Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-t5tsf Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-19T08:31:18.790Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Environment and integrated agricultural systems

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  19 September 2008

J.R. Hendrickson ,
M.A. Liebig  and
G.F. Sassenrath
J.R. Hendrickson*
Affiliation:
USDA-ARS, Northern Great Plains Research Laboratory, PO Box 459, Mandan, ND 58554-0459, USA.
M.A. Liebig
Affiliation:
USDA-ARS, Northern Great Plains Research Laboratory, PO Box 459, Mandan, ND 58554-0459, USA.
G.F. Sassenrath
Affiliation:
USDA-ARS, Application and Production Technology Research Unit, PO Box 36, Stoneville, MS 38776, USA.
*
*Corresponding author: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Modern agriculture has done an excellent job producing food, feed and fiber for the world's growing population, but there are concerns regarding its continued ability to do so, especially with the world's limited resources. To adapt to these challenges, future agricultural systems will need to be diverse, complex and integrated. Integrated agricultural systems have many of these properties, but how they are shaped by the environment and how they shape the environment is still unclear. In this paper, we used commonly available county-level data and literature review to answer two basic questions. First, are there environmental limitations to the adoption of integrated agricultural systems? Second, do integrated agricultural systems have a lower environmental impact than more specialized systems? We focused on the Great Plains to answer these questions. Because of a lack of farm-level data, we used county-level surrogate indicators. The indicators selected were percent land base in pasture and crop diversity along a precipitation gradient in North Dakota, South Dakota, Nebraska and Kansas. Evaluated over the four-state region, neither indicator had a strong relationship with precipitation. In the Dakotas, both percent pasture land and crop diversity suggested greater potential for agricultural integration at the mid-point of the precipitation gradient, but there was no clear trend for Kansas and Nebraska. Integrated agricultural systems have potential to reduce the impact of agriculture on the environment despite concerns with nutrient management. Despite advantages, current adoption of integrated agricultural systems appears to be limited. Future integrated agricultural systems need to work with environmental limitations rather than overcoming them and be capable of enhancing environmental quality.

Keywords

Shannon's diversity indexenvironmental limitationssustainabilityclimatic change
Type
Research Papers
Information
Renewable Agriculture and Food Systems , Volume 23 , Special Issue 4: Principles of Integrated Agricultural Systems , December 2008 , pp. 304 - 313
Copyright
Copyright © 2008 Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1Brown, L.R. 2006. Plan B 2.0: Rescuing a Planet Under Stress and a Civilization in Trouble. W.W. Norton, New York.Google Scholar
2United Nations Population Division. 2006. World Population Prospects: The 2006 Revision. Available at Web site: http://www.un.org/esa/population/unpop.htm (verified 3 December 2007).Google Scholar
3Diamond, J. 2005. Collapse: How Societies Choose to Fail or Succeed. Penguin Books, New York.Google Scholar
4Flannery, T. 2006. The Weather Makers: How Man is Changing the Climate and What it Means for Life on Earth. Atlantic Monthly Press, New York.Google Scholar
5Lobell, D.B. and Asner, G.P. 2003. Climate and management contributions to recent trends in U.S. agricultural yields. Science 299:1032.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
6Nearing, M.A., Pruski, F., and O'Neal, M.R. 2004. Expected climate change impacts on soil erosion rates: a review. Journal of Soil and Water Conservation 59(1):43–50.Google Scholar
7Shaobing, P., Huang, J., Sheehy, J.E., Laza, R.C., Visperas, R.M., Zhong, X., Centeno, G.S., Khush, G.S., and Cassman, K.G. 2004. Rice yields decline with higher night temperature from global warming. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA 101:9971–9975.Google Scholar
8Padbury, G., Waltman, S., Caprio, J., Coen, G., Mcginn, S., Mortensen, D., Nielsen, G., and Sinclair, R. 2002. Agroecosystems and land resources of the Northern Great Plains. Agronomy Journal 94:251–261.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
