Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-7cvxr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-23T07:46:39.345Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Farmer-developed vegetable intercropping systems in southern Hebei, China

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  16 June 2010

Til Feike*
Affiliation:
Department of Crop Science, University of Hohenheim, Fruwirthstr. 23, 70599Stuttgart, Germany.
Qing Chen
Affiliation:
College of Agricultural Resources and Environmental Sciences, China Agricultural University, No. 2 West Yuan Ming Yuan Road, Beijing100094, China.
Simone Graeff-Hönninger
Affiliation:
Department of Crop Science, University of Hohenheim, Fruwirthstr. 23, 70599Stuttgart, Germany.
Judit Pfenning
Affiliation:
Department of Crop Science, University of Hohenheim, Fruwirthstr. 23, 70599Stuttgart, Germany.
Wilhelm Claupein
Affiliation:
Department of Crop Science, University of Hohenheim, Fruwirthstr. 23, 70599Stuttgart, Germany.
*
*Corresponding author: [email protected]

Abstract

The expansion of intensive vegetable production systems exacerbates ongoing resource degradation in China's Hebei province. There is an urgent need to develop and disseminate more sustainable vegetable production systems. Intercropping, the simultaneous cultivation of two or more crops on the same field, is widely practiced in the region. Intercropping can use environmental resources more efficiently and is therefore considered to generate high and stable yields with lower inputs. Until now, scientific literature on vegetable intercropping in China is non-existent. To identify prevailing vegetable intercropping systems, a qualitative inquiry was conducted in southern Hebei province. Researchers, extensionists and farmers were interviewed on the occurrence, methods, potentials and constraints of vegetable intercropping. Furthermore, semi-structured in-depth interviews were conducted to examine the farmers' underlying motives and concepts and to determine the origin and distribution of the systems. The investigations revealed a huge variety of sophisticated systems being practiced in southern Hebei. Apart from pure vegetable intercropping systems such as spinach–garlic, especially maize–vegetable and cotton–vegetable systems are widespread. The systems are developed by the farmers themselves and disseminated by the state extension service. Apart from the benefits of plant health, the optimal use of limited land resources is the main reason for farmers to exercise intercropping. However, with the ongoing mechanization and labor force reduction in the agricultural sector, a great part of the intercropping systems, which demand a high input of manual labor, are prone to extinction in the long run. Recent research in China focused purely on agronomic advantages of intercropping, neglecting the linkages between the socio-economic developments and farmers' decisions in the field. To overcome this dilemma and to maintain the traditional and sustainable intercropping systems, we conclude that only an integrative research approach that involves various stakeholders from the beginning is able to adjust the intercropping systems to future demands.

