Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-r5fsc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-26T11:09:16.813Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Effects of soil fungi on weed communities in a corn–soybean rotation

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 May 2008

N. Jordan  and
S. Huerd
N. Jordan*
Affiliation:
University of Minnesota, 411 Borlaug Hall, 1991 Upper Buford Circle, St Paul, MN 55108, USA.
S. Huerd
Affiliation:
University of Minnesota, 411 Borlaug Hall, 1991 Upper Buford Circle, St Paul, MN 55108, USA.
*
*Corresponding author: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

In a variety of ecosystems, interactions between soil microbiota and weedy plants can strongly affect population and community dynamics of these plants. However, weed–soil microbe interactions are not well characterized in field-crop agroecosystems. In Minnesota (USA), we repeatedly applied a fungicide (benomyl) to field plots in a corn–soybean crop rotation in each of 3 years, and sowed experimental weed communities containing host species for arbuscular-mycorrhizal fungi (AMF) and non-host species. Benomyl typically suppresses formation of mycorrhizal symbiosis in AMF-host plant species, and may also affect other soil fungi. We assessed weed density and biomass production, and monitored AMF colonization rates in each of 3 years. We found that weed density, biomass, community composition and the relative performance of AMF-host and non-host weed species were all significantly responsive to fungicide applications, although for all attributes responsiveness was variable. Fungicide application increased total weed density and biomass production in nearly all cases; most effects were modest but reached a maximum of 49%. Fungicide application also increased the relative performance of non-host species in most cases, although most effects were again modest. Our findings are the first assessment of responses by field-crop weeds to direct manipulation of soil microbial communities in a field setting, and suggest that the population and community ecology of these weeds can be strongly affected by the fungal component of soil microbiota.

