Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t8hqh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-23T13:13:19.811Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Organic amendment effects on tuber yield, plant N uptake and soil mineral N under organic potato production

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  22 July 2008

Derek H. Lynch ,
Zhiming Zheng ,
Bernie J. Zebarth  and
Ralph C. Martin
Derek H. Lynch*
Affiliation:
Department of Plant and Animal Sciences, Nova Scotia Agricultural College, PO Box 550, Truro, NS, B2N 5E3Canada.
Zhiming Zheng
Affiliation:
Department of Plant and Animal Sciences, Nova Scotia Agricultural College, PO Box 550, Truro, NS, B2N 5E3Canada.
Bernie J. Zebarth
Affiliation:
Potato Research Centre, Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada, PO Box 20280, Fredericton, NB, E3B 4Z7, Canada.
Ralph C. Martin
Affiliation:
Department of Plant and Animal Sciences, Nova Scotia Agricultural College, PO Box 550, Truro, NS, B2N 5E3Canada.
*
*Corresponding author: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The market for certified organic potatoes in Canada is growing rapidly, but the productivity and dynamics of soil N under commercial organic potato systems remain largely unknown. This study examined, at two sites in Atlantic Canada (Winslow, PEI, and Brookside, NS), the impacts of organic amendments on Shepody potato yield, quality and soil mineral nitrogen dynamics under organic management. Treatments included a commercial hog manure–sawdust compost (CP) and pelletized poultry manure (NW) applied at 300 and 600 kg total N ha−1, plus an un-amended control (CT). Wireworm damage reduced plant stands at Brookside in 2003 and those results are not presented. Relatively high tuber yields (~30 Mg ha−1) and crop N uptake (112 kg N ha−1) were achieved for un-amended soil in those site-years (Winslow 2003 and 2004) when soil moisture was non-limiting. Compost resulted in higher total yields than CT in one of three site-years. Apparent recovery of N from CP was negligible; therefore CP yield benefits were attributed to factors other than N availability. At Winslow, NW300, but not NW600, significantly increased total and marketable yields by an average of 5.8 and 7.0 Mg ha−1. Plant available N averaged 39 and 33% for NW300 and NW600, respectively. Soil (0–30 cm) NO3−-N at harvest was low (<25 kg N ha−1) for CT and CP, but increased substantially both in season and at harvest (61–141 kg N ha−1) when NW was applied. Most leaching losses of NO3−-N occur between seasons and excessive levels of residual soil NO3-N at harvest, as obtained for NW600, must be avoided. Given current premiums for certified organic potatoes, improving yields through application of amendments supplying moderate rates of N or organic matter appears warranted.

Keywords

organic productionpotatosoil mineral Napparent N recoveryplant available Norganic amendments
Type
Research Papers
Information
Renewable Agriculture and Food Systems , Volume 23 , Issue 3 , September 2008 , pp. 250 - 259
Copyright
Copyright © 2008 Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 Reganold, J.P., Glover, J.D., Preston, K.A., and Hinman, H.R. 2001. Sustainability of three apple production systems. Nature 410:926–930.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
2 Prince Edward Island Department of Agriculture and Forestry (PEIDAF). 2000. Agricultural Business Profile on Organic Potatoes. Factsheet 161/00. PEIDAF, Charlottetown, PEI.Google Scholar
3 Pimentel, D. 1993. Economics and energetics of organic and conventional farming. Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics 6:53–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
4 Varis, E., Pietils, L., and Koikkalainen, K. 1996. Comparison of conventional, integrated and organic potato production in field experiments in Finland. Acta Agriculturae Scandinavica 46:41–48.Google Scholar
5 Mattsson, B. and Wallen, E. 2003. Environmental life cycle assessment (LCA) of organic potatoes. Acta Horticulturae 619:427–435.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
6 De Neve, S., Dietjens, I., Moreels, E., and Hofman, G. 2003. Measured and simulated nitrate leaching on an organic and conventional mixed farm. Biological Agriculture and Horticulture 21:217–229.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
7 Porter, G.A. and Sisson, J.A. 1991. Response of Russet Burbank and Shepody potatoes to nitrogen fertilizer in two cropping systems. American Potato Journal 68:425–443.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
8 Belanger, G., Walsh, J.R., Richards, J.E., Milburn, P.H., and Ziadi, N. 2001. Critical nitrogen curve and nitrogen nutrition index for potato in eastern Canada. American Journal of Potato Research 78:355–364.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
9 Klienhenz, D. and Cardina, J. 2003. Compost application effects on weed populations and crop yield and quality in three early-maturing, organically-managed potato (Solanum tuberosum) cultivars. Acta Horticulturae 619:337–343.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
10 Belanger, G., Ziadi, N., Walsh, J.R., Richards, J.E., and Milburn, P.H. 2003. Residual soil nitrate after potato harvest. Journal of Environmental Quality 32:607–612.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
11 Foley, B.J. and Cooperband, L.R. 2002. Paper mill residuals and compost effects on soil carbon and physical properties. Journal of Environmental Quality 31:2086–2095.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
12 Carter, M.R., Sanderson, J.B., and MacLeod, J.A. 2003. Influence of compost on the physical properties and organic matter fractions of a fine sandy loam throughout the cycle of potato rotation. Canadian Journal of Soil Science 84:211–218.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
13 Opena, G.B. and Porter, G.A. 1999. Soil management and supplemental irrigation effects on potato: II. Root growth. Agronomy Journal 91:426–431.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
14 Lalande, R., Gagnon, B., and Simard, R.R. 2003. Papermill biosolid and hog manure compost affect short-tem biological activity and crop yield of a sandy soil. Canadian Journal of Soil Science 83:353–362.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
15 Black, W.N. and White, R.P. 1973. Effects of nitrogen, phosphorus, potassium and manure factorially applied to potatoes in a long-term study. Canadian Journal of Soil Science 53:205–211.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
16 MacDougall, J.I., Veer, C., and Wilson, F. 1988. Soils of Prince Edward Island. Research Branch, Agriculture Canada, Ottawa, ON, Canada.Google Scholar
17 Webb, K.T., Tompson, R.L., Beke, G.J., and Nowland, J.L. 1991. Soils of Colchester County, Nova Scotia. Report No. 19, Nova Scotia Soil Survey. Research Branch, Agriculture Canada, Ottawa, ON, Canada.Google Scholar
18 Belanger, G., Walsh, J.R., Richards, J.E., Milburn, P.H., and Ziadi, N. 2002. Nitrogen fertilization and irrigation affects tuber characteristics of two potato cultivars. American Journal of Potato Research 79:269–279.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
19 Zebarth, B.J. and Milburn, P.H. 2003. Spatial and temporal distribution of soil inorganic nitrogen concentration in potato hills. Canadian Journal of Soil Science 83:183–195.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
20 Anonymous. 1981. Canada Agricultural Standards Act: Fresh Fruit and Vegetable Regulations. Canadian Publications Centre, Hull, QC, Canada.Google Scholar
21 Zebarth, B.J., Leclerc, Y., Moreau, G., Gareau, R., and Milburn, P.H. 2003. Soil inorganic nitrogen content in commercial potato fields in New Brunswick. Canadian Journal of Soil Science 83:425–429.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
22 Statistical Analysis System Institute (SAS Inst.). 1990. SAS/STAT User's Guide. SAS Inst., Cary, NC.Google Scholar
23 Addelman, S. 1974. Computing the ANOVA table for experiments involving qualitative factors and zero amounts of quantitative factors. American Statistician 28:21–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
24 Gates, A. 1991. A user's guide to analyzing planned experiment. HortScience 26:1262–1265.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
25 Porter, G.A., Opena, G.B., Bradbury, W.B., McBurnie, J.C., and Sisson, J.A. 1999. Soil management and supplemental irrigation effects on potato: I. Soil properties, tuber yield and quality. Agronomy Journal 91:416–425.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