9Epstein, H.E., Lauenroth, W.K., Burke, I.C., and Coffin, D.P. 1998. Regional productivities of plant species in the Great Plains of the United States. Plant Ecology 134:173–195.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
10Kirschenmann, F.L. 2007. Potential for a new generation of biodiversity in agroecosystems of the future. Agronomy Journal 99:373–376.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
11Matson, P.A., Parton, W.J., Power, A.G., and Swift, M.J. 1997. Agricultural intensification and ecosystems properties. Science 277:504–509.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
12Tilman, D., Fargione, J., Wolff, B., D'Antonio, C., Dobson, A., Howarth, R., Schindler, D., Schlesinger, W.H., Simberloff, D., and Swackhamer, D. 2001. Forecasting agriculturally driven global environmental change. Science 292:281–284.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
13Hanson, J.D., Liebig, M.A., Merrill, S.D., Tanaka, D.L., Krupinsky, J.M., and Stott, D.E. 2007. Dynamic cropping systems: Increasing adaptability amid an uncertain future. Agronomy Journal 99(4):939–943.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
14Hendrickson, J.R., Hanson, J., Tanaka, D.L., and Sassenrath, G. 2008. Principles of integrated agricultural systems: introduction to processes and definition. Renewable Agricultural and Food Systems (doi: 10.1017/S1742170507001718).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
15Russelle, M.P., Entz, M.H., and Franzluebbers, A.J. 2007. Reconsidering integrated crop-livestock systems in North America. Agronomy Journal 99:325–334.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
16FAO. 2001. Mixed crop-livestock farming: A review of traditional technologies based on literature and field experience. FAO Animal Production and Health Papers. No. 152. FAO, Rome, Italy.Google Scholar
17Pimentel, D., Harman, R., Pacenza, M., Pecarsky, J., and Pimentel, M. 1994. Natural resources and an optimum human population. Population and Environment 15:347–369.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
18Brouwer, C. and Heibloem, M. 1986. Irrigation Water Management: Irrigation Water Needs. Training Manual No. 3. Natural Resources Management and Environment Department. FAO, Rome, Italy.Google Scholar
19Gollehon, N. and Quinby, W. 2006. Irrigation resources and water costs. Chapter 2.1. In Wiebe, K. and Gollehon, N. (eds). Agricultural Resources and Environmental Indicators, 2006 edition. Economic Research Service, U.S. Department of Agriculture. p. 24–32.Google Scholar
20Redmon, L.A. and Hendrickson, J.R. 2007. Forage systems for temperate sub-humid and semi-arid areas. In Barnes, R.F., Moore, K.J., Nelson, C.J. and Collins, M. (eds). Forages, Volume II: The Science of Grassland Agriculture, 6th ed.Blackwell Publishing Professional, Ames, IA. p. 291–302.Google Scholar
21Soil Survey Staff. 1999. Soil Taxonomy: A Basic System of Soil Classification for Making and Interpreting Soil Surveys, 2nd ed. USDA-NRCS Agricultural Handbook No. 436, U.S. Government Printing Office, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
22NASS. 2004. 2002 Census of Agriculture. Available at Web site: http://www.agcensus.usda.gov/Publications/2002/index.asp (accessed 1 September 2007; verified 12 December 2007).Google Scholar
23NASS. 2007. United States Department of Agriculture— Quick Stats. Available at Web site: http://www.nass.usda.gov/QuickStats/Create_County_Indv.jsp (accessed 2 September 2007; verified 27 December 2007).Google Scholar
24Shannon, C.E. 1948. A mathematical theory of communications. Bell System Technical Journal 27:379–423, 623–656.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
25NASS. 2004. Farm and Ranch Irrigation Survey. 2002 Census of Agriculture. Volume 3, Special Studies Part 1. National Agricultural Statistics Service, USDA. Washington, DC.Google Scholar
26Miller, J.A. and Appel, C.L. 1997. Ground water atlas of the United States: Kansas, Missouri and Nebraska. HA 730-D. U.S. Geological Survey. USGS Information Services, Denver, CO.Google Scholar
27Lubowski, R.N., Bucholtz, S., Claasen, R., Roberts, M.J., Cooper, J.C., Gueorguieva, A., and Johansson, R. 2006. Environmental Effects of Agricultural Land-use Change: The Role of Economics and Policy. United States Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service, Economic Research Report No. 25. Washington, DC.Google Scholar
28High Plains Regional Climate Center. Historical Climatic Data Summaries. Available at Web site: http://www.hprcc.unl.edu/data/historical/ (accessed 13 September 2007; verified 11 December 2007).Google Scholar
