Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-7cvxr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-23T07:57:06.643Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Banded herbicide, rotary hoeing and cultivation effects on weed populations in ridge-tilled soybean

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 February 2007

Thomas W. Jurik
Thomas W. Jurik*
Affiliation:
Department of Ecology, Evolution, and Organismal Biology, Iowa State University, Ames, IA 50011, USA,.
*
*Corresponding author: Email: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Can banded herbicide be eliminated in ridge-tilled soybean (Glycine max)? The effects of banded herbicide, rotary hoeing and cultivation on weed populations and soybean yield in a ridge-tillage system were tested on three farms in Iowa, USA in 1989 and 1990. In 1989, plots either had no herbicide or had herbicide banded in the row at planting in mid-May; all plots received two rotary hoeings and two cultivations. In 1990, treatments were banded herbicide with no rotary hoeing, banded herbicide with one rotary hoeing, and no herbicide with one or two rotary hoeings; all plots received two or three cultivations. In both years, over all weed species [primarily giant foxtail (Setaria faberi), Pennsylvania smartweed (Polygonum pensylvanicum) and redroot pigweed (Amaranthus retroflexus)], seedling emergence was highest in late May and early June, with few seedlings emerging after mid-June. Weed populations were highest in May and June, after which rotary hoeing and cultivation reduced weed numbers in all plots. There were no consistent differences among treatments in weed numbers in early August for the 2 years. In both years, there was no significant difference in soybean yield among treatments. Within-farm mean yields ranged from 2.26 to 3.01 Mg ha−1 among farms in 1989 and from 2.07 to 2.93 Mg ha−1 among farms in 1990. Ridge-tillage without herbicide was generally equivalent to ridge-tillage with banded herbicide, with respect to total number of weeds and number of broad-leaved weeds remaining in August after tillage, and to soybean yield.

Keywords

conservation tillagemechanical weed controlseedling emergenceweed densityweed population dynamics
Type
Review Article
Information
Renewable Agriculture and Food Systems , Volume 21 , Issue 3 , September 2006 , pp. 151 - 158
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2006

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

01Klein, R.N., Wicks, G.A. and Wilson, R.G. (1996) Ridge-till, an integrated weed management system. Weed Science 44: 417–422.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
02Chase, C.A. and Duffy, M.D. (1991) An economic analysis of the Nashua tillage study: 1978–1987. Journal of Production Agriculture 4: 91–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
03Buhler, D.D. (1992) Population dynamics and control of annual weeds in corn ( Zea mays ) as influenced by tillage systems. Weed Science 40: 241–248.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
04Buhler, D.D., Stoltenberg, D.E., Becker, R.L. and Gunsolus, J.L. (1994) Perennial weed populations after 14 years of variable tillage and cropping practices. Weed Science 42: 205–209.Google Scholar
05Clements, D.R., Benoit, D.L., Murphy, S.D. and Swanton, C.J. (1996) Tillage effects on weed seed return and seedbank composition. Weed Science 44: 314–322.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
06Buhler, D.D. (1995) Influence of tillage systems on weed population dynamics and management in corn and soybean in the central USA. Crop Science 35: 1247–1258.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
07Regehr, D.L. and Janssen, K.A. (1989) Preplant weed control in a ridge-till soybean ( Glycine max ) and grain sorghum ( Sorghum bicolor ) rotation. Weed Technology 3: 621–626.Google Scholar
08Buhler, D.D., Gunsolus, J.L. and Ralston, D.F. (1992) Integrated weed management techniques to reduce herbicide inputs in soybean. Agronomy Journal 84: 973–978.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
09Buhler, D.D., Doll, J.D., Proost, R.T. and Visocky, M.R. (1995) Integrating mechanical weeding with reduced herbicide use in conservation tillage corn production systems. Agronomy Journal 87: 507–512.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
10USDA Soil Conservation Service. 1977. Soil Survey of Buena Vista County, Iowa. National Cooperative Soil Survey, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
11USDA Soil Conservation Service. 1985. Soil Survey of Pocahontas County, Iowa. National Cooperative Soil Survey, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
12USDA Soil Conservation Service. 1981. Soil Survey of Boone County, Iowa. National Cooperative Soil Survey, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
13SAS. 1996. SAS Proprietary Software Release 6.12. SAS Institute Inc., Cary, NC.Google Scholar
14Sims, G.K., Buhler, D.D. and Turco, R.F. (1994) Residue management impact on the environment. In Unger, P.W. (ed.). Managing Agricultural Residues. Lewis Publishers, Boca Raton, FL. p. 77–98.Google Scholar
15Swanton, C.J., Shrestha, A., Roy, R.C., Ball-Coelho, B.R. and Knezevic, S.Z. (1999) Effect of tillage systems, N, and cover crop on the composition of weed flora. Weed Science 47: 454–461.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
16Forcella, F. and Lindstrom, M.J. (1988) Weed seed populations in ridge and conventional tillage. Weed Science 36: 500–503.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
17Buhler, D.D., King, R.P., Swinton, S.M., Gunsolus, J.L. and Forcella, F. (1997) Field evaluation of a bioeconomic model for weed management in soybean (Glycine max). Weed Science 45: 158–165.Google Scholar
18Sartorato, I., Berti, A. and Zanin, G. (1996) Estimation of economic thresholds for weed control in soybean (Glycine max (L.) Merr.). Crop Protection 15: 63–68.Google Scholar
19Buhler, D.D. (1999) Weed population responses to weed control practices. I. Seed bank, weed populations, and crop yields. Weed Science 47: 416–422.Google Scholar
20McGiffen, M.E. Jr, Forcella, F., Lindstrom, M.J. and Reicosky, D.C. (1997) Covariance of cropping systems and foxtail density as predictors of weed interference. Weed Science 45: 388–396.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
21Peters, E.D., Klingman, D.L. and Larson, R.E. (1959) Rotary hoeing in combination with herbicides and other cultivations for weed control in soybeans. Weeds 7: 449–458.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
22Lovely, W.G., Weber, C.R. and Staniforth, D.W. (1958) Effectiveness of the rotary hoe for weed control in soybeans. Agronomy Journal 50: 621–625.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
23Gunsolus, J.L. (1990) Mechanical and cultural weed control in corn and soybeans. American Journal of Alternative Agriculture 5: 114–119.Google Scholar
24Teasdale, J.R. and Mohler, C.L. (2000) The quantitative relationship between weed emergence and the physical properties of mulches. Weed Science 48: 385–392.Google Scholar
25Mester, T.C. and Buhler, D.D. (1991) Effects of soil temperature, seed depth, and cyanazine on giant foxtail ( Setaria faberi ) and velvetleaf ( Abutilon theophrasti ) seedling development. Weed Science 39: 204–209.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
26Ghorbani, R., Seel, W. and Leifert, C. (1999) Effects of environmental factors on germination and emergence of Amaranthus retroflexus. Weed Science 47: 505–510.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
27Hooker, D.C., Vyn, T.J. and Swanton, C.J. (1997) Effectiveness of soil-applied herbicides with mechanical weed control for conservation tillage systems in soybean. Agronomy Journal 89: 579–587Google Scholar