Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-jkksz Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-23T06:50:40.890Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Crop–livestock integration in smallholder farming systems of Goromonzi and Murehwa, Zimbabwe

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  26 October 2018

Siyabusa Mkuhlani Open the ORCID record for Siyabusa Mkuhlani [Opens in a new window] ,
Walter Mupangwa ,
Neil MacLeod ,
Lovemore Gwiriri ,
Isaiah Nyagumbo ,
Godfrey Manyawu  and
Ngavaite Chigede
Siyabusa Mkuhlani*
Affiliation:
CIMMYT Southern Africa Regional Office, 12.5 km Peg Mazowe Road, Mt Pleasant, Harare, Zimbabwe
Walter Mupangwa
Affiliation:
CIMMYT Southern Africa Regional Office, 12.5 km Peg Mazowe Road, Mt Pleasant, Harare, Zimbabwe
Neil MacLeod
Affiliation:
CSIRO Agriculture and Food, St Lucia, Queensland4072, Australia
Lovemore Gwiriri
Affiliation:
Centre for Agroecology, Water and Resilience, Coventry University, Priory Street, CoventryCV15FB, UK
Isaiah Nyagumbo
Affiliation:
CIMMYT Southern Africa Regional Office, 12.5 km Peg Mazowe Road, Mt Pleasant, Harare, Zimbabwe
Godfrey Manyawu
Affiliation:
International Livestock Research Institute, c/o CIMMYT Southern Africa Regional Office, Harare, Zimbabwe
Ngavaite Chigede
Affiliation:
Chibero Agricultural College, P. Bag 901, Norton, Zimbabwe
*
Author for correspondence: Siyabusa Mkuhlani, E-mail: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Poor productivity in smallholder farming systems has necessitated research on the potential of crop–livestock integration to sustainably improve productivity. The study hypothesized that improvement in individual agronomic and livestock systems and synergistic utilization of by-products of either system increases productivity, profitability and integration. Smallholder farming households were classified into: old and resource endowed (OR); part time (PT); and young, risk-taking and enthusiastic (YRE) following a survey conducted in Murehwa and Goromonzi districts of Zimbabwe. Crop–livestock systems’ integration scenarios were developed for each farmer category. Expression of crop–livestock integration in physical terms, e.g., kg ha−1, can be complex and confounding, hence the expression of integration in monetary values. Baseline scenario results indicate that OR had the highest crop–livestock integration of $3981 compared with PT and YRE despite OR having the lowest manure usage compared with PT and YRE farmers. Moreover, OR had the least legume yields of <800 compared with 3530 kg ha−1 in YRE farmers. Subsequent crop–livestock integration scenarios increased maize grain yields by at least 50%, thus increasing profitability to $1210, $3230 and $3100 yr−1 for mucuna, cowpea and groundnut, respectively. Total income increased by 135, 132 and 101% translating to $9880, $2960 and $6290 yr−1 in OR, PT and YRE farmers, respectively. Crop–livestock integration therefore has the potential to improve smallholder crop and livestock productivity, variable with socio-economic status.

Keywords

Crop–livestock productivityfarm household typologyprofitabilitysimulation modelingsmallholder farming systems
Type
Research Paper
Information
Renewable Agriculture and Food Systems , Volume 35 , Issue 3 , June 2020 , pp. 249 - 260
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2018

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Abunyewa, A and Karbo, KN (2005) Improved fallow with pigeon pea for soil fertility improvement and to increase maize production in a smallholder crop-livestock farming system in the subhumid zone of Ghana. Land Degradation and Development 16, 447–454, Available at http://doi.wiley.com/10.1002/ldr.672.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Akibode, S and Maredia, M (2011) Report: Global and regional trends in production, trade and consumption of food legume crops, Michigan, USA. Available at http://impact.cgiar.org/sites/default/files/images/Legumetrendsv2.pdf.Google Scholar
Blackburn, H (1998) Mixed farming systems and the environment: livestock production, the environment and mixed cropping systems. In Nell AL (ed.), Proceedings of the International Conference on Livestock and the Environment, IACW, Wageningen, Netherlands, 16–20 June, 1997.Google Scholar
