Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-mlc7c Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-19T12:33:45.139Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Investigating tarps to facilitate organic no-till cabbage production with high-residue cover crops

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  26 September 2018

Natalie P Lounsbury*
Affiliation:
Department of Natural Resources and the Environment, University of New Hampshire, Durham, New Hampshire, USA
Nicholas D Warren
Affiliation:
Department of Natural Resources and the Environment, University of New Hampshire, Durham, New Hampshire, USA
Seamus D Wolfe
Affiliation:
Department of Natural Resources and the Environment, University of New Hampshire, Durham, New Hampshire, USA
Richard G Smith
Affiliation:
Department of Natural Resources and the Environment, University of New Hampshire, Durham, New Hampshire, USA
*
Author for correspondence: Natalie P. Lounsbury, E-mail: [email protected]

Abstract

High-residue cover crops can facilitate organic no-till vegetable production when cover crop biomass production is sufficient to suppress weeds (>8000 kg ha−1), and cash crop growth is not limited by soil temperature, nutrient availability, or cover crop regrowth. In cool climates, however, both cover crop biomass production and soil temperature can be limiting for organic no-till. In addition, successful termination of cover crops can be a challenge, particularly when cover crops are grown as mixtures. We tested whether reusable plastic tarps, an increasingly popular tool for small-scale vegetable farmers, could be used to augment organic no-till cover crop termination and weed suppression. We no-till transplanted cabbage into a winter rye (Secale cereale L.)-hairy vetch (Vicia villosa Roth) cover crop mulch that was terminated with either a roller-crimper alone or a roller-crimper plus black or clear tarps. Tarps were applied for durations of 2, 4 and 5 weeks. Across tarp durations, black tarps increased the mean cabbage head weight by 58% compared with the no tarp treatment. This was likely due to a combination of improved weed suppression and nutrient availability. Although soil nutrients and biological activity were not directly measured, remaining cover crop mulch in the black tarp treatments was reduced by more than 1100 kg ha−1 when tarps were removed compared with clear and no tarp treatments. We interpret this as an indirect measurement of biological activity perhaps accelerated by lower daily soil temperature fluctuations and more constant volumetric water content under black tarps. The edges of both tarp types were held down, rather than buried, but moisture losses from the clear tarps were greater and this may have affected the efficacy of clear tarps. Plastic tarps effectively killed the vetch cover crop, whereas it readily regrew in the crimped but uncovered plots. However, emergence of large and smooth crabgrass (Digitaria spp.) appeared to be enhanced in the clear tarp treatment. Although this experiment was limited to a single site-year in New Hampshire, it shows that use of black tarps can overcome some of the obstacles to implementing cover crop-based no-till vegetable productions in northern climates.

Type
Preliminary Report
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2018

