Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-dsjbd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-23T16:16:37.272Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Yield and qualitative traits of sugarcane cultivated in agroforestry systems: Toward sustainable production systems

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 September 2017

Felipe Schwerz ,
Elvis F. Elli ,
Alexandre Behling ,
Denise Schmidt ,
Braulio O. Caron  and
Jaqueline Sgarbossa
Felipe Schwerz*
Affiliation:
Department of Agronomic and Environmental Sciences, Federal University of Santa Maria, Frederico Westphalen Campus, 98400-000, Frederico Westphalen, Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil
Elvis F. Elli
Affiliation:
Department of Biosystems Engineering, University of São Paulo, College of Agriculture, 13418-900, Piracicaba, São Paulo, Brazil
Alexandre Behling
Affiliation:
Department of Forest Science, Federal University of Paraná, 80060-000, Curitiba, Paraná, Brazil
Denise Schmidt
Affiliation:
Department of Agronomic and Environmental Sciences, Federal University of Santa Maria, Frederico Westphalen Campus, 98400-000, Frederico Westphalen, Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil
Braulio O. Caron
Affiliation:
Department of Agronomic and Environmental Sciences, Federal University of Santa Maria, Frederico Westphalen Campus, 98400-000, Frederico Westphalen, Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil
Jaqueline Sgarbossa
Affiliation:
Department of Agronomic and Environmental Sciences, Federal University of Santa Maria, Frederico Westphalen Campus, 98400-000, Frederico Westphalen, Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil
*
Author for correspondence: Felipe Schwerz, E-mail: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

One of the greatest challenges in crop science worldwide is to generate a balance between crop production and environmental preservation. Agroforestry systems present promising strategies for balancing environmental health and crop production. The aim of this study was to evaluate yield components and the juice quality of five sugarcane crop years cultivated in the understory of Aleurites fordii, in two intercropping systems and a monocropping system. A field experiment was conducted from November 2011 to June 2016 in the city of Frederico Westphalen—Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil. Information generated in this study confirms the viability of the cultivation of sugarcane in agroforestry systems, and provides information for farmers which can be used to assist in the planning of more ideal agroforestry arrangements. Agroforestry systems should consider the benefits of both forest and cultivated plant species. In this study, A. fordii trees had greater growth in the intercrop II system; however, this system promoted reductions in sugarcane yield components due to the lowest relative amount of solar radiation intercepted by sugarcane plants. For sugarcane production, the use of an intercropping system with 12 × 12 m2 arrangements should be prioritized, because it promotes greater sugarcane yields when compared with 6 × 6 m2 intercropping systems; however, significant differences were not observed when the system (12 × 12 m2) was compared with the monocropping system for most of the analyzed variables. This study sought to provide new sustainable alternatives for farmers in order to increase the diversification of rural properties and maintain the preservation of existing agroecosystems.