Chastain, JP and Camberato, JJ (2004) Dairy manure production and nutrient content. In Adams, Jesse (eds), Confined Animal Manure Manager Certification Program Manual Dairy Version. Cooperative Extension Service, Clemson University, Clemson, SC, Clemson, USA, pp. 1–16.Google Scholar
Chikowo, R, Zingore, S, Snapp, S and Johnston, A (2014) Farm typologies, soil fertility variability and nutrient management in smallholder farming in Sub-Saharan Africa. Nutrient Cycling in Agroecosystems 100, 1–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chipunza, MM, Mutibvu, T, Kashangura, MT and Mbiriri, DT (2013) Santé et de la Production Animales en Afrique. Bulletin of Animal Health and Production in Africa 61, 181–188.Google Scholar
Cooper, PJM, Dimes, J, Rao, KPC, Shapiro, B, Shiferaw, B and Twomlow, S (2008) Coping better with current climatic variability in the rain-fed farming systems of sub-Saharan Africa: an essential first step in adapting to future climate change? Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment 126, 24–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Davendra, C (2002) Mixed farming and intensification of animal production systems in Asia. Outlook on Agriculture 31, 161–175.Google Scholar
de Voil, PG, Rodriguez, D, Power, B and Rossing, WAH (2009) Simulation of whole farm management decisions. In 18th World IMACS/MODSIM Congress, 13–17 July 2009. Cairns, Australia, pp. 642–648.Google Scholar
Dimes, J, Cooper, P and Rao, KPC (2008) Climate change impact on crop productivity in the semi-arid tropics of Zimbabwe in the 21st century. In Humphreys, E and Bayot, RS (eds), Proceedings of the Workshop on Increasing the Productivity and Sustainability of Rainfed Cropping Systems of Poor, Smallholder Farmers, CGIAR Challenge Program on Water and Food, Tamale, Ghana, 22–25 September 2008 Climate. Tamale, Ghana, pp. 189–198.Google Scholar
FAO (2001) Mixed crop-livestock farming: A review of traditional technologies based on literature and field experience, FAO animal production and health papers, Working paper No. 152. FAO. Rome, Italy.Google Scholar
FAO (2006) Fertilizer Use by Crop in Zimbabwe. Rome, Italy: FAO. Available at ftp://ftp.fao.org/agl/agll/docs/fertusezimbabwe.pdf (Accessed 20 March 2012).Google Scholar
Giller, KE, Murwira, MS, Dhliwayo, DKC, Mafongoya, PL and Mpepereki, S (2011) Soyabeans and sustainable agriculture in Southern Africa. International Journal of Agricultural Sustainability 9, 50–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gwanzura, T, Ngambi, JW and Norris, D (2012) Nutrient composition and tannin contents of forage sorghum, cowpea, lablab and mucuna hays grown in Limpopo province of South Africa. Asian Journal of Animal Sciences 6, 256–252.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gwiriri, LC, Manyawu, G, Mashanda, PB, Chakoma, I, Moyo, S, Chakoma, C, Sethaunyane, H, Imbayarwo-Chikosi, VE, Dube, S and Maasdorp, BV (2016) The potential of replacing conventional dairy supplements with forage legume-based diets in Zimbabwe's smallholder dairy sector. African Journal of Range & Forage Science 119, 1–9.Google Scholar
Holzworth, , Huth, NI, DeVoil, PG, Zurcher, EJ, Herrmann, NI, McLean, G, Chenu, K, van Oosterom, EJ, Snow, V, Murphy, C, Moore, AD, Brown, H, Whish, JPM, Verrall, S, Fainges, J, Bell, LW, Peake, AS, Poulton, PL, Hochman, Z, Thorburn, PJ, Gaydon, DS, Dalgliesh, NP, Rodriguez, D, Cox, H, Chapman, S, Doherty, A, Teixeira, E, Sharp, J, Cichota, R, Vogeler, I, Li, FY, Wang, E, Hammer, GL, Robertson, MJ, Dimes, JP, Whitbread, AM, Hunt, J, van Rees, H, McClelland, T, Carberry, PS, Hargreaves, JNG, MacLeod, N, McDonald, C, Harsdorf, J, Wedgwood, S and Keating, BA (2014) APSIM – evolution towards a new generation of agricultural systems simulation. Environmental Modelling and Software 62, 327–350, Available at http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.envsoft.2014.07.009.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Homann, S and Van Rooyen, A (2007) Unexploited agricultural growth: the case of crop–livestock production systems in Zimbabwe. In Nambiro, E, Omare, MN and Nkamleu, GB (eds), 2nd African Association of Agricultural Economists Conference, 20–22 August, 2007, Accra, Ghana. Accra, Ghana, pp. 503–506. Available at http://www.aaae-africa.orgGoogle Scholar