Keywords

weed ecologysoil microbiologyplant–soil interactionmycorrhizaeweed biocontrol
Type
Research Papers
Information
Renewable Agriculture and Food Systems , Volume 23 , Issue 2 , June 2008 , pp. 108 - 117
Copyright
Copyright © 2008 Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 Caesar, A. 2005. Melding ecology, classical weed biocontrol, and plant microbial ecology can inform improved practices in controlling invasive plant species. Biological Control 35:240–246.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
2 Wolfe, B.E. and Klironomos, J.N. 2005. Breaking new ground: soil communities and exotic plant invasion. Bioscience 55:477–487.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
3 Reinhart, K.O. and Callaway, R.M. 2006. Soil biota and invasive plants. New Phytologist 170:445–457.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
4 Vatovec, C., Jordan, N., and Huerd, S. 2005. Mycorrhizal responsiveness among certain agronomic weed species. Renewable Agriculture and Food Systems 20:181–189.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
5 Gosling, P., Hodge, A., Goodlass, G., and Bending, G. 2006. Arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi and organic farming. Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment 113:17–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
6 Abawi, G.S. and Widmer, T.L. 2000. Impact of soil health management practices on soilborne pathogens, nematodes and root diseases of vegetable crops. Applied Soil Ecology 15:37–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
7 Manici, L.M., Caputo, F., and Babini, V. 2004. Effect of green manure of Pythium spp. population and microbial communities in intensive cropping systems. Plant and Soil 263:133–142.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
8 Wiggins, E. and Kinkel, L.L. 2005. Green manures and crop sequences influence alfalfa root rot and pathogen inhibitory activity among soil-borne streptomycetes. Plant and Soil 268:271–283.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
9 McGonigle, T.P. and Miller, M.H. 2000. The inconsistent effect of soil disturbance on colonization of roots by arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi: a test of the inoculum density hypothesis. Applied Soil Ecology 14:147–155.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
10 Jansa, J., Mozafar, A., Kuhn, G., Anken, T., Ruh, R., Sanders, I.R., and Frossard, E. 2003. Soil tillage affects the community structure of mycorrhizal fungi in maize roots. Ecological Applications 13:1164–1176.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
11 Kremer, R.J. 1993. Management of weed seed banks with microorganisms. Ecological Applications 3:42–52.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
12 Kennedy, A.C., Johnson, B.N., and Stubbs, T.L. 2001. Host range of a deleterious rhizobacterium for biological control of downy brome. Weed Science 49:792–797.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
13 Kremer, R.J. and Li, J.M. 2003. Developing weed-suppressive soils through improved soil quality management. Soil and Tillage Research 72:193–202.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
14 Jordan, N.R., Zhang, J., and Huerd, S. 2000. Arbuscular-mycorrhizal fungi: potential roles in weed management. Weed Research 40:397–410.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
15 Chee-Sanford, J.C., Williams, M.M., Davis, A.S., and Sims, G.K. 2006. Do microorganisms influence seed-bank dynamics? Weed Science 54:575–587.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
16 Quimby, P.C., King, L.R., and Grey, W.E. 2002. Biological control as a means of enhancing the sustainability of crop/land management systems. Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment 88:147–152.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
17 Kulmatiski, A., Beard, K.H., and Stark, J.M. 2004. Finding endemic soil-based controls for weed growth. Weed Technology 18:1353–1358.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
18 Davis, A.S., Anderson, K.I., Hallett, S.G., and Renner, K.A. 2006. Weed seed mortality in soils with contrasting agricultural management histories. Weed Science 54:291–297.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
19 Francis, R. and Read, D.J. 1995. Mutualism and antagonism in the mycorrhizal symbiosis, with special reference to impacts on plant community structure. Canadian Journal of Botany 73(Suppl. 1):S1301–S1309.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
20 Grubb, P.J. 1986. The ecology of establishment. In Bradshaw, A.D., Goode, D.A., and Thorpe, E., (eds). Ecology and Design in Landscape. Symposium of British Ecological Society 24:83–97.Google Scholar
21 Allen, M.F., Allen, E.B., and Friese, C.F. 1989. Response of the non-mycorrhizal plant Salsola kali to invasion by vesicular–arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi. New Phytologist 111:45–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
22 Johnson, N.C., Grahan, J.H., and Smith, F.A. 1997. Functioning of mycorrhizal associations along the mutualism–parasitism continuum. New Phytologist 135:575–585.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
23 Muthukumar, T., Udayiam, K., Karthikeyan, A., and Manian, S. 1997. Influence of native endomycorrhiza, soil flooding and nurse plant on mycorrhizal status and growth of purple nutsedge (Cyperus rotundus L.). Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment 61:51–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
24 Johnson, N.C. 1998. Responses of Salsola kali and Panicum virgatum to mycorrhizal fungi, phosphorus and soil organic matter: implications for reclamation. Journal of Applied Ecology 35:86–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
25 Gange, A.C., Lindsay, D.E., and Ellis, L.S. 1999. Can arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi be used to control the undesirable grass Poa annua on golf courses? Journal of Applied Ecology 36:909–919.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
26 Bever, J.D. 2003. Soil community feedback and the coexistence of competitors: conceptual frameworks and empirical tests. New Phytologist 157:465–473.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
27 Reynolds, H.L., Packer, A., Bever, J.D., and Clay, K. 2003. Grassroots ecology: plant-microbe–soil interactions as drivers of plant community structure and dynamics. Ecology 84:2281–2291.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
28 Hart, M.M., Reader, R.J., and Klironomos, J.N. 2003. Plant coexistence mediated by arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi. Trends in Ecology and Evolution 18:418–423.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
29 van der Heijden, M.G.A., Boller, T., Weimken, A., and Sanders, I.R. 1998. Different arbuscular mycorrhizal fungal species are potential determinants of plant community structure. Ecology 79:2082–2091.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
30 van der Heijden, M.G.A., Klironomos, J.N., Ursic, M., Moutoglis, P., Streitwolf-Engel, R., Boller, T., Wiemken, A., and Sanders, I.R. 1998. Mycorrhizal fungal diversity determines plant biodiversity, ecosystem variability and productivity. Nature 396:69–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
31 Bever, J.D., Westover, K.M., and Antonovics, J. 1997. Incorporating the soil community into plant population dynamics: the utility of the feedback approach. Journal of Ecology 85:561–573.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
