Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-r5fsc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-23T10:27:59.907Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The impact of tillage regime and row cover use on insect pests and yield in organic cucurbit production

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  26 October 2017

Amanda Skidmore ,
Neil Wilson ,
Mark Williams  and
Ricardo Bessin
Amanda Skidmore*
Affiliation:
Department of Entomology, S-225 Ag. Sci. Center North, University of Kentucky, Lexington, Kentucky 40546-0091, USA
Neil Wilson
Affiliation:
Department of Horticulture, N-322 Ag. Sci. Center North, University of Kentucky, Lexington, Kentucky 40546-0091, USA
Mark Williams
Affiliation:
Department of Horticulture, N-322 Ag. Sci. Center North, University of Kentucky, Lexington, Kentucky 40546-0091, USA
Ricardo Bessin
Affiliation:
Department of Entomology, S-225 Ag. Sci. Center North, University of Kentucky, Lexington, Kentucky 40546-0091, USA
*
Author for correspondence: Amanda Skidmore, E-mail: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Control of cucurbit pests, such as striped cucumber beetle (Acalymma vittatum), spotted cucumber beetle (Diabrotica undecimpunctata howardi) and squash bug (Anasa tristis), in organic systems is difficult due to a lack of effective insecticide options. This has led to the development of many integrated pest management techniques, such as use of row covers, crop rotation and cover crops. This study explored the novel use of strip tillage and row covers to reduce pest pressure in summer squash (Cucurbita pepe) and muskmelon (Cucumis melo) production systems. Results showed that although strip tillage reduced striped cucumber beetle and squash bug numbers, there was a yield reduction in both crops compared with the plasticulture system. Row cover increased marketable yield in both systems, with the highest yield being in the plasticulture system. Unmarketable fruit directly attributed to insect damage was higher in the plasticulture systems, but was not significantly different when compared with the strip tillage system. Although there are many documented positive attributes of strip tillage, results from this study indicate that a combination of plasticulture and row cover may be a superior system for organic cucurbit production.

Keywords

Organic agricultureintegrated pest management (IPM)summer squashmuskmelonspotted cucumber beetle (Acalymma vittatum)striped cucumber beetle (Diabrotica undecimpunctata howardi)squash bug (Anasa tristis)
Type
Research Paper
Information
Renewable Agriculture and Food Systems , Volume 34 , Issue 4 , August 2019 , pp. 338 - 348
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2017 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Arancibia, RA and Motsenbocker, CE (2008) Differential watermelon fruit size distribution in response to plastic mulch and spunbonded polyester rowcover. HortTechnology 18, 45–52.Google Scholar
Aziz, I, Mahmood, T and Islam, KR (2013) Effect of long term no-till and conventional tillage practices on soil quality. Soil and Tillage Research 131, 28–35.Google Scholar
Baker, JT and Reddy, VR (2001) Temperature effects on phenological development and yield of muskmelon. Annals of Botany 87, 605–613.Google Scholar
Batey, T (2009) Soil compaction and soil management–a review. Soil Use and Management 25, 335–345.Google Scholar
Batte, MT, Hooker, NH, Haab, TC and Beaverson, J (2007) Putting their money where their mouths are: Consumer willingness to pay for multi-ingredient, processed organic food products. Food Policy 32, 145–159.Google Scholar
Bonjour, EL, Fargo, WS & Rensner, PE (2014) Ovipositional preference of squash bugs (Heteroptera: Coreidae) among cucurbits in Oklahoma. Journal of Economic Entomology 83, 943–947.Google Scholar
Bonti-Ankomah, S and Yiridoe, EK (2006) Organic and conventional food: A literature review of the economics of consumer perceptions and preferences. Organic Agriculture Centre of Canada 59, 1–40.Google Scholar
Branson, TF and Krysan, JL (1981) Feeding and oviposition behavior and life cycle strategies of Diabrotica: An evolutionary view with implications for pest management. Environmental Entomology 10, 826–831.Google Scholar
Brown, R (2014) No3 2013 Melon Variety Trial. Paper 7. Rhode Island Agricultural Experiment Station Bulletin, Kingston, Rhode Island.Google Scholar
Brust, GE and Foster, RE (1999) New economic threshold for striped cucumber beetle (Coleoptera: Chrysomelidae) in cantaloupe in the midwest. Journal of Economic Entomology 92, 936–940.Google Scholar
Brust, GE, Foster, RE and Buhler, WG (1996) Comparison of insecticide use programs for managing the striped cucumber beetle (Coleoptera: Chrysomelidae) in muskmelon. Journal of Economic Entomology 89, 981–986.Google Scholar
Bruton, BD, Mitchell, F, Fletcher, J, Pair, SD, Wayadande, A, Melcher, U, Brady, J, Bextine, B and Popham, TW (2003) Serratia marcescens, a phloem-colonizing, squash bug-transmitted bacterium: Causal agent of cucurbit yellow vine disease. Plant Disease 87, 937–944.Google Scholar
Burkness, EC and Hutchison, WD (1998) Development and validation of a fixed-precision sampling plan for estimating striped cucumber beetle (Coleoptera: Chrysomelidae) density in cucurbits. Environmental Entomology 27, 178–183.Google Scholar
Cantliffe, DJ, Shaw, NL and Stoffella, PJ (2007) Current trends in cucurbit production in the US. Acta Horticulturae 731, 473–478.Google Scholar
Cartwright, B, Palumbo, JC and Fargo, WS (1990) Influence of crop mulches and row covers on the population dynamics of the squash bug (Heteroptera: Coreidae) on summer squash. Journal of Economic Entomology 83, 1988–1993.Google Scholar
Cavanagh, A, Hazzard, R, Adler, LS and Boucher, J (2009) Using trap crops for control of Acalymma vittatum (Coleoptera: Chrysomelidae) reduces insecticide use in butternut squash. Journal of Economic Entomology 102, 1101–1107.Google Scholar
Cline, GR, Sedlacek, JD, Hillman, SL, Parker, SK and Silvernail, AF (2008) Organic management of cucumber beetles in watermelon and muskmelon production. HortTechnology 18, 436–444.Google Scholar
Condron, LM, Cameron, KC, Di, HJ, Clough, TJ, Forbes, EA, Mclaren, RG and Silva, RG (2000) A comparison of soil and environmental quality under organic and conventional farming systems in New Zealand. New Zealand Journal of Agricultural Research 43, 443–466.Google Scholar
Cranshaw, W (2004) Garden Insects of North America: The Ultimate Guide to Backyard Bugs. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Desneux, N, Decourtye, A and Delpuech, J-M (2006) The sublethal effects of pesticides on beneficial arthropods. Annual Review of Entomology 52, 81–106.Google Scholar
Dogramaci, M., Shrefler, JW, Giles, K and Edelson, JV (2006) Spatial pattern and sequential sampling of squash bug (Heteroptera : Coreidae) adults in watermelon. Journal of Economic Entomology 99, 559–567.Google Scholar
Ellers-Kirk, C and Fleischer, SJ (2006) Development and life table of Acalymma vittatum (Coleoptera: Chrysomelidae), a vector of Erwinia tracheiphila in cucurbits. Environmental Entomology 35, 875–880.Google Scholar
Garratt, MPD, Wright, DJ and Leather, SR (2011) The effects of farming system and fertilisers on pests and natural enemies: A synthesis of current research. Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment 141, 261–270.Google Scholar
Goh, KM (2011) Greater mitigation of climate change by organic than conventional agriculture: A review. Biological Agriculture & Horticulture 27, 205–229.Google Scholar
Gusmini, G and Wehner, TC (2008) Fifty-five years of yield improvement for cucumber, melon, and watermelon in the United States. HortTechnology 18, 9–12.Google Scholar
Hanna, HM, Carlson, BL, Steward, BL and Rosentrater, KA (2015) Evaluation of Multi-row Covers and Support Structure for Cantaloupe and Summer Squash. 2015 American Society of Agricultural and Biological Engineers Annual International Meeting, New Orleans, Louisiana.Google Scholar
Harmon, JP, Hladilek, EE, Hinton, JL, Stodola, TJ and Andow, DA (2003) Herbivore response to vegetational diversity: Spatial interaction of resources and natural enemies. Population Ecology 45, 75–81.Google Scholar
Hole, DG., Perkins, AJ, Wilson, JD, Alexander, IH, Grice, PV and Evans, AD (2005) Does organic farming benefit biodiversity? Biological Conservation 122, 113–130.Google Scholar
Hoyt, GD, Monks, DW and Monaco, TJ (1994) Conservation tillage for vegetable production. HortTechnology 4, 129–135.Google Scholar
Ibarra, L, Flores, J and DíAZ-Pérez, JC (2001) Growth and yield of muskmelon in response to plastic mulch and row covers. Scientia Horticulturae 8(7), 139–145.Google Scholar
Jenni, S, Cloutier, DC, Bourgeois, G and Stewart, KA (1996) A heat unit model to predict growth and development of muskmelon to anthesis of perfect flowers. Journal of the American Society for Horticultural Science 121, 274–280.Google Scholar
Jensen, MH and Malter, AJ (1995) Protected Agriculture: A Global Review. World Bank Technical Paper Number 253. World Bank Publications.Google Scholar
Johnson, AM and Hoyt, GD (1999) Changes to the soil environment under conservation tillage. HortTechnology 9, 380–393.Google Scholar
Keinath, AP (1996) Soil amendment with cabbage residue and crop rotation to reduce gummy stem blight and increase growth and yield of watermelon. Plant Disease 80, 564–570.Google Scholar
Kladivko, EJ (2001) Tillage systems and soil ecology. Soil and Tillage Research 61, 61–76.Google Scholar
Kogan, M (1998) Integrated pest management: historical perspectives and contemporary developments. Annual Review of Entomology 43, 243–270.Google Scholar
Lamont, WJ (2005) Plastics: modifying the microclimate for the production of vegetable crops. HortTechnology 15, 477–481.Google Scholar
Leftwich, PT, Bolton, M and Chapman, T (2016) Evolutionary biology and genetic techniques for insect control. Evolutionary Applications 9, 212–230.Google Scholar
Lewis, MT, Fleischer, SJ and Roberts, DC (2016) Horticultural production systems influence ground beetle (Coleoptera: Carabidae) distribution and diversity in cucurbits. Environmental Entomology 45, 559–569.Google Scholar
Lewis, WJ, Van Lenteren, JC, Phatak, SC and Tumlinson, JH (1997) A total system approach to sustainable pest management. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 94, 12243–12248.Google Scholar
Lilley, JM and Sánchez, ES (2016) The potential of strip tillage and rowcovers for organic cucurbit production. HortTechnology 26, 628–636.Google Scholar
Loy, JB and Wells, OS (1975) Response of hybrid muskmelons to polyethylene row covers and black polyethylene mulch. Scientia Horticulturae 3, 223–230.Google Scholar
Lupwayi, NZ, Rice, WA and Clayton, GW (1998) Soil microbial diversity and community structure under wheat as influenced by tillage and crop rotation. Soil Biology and Biochemistry 30, 1733–1741.Google Scholar
Mäder, P, Fliessbach, A, Dubois, D, Gunst, L, Fried, P and Niggli, U (2002) Soil fertility and biodiversity in organic farming. Science 296, 1694–1697.Google Scholar
Mahadeen, AY (2014) Effect of polyethylene black plastic mulch on growth and yield of two summer vegetable crops under rain-fed conditions under semi-arid region conditions. American Journal of Agricultural and Biological Sciences 9, 202.Google Scholar
Margolies, DC, Nechols, JR and Vogt, EA (1998) Rapid adaptation of squash bug, Anasa tristis, populations to a resistant cucurbit cultivar. Entomologia Experimentalis et Applicata 89, 65–70.Google Scholar
Mumtaz, F (2014) Management of Bacterial Wilt on Muskmelon Using Actigard. Purdue University. Open Access Theses. 365.Google Scholar
Nair, A and Ngouajio, M (2010) Integrating rowcovers and soil amendments for organic cucumber production: Implications on crop growth, yield, and microclimate. HortScience 45, 566–574.Google Scholar
Nesmith, DS, Hoogenboom, G and Mccracken, DV (1994) Summer squash production using conservation tillage. HortScience 29, 28–30.Google Scholar
Olson, DL, Nechols, JR and Schuhle, BW (1996) Comparative evaluation of population effect and economic potential of biological suppression tactics versus chemical control for squash bug (Heteroptera: Coreidae) management on pumpkins. Journal of Economic Entomology 89, 631–639.Google Scholar
Organictradeassociation (2016) U. S. Organic State of the Industry.Google Scholar
Orozco-Santos, M, Perez-Zamora, O and Lopez-Arriaga, O (1995) Floating row cover and transparent mulch to reduce insect populations, virus diseases and increase yield in cantaloupe. The Florida Entomologist 78, 493–501.Google Scholar
Pair, SD (1997) Evaluation of systemically treated squash trap plants and attracticidal baits for early-season control of striped and spotted cucumber beetles (Coleoptera: Chrysomelidae) and squash bug (Hemiptera: Coreidae) in cucurbit crops. Journal of Economic Entomology 90, 1307–1314.Google Scholar
Pedersen, AB and Godfrey, LD (2011) Evaluation of cucurbitacin-based gustatory stimulant to facilitate cucumber beetle (Coleoptera: Chrysomelidae) management with foliar insecticides in melons. Journal of Economic Entomology 104, 1294–1300.Google Scholar
Perring, TM, Royalty, RN and Farrar, CA (1989) Floating row covers for the exclusion of virus vectors and the effect on disease incidence and yield of cantaloupe. Journal of Economic Entomology 82, 1709–1715.Google Scholar
Phillips, BW and Gardiner, MM (2016) Does local habitat management or large-scale landscape composition alter the biocontrol services provided to pumpkin agroecosystems? Biological Control 92, 181–194.Google Scholar
Pimentel, D and Kounang, N (1998) Ecology of soil erosion in ecosystems. Ecosystems 1, 416–426.Google Scholar
Ponisio, LC, Gonigle, LK, Mace, KC, Palomino, J, De Valpine, P and Kremen, C (2014) Diversification practices reduce organic to conventional yield gap. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences 282, 20141396.Google Scholar
Rojas, ES, Gleason, M, Batzer, J and Duffy, M (2011) Feasibility of delaying removal of row covers to suppress bacterial wilt of muskmelon (Cucumis melo). Plant Disease 95, 729–734.Google Scholar
Rojas, ES, Batzer, JC, Beattie, GA, Fleischer, SJ, Shapiro, LR, Williams, MA, Bessin, R, Bruton, BD, Boucher, TJ and Jesse, LCH (2015) Bacterial wilt of cucurbits: Resurrecting a classic pathosystem. Plant Disease 99, 564–574.Google Scholar
Schmidt, JM, Barney, SK, Williams, MA, Bessin, RT, Coolong, TW and Harwood, JD (2014) Predator–prey trophic relationships in response to organic management practices. Molecular Ecology 23, 3777–3789.Google Scholar
Schroder, RFW, Martin, PAW and Athanas, MM (2001) Effect of a phloxine B-cucurbitacin bait on diabroticite beetles (Coleoptera: Chrysomelidae). Journal of Economic Entomology 94, 892–897.Google Scholar
Sebastian, P, Schaefer, H, Telford, IRH and Renner, SS (2010) Cucumber (Cucumis sativus) and melon (C. melo) have numerous wild relatives in Asia and Australia, and the sister species of melon is from Australia. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 107, 14269–14273.Google Scholar
Sheibani, S and Ahangar, AG (2013) Effect of tillage on soil biodiversity. Journal of Novel Applied Sciences 2, 273–281.Google Scholar
Soltani, N, Anderson, JL and Hamson, AR (1995) Growth analysis of watermelon plants grown with mulches and rowcovers. Journal of the American Society for Horticultural Science 120, 1001–1009.Google Scholar
Stark, JD and Banks, JE (2003) Population-level effects of pesticides and other toxicants on arthropods. Annual Review of Entomology 48, 505–519.Google Scholar
Stinner, BR and House, GJ (1990) Arthropods and other invertebrates in conservation-tillage agriculture. Annual Review of Entomology 35, 299–318.Google Scholar
Szalanski, AL and Owens, CB (2003) Genetic variation of the southern corn rootworm, (Coleoptera: Chrysomelidae). Florida Entomologist 86, 329–333.Google Scholar
Tarara, JM (2000) Microclimate modification with plastic mulch. HortScience 35, 169–180.Google Scholar
Tillman, J, Nair, A, Gleason, M and Batzer, J (2015 a) Evaluating strip tillage and rowcover use in organic and conventional muskmelon production. HortTechnology 25, 487–495.Google Scholar
Tillman, J, Nair, A, Gleason, M and Batzer, J (2015 b) Rowcovers and strip tillage provide an alternative to plasticulture systems in summer squash production. HortScience 50, 1777–1783.Google Scholar
United States Agriculture Census (2014) 2012: Full Report. Eds. Vilsack, TC, Clark, CZF. United States Department of Agriculture's National Statistics Services, 1, 1–695.Google Scholar
Van Oost, K, Govers, G, De Alba, S and Quine, TA (2006) Tillage erosion: A review of controlling factors and implications for soil quality. Progress in Physical Geography 30, 443–466.Google Scholar
Verhulst, N, Govaerts, B, Verachtert, E, Castellanos-Navarrete, A, Mezzalama, M, Wall, P, Deckers, J and Sayre, KD (2010) Conservation agriculture, improving soil quality for sustainable production systems. Advances in Soil Science: Food Security and Soil Quality 1799267585, 137–208.Google Scholar
Waterfield, G and Zilberman, D (2012) Pest management in food systems: An economic perspective. Annual Review of Environment and Resources 37, 223–245.Google Scholar
Webb, SE and Linda, SB (1992) Evaluation of spunbonded polyethylene row covers as a method of excluding insects and viruses affecting fall-grown squash in Florida. Journal of Economic Entomology 85, 2344–2352.Google Scholar
Wolters, V (2000) Invertebrate control of soil organic matter stability. Biology and Fertility of Soils 31, 1–19.Google Scholar
Yiridoe, EK, Bonti-Ankomah, S and Martin, RC (2005) Comparison of consumer perceptions and preference toward organic versus conventionally produced foods: A review and update of the literature. Renewable Agriculture and Food Systems 20, 193–205.Google Scholar
Zehnder, G, Gurr, GM, Kühne, S, Wade, MR, Wratten, SD and Wyss, E (2007) Arthropod pest management in organic crops. Annual Review of Entomology 52, 57–80.Google Scholar
Supplementary material: File

Skidmore et al supplementary material

Skidmore et al supplementary material 1

Download Skidmore et al supplementary material(File)
File 13.9 KB