Keywords

tree–crop interactionsSacharum officinarum L.intercropping systemstree arrangementcane-ratoon
Type
Research Paper
Information
Renewable Agriculture and Food Systems , Volume 34 , Issue 4 , August 2019 , pp. 280 - 292
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2017 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Altieri, MA (2009) Agroecology, small farms, and food sovereignty. Monthly Review 61, 102–113.Google Scholar
Alvares, CA, Stape, JL, Sentelhas, PC, Moraes, G, Leonardo, J and Sparovek, G (2013) Köppen's climate classification map for Brazil. Meteorologische Zeitschrift 22, 711–728.Google Scholar
Bayala, J and Wallace, JS (2015) The water balance of mixed tree crop systems. In Ong, CK, Black, C and Wilson, J (eds). Tree–Crop Interactions, 2nd edition: Agroforestry in a Changing Climate. CAB International, Wallingford. pp. 146–190.Google Scholar
Berlyn, GP and Cho, J (2000) Light, moisture and nutrient use by plants. In Ashton, MS and Montagnini, F (eds). The Silvicultural basis for Agroforestry Systems. CRC Press, Boca Raton. p. 9–39.Google Scholar
Binkley, D, Stape, JL and Ryan, MG (2004) Thinking about efficiency of resources use in forests. Forest Ecology and Management 193, 5–16.Google Scholar
Boardman, NK (1977) Comparative photosynthesis of sun and shade plants. Annual Review of Plant Physiology 28, 355–377.Google Scholar
Brooker, RW, Bennett, AE, Cong, WF, Daniell, TJ, George, TS, Hallett, PD, Hawes, C, Iannetta, PPM, Jones, HG, Karley, AJ, Li, L, McKenzie, BM, Pakeman, RJ, Paterson, E, Schöb, C, Shen, J, Squire, G, Watson, CA, Zhang, C, Zhang, F, Zhang, J and White, PJ (2015) Improving intercropping: a synthesis of research in agronomy, plant physiology and ecology. New Phytologist 206, 107–117.Google Scholar
Caballero, R, Goicoechea, E and Hernaiz, P (1995) Forage yields and quality of common vetch and oat sown at varying seeding ratios and seeding rates of vetch. Field Crops Research 41, 135–140.Google Scholar
Cardozo, NP and Sentelhas, PC (2013) Climatic effects on sugarcane ripening under the influence of cultivars and crop age. Scientia Agricola 70, 449–456.Google Scholar
Chapman, LS, Ferraris, R and Ludlow, MM (1992) Ratooning ability of cane varieties: variation in yield and yield components. Proceedings of the Australian Society of Sugar Cane Technology 14, 130–138.Google Scholar
Chappell, MJ, Wittman, H, Bacon, CM, Ferguson, BG, Barrios, LG, Barrios, RG, Jaffee, D, Lima, J, Méndez, E, Morales, H, Soto-Pinto, L and Vandermeer, J (2013) Food sovereignty: an alternative paradigma for poverty reduction and biodiversity conservation in Latin America. F1000 Research 2, 235–253.Google Scholar
Chen, Y, Chen, J, Chang, G and Chang, C (2010) Biodiesel production from tung (Vernicia montana) oil and its blending properties in different fatty acid compositions. Bioresource Technology 101, 9521–9526.Google Scholar
Comissão de química e fertilidade do solo (2004) Manual de adubação e calagem para os estados do Rio Grande do Sul e Santa Catarina. Porto Alegre: Sociedade Brasileira de Ciência do Solo—Núcleo Regional Sul, p. 400.Google Scholar
Conab—Companhia nacional de abastecimento (2014) Acompanhamento da safra brasileira de cana-de-açúcar. 2014/2015. Available in: <http://www.conab.gov.br/OlalaCMS/uploads/arquivos/14_08_28_08_52_35_boletim_cana_portugues_-_2o_lev_-_2014-15.pdf>. Acessed 14 Jan 2017..+Acessed+14+Jan+2017.>Google Scholar
Conab—Companhia nacional de abastecimento (2016) Acompanhamento da safra brasileira de cana-de-açúcar. 2016/2017. Available in: <http://www.conab.gov.br/OlalaCMS/uploads/arquivos/16_08_18_12_03_30_boletim_cana_portugues_-_2o_lev_-_16-17.pdf>. Acessed 14 Jan 2017..+Acessed+14+Jan+2017.>Google Scholar
Cong, WF, Hoffland, E, Li, L, Six, J, Sun, JH, Bao, XG, Zhang, FS and Van der Werf, W (2014) Intercropping enhances soil carbon and nitrogen. Global Change Biology 21, 1715–1726.Google Scholar
Dubè, F, Couto, L, Silva, ML, Leite, HG, Garcia, R and Araújo, GAA (2002) A simulation model for evaluating technical and economic aspects of an industrial Eucalyptus-based agroforestry system in Minas Gerais, Brazil. Agroforestry Systems 55, 73–80.Google Scholar
Dyer, J, Chapital, DC, Kuan, JW, Shepherd, HS, Tang, F and Pepperman, AB (2004) Production of linolenic acid in yeast cells expressing an omega-3 desaturase from tung (Aleurites fordii). Journal of the American Oil Chemists’ Society 81, 647–651.Google Scholar
Elli, EF, Caron, BO, Paula, GM, Eloy, E, Schwerz, F and Schmidt, D (2016 a) Ecophysiology of sugarcane in the understory of Peltophorum dubium Spr. in agroforestry systems arrangements. Comunicata Scientiae 7, 464–472.Google Scholar
Elli, EF, Caron, BO, Eloy, E, Behling, A, Souza, VQ and Schwerz, F (2016 b) Productive, morphological and qualitative characteristics of sugarcane in the understory tree species in agroforestry systems. African Journal of Agricultural Research 11, 1576–1584.Google Scholar
Ghezehei, SB, Annandale, J and Everson, C (2016) Optimizing resource distribution and crop productivity in hedgerow intercropping by manipulating tree arrangement. Agroforestry Systems 90, 861–873.Google Scholar
Godfray, HCJ, Beddington, JR, Crute, IR, Haddad, L, Lawrence, D, Muir, JF, Pretty, J, Robinson, S, Thomas, SM and Toulmin, C (2010) Food security: the challenge of feeding 9 billion people. Science 327, 812–818.Google Scholar
Gouy, M, Luquet, D, Rouan, L, Martiné, JF, Thong-Chane, A, Costet, LL, Niboucheb, S and Gozé, E (2015) Site and Saccharum spontaneum introgression level drive sugarcane yield component traits and their impact on sucrose yield in contrasted radiation and thermal conditions in La Réunion. Field Crops Research 171, 99–108.Google Scholar
Hardy, JP, Melloh, R, Koenig, G, Marks, D, Winstral, A, Pomeroy, JW and Link, T (2004) Solar radiation transmission through conifer canopies. Agricultural and Forest Meteorology 126, 257–270.Google Scholar
Inman-Bamber, NG and Smith, DM (2005) Water relations in sugarcane and response to water deficits. Field Crops Research 92, 185–202.Google Scholar
Inman-Bamber, NG, Bonnett, GD, Spillman, MF, Hewitt, MH and Glassop, D (2010) Sucrose accumulation in sugarcane is influenced by temperature and genotype through the carbon source–sink balance. Crop and Pasture Science 61, 111–121.Google Scholar
Keating, BA, Robertson, MJ, Muchow, RC and Huth, NI (1999) Modelling sugarcane production systems. I. Development and performance of the sugarcane module. Field Crops Research 48, 27–36.Google Scholar
Kruschewsky, GC, Macedo, RLG, Venturin, N and Oliveira, TK (2007) Arranjo estrutural e dinâmica de crescimento de Eucalyptus spp. em sistema agrossilvipastoril no cerrado. Cerne 13, 360–367.Google Scholar
Larcher, W (2000) Ecofisiologia Vegetal. Rima Artes e Textos, São Carlos. p. 531.Google Scholar
Leite, LP, Zubizarreta-Gerendiain, A and Robinson, A (2012) Modeling mensurational relationships of plantation—growth loblolly pine (Pinus taeda L.) in Urugay. Forest Ecology and Management 289, 455–462.Google Scholar
Leite, MSDO, Peternelli, LA, Barbosa, MHP, Cecon, PR and Cruz, CD (2009) Sample size for full-sib family evaluation in sugarcane. Pesquisa Agropecuária Brasileira 44, 1562–1574.Google Scholar
Li, QZ, Sun, JH, Wei, XJ, Christie, P, Zhang, FS and Li, L (2011) Over yielding and interspecific interactions mediated by nitrogen fertilization in strip intercropping of maize with faba bean, wheat and barley. Plant and Soil 339, 147–161.Google Scholar
Longuetaud, F, Piboule, A, Wernsdörfer, H and Collet, C (2013) Crown plasticity reduces inter-tree competition in a mixed broadleaved forest. European Journal of Forest Research 132, 621–634.Google Scholar
Makumba, W, Janssen, B, Oenema, O, Akinnifesi, FK, Mweta, D and Kwesiga, F (2006) The long-term effects of a gliricidia–maize intercropping system in southern Malawi, on gliricidia and maize yields, and soil properties. Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment 116, 85–92.Google Scholar
Muller, MD, Paciullo, DSC, Martins, CE, Rocha, WSD and Castro, CRT (2014) Desenvolvimento vegetativo de pinhão manso em diferentes arranjos de plantio em sistemas agrossilvipastoris. Pesquisa Agropecuária Brasileira 49, 506–514.Google Scholar
Nicodemo, MLF, Castiglioni, PP, Pezzopane, JRM, Tholon, P and Carpanezzi, AA (2016) Reducing competition in agroforestry by pruning native trees. Revista Árvore 40, 509–518.Google Scholar
Ong, CK and Kho, RM (2015) A framework for quantifying the various effects of tree-crop interactions. In Ong, CK, Black, C and Wilson, J (eds). Tree–Crop Interactions, 2nd edition: Agroforestry in a Changing Climate. CAB International, Wallingford. pp. 1–23.Google Scholar
Ong, CK, Black, CR, Wallace, JS, Khan, AAH, Lott, JE, Jackson, NA, Howard, SB and Smith, DM (2000) Productivity, microclimate and water use in Grevillea Robusta-based agroforestry systems on hill slopes in semi-arid Kenya agriculture. Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment 80, 121–141.Google Scholar
Paciullo, DSC, Miranda Gomide, CA, Castro, CRT, Fernandes, PB, Müller, MD, Pires, MDF and Xavier, DF (2011) Características produtivas e nutricionais do pasto em sistema agrossilvipastoril, conforme a distância das árvores. Pesquisa Agropecuária Brasileira 46, 1176–1183.Google Scholar
Park, J, Kim, D and Wang, Z (2008) Production and characterization of biodiesel from tung oil. Applied Biochemistry and Biotechnology 148, 109–117.Google Scholar
Pei, YH, Kim, JW, Kang, HB, Lee, HK, Kim, CS, Song, HH and Oh, SR (2012) Tigliane diterpene esters with IFN γ-inducing activity from the leaves of Aleurites fordii. Bioorganic & Medicinal Chemistry Letters 22, 2318–2320.Google Scholar
Pinto, LFG, Bernardes, MS, Stape, JL and Pereira, AR (2005) Growth, yield and system performance simulation of a sugarcane–eucalyptus interface in a sub-tropical region of Brazil. Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment 105, 77–86.Google Scholar
Prasad, JVNS, Korwar, GR, Rao, KV, Mandal, UK, Rao, CAR, Rao, GR, Ramakrishna, YS, Venkateswarlu, B, Rao, SN, Kulkarni, HD and Rao, MR (2010) Tree row spacing affected agronomic and economic performance of Eucalyptus-based agroforestry in Andhra Pradesh, Southern India. Agroforestry System 78, 253–267.Google Scholar
Rae, AL, Grof, CPL, Casu, RE and Bonnett, GD (2005) Sucrose accumulation in the sugarcane stem: pathways and control points for transport and compartmentation. Field Crops Research 92, 159–168.Google Scholar
Ramburan, S, Wettergreen, T, Berry, SD and Shongwe, B (2013) Genetic, environmental and management contributions to ratoon decline in sugarcane. Field Crops Research 146, 105–112.Google Scholar
Ribeiro, RV, Machado, EC, Magalhães Filho, JR, Lobo, AKM, Martins, MO, Silveira, JA, Yind, X and Struik, PC (2017) Increased sink strength offsets the inhibitory effect of sucrose on sugarcane photosynthesis. Journal of Plant Physiology 208, 61–69.Google Scholar
