Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-hc48f Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-22T17:53:17.820Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Cover crop effects on the growth of perennial weeds in two long-term organic crop rotations – CORRIGENDUM

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  16 December 2024

Bo Melander ,
Jim Rasmussen  and
Peter Sørensen
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content. As you have access to this content, full HTML content is provided on this page. A PDF of this content is also available in through the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Keywords

Cirsium arvenseElytrigia repensPlantago lanceolateSonchus arvensisweed suppression
Type
Corrigendum
Information
Renewable Agriculture and Food Systems , Volume 39 , 2024 , e34
Check for updates
Creative Commons
Creative Common License - CCCreative Common License - BY
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s), 2024. Published by Cambridge University Press

The authors apologise for errors in figures 1, 2, 3, and 4 of the published version. These figures should have appeared as indicated below:

Figure 1. The development of perennial weed biomass in total from 1997 to 2022, shown as means for rotations O2 and O4 with and without cover cropping but across entry points. Error bars show standard errors of means (n = 8).

Figure 2. The development of perennial weeds in total (Sonchus arvensis, Cirsium arvense, and Elytrigia repens) from 2012 to 2021 based on visual scoring and shown as means for rotations O2 and O4 with and without cover cropping, but across entry points. Error bars show standard errors of means (n = 8).

Figure 3. The development of Sonchus arvensis and Cirsium arvense from 2012 to 2021 based on scoring and shown as means for rotations O2 and O4 with and without cover cropping, but across entry points. Error bars show standard errors of means (n = 8).

Figure 4. The development of Elytrigia repens from 2012 to 2021 based on scoring and shown as means for rotations O2 and O4 with and without cover cropping, but across entry points. Error bars are standard errors of means (n = 8).

References

Melander, B, Rasmussen, J, Sørensen, P (2024). Cover crop effects on the growth of perennial weeds in two long-term organic crop rotations. Renewable Agriculture and Food Systems 39, e20. doi:10.1017/S174217052400022XCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Figure 0

Figure 1. The development of perennial weed biomass in total from 1997 to 2022, shown as means for rotations O2 and O4 with and without cover cropping but across entry points. Error bars show standard errors of means (n = 8).

Figure 1

Figure 2. The development of perennial weeds in total (Sonchus arvensis, Cirsium arvense, and Elytrigia repens) from 2012 to 2021 based on visual scoring and shown as means for rotations O2 and O4 with and without cover cropping, but across entry points. Error bars show standard errors of means (n = 8).

Figure 2

Figure 3. The development of Sonchus arvensis and Cirsium arvense from 2012 to 2021 based on scoring and shown as means for rotations O2 and O4 with and without cover cropping, but across entry points. Error bars show standard errors of means (n = 8).

Figure 3

Figure 4. The development of Elytrigia repens from 2012 to 2021 based on scoring and shown as means for rotations O2 and O4 with and without cover cropping, but across entry points. Error bars are standard errors of means (n = 8).