Jones, JW, Hoogenboom, G, Porter, CH, Boote, KJ, Batchelor, WD, Hunt, LA, Wilkens, PW, Singh, U, Gijsman, AJ and Ritchie, JT (2003) The DSSAT cropping system model. European Journal of Agronomy 18, 235–265, Available at http://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S1161030102001077.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kandji, ST, Verchot, L and Mackensen, J (2006) Climate change and variability in the Sahel region: impacts and adaptation strategies in the agricultural sector, Environment Report, World agro-foretsry Centre, UNEP & ICRA, Nairobi, Kenya.Google Scholar
Kassie, GT, Erenstein, O, Mwangi, W, Larovere, R, Setimela, P and Langyintuo, A (2012) Characterization of Maize Production in Southern Africa: Synthesis of CIMMYT/DTMA Household Level Farming System Surveys. Mexico.Google Scholar
Keating, BA, Carberry, PS, Hammer, GL, Probert, ME, Robertson, MJ, Holzworth, D, Huth, NI and Hargreaves, JNG (2003) An over view of APSIM, a model designed for farming systems simulation. European Journal of Agronomy 18, 267–288.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kindu, M, Duncan, AJ, Valbuena, D, Gerard, B, Dagnachew, L, Mesfin, B and Gedion, J (2014) Intensification of crop–livestock farming systems in east Africa: a comparison of selected sites in the highlands of Ethiopia and Kenya. In Vanlauwe, B, van Asten, P and Blomme, G (eds), Challenges and Opportunities for Agricultural Intensification of the Humid Highland Systems of Sub-Saharan Africa. Zurich, Switzerland: Springer International Publishing, pp. 19–28. Available at http://link.springer.com/10.1007/978-3-319-07662-1.Google Scholar
Kurosaki, T (1997) Production risk and advantages of mixed farming in the Pakistan Punjab. The Developing Economies 1, 28–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lazzarini, I, Sampaio, CB, Detmann, E, Souza, MAD, Paulino, MF and Oliveira, FA (2009) Intake and digestibility in cattle fed low-quality tropical forage and supplemented with nitrogenous compounds. Revista Brasileria de Zootecnia 38, 2021–2030.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lisson, S, Rahman, R, MacLeod, N, McDonald, C, Ash, A, Pengelly, B, Brennan, L, Gross, J, Corfield, J, Saenong, S, Panjaitan, TS, Wirajaswadi, L, Sutaryono, Y and Bahar, S (2001) An integrated modelling approach to enhancing Bali cattle production in the mixed crop/livestock systems of Indonesia. In Seminar Nasional Sistem Integrasi Tanaman-Ternak AN. pp. 82–86.Google Scholar
Lisson, S, MacLeod, N, McDonald, C, Corfield, J, Pengelly, B, Wirajaswadi, L, Rahman, R, Bahar, S, Padjung, R, Razak, N, Puspadi, K, Dahlanuddin, Sutaryono Y, Saenong, S, Panjaitan, T, Hadiawati, L, Ash, A and Brennan, L (2010) A participatory, farming systems approach to improving Bali cattle production in the smallholder crop-livestock systems of Eastern Indonesia. Agricultural Systems 103, 486–497, Available at http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.agsy.2010.05.002.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Luley-Goedl, C and Nidetzky, B (2010) Carbohydrate synthesis by disaccharide phosphorylases: reactions, catalytic mechanisms and application in the glycosciences. Biotechnology Journal 5, 1324–1338.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
MacCarthy, DS, Vlek, PLG, Bationo, A, Tabo, R and Fosu, M (2010) Modeling nutrient and water productivity of sorghum in smallholder farming systems in a semi-arid region of Ghana. Field Crops Research 118, 251–258, Available at http://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0378429010001437 (Accessed 10 March 2014).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
MacLeod, ND, McDonald, CK, Lisson, SN and Rahman, R (1999) Modelling for scenario analysis for improved smallholder farming systems in Indonesia. In Oxley, L., Kulasiri, D. (eds), MODSIM International Congress on Modelling and Simulation, Modelling and Simulation Society of Australia and New Zealand, Christchurch, New Zealand, pp. 109–114.Google Scholar
Manuela, C, Soler, T and Paulo, C (2007) Application of the CSM-CERES-Maize model for planting date evaluation and yield forecasting for maize grown off-season in a subtropical environment. European Journal of Agronomy 27, 165–177.Google Scholar