Robertson, MJ, Muchow, RC, Donaldson, RA, Inman-bamber, NG and Wood, AW (1999) Estimating the risk associated with drying-off strategies for irrigated sugarcane before harvest. Australian Journal of Agricultural Research 50, 65–77.Google Scholar
Rozados-Lorenzo, MJ, Gonzalez-Hernandez, MP and Silva-Pando, FJ (2007) Pasture production under different tree species and densities in an Atlantic silvopastoral system. Agroforestry System 70, 53–62.Google Scholar
Salton, JC, Mercante, FM, Tomazi, M, Zanatta, JA, Concenço, G, Silva, WM and Retorea, M (2013) Integrated crop livestock system in tropical Brazil: toward a sustainable production system. Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment 190, 70–79.Google Scholar
SAS learning edition (2003) Getting started with the SAS Learning Edition. Cary, North Carolina, USA. p. 200.Google Scholar
Schröter, M, Härdtle, W and Von Oheimb, G (2012) Crown plasticity and neighborhood interactions of European beech (Fagus sylvatica L.) in an old-growth forest. European Journal of Forest Research 131, 787–798.Google Scholar
Silva, ALC and Costa, WAJM (2004) Varietal variation in growth, physiology and yield of sugarcane under two contrasting water regimes. Tropical Agricultural Research 16, 1–12.Google Scholar
Singels, A and Smit, M (2009) Sugarcane response to row spacing-induced competition for light. Field Crops Research 113, 149–155.Google Scholar
Srivastava, TK and Chauhan, RS (2006) Weed dynamics and control of weeds in relation to management practices under sugarcane (Saccharum species complex hybrid) multi-ratooning system. Indian Journal of Agronomy 51, 228–231.Google Scholar
Thornthwaite, CW and Mather, JR (1955) The Water Balance. Drexel Institute of Climatology, New Jersey. Publications in climatology, 104p.Google Scholar
Torres Neto, AB, Silva, ME, Silva, WB, Swarnakar, R and Silva, FLH (2006) Cinética e caracterização físico-química do fermentado do pseudofruto do caju (Anacardium occidentale L.). Química Nova 29, 489–492.Google Scholar
Tracy, BF and Zhang, Y (2008) Soil compaction, corn yield response, and soil nutrient pool dynamics within an integrated crop-livestock system in Illinois. Crop Science 48, 1211–1218.Google Scholar
Van de Peer, T, Verheyen, K, Kint, V, Van Cleemput, E and Muys, B (2017) Plasticity of tree architecture through interspecific and intraspecific competition in a young experimental plantation. Forest Ecology and Management 385, 1–9.Google Scholar
Vandermeer, JH (1989) The Ecology of Intercropping. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK. p. 241.Google Scholar
Vandermeer, JH (2011) The Ecology of Agroecosystems. Jones and Bartlett Publishers, Boston, MA, USA. p. 387.Google Scholar
Wang, LP, Jackson, PA, Lu, X, Fan, YH, Foreman, JW, Chen, XK, Deng, HH, Fu, C, Ma, L and Aitken, KS (2008) Evaluation of sugarcane × Saccharum spontaneum progeny for biomass composition and yield components. Crop Science 48, 951–961.Google Scholar
Zhan, Z, Wang, Y, Shockey, J, Chen, Y, Zhou, Z, Yao, X and Ren, H (2012) Breeding status of tung tree (Vernicia sp.) in China, a multipurpose oilseed crop with industrial uses. Silvae Genetica 61, 265–270.Google Scholar
Zhang, FS and Li, L (2003) Using competitive and facilitative interactions in intercropping systems enhances crop productivity and nutrient-use efficiency. Plant and Soil 248, 305–312.Google Scholar
Zhang, L, Van der Werf, W, Zhang, S, Li, B and Spiertz, JHJ (2007) Growth, yield and quality of wheat and cotton in relay strip intercropping systems. Field Crops Research 103, 178–188.Google Scholar