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bates, D, Mächler, M, Bolker, B and Walker, S (2015) Fitting linear mixed-effects models using lme4. Journal of Statistical Software 1, 148.Google Scholar
Biederbeck, VO and Campbell, CA (1973) Soil microbial activity as influenced by temperature trends and fluctuations. Canadian Journal of Soil Science 53, 363376.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bond, W and Burch, PJ (1989) Weed Control in Carrots and Salad Onions Low-Level Polyethylene Covers. In Proceedings of the Brighton Crop Protection Conference-Weeds. Farnham, UK: British Crop Protection Council, pp. 1021–1026.Google Scholar
Boydston, RA and Williams, MM (2017) No-till snap bean performance and weed response following rye and vetch cover crops. Renewable Agriculture and Food Systems 32, 463473.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ciaccia, C, Canali, S, Campanelli, G, Testani, E, Montemurro, F, Leteo, F and Delate, K (2016) Effect of roller-crimper technology on weed management in organic zucchini production in a Mediterranean climate zone. Renewable Agriculture and Food Systems 31, 111121.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clark, AJ, Decker, AM and Meisinger, JJ (1994) Seeding rate and kill date effects on hairy vetch-cereal rye cover crop mixtures for corn production. Agronomy Journal 86, 10651070.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clark, AJ, Decker, AM, Meisinger, JJ and McIntosh, MS (1997) Kill date of vetch, rye, and a vetch-rye mixture: II. Soil moisture and corn yield. Agronomy Journal 89, 434441.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Delate, K, Cwach, D and Chase, C (2012) Organic no-tillage system effects on soybean, corn and irrigated tomato production and economic performance in Iowa, USA. Renewable Agriculture and Food Systems 27, 4959.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dufrene, M and Legendre, P (1997) Species assemblages and indicator species: the need for a flexible asymmetrical approach. Ecological Monographs 67, 345366.Google Scholar
El-Keblawy, A and Al-Hamadi, F (2009) Assessment of the differential response of weeds to soil solarization by two methods. Weed Biology and Management 9, 7278.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Findeling, A, Garnier, P, Coppens, F, Lafolie, F and Recous, S (2007) Modelling water, carbon and nitrogen dynamics in soil covered with decomposing mulch. European Journal of Soil Science 58, 196206.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fortier, JM and Bilodeau, M (2014) The Market Gardener: A Successful Grower's Handbook for Small-Scale Organic Farming. Gabriola Island, BC: New Society Publishers.Google Scholar
Haynes, RJ and Tregurtha, R (1999) Effects of increasing periods under intensive arable vegetable production on biological, chemical and physical indices of soil quality. Biology and Fertility of Soils 28, 259266.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Horowitz, M, Regev, Y and Herzlinger, G (1983) Solarization for weed control. Weed Science 31, 170179.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hoyt, GD (1999) Tillage and cover residue effects on vegetable yields. HortTechnology 9, 351358.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jokela, D and Nair, A (2016 a) No tillage and strip tillage effects on plant performance, weed suppression, and profitability in transitional organic broccoli production. HortScience 51, 11031110.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jokela, D and Nair, A (2016 b) Effects of reduced tillage and fertilizer application method on plant growth, yield, and soil health in organic bell pepper production. Soil and Tillage Research 163, 243254.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lawson, A, Fortuna, AM, Cogger, C, Bary, A and Stubbs, T (2013) Nitrogen contribution of rye-hairy vetch cover crop mixtures to organically grown sweet corn. Renewable Agriculture and Food Systems 28, 5969.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Leavitt, MJ, Sheaffer, CC, Wyse, DL and Allan, DL (2011) Rolled winter rye and hairy vetch cover crops lower weed density but reduce vegetable yields in no-tillage organic production. HortScience 46, 387395.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lomander, A, Kätterer, T and Andrén, O (1998) Carbon dioxide evolution from top- and subsoils affected by moisture and constant and fluctuating temperature. Soil Biology and Biochemistry 30, 20172022.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lowry, CJ and Brainard, DC (2017) Organic farmer perceptions of reduced tillage: a Michigan farmer survey. Renewable Agriculture and Food Systems 113. Available in https://doi.org/10.1017/S1742170517000357.Google Scholar
Luna, JM, Mitchell, JP and Shrestha, A (2012) Conservation tillage for organic agriculture: evolution toward hybrid systems in the western USA. Renewable Agriculture and Food Systems 27, 2130.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McCune, B and Medford, MJ (2011) PC-ORD. Multivariate Analysis of Ecological Data. Gleneden Beach, Oregon, USA: MjM Software.Google Scholar
Mirsky, SB, Curran, WS, Mortenseny, DM, Ryany, MR and Shumway, DL (2011) Timing of cover-crop management effects on weed suppression in no-till planted soybean using a roller-crimper. Weed Science 59, 380389.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mirsky, SB, Ryan, MR, Curran, WS, Teasdale, JR, Maul, J, Spargo, JT, Moyer, J, Grantham, AM, Weber, D, Way, TR and Camargo, GG (2012) Conservation tillage issues: cover crop-based organic rotational no-till grain production in the mid-Atlantic region, USA. Renewable Agriculture and Food Systems 27, 3140.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mischler, R, Duiker, SW, Curran, WS and Wilson, D (2010) Hairy vetch management for no-till organic corn production. Agronomy Journal 102, 355362.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mochizuki, MJ, Rangarajan, A, Bellinder, RR, van Es, HM and Björkman, T (2008) Rye mulch management affects short-term indicators of soil quality in the transition to conservation tillage for cabbage. HortScience 43, 862867.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Morse, RD (1999) No-till vegetable production – its time is now. HortTechnology 9, 373379.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mulumba, LN and Lal, R (2008) Mulching effects on selected soil physical properties. Soil and Tillage Research 98, 106111.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Myers, MW, Curran, WS, VanGessel, MJ, Calvin, DD, Mortensen, DA, Majek, BA, Karsten, HD and Roth, GW (2004) Predicting weed emergence for eight annual species in the northeastern United States. Weed Science 52, 913919.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Oksanen, J, Blanchet, FG, Friendly, M, Kindt, R, Legendre, P, McGlinn, D, Minchin, PR, O'Hara, RB, Simpson, GL, Solymos, P, Henry, M, Stevens, H, Szoecs, E and Wagner, H (2018) vegan: Community Ecology Package. R package version 2.4-6. https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=veganGoogle Scholar
Quemada, M and Cabrera, ML (1997) Temperature and moisture effects on C and N mineralization from surface applied clover residue. Plant and Soil 189, 127137.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reberg-Horton, SC, Grossman, JM, Kornecki, TS, Meijer, AD, Price, AJ, Place, GT and Webster, TM (2012) Utilizing cover crop mulches to reduce tillage in organic systems in the southeastern USA. Renewable Agriculture and Food Systems 27, 4148.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rubin, B and Benjamin, A (1984) Solar heating of the soil: involvement of environmental factors in the weed control process. Weed Science 32, 138142.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ryan, MR, Curran, WS, Grantham, AM, Hunsberger, LK, Mirsky, SB, Mortensen, DA, Nord, EA and Wilson, DO (2011) Effects of seeding rate and poultry litter on weed suppression from a rolled cereal rye cover crop. Weed Science 59, 438444.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smith, AN, Reberg-Horton, SC, Place, GT, Meijer, AD, Arellano, C and Mueller, JP (2011) Rolled rye mulch for weed suppression in organic no-tillage soybeans. Weed Science 59, 224231.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Standifer, LC, Wilson, PW and Porche-Sorbet, R (1984) Effects of solarization on soil weed seed populations. Weed Science 32, 569573.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stapleton, JJ (2000) Soil solarization in various agricultural production systems. Crop Protection 19, 837841.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stapleton, JJ and DeVay, JE (1986) Soil solarization: a non-chemical approach for management of plant pathogens and pests. Crop Protection 5, 190198.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Teasdale, JR and Mohler, CL (1993) Light transmittance, soil temperature, and soil moisture under residue of hairy vetch and rye. Agronomy Journal 85, 673680.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wayman, S, Cogger, C, Benedict, C, Burke, I, Collins, D and Bary, A (2015) The influence of cover crop variety, termination timing and termination method on mulch, weed cover and soil nitrate in reduced-tillage organic systems. Renewable Agriculture and Food Systems 30, 450460.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weaver, SE (1984) Critical period of weed competition in three vegetable crops in relation to management practices. Weed Research 24, 317325.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wolfe, DW, Topoleski, DT, Gundersheim, NA and Ingall, BA (1995) Growth and yield sensitivity of four vegetable crops to soil compaction. Journal of the American Society for Horticultural Science 120, 956963.CrossRefGoogle Scholar