Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t7czq Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-22T12:02:28.876Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Communicating imperceptible product attributes through traceability: A case study in an organic food supply chain

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  14 June 2010

Helena Lindh  and
Annika Olsson
Helena Lindh*
Affiliation:
Division of Packaging Logistics, Lund University, SE-221 00Lund, Sweden.
Annika Olsson
Affiliation:
Division of Packaging Logistics, Lund University, SE-221 00Lund, Sweden.
*
*Corresponding author: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Companies in the food industry are driven to improve their traceability for several reasons. The primary reasons are food safety and quality. Another is the response to the increased interest among consumers in imperceptible product attributes such as organic, fair trade, dolphin-safe and non genetically modified (non-GMO). Such attributes are hard to distinguish and thus require generally enhanced traceability in order to verify their existence. This has led to an emergent area in which actors engage in gaining and maintaining traceability and communicating it to the consumers. This paper describes the relations between the actors in a supply chain (SC) in the field of organic food systems. It examines the objectives each actor has for gaining and maintaining traceability throughout the SC. The focus on organic relates to the challenge for the companies to ensure this imperceptible product attribute throughout the entire food system. A single case study was conducted in an organic food system providing organic ice cream products. The data collection included semi-structured interviews, observations, a review of internal documents and a survey among the participating companies. The findings illustrate and elaborate on the objectives companies have for engaging in traceability. The objectives identified are divided into three categories: food safety and quality, managing the SC and internal resources and communication with consumers. The survey confirms the results from the interviews that all actors want to engage in traceability. They prioritize the objectives differently, however. The study highlights the value of close relations between the actors when addressing consumer concerns regarding product and process characteristics, such as the imperceptible organic attribute.

Keywords

case studyconsumer communicationfood supply chainfood systemimperceptible product attributesorganic foodsupply chain managementtraceability
Type
Research Papers
Information
Renewable Agriculture and Food Systems , Volume 25 , Issue 4 , December 2010 , pp. 263 - 271
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2010

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1.Coff, C., Barling, D., Korthals, M., and Nielsen, T. 2008. Ethical Traceability and Communicating Food. Springer, Dordrecht, The Netherlands.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
2.Michalopoulos, T., Korthals, M., and Hogeveen, H. 2008. Trading ‘Ethical Preferences’ in the market: outline of a politically liberal framework for the ethical characterization of foods. Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics 21(1):3–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
3.Zsidisin, G.A. and Ritchie, B. 2008. Supply Chain Risk: A Handbook of Assessment, Management, and Performance. Springer, New York.Google Scholar
4.Tavernier, E.M. 2004. An empirical analysis of producer perceptions of traceability in organic agriculture. Renewable Agriculture and Food Systems 19(2):110–117.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
5.FSA 2002. Traceability in the food chain: a preliminary study. Food Chain Strategy Division. Available at Web site http://www.food.gov.uk/news/newsarchive/2002/apr/traceability.Google Scholar
6.Moe, T. 1998. Perspectives on traceability in food manufacture. Trends in Food Science and Technology 9(5):211–214.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
7.Kelepouris, T., Pramatari, K., and Doukidis, G. 2007. RFID-enabled traceability in the food supply chain. Industrial Management and Data Systems 107(2):183–200.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
8.Viaene, J. and Verbeke, W. 1998. Traceability as a key instrument towards supply chain and quality management in the Belgian poultry meat chain. Supply Chain Management 3(3):139.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
9.Mentzer, J.T., DeWitt, W., Keebler, J.S., Min, S., Nix, N.W., Smith, C.D., and Zacharia, Z.G. 2001. Defining supply chain management. Journal of Business Logistics 22(2):1–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
10.Bowersox, D.J., Closs, D.J., and Cooper, M.B. 2002. Supply Chain Logistics Management. International edition.McGraw-Hill, Boston, MA.Google Scholar
11.Lambert, D.M. and Cooper, M.C. 2000. Issues in supply chain management. Industrial Marketing Management 29(1):65–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
12.Narayanan, V.G. and Raman, A. 2004. Aligning incentives in supply chains. Harvard Business Review (November): 82(11):94–102.Google ScholarPubMed
13.Norrman, A. 2006. Supply chain risk sharing contracts from Buyes' perspective: content and experiences. In Persson, G. and Jahre, M. (eds). Proceedings of the 18th Annual Nofoma Conference. Nofoma, Oslo. p. 1–21.Google Scholar
14.Brom, F.W.A. 2000. Food, consumer concerns, and trust: food ethics for a globalizing market. Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics 12(2):127–139.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
15.Golan, E., Krissoff, B., and Kuchler, F. 2004. Food traceability: one ingredient in a safe and efficient food supply. Amber Waves 2(2):14–21.Google Scholar
16.Golan, E., Krissof, B., Kuchler, F., Calvin, L., Nelson, K., and Price, G. 2004. Traceability in the U.S. Food Supply: Economic Theory and Industry Studies; 830. United States Department of Agriculture, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
17.Pouliot, S. and Sumner, D.A. 2008. Traceability, liability, and incentives for food safety and quality. American Journal of Agricultural Economics 90(3):15–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
18.Furness, A. and Osman, K.A. 2003. Developing traceability systems across the supply chain. In Lees, M. (ed.). Food Authenticity and Traceability. Woodhead Publishing Limited, Cambridge. p. 473–495.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
19.Deblonde, M., Graaff, R., and Brom, F. 2007. An ethical toolkit for food companies: reflections on its use. Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics 20(1):99–118.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
20.Matförgiftningar. 2009. National Food Administration—Livsmedelsverket. www.slv.se (accessed November 19, 2009).Google Scholar
21.Beer, S. 2001. Food and society. In Eastham, J.F., Sharples, L., and Ball, S.D. (eds). Food Supply Chain Management: Issues for the Hospitality and Retail Sectors. Elsevier Butterworth-Heinemann, Oxford. p. 21–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
22.Ghosh, A. and Fedorowicz, J. 2008. The role of trust in supply chain governance. Business Process Management Journal 14(4):453–470.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
23.Poppo, L. and Zenger, T. 2002. Do formal contracts and relational governance function as substitutes or complements? Strategic Management Journal 23(8):707–725.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
24.Seshadri, S. and Mishra, R. 2004. Relationship marketing and contract theory. Industrial Marketing Management 33(6):513–526.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
25.Beer, S. 1998. Tokenism? An investigation into the nature of food quality assurance schemes with specific reference to the meat production sector. In Edwards, J.S.A. (ed.). Proceedings of the Culinary Arts and Sciences Conference: Global and National Perspectives. Centre for Culinary Research, Bournemouth. p. 225–236.Google Scholar
26.Beekman, V. 2008. Consumer rights to informed choice on the food market. Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 11(1):61–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
27.Yin, R.K. 2003. Case Study Research: Design and Methods. Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks, CA.Google Scholar
28.Bowersox, D.J., Closs, D.J., and Cooper, M.B. 2002. Supply Chain Logistics Management. McGraw-Hill/Irwin, New York.Google Scholar
29.Mentzer, J.T., DeWitt, W., Keebler, J.S., Min, S., Nix, N.W., Smith, C.D., and Zacharia, Z.G. 2001. Defining supply chain management. Journal of Business Logistics 22(2):1–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar