Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-gb8f7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-29T01:09:41.480Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Soil CO2 respiration: Comparison of chemical titration, CO2 IRGA analysis and the Solvita gel system

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 May 2008

R.L. Haney ,
W.F. Brinton  and
E. Evans
R.L. Haney*
Affiliation:
USDA-ARS, 808 E Blackland Rd, Temple, TX 76502USA.
W.F. Brinton
Affiliation:
Woods End Laboratories, Inc., 290 Belgrade Road, Mt Vernon, ME 04352, USA.
E. Evans
Affiliation:
Woods End Laboratories, Inc., 290 Belgrade Road, Mt Vernon, ME 04352, USA.
*
*Corresponding author: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The measurement of soil carbon dioxide respiration is a means to gauge biological soil fertility. Test methods for respiration employed in the laboratory vary somewhat, and to date the equipment and labor required have somewhat limited more widespread adoption of such methodologies. The purpose of this research is to compare the results of measured soil CO2 respiration using three methods: (1) titration method; (2) infrared gas analysis (IRGA); and (3) the Solvita gel system for soil CO2 analysis. We acquired 36 soil samples from across the USA for comparison, which ranged in pH from 4.5 to 8.5, organic C from 0.8 to 4.6% and the clay content from 6 to 62%. All three methods were highly correlated with each other after 24-h of incubation (titration and Solvita r2=0.82, respirometer and Solvita r2=0.79 and titration versus respirometer r2=0.95). The 24-h (1-day) CO2 release from all three methods was also highly correlated to both basal soil respiration (7–28 days) and cumulative 28-day CO2 respiration. An additional 24 soil samples were acquired and added to the original 36, for a total of 60 soil samples. These samples were used for calibration of the Solvita gel digital color reader results using CO2-titration results and regression analysis. Regression analysis resulted in the equation y=20.6∗(Solvita number)−16.5 with an r2 of 0.83. The data suggest that the Solvita gel system for soil CO2 analysis could be a simple and easily used method to quantify soil microbial activity. Applications may also exist for the gel system for in situ measurements in surface gas chambers. Once standardized soil sampling and laboratory analysis protocols are established, the Solvita method could be easily adapted to commercial soil testing labs as an index of soil microbial activity.

Keywords

chemical titrationsoil CO2 respirationinfrared gas analysissoil microbial activity
Type
Research Papers
Information
Renewable Agriculture and Food Systems , Volume 23 , Issue 2 , June 2008 , pp. 171 - 176
Copyright
Copyright © 2008 Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 Staben, M.L., Bezdicek, D.F., Smith, J.L., and Fauci, M.F. 1997. Assessment of soil quality in conservation reserve program and wheat-fallow soils. Soil Science Society of America Journal 61:124–130.Google Scholar
2 Smith, N.R. and Humfeld, H. 1931. The decomposition of green manures grown on a soil and turned under compared to the decomposition of green manures added to a fallow soil. Journal of Agricultural Research 43:715–731.Google Scholar
3 Gainey, P.L. 1919. Parallel formation of carbon dioxide, ammonia, and nitrate in soil. Soil Science 7:293–311.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
4 Lebedjantzev, A.N. 1924. Drying of soil, as one of the natural factors in maintaining soil fertility. Soil Science 18:419–447.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
5 Birch, H.F. 1960. Nitrification in soils after different periods of dryness. Plant and Soil 7:81–96.Google Scholar
6 Anderson, J.P.E. 1982. Soil respiration. In Page, A.L., Miller, R.H., and Keeney, D.R. (eds). Methods of Soil Analysis, Part 2. 2nd ed.Agronomy Monogram No. 9, American Society of Agronomy and Soil Science Society America, Madison, WI. p. 837–871.Google Scholar
7 Brinton, W.F. 2003. Characteristics of municipal green waste composts. Abstracts ASA–SSSA Annual Meeting, November 2–6, Denver, Colorado.Google Scholar
8 Brewer, L.J. and Sullivan, D.M. 2003. Maturity and stability evaluation of composted yard trimmings. Compost Science and Utilization 11(2):96–112.Google Scholar
9 Franzluebbers, A.J., Haney, R.L., Hons, F.M., and Zuberer, D.A. 1996. Determination of soil microbial biomass and nitrogen mineralization following rewetting of dried soil. Soil Science Society America Journal 60:1133–1139.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
10 Fierer, N. and Schimel, J.P. 2003. A proposed mechanism for the pulse in carbon dioxide production commonly observed following the rapid rewetting of a dry soil. Soil Science Society America Journal 67:798–805.Google Scholar
11 Maysoon, M.M., Rice, C.W., and Milliken, G.A. 2005. Carbon and nitrogen mineralization as affected by drying and wetting cycles. Soil Biology and Biochemistry 37:339–347.Google Scholar