Mashingaidze, N, Madakadze, C, Twomlow, S, Nyamangara, J and Hove, L (2012) Crop yield and weed growth under conservation agriculture in semi-arid Zimbabwe. Soil & Tillage Research 124, 102–110.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Masikati, P, Manschadi, A, Van Rooyen, A and Hargreaves, J (2014) Maize–mucuna rotation: an alternative technology to improve water productivity in smallholder farming systems. Agricultural Systems 123, 62–70, Available at http://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0308521X13001133 (Accessed 26 February 2014).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Maat, H (2011) The history and future of agricultural experiments. Wageningen Journal of Life Sciences 57, 187–195.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mohammed-Saleem, MA (1995) Mixed farming systems in sub-Saharan Africa. In Wilson, RT, Ehui, S and Mack, S (eds), Proceedings of the Joint FAO/ILRI Roundtable on Livestock Development Strategies for Low Income Countries, ILRI, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia, 27 February-02 March 1995. Nairobi, Kenya: Food and Agriculture Organization/International Livestock Research Institute, pp. 93–100.Google Scholar
Mpande, R and Adziwa, B (2011) Policy and Advocacy Issues: Developing the Organic Agriculture Sector in Zimbabwe: The Case Study of Mashonaland East Province. Zimbabwe Organic Producers and Promoters Association (ZOPPA), Harare, Zimbabwe.Google Scholar
Mugandani, R, Wuta, M, Makarau, A and Chipindu, B (2012) Re-classification of agro-ecological regions of Zimbabwe in conformity with climate variability and change. African Crop Science Journal 20, 361–369.Google Scholar
Mupangwa, W and Jewitt, GPW (2011) Simulating the impact of no-till systems on field water fluxes and maize productivity under semi-arid conditions. Physics and Chemistry of the Earth 36, 1004–1011, Available at http://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S1474706511001859 (Accessed 10 March 2014).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mutenje, M, Kassie, GT, Gwara, S and Mujeyi, A (2014) Integrating Crops and Livestock for Improved Food Security and Livelihoods in Rural Zimbabwe (ZIMCLIFS) Baseline Report. Harare, Zimbabwe.Google Scholar
Nkomboni, D, Sisito, G, Van Rooyen, A, Homann-Kee Tui, S, Sikosana, JLN and Ndlovu, LR (2014) The potential for increasing cattle productivity in mixed farming systems of Zimbabwe. Livestock Research for Rural Development 26, 12–16.Google Scholar
Nyamapfene, K (1991) Soils of Zimbabwe. Harare, Zimbabwe: Nehanda Publishers.Google Scholar
Nzuma, JK (2013) Manure Management Options for Increasing Crop Production in the Small Holder Sector of Zimbabwe. University of Zimbabwe. Available at http://ir.uz.ac.zw/jspui/bitstream/10646/975/1/01Nzuma_etd.pdf.Google Scholar
Parkinson, R (2009) Treatise on the Breeding and Management of Live Stock First. New York, USA: Cadell and Davies 1810 Publishers.Google Scholar
Parsons, D, Nicholson, CF, Blake, RW, Ketterings, QM, Ramírez-aviles, L, Fox, DG, Tedeschi, LO and Cherney, JH (2011) Development and evaluation of an integrated simulation model for assessing smallholder crop–livestock production in Yucatán, Mexico. Agricultural Systems 104, 1–12, Available at http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.agsy.2010.07.006.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Russo, SL (1988) The use of crop residues for livestock feed by small farmers in the Gambia. In Dzowela, BH, Said, AN, Wendem-Agenehu, Asrat, Kategile, JA (eds), Proceedings of the First Joint Workshop Held in Lilongwe, Malawi 5–9 December 1988 by the Pastures Network for Eastern and Southern Africa (PANESA) and African Research Network for Agricultural by-Products (AMAB). Lilongwe, Malawi.Google Scholar
Sánchez, PA (2010) Tripling crop yields in tropical Africa. Nature Geoscience 3, 1–2, Available at http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/ngeo853.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schiere, JB and Kater, L (2001) Mixed Crop-Livestock Farming: A Review of Traditional Technologies Based on Literature and Field Experience, FAO animal production and health papers, FAO animal production and health papers, Working paper No. 152, FAO. Rome, Italy.Google Scholar