29National Corn Handbook. Available at Web site: http://www.ces.purdue.edu/extmedia/NCH/NCH-40.html (accessed 14 September 2007; verified 17 December 2007).Google Scholar
30Goodwin, B.K., Vandeveer, M.L., and Deal, J.L. 2004. An empirical analysis of acreage effects of participation in the federal crop insurance program. American Journal of Agricultural Economics 86:1058–1077.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
31Swenson, A.L. 2001. Financial Characteristics of North Dakota Farms 1998–2000. Agribusiness and Applied Economics Report No. 467. Department of Agribusiness and Applied Economics, North Dakota State University, Fargo, ND.Google Scholar
32Swenson, A.L. 2004. Financial Characteristics of North Dakota Farms 2001–2003. Agribusiness and Applied Economics Report No. 546. Department of Agribusiness and Applied Economics, North Dakota State University, Fargo, ND.Google Scholar
33Swenson, A.L. 2005. Financial Characteristics of North Dakota Farms 2003–2004. Agribusiness and Applied Economics Report No. 568. Department of Agribusiness and Applied Economics North Dakota State University, Fargo, ND.Google Scholar
34Swenson, A.L. 2006. Financial Characteristics of North Dakota Farms 2004–2005. Agribusiness and Applied Economics Report No. 588. Department of Agribusiness and Applied Economics, North Dakota State University. Fargo, ND.Google Scholar
35Swenson, A.L. 2007. Financial Characteristics of North Dakota Farms 2005–2006. Agribusiness and Applied Economics Report No. 608. Department of Agribusiness and Applied Economics, North Dakota State University. Fargo, ND.Google Scholar
36Archer, D.W., Dawson, J., Kreuter, U.P., Hendrickson, M., and Halloran, J.M. 2008. Social and political influences on agricultural systems. Renewable Agriculture and Food Systems (doi: 10.1017/S174217050700169X).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
37Van Loon, G.W., Patil, S.G., and Hugar, L.B. 2005. Agricultural Sustainability: Strategies for Assessment. Sage Publications, New Delhi, India.Google Scholar
38Doran, J.W. 2002. Soil health and global sustainability: translating science into practices. Agricultural Ecosystems and Environment 88:119–127.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
39Liebig, M.A. and Varvel, G.E. 2003. Effects of western Corn Belt cropping systems on agroecosystem functions. Agronomy Journal 95(2):316–322.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
40Russell, A.E., Laird, D.A., and Mallarino, A.P. 2006. Nitrogen fertilization and cropping system impacts on soil quality in Midwestern Mollisols. Soil Science Society of America Journal 70:249–255.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
41Johnson, J.M.-F., Reicosky, D.C., Allmaras, R.R., Sauer, T.J., Venterea, R.T., and Dell, C.J. 2005. Greenhouse gas contributions and mitigation potential of agriculture in the central USA. Soil Tillage Research 83:73–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
42Franzluebbers, A.J. 2005. Soil organic carbon sequestration and agricultural greenhouse gas emissions in the southeastern USA. Soil Tillage Research 83:120–147.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
43Liebig, M.A., Morgan, J.A., Reeder, J.D., Ellert, B.H., Gollany, H.T., and Schuman, G.E. 2005. Greenhouse gas contributions and mitigation potential of agricultural practices in northwestern USA and western Canada. Soil Tillage Research 83:25–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
44Eghball, B. 2002. Soil properties as influenced by phosphorus- and nitrogen-based manure and compost applications. Agronomy Journal 94:128–135.Google Scholar
45Schlegel, A.J. 1992. Effect of composted manure on soil chemical properties and nitrogen use by grain sorghum. Journal of Production Agriculture 5:153–157.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
46Al-Kaisi, M.M., Yin, X., and Licht, M.A. 2005. Soil carbon and nitrogen changes as influenced by tillage and cropping systems in some Iowa soils. Agriculture Ecosystems and the Environment 105:635–647.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
47Liebig, M.A., Johnson, H.A., Hanson, J.D., and Frank, A.B. 2005. Soil carbon under switchgrass stands and cultivated cropland. Biomass Bioenergy 28(4):347–354.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
48Franzluebbers, A.J. 2007. Integrated crop-livestock systems in the southeastern USA. Agronomy Journal 99:361–372.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
49Acosta-Martinez, V., Zobeck, T.M., and Allen, V. 2004. Soil microbial, chemical and physical properties in continuous cotton and integrated crop–livestock systems. Soil Science Society of America Journal 68:1875–1884.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
50Bremer, E., Janzen, H.H., and McKenzie, R.H. 2002. Short-term impact of fallow frequency and perennial grass on soil organic carbon in a Brown Chernozem in southern Alberta. Canadian Journal of Soil Science 82:481–488.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
51Allen, V.G., Baker, M.T., Segarra, E., and Brown, C.P. 2007. Integrated irrigated crop-livestock systems in dry climates. Agronomy Journal 99:346–360.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
52Padbury, G. and Stushnoff, C. 2000. Risk of wind erosion. In McRae, T., Smith, C.A.S. and Gregorich, L.J. (eds). Environmental Sustainability of Canadian Agriculture: Report of the Agri-environmental Indicator Project. Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada, Ottawa, ON. p. 69–76.Google Scholar
53Tanaka, D.L., Anderson, R.L., and Rao, S.C. 2005. Crop sequencing to improve use of precipitation and synergize crop growth. Agronomy Journal 97:385–390.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
54Krupinsky, J.M., Tanaka, D.L., Merrill, S.D., Liebig, M.A., and Hanson, J.D. 2006. Crop sequence effects of 10 crops in the northern Great Plains. Agricultural Systems 88:227–254.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
55Entz, M.H., Baron, V.S., Carr, P.M., Meyer, D.W., Smith, S.R. Jr, and McCaughey, W.P. 2002. Potential of forages to diversify cropping systems in the northern Great Plains. Agronomy Journal 94:240–250.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
56Grant, C.A., Peterson, G.A., and Campbell, C.A. 2002. Nutrient considerations for diversified cropping systems in the northern Great Plains. Agronomy Journal 94:186–198.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
57Karlen, D.L., Varvel, G.E., Bullock, D.G., and Cruse, R.M. 1994. Crop rotations for the 21st century. In Sparks, D.L. (ed.) Advances in Agronomy, Vol. 53. Academic Press, New York. p. 1–45.Google Scholar
58Krupinsky, J.M., Bailey, K.L., McMullen, M.P., Gossen, B.D., and Turkington, T.K. 2002. Managing plant disease risk in diversified cropping systems. Agronomy Journal 94:198–209.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
59Miller, P.R., Gan, Y., McConkey, B.G., and McDonald, C.L. 2003. Pulse crops for the northern Great Plains: I. Grain productivity and residual effects on soil water and nitrogen. Agronomy Journal 95:972–979.Google Scholar
60Stevenson, F.C. and van Kessel, C. 1996. The nitrogen and non-nitrogen rotation benefits of pea to succeeding crops. Canadian Journal of Plant Science 76:735–745.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
61Power, J.F. 1987. Legumes: their potential role in agricultural production. American Journal Alternative Agriculture 2:69–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
62Kelner, D.J., Vessey, J.K., and Entz, M.H. 1997. The nitrogen dynamics of 1-, 2-, and 3-year stands of alfalfa in a cropping system. Agriculture Ecosystems and the Environment 64:1–10.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
63Kelner, D.J. and Vessey, J.K. 1995. Nitrogen fixation and growth of one-year stands of non-dormant alfalfa. Canadian Journal of Plant Science 75:655–665.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
64Sulc, R.M. and Tracy, B.F. 2007. Integrated crop-livestock systems in the U.S. Corn Belt. Agronomy Journal 99:335–345.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
65Cox, S.W.R. (ed.). 2007. Precision Livestock Farming '07. Proceedings of the 3rd European Conference on Precision Livestock Farming, Skiathos, Greece, 3–6 June 2007. Wageningen Academic Publishers, Wageningen, The Netherlands.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
66Jongbloed, A.W. and Lenis, N.P. 1998. Environmental concerns about animal manure. Journal of Animal Science 76:2641–2648.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
67Winter, S.R. and Unger, P.W. 2001. Irrigated wheat grazing and tillage effects on subsequent dryland grain sorghum production. Agronomy Journal 93:504–510.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
68Chang, C., Cho, C.M., and Janzen, H.H. 1998. Nitrous oxide emission from long-term manured soils. Soil Science Society of America Journal 62:677–682.CrossRefGoogle Scholar