Type
Research Papers
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2010

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1.Wu, Z. and McErlean, S. 2003. Market efficiency in the reformed Chinese grain marketing system. China Economic Review 14(2):115130.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
2.Hebei Statistical Yearbook 1999–2008. China Statistical Press, Beijing, China.Google Scholar
3.Deng, X., Shan, L., Zhang, H., and Turner, N.C. 2006. Improving agricultural water use efficiency in arid and semiarid areas of China. Agricultural Water Management 80:2340.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
4.Zhang, H., Wang, X., You, M., and Liu, C. 1999. Water-yield relations and water-use efficiency of winter wheat grown in the North China Plain. Irrigation Science 19:3745.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
5.Jia, J., Yu, J., and Liu, C. 2002. Groundwater regime and calculation of yield response in North China Plain: a case study of Luancheng County in Hebei Province. Journal of Geographical Sciences 12(2):217225.Google Scholar
6.Li, Y., Wan, W., Song, J., Wu, Y., Xu, Y., and Zhang, M. 2009. Classification of groundwater contamination in Yuxi River Valley, Shaanxi Province, China. Bulletin of Environmental Contamination and Toxicology 82:234238.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
7.Tieyu, W., Yonglong, L., Yajuan, S., and Hong, Z. 2005. Spatial distribution of organochlorine pesticide residues in soils surrounding Guanting reservoir, People's Republic of China. Bulletin of Environmental Contamination and Toxicology 74:623630.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
8.Brown, G.P. 1995. Arable land loss in rural China: policy and implementation in Jiangsu Province. Asian Survey 10:922940.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
9.Chen, J. 2007. Rapid urbanization in China: a real challenge to soil protection and food security. Catena 69:115.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
10.Zhu, X.G. 1998. The agricultural utilization of water resource in the NCP. World Survey and Research 4:9–12 (in Chinese).Google Scholar
11.China Statistical Yearbook 2008. China Statistical Press, Beijing, China.Google Scholar
12.Chandler, P. 1994. Adaptive ecology of traditionally derived agroforestry in China. Human Ecology 22(4):415442.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
13.Knörzer, H., Graeff-Hönninger, S., Guo, B., Wang, P., and Claupein, W. 2009. The rediscovery of intercropping in China: a traditional cropping system for future Chinese agriculture – a review. In Lichtfouse, E. (ed.). Climate Change, Intercropping, Pest Control and Beneficial Organisms, Sustainable Agriculture Reviews 2. Springer Science+Business Media B.V., Amsterdam, The Netherlands.Google Scholar
14.Li, L., Sun, J., Zhang, F., Guo, T., Bao, X., Smith, F.A., and Smith, S.E. 2006. Root distribution and interactions between intercropped species. Oecologia 147:280290.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
15.Alene, A.D. and Hassan, R.M. 2003. Total factor productivity and resource use efficiency of alternative cropping systems in two agro-climatic zones in eastern Ethiopia. Agricultural Economics Review 4(2):3247.Google Scholar
16.Carrubba, A., la Torre, R., Saiano, F., and Aiello, P. 2008. Sustainable production of fennel and dill by intercropping. Agronomy Journal of Sustainable Development 28:247256.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
17.Innis, D.Q. 1997. Intercropping and the scientific basis of traditional agriculture. Intermediate Technology Publications, London, UK.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
18.Whitmore, A.P. and Schröder, J.J. 2007. Intercropping reduces nitrate leaching from under field crops without loss of yield – a modeling study. European Journal of Agronomy 27:8188.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
19.Baumann, D.T., Bastiaans, L., and Kropff, M.J. 2002. Intercropping system optimization for yield, quality, and weed suppression – combining mechanistic and descriptive models. Agronomy Journal 94:734742.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
20.Hatcher, P. and Melander, B. 2003. Combining physical, cultural and biological methods: Prospects for integrated non-chemical weed management strategies. Weed Research 43(5):303322.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
21.Liebman, M. and Davis, A.S. 2000. Integration of soil, crop and weed management in low external-input farming systems. Weed Research 40:2747.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
22.Laloy, E. and Bielders, C.L. 2010. Effect of intercropping period management on runoff and erosion in a maize cropping system. Journal of Environmental Quality 39:10011008.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
23.Altieri, M.A. 1999. The role of biodiversity in agroecosystems. Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment 74:9–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
24.Zhang, F. and Li, L. 2003. Using competitive and facilitative interactions in intercropping systems enhances crop productivity and nutrient-use efficiency. Plant and Soil 248:305312.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
25.Li, L., Tang, C., Rengel, Z., and Zhang, F. 2004. Calcium, magnesium and microelement uptake as affected by phosphorus sources and interspecific root interactions between wheat and chickpea. Plant and Soil 261:2937.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
26.Gao, Y., Duan, A., Sun, J., Li, F., Liu, Z., Liu, H., and Liu, Z. 2009. Crop coefficient and water-use efficiency of winter wheat/spring maize strip intercropping. Field Crops Research 111:6573.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
27.Knowler, D. and Bradshaw, B. 2007. Farmer's adoption of conservation agriculture: A review and synthesis of recent research. Food Policy 32:2548.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
28.von Wirén-Lehr, S. 2001. Sustainability in agriculture – an evaluation of principal goal-oriented concepts to close the gap between theory and practice. Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment 84:115129.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
29.Feintrenie, L. and Levang, P. 2009. Sumatra's rubber agroforests: advent, rise and fall of a sustainable cropping system. Small-scale Forestry 8:323335.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
30.Case, D.D. 1990. The community's toolbox: The idea, methods and tools for participatory assessment, monitoring and evaluation in community forestry. FAO Regional Wood Energy Development Programme, Bangkok, Thailand.Google Scholar
31.Garforth, C. and Usher, R. 1997. Promotion and uptake pathways for research output: a review of analytical frameworks and communication channel. Agricultural Systems 55(2):301322.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
32.McLellan, E., MacQueen, K., and Neidig, J.L. 2003. Beyond the qualitative interview: data preparation and transcription. Field Methods 15(1):6384.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
33.Mayring, P. 2000. Qualitative content analysis. Forum: Qualitative Social Research 1(2), Art. 20 (in German). Available at Web site http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:0114-fqs0002204 (accessed June 4, 2010).Google Scholar
34.Dong, X. 1996. Two-tier land tenure system and sustained economic growth in post-1978 rural China. World Development 24(5):915928.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
35.Tan, S., Heerink, N., and Qu, F. 2006. Land fragmentation and its driving forces in China. Land Use Policy 23(3):272285.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
36.Dou, J., Chen, Y., Jiang, Y., Wang, Y., Li, D., and Zhang, F. 2007. A web-GIS based support system for rural land consolidation in China. New Zealand Journal of Agricultural Research 50:11951203.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
37.Iqdal, J., Cheema, Z.A., and An, M. 2007. Intercropping of field crops in cotton for the management of purple nutsedge (Cyperus rotundus L.). Plant and Soil 300:163171.Google Scholar
38.Rao, M.R. and Willey, R.W. 1980. Evaluation of yield stability in intercropping: Studies on sorghum/pigeon pea. Experimental Agriculture 16:105116.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
39.Hebei Economic Statistical Yearbook 1999–2008. China Statistical Press, Beijing, China.Google Scholar
40.Lu, M. 1999. Zhong Guo Nong Ye Ke Xue Ji Shu 50 Nian [50 Years of Chinese Agricultural Science and Technology]. China Agricultural Publication House, Beijing, China, p. 206216 (in Chinese).Google Scholar
41.Huang, J., Qiao, F., Zhang, L., and Rozelle, S. 2001. Farm pesticides, rice production, and human health in China. Research Report 2001-RR3: International Development Research Centre (IDRC), p. 4952.Google Scholar
42.Tong, P.Y. 1994. Achievements and perspectives of tillage and cropping systems in China. Cropping System and Cultivation Technology (Genzuo Yu Zaipei) 77:15 (in Chinese).Google Scholar
43.Wan, G.H. 2001. Effects of land fragmentation and returns to scale in the Chinese farming sector. Applied Economics 33:183194.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
44.China's Rural Household Survey Yearbook 2007. China Statistical Press, Beijing, China.Google Scholar
45.Alabi, R.A. and Esobhawan, A.O. 2006. Relative economic value of maize–okra intercrops in rainforest zone, Nigeria. Journal of Central European Agriculture 7(3):433438.Google Scholar
46.Zhong, L. and Mol, A.P.J. 2010. Water price reforms in China: Policy Making and Implementation. Water Resources Management 24(2):377396.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
47.Uchida, E., Xu, J., and Rozelle, S. 2005. Grain for Green: Cost-effectiveness and sustainability of China's conservation set-aside program. Land Economics 81(2):247264.CrossRefGoogle Scholar