32 Golubski, A.J. 2002. Potential impacts of multiple partners on mycorrhizal community dynamics. Theoretical Population Biology 62:47–62.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
33 Wardle, D.A., Yeates, G.W., Nicholson, K.S., Bonner, K.I., and Watson, R.N. 1999. Response of soil microbial biomass dynamics, activity and plant litter decomposition to agricultural intensification over a seven-year period. Soil Biology and Biochemistry 31:1707–1720.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
34 Marshall, E.J.P., Brown, V.K., Boatman, N.D., Lutman, P.J.W., Squire, G.R., and Ward, L.K. 2003. The role of weeds in supporting biological diversity within crop fields. Weed Research 43:77–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
35 Chen, X., Tang, J.J., Fang, Z.G., and Shimizu, K. 2004. Effects of weed communities with various species numbers on soil features in a subtropical orchard ecosystem. Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment 102:377–388.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
36 Jordan, N.R. and Vatovec, C.M. 2004. Agroecological benefits from weeds. In Inderjit, (ed.). Weed Ecology and Management. Kluwer Academic Publishers, New York, p. 137–158.Google Scholar
37 Murphy, S.D., Clements, D.R., Belaoussoff, S., Kevan, P.G., and Swanton, C.J. 2006. Promotion of weed species diversity and reduction of weed seedbanks with conservation tillage and crop rotation. Weed Science 54:69–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
38 Hartnett, D.C. and Wilson, G.W.T. 2002. The role of mycorrhizas in plant community structure and dynamics: lessons from grasslands. Plant and Soil 244:319–331.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
39 Chen, S.K., Edwards, C.A., and Subler, S. 2001. Effects of the fungicides benomyl, captan and chlorothalonil on soil microbial activity and nitrogen dynamics in laboratory incubations. Soil Biology and Biochemistry 33:1971–1980.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
40 Martikainen, E., Haimi, J., and Ahtiainen, J. 1998. Effects of dimethoate and benomyl on soil organisms and soil processes – a microcosm study. Applied Soil Ecology 9:381–387.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
41 Grace, C. and Stribley, D.P. 1991. A safer procedure for routine staining of vesicular arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi. Mycological Research 95:1160–1162.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
42 McGonigle, T.P., Miller, M.H., Evans, D.G., Fairchild, G.L., and Swan, J.A. 1990. A new method which gives an objective measure of colonization of roots by vesicular-arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi. New Phytologist 115:495–501.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
43 Pellicane, P.J. and Mielke, P.W. 1999. Permutation procedures for multi-dimensional applications in wood related research. Wood Science and Technology 33:1–13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
44 SAS Institute. 2002. SAS/STAT Users Guide: Release 8.02. SAS Institute, Cary, NC.Google Scholar
45 Greig-Smith, P. 1983. Quantitative Plant Ecology. 3rd ed.Blackwell Scientific Publications, Oxford.Google Scholar
46 O'Connor, P.J., Smith, S.E., and Smith, E.A. 2002. Arbuscular mycorrhizas influence plant diversity and community structure in a semiarid herbland. New Phytologist 154:209–218.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
47 Callaway, R.M., Thelen, G.C., Barth, S., Ramsey, P.W., and Gannon, J.E. 2004. Soil fungi alter interactions between the invader Centaurea maculosa and North American natives. Ecology 85:1062–1071.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
48 Dhillion, S.S. and Gardsjord, T.L. 2004. Arbuscular mycorrhizas influence plant diversity, productivity, and nutrients in boreal grasslands. Canadian Journal of Botany-Revue Canadienne de Botanique 82:104–114.Google Scholar
49 Koide, R.T., Li, M., Lewis, J., and Irby, C. 1988. Role of mycorrhizal infection in the growth and reproduction of wild vs. cultivated plants. Oecologia 77:537–543.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
50 Koide, R.T. and Lu, X.H. 1992. Mycorrhizal infection of wild oats: maternal effects on offspring growth and reproduction. Oecologia 90:218–226.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
51 Stanley, M.R., Koide, R.T., and Shumway, D.L. 1993. Mycorrhizal symbiosis increases growth, reproduction and recruitment of Abutilon theophrasti Medic. in the field. Oecologia 94:30–35.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
52 Shumway, D.L. and Koide, R.T. 1994. Reproductive responses to mycorrhizal colonization of Abutilon theophrasti plants grown for two generations in the field. New Phytologist 128:219–224.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
53 Koide, R.T. and Lu, X.H. 1995. On the cause of offspring superiority conferred by mycorrhizal infection of Abutilon theophrasti. New Phytologist 131:435–441.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
54 Heppell, K.B., Shumway, D.L., and Koide, R.T. 1998. The effect of mycorrhizal infection of Abutilon theophrasti on competitiveness of offspring. Functional Ecology 12:171–175.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
55 Forcella, F., Colbach, N., and Kegode, G. 2000. Estimating seed production of three Setaria species in row crops. Weed Science 48:436–444.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
56 Allison, V.J., Rajaniemi, T.K., Goldberg, D.E., and Zak, D.R. 2007. Quantifying direct and indirect effects of fungicide on an old-field plant community: an experimental null-community approach. Plant Ecology 190:53–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
57 Hamel, C. 1996. Prospects and problems pertaining to the management of arbuscular mycorrhizae in agriculture. Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment 60:197–210.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
58 Johnson, N.C., Grahan, J.H., and Smith, F.A. 1997. Functioning of mycorrhizal associations along the mutualism–parasitism continuum. New Phytologist 135:575–585.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
59 Klironomos, J.N. 2003. Variation in plant response to native and exotic arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi. Ecology 84:2292–2301.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
60 Liebman, M. and Gallandt, E.R. 1997. Many little hammers: ecological management of crop–weed interactions. In Jackson, L. (ed.). Ecology in Agriculture. Academic Press, New York, p. 291–341.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
61 Gange, A.C., Brown, V.K., and Sinclair, G.S. 1993. Vesicular-arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi: a determinant of plant community structure in early succession. Functional Ecology 7:616–622.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
62 Albrecht, H. 2003. Suitability of arable weeds as indicator organisms to evaluate species conservation effects of management in agricultural ecosystems. Agricultural, Ecosystems and Environment 98:201–211.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
63 Feldmann, F. and Boyle, C. 1999. Weed-mediated stability of arbuscular mycorrhizal effectiveness in maize monocultures. Journal of Applied Botany 73:1–5.Google Scholar
64 Kabir, Z. and Koide, R.T. 2000. The effect of dandelion or a cover crop on mycorrhiza inoculum potential, soil aggregation and yield of maize. Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment 78:167–174.CrossRefGoogle Scholar