitrogen fertilization effects on changes in soil carbon and nitrogen. Agronomy Journal 86: 319–325.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
35Varvel, G.E. 1994. Monoculture and rotation effects on precipitation use efficiency of corn. Agronomy Journal 86: 204–208.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
36Varvel, G.E. 1995. Precipitation use efficiency of soybean and grain sorghum in monoculture and rotation systems. Soil Science Society of America Journal 59: 527–531.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
37Helmers, G.A., Yamoah, C.F., and Varvel, G.E. 2001. Separating the impacts on risk of crop diversification and rotations. Agronomy Journal 93: 1337–1340.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
38Yamoah, C.F., Francis, C.A., Varvel, G.E., and Waltman, W.J. 1998. Weather and management impact on crop yield variability in rotations. Journal of Production Agriculture 11: 219–225.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
39Varvel, G.E. 2000. Crop rotation and nitrogen effects on normalized grain yields in a long-term study. Agronomy Journal 92: 938–941.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
40Aase, J.K., Pikul, J.L. Jr 1995. Crop and soil response to long term tillage practices in the Northern Great Plains. Agronomy Journal 87: 652–656.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
41Pikul, J.L. Jr, and Aase, J.K. 1995. Infiltration and soil properties as affected by annual cropping in the Northern Great Plains. Agronomy Journal 87: 656–662.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
42Campbell, C.A., Read, D.W.L., Zentner, R.P., Leyshon, A.J., and Ferguson, W.S. 1983. The first 12 years of a long-term crop rotation study in southwestern Saskatchewan: yields and quality of grain. Canadian Journal of Plant Science 63: 91–108.Google Scholar
43Campbell, C.A., Read, D.W.L., Biederbeck, V.O., and Winkleman, G.E. 1983. The first 12 years of a long-term crop rotation study in southwestern Saskatchewan—nitrate-N distribution in the soil and N uptake by the plant. Canadian Journal of Soil Science 63: 563–578.Google Scholar
44Biederbeck, V.O., Campbell, C.A., and Zentner, R.P. 1984. Effect of crop rotation and fertilization on some biological properties of a loam in southwestern Saskatchewan. Canadian Journal of Soil Science 64: 355–367.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
45Campbell, C.A. and Zentner, R.P. 1993. Soil organic matter as influenced by crop rotations and fertilization. Soil Science Society of America Journal 57: 1034–1040.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
46Bowman, R.A., Nielsen, D.C., Vigil, M.F., and Aiken, R.M. 2000. Effect of sunflower on soil quality indicators and subsequent wheat yield. Soil Science 165: 516–522.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
47Bowman, R.A. and Halvorson, A.D. 1997. Crop rotation and tillage effects on phosphorus distribution in the central Great Plains. Soil Science Society of America Journal 61: 1418–1422.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
48Wright, S.F. and Anderson, R.L. 2000. Aggregate stability and glomalin in alternative crop rotations for the central Great Plains. Biology and Fertility of Soils 31: 249–253.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
49Merrill, S.D., Black, A.L. and Zobeck, T.M. 1995. Overwinter changes in dry aggregate size distribution influencing wind erodibility in a spring wheat–summerfallow cropping system. Journal of the Minnesota Academy of Science 59: 27–36.Google Scholar
50Merrill, S.D., Black, A.L., Fryrear, B.W., Saleh, A., Zobeck, T.M., Halvorson, A.D., and Tanaka, D.L. 1999. Soil wind erosion hazard of spring wheat-fallow as affected by long-term climate and tillage. Soil Science Society of America Journal 63: 1768–1777.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
51Merrill, S.D., Black, A.L., and Bauer, A. 1996. Conservation tillage affects root growth of dryland spring wheat under drought. Soil Science Society of America Journal 60: 575–583.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
52Wienhold, B.J. and Halvorson, A.D. 1998. Cropping system influences on several soil quality attributes in the Northern Great Plains. Journal of Soil and Water Conservation 53: 254–258.Google Scholar
53DeVuyst, E.A. and Halvorson, A.D. 2004. Economics of annual cropping versus crop-fallow in the Northern Great Plains as influenced by tillage and nitrogen. Agronomy Journal 96: 148–153.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
54Pikul, J.L. Jr, and Aase, J.K. 1999. Wheat response and residual soil properties following subsoiling of a sandy loam in eastern Montana. Soil and Tillage Research 51 (1–2): 59–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
55Monreal, C.M., Zentner, R.P., and Robertson, J.A. 1997. An analysis of soil organic matter dynamics in relation to management, erosion and yield of wheat in long-term crop rotation plots. Canadian Journal of Soil Science 77: 553–563.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
56Vanderlip, R.L. 1979. How a sorghum plant develops. Kansas State University, Manhattan, KS.Google Scholar
57Haun, J.R. 1973. Visual quantification of wheat development. Agronomy Journal 65: 116–119.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
58Ritchie, S.W., Hanway, J.J. and Benson, G.O. 1992. How a corn plant grows. Special Report Number 48. Iowa State University, Ames, IA.Google Scholar
59Pikul, J.L. Jr, Schwartz, R.C., Benjamin, J.G., Baumhardt, R.L., and Merrill, S. 2006. Cropping system influences on soil physical properties in the Great Plains. Renewable Agriculture and Food Systems 21: 15–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
60Mikha, M.M., Vigil, M.F., Liebig, M., Bowman, R., McConkey, B., Deibert, E., and Pikul, J. Jr 2006. Cropping system influences on soil chemical properties and soil quality in the great plains. Renewable Agriculture and Food Systems 21: 26–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
61Liebig, M., Carpenter-Boggs, L., Johnson, J.M.F., Wright, S., and Barbour, N. 2006. Cropping system effects on soil biological characteristics in the Great Plains. Renewable Agriculture and Food Systems 21: 36–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
62Army, T.J. and Kemper, W.D. 1991. Support for long-term agricultural research. Agronomy Journal 83: 62–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
63Rasmussen, P.E., Goulding, K.W.T., Brown, J.R., Grace, P.R., Janzen, H., and Körschens, M. 1998. Long-term agroecosystem experiments: assessing agricultural sustainability and global change. Science 282: 893–896.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
64Wienhold, B.J., Pikul, J.L. Jr, Liebig, M.A., Mikha, M.M., Varvel, G.E., Doran, J.W. and Andrews, S.S. 2006. Cropping system effects on soil quality in the great plains: synthesis from a regional project. Renewable Agriculture and Food Systems. 21: 49–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar