Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-8ctnn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-23T10:35:16.306Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Challenging conservation agriculture on marginal slopes in Sehoul, Morocco

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  29 November 2013

G. Schwilch ,
A. Laouina ,
M. Chaker ,
N. Machouri ,
M. Sfa  and
L. Stroosnijder
G. Schwilch*
Affiliation:
Centre for Development and Environment CDE, University of Bern, Hallerstrasse 10, 3012 Bern, Switzerland.
A. Laouina
Affiliation:
Chaire UNESCO-GN ‘Gestion de l'Environment et Développement Durable’, CERGéo, FLSH, Université Mohamed V Agdal, Rabat, BP 1040, Morocco.
M. Chaker
Affiliation:
Chaire UNESCO-GN ‘Gestion de l'Environment et Développement Durable’, CERGéo, FLSH, Université Mohamed V Agdal, Rabat, BP 1040, Morocco.
N. Machouri
Affiliation:
Chaire UNESCO-GN ‘Gestion de l'Environment et Développement Durable’, CERGéo, FLSH, Université Mohamed V Agdal, Rabat, BP 1040, Morocco.
M. Sfa
Affiliation:
Chaire UNESCO-GN ‘Gestion de l'Environment et Développement Durable’, CERGéo, FLSH, Université Mohamed V Agdal, Rabat, BP 1040, Morocco.
L. Stroosnijder
Affiliation:
Land Degradation and Development Group, Wageningen University, PO Box 47, 6700 AA Wageningen, The Netherlands.
*
*Corresponding author: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

In Sehoul, Morocco, the use of marginal land for agriculture became a necessity for the local population due to increased poverty and the occupation of the best land by new owners. Desertification poses an additional threat to agricultural production on marginal slopes, which are often stony and degraded. In a participatory process embedded in the EU DESIRE research project, potential sustainable land management measures were selected to address land degradation and desertification. Promising experiences with no-tillage practices elsewhere in Morocco had motivated the Moroccan government to promote conservation agriculture throughout the country. This combination of crop rotation, minimal soil disturbance and soil cover maintenance, however, had not yet been tested on sloping degraded land. Field trials of grazing enclosure combined with no or minimum tillage were conducted on the plots of two farmers, and trial results were analyzed based on stakeholders’ criteria. Results suggest that increased soil cover with barley residues improved rainwater use efficiency and yields only slightly, although soil water was generally enhanced. Soil moisture measurements revealed that no-tillage was favorable mainly at soil depths of 5 cm and in connection with low-rainfall events (<20 mm); under these circumstances, moisture content was generally higher under no-tillage than under conventional tillage. Moreover, stakeholder discussion confirmed that farmers in Sehoul remain primarily interested in animal husbandry and are reluctant to change the current grazing system. Implementation of conservation agriculture is thus challenged both by the degraded, sloping and stony nature of the land, and by the socio-economic circumstances in Sehoul.

Keywords

sustainable land managementmarginal landstony slopessoil moisturestakeholder participationMorocco
Type
Research Papers
Information
Renewable Agriculture and Food Systems , Volume 30 , Issue 3 , June 2015 , pp. 233 - 251
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2013 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1Qadir, M., Noble, A., and Cartres, C. 2011. Adapting to climate change by improving water productivity of soils in dry areas. Land Degradation & Development 24(1):12–121.Google Scholar
2Bossio, D., Critchley, W., Geheb, K., van Lynden, G., and Mati, B. 2007. Conserving land – protecting water. In Molden, D. (ed.). Water for Food, Water for Life: A Comprehensive Assessment of Water Management in Agriculture. Earthscan, London, and International Water Management Institute, Colombo, Sri Lanka. p. 551–583.Google Scholar
3Stroosnijder, L. 2009. Modifying land management in order to improve efficiency of rainwater use in the African highlands. Soil and Tillage Research 103:247–256.Google Scholar
4García-Ruiz, J.M. 2010. The effects of land uses on soil erosion in Spain: A review. Catena 81:1–11.Google Scholar
5Njeru, J.L.G. 2005. Monitoring and modelling crop growth, water use and production under dryland environment north-west of Mount Kenya. Dissertation, University of Berne, Switzerland.Google Scholar
6Stroosnijder, L. 2003. Technologies for improving green water use efficiency in semi-arid Africa. In Beukes, B., de Villeirs, M., Mkize, S., Sally, H., and van Rensburg, L. (eds). Proceedings Water Conservation Technologies for Sustainable Dryland Agriculture in Sub-Saharan Africa. Symposium and Workshop, Bloemfontein, South Africa. p. 92–102.Google Scholar
7Rockström, J., Kaumbutho, P., Mwalley, J., Nzabi, A., Temesgen, M., Mawenya, L., Barron, J., Mutua, J., and Damgaard-Larsen, S. 2009. Conservation farming strategies in East and Southern Africa: Yields and rain water productivity from on-farm action research. Soil and Tillage Research 103:23–32.Google Scholar
8Molden, D., Oweis, T., Steduto, P., Bindraban, P., Hanjra, M., and Kijne, J. 2010. Improving agricultural water productivity: Between optimism and caution. Agricultural Water Management 97:528–535.Google Scholar
9Derpsch, R. 2008. No-tillage and conservation agriculture: A progress report. In: Goddard, T., Zoebisch, M.A., Gan, Y.T., Ellis, W., Watson, A., and Sombatpanit, S. (eds). No-Till Farming Systems. Special Publication No. 3. World Association of Soil and Water Conservation (WASWC), Bangkok. p. 7–39.Google Scholar
10Kassam, A. and Friedrich, T. 2011. Conservation agriculture: Global perspectives and developments. Regional Conservation Agriculture Symposium 2011, February 8–10, 2011, Johannesburg, South Africa.Google Scholar
11Schwilch, G., Bachmann, F., and Liniger, H.P. 2009. Appraising and selecting conservation measures to mitigate desertification and land degradation based on stakeholder participation and global best practices. Land Degradation & Development 20:308–326.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
12Schwilch, G., Bachmann, F., and de Graaff, J. 2012. Decision support for selecting SLM technologies with stakeholders. Applied Geography 34:86–98.Google Scholar
13Derpsch, R., Friedrich, T., Kassam, A., and Li, H.W. 2010. Current status of adoption of no-till farming in the world and some of its main benefits. International Journal of Agricultural and Biological Engineering 3(1):1–25.Google Scholar
14Mrabet, R. 2008. No-Till practices in Morocco. In: Goddart, T., Zoebisch, M.A., Gan, Y.T., Ellis, W., Watson, A., and Sombatpanit, S. (eds). No Till Farming Systems. Special Publication No. 3. World Association of Soil and Water Conservation, Bangkok. p. 544.Google Scholar
15Ibno Namr, K. and Mrabet, R. 2004. Influence of agricultural management on chemical quality of a clay soil of semi-arid Morocco. Journal of African Earth Sciences 39:485–489.Google Scholar
16Laouina, A., Aderghal, M., Al Karkouri, J., Chaker, M., Machmachi, I., Machouri, N., and Sfa, M. 2010. Utilisation des sols, ruissellement et dégradation des terres: le cas du secteur Sehoul, région atlantique (Maroc). Sécheresse 21(4):309–316.Google Scholar
17Drungil, C.E.C., Abt, K., and Gish, T.J. 1998. Soil moisture determination in gravelly soils with time domain reflectometry. Transactions of the ASAE 32(1):177–180.Google Scholar
18Schwilch, G., Bachmann, F., Valente, S., Coelho, C., Moreira, J., Laouina, A., Chaker, M., Aderghal, M., Santos, P., and Reed, M.S. 2012. A structured multi-stakeholder learning process for sustainable land management. Journal of Environmental Management 107:52–63.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
19Laouina, A., Chaker, M., Aderghal, M., Al Karkouri, J., Machouri, N., and Nafaa, R. 2009. WP3.3 Stakeholder Workshop 2 Report – held in Morocco, Sehoul region, Arjat, December 16, 2008. DESIRE Report No. 64.Google Scholar
20Laouina, A., Chaker, M., Nafaa, R., Al Karkouri, J., Aderghal, M., Antari, M., and Nouria, A. 2007. DESIRE WB3 Workshop 1 Report – held in the Sehoul commune, Rabat Region, Morocco. DESIRE Report No. 3.Google Scholar
21Stroosnijder, L. 1987. Soil evaporation: Test of a practical approach under semi-arid conditions. Netherlands Journal of Agricultural Science 35:417–426.Google Scholar
22Laouina, A., Chaker, M., and Nafaa, R. 2003. Suivi et mesure de l’érosion hydrique des terres au Maroc, 15 ans de recherche et d'expérimentation. Revue de géographie du Maroc 21:79–98.Google Scholar
23Farooq, M., Flower, K., Jabran, K., Wahid, A., and Siddique, K. 2011. Crop yield and weed management in rainfed conservation agriculture. Soil and Tillage Research 117:172–183.Google Scholar
24Araya, A. and Stroosnijder, L. 2010. Effects of tied ridges and mulch on barley (Hordeum vulgare) rainwater use efficiency and production in Northern Ethiopia. Agricultural Water Management 97:841–847.Google Scholar
25Ward, P., Flower, K., Cordingley, N., Weeks, C., and Micin, S. 2012. Soil water balance with cover crops and conservation agriculture in a Mediterranean climate. Field Crops Research 132:33–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
26Giller, K., Witter, E., Corbeels, M., and Tittonell, P. 2009. Conservation agriculture and smallholder farming in Africa: The heretics’ view. Field Crops Research 114:23–34.Google Scholar
27Sahrawat, K., Wani, S., Pathak, P., and Rego, T. 2010. Managing natural resources of watersheds in the semi-arid tropics for improved soil and water quality: A review. Agricultural Water Management 97:375–381.Google Scholar
28Knowler, D. and Bradshaw, B. 2007. Farmers’ adoption of conservation agriculture: A review and synthesis of recent research. Food Policy 32:25–48.Google Scholar
29de Graaff, J., Amsalu, A., Bodnár, F., Kessler, A., Posthumus, H., and Tenge, A. 2008. Factors influencing adoption and continued use of long-term soil and water conservation measures in five developing countries. Applied Geography 28:271–280.Google Scholar