Seed Co (2010) Seed Co Product Manual 2010/11. Harare, Zimbabwe. Available at http://www.seedco.co.zw (Accessed 10 February 2012).Google Scholar
Sempore, AW, Andrieu, N, Le, Gal PY, Nacro, HB, Sedogo, MP (2016) Agroecology and sustainable food systems supporting better crop-livestock integration on small-scale West African farms: a simulation-based approach. Agroecology and Sustainable Food Systems 40, 3–23, Available at http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/21683565.2015.1089966.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shamudzarira, Z and Robertson, MJ (2002) Simulating response of maize to nitrogen fertilizer in semi-arid Zimbabwe. Experimental Agriculture 38, Available at http://www.journals.cambridge.org/abstract_S0014479702000170 (Accessed 10 March 2014).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shewry, PR and Halford, NG (2015) Cereal seed storage proteins: structures, properties and role in grain utilization. Journal of Experimental Botany 66, 947–958, Available at http://jxb.oxfordjournals.org/content/53/370/947.full.Google Scholar
Sombilla, M, Balasubramanian, V and Bell, M (2000) Yield, profit, and knowledge gaps in rice farming: causes and development of mitigation measures. In Papademetriou, MK, Dent, FJ and Herath, EM (eds), Bridging the Rice Yield Gap in Asia and the Pacific, Bangkok, Thailand, 5–7 October, 1999. Bangkok, Thailand. Available at http://www.fao.org/docrep/003/x6905e/x6905e0f.htm.Google Scholar
Soussana, JF (2015) Livestock and climate change: combining mitigation and adaptation options and projecting sustainable futures. In Climate smart agriculture (CSA) 2015: Global science conference, Climate-smart livestock session, 16–18 March 2015, Le Corum, Montpellier, France. pp. 226.Google Scholar
Subhadra, MR (2007) The Economics of Mixed farming in Kerala (PhD thesis). Department of Applied economics, Mahatma Gandhi University. Available at http://www.mgutheses.in/page/titles_view.php?q=T1472&word=.Google Scholar
Thomas, DSG, Twyman, C, Osbahr, H and Hewitson, B (2007) Adaptation to climate change and variability: farmer responses to intra-seasonal precipitation trends in South Africa. Climate Change 83, 301–322.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tshoni, S (2015) Analysis of Smallholders’ Farm Diversity and Risk Attitudes in the Stellenbosch Local Municipal Area (MSc thesis in Agricultural Economics). Faculty of Agri-Sciences, Stellenbosch Universitysch.Google Scholar
Twomlow, S, Urolov, JC, Jenrich, M and Oldrieve, B (2008) Lessons from the field – Zimbabwe's Conservation Agriculture Task Force. Journal of SAT 6, 1–11.Google Scholar
Umar, BB, Aune, JB, Johnsen, FH, Lungu, OI (2011) Options for improving smallholder conservation agriculture in Zambia. Journal of Agricultural Science 3, 50–62. https://doi.org/10.5539/jas.v3n3p50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Van Keulen, H and Schiere, H (2004) Crop-livestock systems: old wine in new bottles? In Proceedings of the 4th International Crop Science Congress, 26 Sep–1 Oct 2004, Brisbane, Australia. Brisbane, Australia, pp. 1–12. Available at http://cropscience.org.au/icsc2004/pdf/211_vankeulenh.pdf.Google Scholar
Verburg, K and Bond, WJ (2003) Use of APSIM to Simulate Water Balances of Dryland Farming Systems in South Eastern Australia. Technical Report 50/03. CSIRO Land and Water, Canberra, Australia.Google Scholar
VSN (2002) GenStat for Windows, 6th Edn. Available at http://www.vsni.co.uk.Google Scholar
Williams, TO, Hiernaux, P, Fernández-rivera, S (1999) Crop–livestock systems in sub-Saharan Africa: determinants and intensification pathways. In McCarthy, N et al. (eds). Property Rights, Risk and Livestock Development in Africa. Washington DC: IFPRI, Nairobi, pp. 132–151.Google Scholar
Wolmer, W (1997) Crop-livestock Integration: The Dynamics of Intensification in Contrasting Agro-Ecological Zones: A Review IDS Working Paper 63. Sustainable Livelihoods Programme, Institute of Development Studies, Sussex, UK.Google Scholar
Supplementary material: File

Mkuhlani et al. supplementary material

Mkuhlani et al. supplementary material 1

Download Mkuhlani et al. supplementary material(File)
File 4.2 MB