26 Zebarth, B.J., Leclerc, Y., Moreau, G., Sanderson, J.B., Arsenault, W.J., Botha, E.J., and Wang-Pruski, G. 2005. Estimation of soil nitrogen supply in potato fields using a plant bioassay approach. Canadian Journal of Soil Science 85:377–386.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
27 Qian, P. and Schoenau, J.J. 2002. Availability of nitrogen in solid manure amendments with different C:N ratios. Canadian Journal of Soil Science 81:219–225.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
28 Beauchamp, E.G. and Paul, J.W. 1989. A simple model to predict manure N availability to crops in the field. In Hansen, J.A. and Henriken, K. (eds) Nitrogen in Organic Wastes Applied to Soils. Harcourt Brace Jovanovich Publications, Boston, MA. p. 140–149.Google Scholar
29 Janssen, B.H. 1996. Nitrogen mineralization in relation to C:N ratio and decomposability of organic materials. Plant and Soil 181:39–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
30 Harris, P.M. 1992. Mineral nutrition. In Harris, P.M. (ed.) The Potato Crop: The Scientific Basis for Improvement. Chapman and Hall, London, UK. p. 162–213.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
31 McRae, R.J., Hill, S.B., Mehuys, G.R., and Henning, J. 1990. Farm-scale agronomic and economic conversion from conventional to sustainable agriculture. Advances in Agronomy 43:155–198.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
32 Gallandt, E.R., Mallory, E.B., Alford, A.R., Drummond, F.A., Groden, E., Liebman, M., Marra, M.C., McBurnie, J.C., and Porter, G.A. 1998. Comparison of alternative pest and soil management strategies for Maine potato production systems. American Journal of Alternative Agriculture 13:146–161.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
33 Gosling, P. and Shephard, M. 2005. Long-term changes in soil fertility in organic arable farming systems in England, with particular reference to phosphorus and potassium. Agriculture Ecosystems and Environment 105:425–432.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
34 Kirchmann, H. and Thorvaldsson, G. 2000. Challenging targets for future agriculture. European Journal of Agronomy 12:145–161.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
35 Zebarth, B.J., Chabot, R., Coulombe, J., Simard, R.R., Douheret, J., and Tremblay, N. 2005. Pelletized organo-mineral fertilizer product as a nitrogen source for potato production. Canadian Journal of Soil Science 85:1–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
36 Neuhoff, D. and Kopke, U. 2002. Potato production in organic farming: effects of increased manure application and different cultivars on tuber yield and quality. Pflanzenbauwissenschaften 6:49–56.Google Scholar
37 Greenwood, D.J., Neeteson, J.J., and Draycott, A. 1985. Response of potatoes to N fertilizer: quantitative relations for components of growth. Plant and Soil 85:63–183.Google Scholar
38 Tran, T.S. and Giroux, M. 1991. Effects of N rates and harvest dates on the efficiency of 15N-labelled fertilizer harvested potatoes (Solanum tuberosum L.). Canadian Journal of Soil Science 71:519–532.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
39 Gasser, M.O., Laverdiere, M.R., Lagace, R., and Caron, J. 2002. Impact of potato–cereal rotations and slurry applications on nitrate leaching and nitrogen balance in sandy soils. Canadian Journal of Soil Science 82:469–479.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
40 Sheldrick, B.H. and Wang, C. 1993. Particle-size distribution. In Carter, M.C. (ed.) Soil Sampling and Methods of Analysis. Lewis Publishers, Boca Raton, FL. p. 499–513.Google Scholar
41 Tiessen, H. and Moir, J.O. 1993. Total and organic carbon. In Carter, M.C. (ed.) Soil Sampling and Methods of Analysis. Lewis Publishers, Boca Raton, FL. p. 187–199.Google Scholar
42 Mehlich, A. 1984. Mehlich no. 3 extraction: a modification of Mehlich no. 2 extractant. Communications in Soil Science and Plant Analyses 15:1409–1416.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
43 Lynch, D.H., Voroney, R.P., and Warman, P.R. 2004. Nitrogen availability from composts for humid region perennial grass and legume–grass forage production. Journal of Environmental Quality 33:1509–1520.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed