Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-2brh9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-25T09:43:47.578Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The impact of organic cotton cultivation on the livelihood of smallholder farmers in Meatu district, Tanzania

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  30 October 2014

Christine Altenbuchner ,
Manuela Larcher  and
Stefan Vogel
Christine Altenbuchner*
Affiliation:
Institute for Sustainable Economic Development, University of Natural Resources and Life Sciences, Vienna, Austria.
Manuela Larcher
Affiliation:
Institute for Sustainable Economic Development, University of Natural Resources and Life Sciences, Vienna, Austria.
Stefan Vogel
Affiliation:
Institute for Sustainable Economic Development, University of Natural Resources and Life Sciences, Vienna, Austria.
*
*Corresponding author: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

In Tanzania, as in many developing countries, cotton is an important source of income for smallholder farmers but also causes various negative effects through high pesticide and intensive land use. To overcome these effects organic agriculture is promoted by different non-governmental organizations (NGOs) and companies. This study examines how organic cotton cultivation influences the livelihood of smallholder farmers in rural Tanzania and focuses on three areas: (1) the motivation to change from conventional to organic farming, (2) experiences and challenges of farmers in the conversion process as well as in the period following the conversion, and (3) the attitude and perceptions of farmers toward organic farming in general. Qualitative interviews with organic farmers in Meatu district in the north of Tanzania, as well as expert interviews, were conducted and observations were made. Results show that although the organic price premium is an important incentive for farmers to convert to organic agriculture, access to training and advisory service are even more important, as no other sufficient agriculture extension service is available in the region. Due to a high level of poverty in the region, environmental motivations for conversion are not in the foreground. Furthermore, the study shows that organic farming can contribute greatly to the improvement of livelihoods in the region (improved soil fertility, increased yields and income, higher standard of living) and increases farmers’ ability to cope with challenges, mainly through knowledge transfer, access to capital and capacity building on a local level. Although positive effects on female farmers were identified, cultural preconditions (e.g., polygamy) harm efforts to strengthen women to a higher degree and gender disparities are still challenging. Further social problems (i.e., high birth rates, a poor education system and a lack of health care), global trading schemes as well as environmental factors (i.e., water scarcity and extreme weather events) cannot be fully offset by the conversion to organic cotton cultivation. Farmers in the Meatu region profit to a high degree from organic agriculture, mainly due to access to knowledge and extension services, nevertheless important challenges remain for farmers and their families.

Keywords

organic cotton productioncultivationsmallholder farmersimprovement of livelihoodsustainable developmentMeatuShinyangaTanzaniaAfrica
Type
Research Papers
Information
Renewable Agriculture and Food Systems , Volume 31 , Issue 1 , February 2016 , pp. 22 - 36
Check for updates
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2014 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1Engelhardt, A. 2012. Schwarzbuch Baumwolle: Was wir wirklich auf der Haut tragen. Deuticke in Paul Zsolnay Verlag, Vienna, Austria.Google Scholar
2Shui, S. 2006. Cotton International Commodity Profile. Background paper for the Competitive Commercial Agriculture in Sub-Saharan Africa (CCAA). FAO Trade and Markets Division, Rome.Google Scholar
3Woodward, A.R. 2007. The impact of U.S. subsidies on West African cotton production. In Pinstrup-Andersen, P. and Cheng, F. (eds). Food Policy for Developing Countries: Case Studies. Cornell University, Ithaca, New York. p. 12–23.Google Scholar
4Baffes, J. 2003. Trade Note—Cotton and Developing Countries: A Case Study in Policy Incoherence. Worldbank, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
5Environmental Justice Foundation. 2007. The Deadly Chemicals in Cotton. EJF, London.Google Scholar
6Eyhorn, F., Mäder, P., and Ramakrishnan, M. 2005. The Impact of Organic Cotton Farming on the Livelihoods of Smallholders: Evidence from the Maikaal bioRe project in central India. FiBL, Frick, Switzerland.Google Scholar
7Bachmann, F. 2012. Potential and limitations of organic and fair trade cotton for improving livelihoods of smallholders: Evidence from Central Asia. Renewable Agriculture and Food Systems 27(2):138–147.Google Scholar
8Jackson, G.J. 1989. Insecticide resistance: The challenge of the decade. In Green, M.B., De, D.J., and Lyon, B. (eds). Agrochemical Sciences: Pest Management in Cotton. Ellis Horwood, West Sussex, UK. p. 27–30.Google Scholar
9Poswal, A. and Williamson, S. 1998. Stepping Off the Cotton Pesticide Treadmill: Preliminary Findings from a Farmer Particiatory Cotton IPM Training Project in Pakistan. CABI Bioscience centre, Rawalpindi, Pakistan/Egham, UK.Google Scholar
10IFOAM. s.a. Principles of Organic Agriculture. Available at Web site http://www.ifoam.org/en/organic-landmarks/principles-organic-agriculture (verified June 10, 2014)Google Scholar
11Meyer, A. 2001. Produktbezogene ökologische Wettbewerbsstrategien. Deutscher Universitats Verlag, Wiesbaden, Germany.Google Scholar
12von Boguslawski, C. and Basedow, T. 2001. Studies in cotton fields in Egypt on the effects of pheromone mating disruption on Pectinophora gossypiella on the occurrence of other arthropods and on yields. Journal of Applied Entomology 125:327–331.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
13Raj, D.A., Sridahr, K., Ambatipudi, A., Lanting, H., and Brenchandran, S. 2005. Case study on organic versus conventional cotton in Karimnagar, Andhira Pradesh. In Second International Symposium on Biological Control of Arthropds, Davos, Switzerland, September 12–16, 2005.Google Scholar
14Adanacioglu, H. and Olgun, A. 2012. Evaluation of the efficiency of organic cotton farmers: A case study from turkey. Bulgarian Journal of Agricultural Science 18(3):418–428.Google Scholar
15Eyhorn, F. 2007. Organic Farming for Sustainable Livelihoods in Developing Countries? The Case of Cotton in India. vdf Hochschulverlag AG, Zurich.Google Scholar
16Truscott, L., Denes, H., Nagarajan, P., Tovignan, S., Lizarraga, A., and dos Santos, A. 2013. Farm and Fiber Report 2011–12. Textile Exchange, O'Donnell, Texas.Google Scholar
17Pepper, L.R., Truscott, L., Denes, H., Nagarajan, P., Tovignan, S., and Lizarraga, A. 2012. Farm and Fiber Report 2010–11. Textile Exchange, O'Donnell, Texas.Google Scholar
18Mwinuka, L. and Maro, F. 2013. Analysis of Incentives and Disincentives for Cotton in the United Republic of Tanzania. Technical notes series. FAO, Rome.Google Scholar
19Altieri, M.A. 2002. Agroecology: The science of natural resource management for poor farmers in marginal environments. Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment 93(1–3):1–24.Google Scholar
20Scialabba, N.E.-H. 2007. Organic Agriculture and Food Security. FAO, Rome.Google Scholar
21Willer, H., Yussefi-Menzler, M., and Sorensen, N. 2008. The World of Organic Agriculture: Statistics and Emerging Trends 2008. IFOAM and FiBL, Frick, Switzerland.Google Scholar
22Walaga, C. and Hauser, M. 2005. Achieving household food security through organic agriculture? Journal für Entwicklungspolitik XXI(3):65–84.Google Scholar
23Lyons, K. and Burch, D. 2007. Socio-economic effects of organic agriculture in Africa. In 16th IFOAM Organic World Congress, Modena, Italy, June 16–20, 2008.Google Scholar
24International Trade Centre. 2011. Cotton from Tanzania. ITC, Geneva.Google Scholar
25International Trade Centre. 2007. Organic Cotton: An Opportunity for Trade. Technical Paper. ITC, Geneva.Google Scholar
26UNEP-UNCTAD. 2008. Organic Agriculture and Food Security in Africa. UNEP-UNCTAD Capacity-building Task Force on Trade, Environment and Development, New York/Geneva.Google Scholar
27Sligh, M. and Christman, C. 2007. Issue paper: Organic agriculture and access to food. In International Conference on Organic Agriculture and Food Security, Rome, May 3–5, 2007.Google Scholar
28Padel, S. 2001. Conversion to organic farming: A typical example of the diffusion of an innovation? Sociologia Ruralis 41(1):40–61.Google Scholar
29Soltani, S., Azadi, H., Mahmoudi, H., and Witlox, F. 2013. Organic Agriculture in Iran: Farmers' Barriers to and Factors Influencing Adoption. Renewable Agriculture and Food Systems, FirstView, 1–9.Google Scholar
30Jawtusch, J., Oehen, B., and Niggli, U. 2011. Environmental, social, and economic impacts of sustainability certification in agricultural sector: The current state of empirical research. In Willer, H. and Kilcher, L. (eds). The World of Organic Agriculture. Statistics and Emerging Trends 2011. IFOAM and FiBL, Bonn, Germany/Frick, Switzerland.Google Scholar
31Ramesh, P., Singh, M., and Subba Rao, A. 2005. Organic farming: Its relevance to the Indian context. Current Science 88(4):561–568.Google Scholar
32Ferringo, S., Ratter, S.G., Ton, P., Vodouhe, D.S., Williamson, S., and Wilson, J. 2005. Organic Cotton: A New Development Path for African Smallholders? International Institute for Environment and Development, London.Google Scholar
33Panneerselvam, P., Halberg, N., Vaarst, M., and Hermansen, J.E. 2012. Indian farmers' experience with and perceptions of organic farming. Renewable Agriculture and Food Systems 27(2):157–169.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
34Baffes, J. 2002. Tanzania's Cotton Sector: Constraints and Challenges in a Global Environment. Africa Region Working Paper Series No. 42. Worldbank, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
35Busi, M., Lyaro, S., Matto, W., and Conrad, H. 2008. Cotton Market Development: Strategy for Central Tanzania. Proposal to RLDC Board. Rural Livelihood Development Company, Dodoma, Tanzania.Google Scholar
36National Bureau of Statistics. 2013. Tanzania in Figures 2012. NBS, Dar es Salaam.Google Scholar
37Mwangulumba, E.I. and Kalidushi, B. 2012. Tanzania cotton production and productivity. In Southern and Eastern African Cotton Forum Conference, Nyeri, Kenya.Google Scholar
38Kiishweko, O. 2011. A new initiative aims to tackle the unscrupulous agents and lack of credit that stop Tanzanian farmers making a good living. The Guardian, October 28, 2011, London.Google Scholar
39Dery, B.B., Otsyina, R., and Ng'atigwa, C. 1999. Indigenous Knowledge of Medicinal Trees and Setting Priorities for their Domestication in Shinyanga Region, Tanzania. International Centre for Research in Agroforestry, Nairobi, Kenya.Google Scholar
40Ecotextile News Magazine. 2009. Out of Africa: Special bioRe® Supplement. Mowbray Communications Ltd., West Yorkshire, UK.Google Scholar
41Bernard, H.R. 2002. Research Methods in Anthropology—Qualitative and Quantitative Approaches. 4th ed. AltaMira Press, Oxford, UK.Google Scholar
42Gläser, J. and Laudel, G. 2009. Experteninterviews und Qualitative Inhaltsanalyse: als Instrumente rekonstruierender Untersuchungen. 3rd ed. VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften, Wiesbaden, Germany.Google Scholar
43Glaser, B.G. and Strauss, A.L. 2009. The Discovery of Grounded Theory: Strategies for Qualitative Research. Rutgers, New Jersey, USA.Google Scholar
44Flick, U. 2009. An Introduction to Qualitative Research. 4th ed. SAGE Publications, London.Google Scholar
45Atteslander, P. 2003. Methoden der empirischen Sozialforschung. 10th ed. Walther de Gruyter Studienbuch, Berlin.Google Scholar
46Kruse, J., Bethmann, S., Niermann, D., and Schmieder, C. 2012. Qualitative Interviewforschung in und mit fremden Sprachen: Eine Einführung in Theorie und Praxis. Beltz Juventa, Weinheim, Germany.Google Scholar
47Kuckartz, U. 2007. Einführung in die computergestützte Analyse qualitativer Daten. 2nd ed. VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften, Wiesbaden, Germany.Google Scholar
48Lamnek, S. 2005. Qualitative Sozialforschung: Lehrbuch. Beltz PVU, Weinheim, Germany.Google Scholar
49Mapfumo, P., Adjei-Nsiah, S., Mtambanengwe, F., Chikowo, R., and Giller, K.E. 2013. Participatory action research (PAR) as an entry point for supporting climate change adaptation by smallholder farmers in Africa. Environmental Development 5:6–22.Google Scholar
50Ananda, J. and Herath, G. 2003. Soil erosion in developing countries: A socio-economic appraisal. Journal of Environmental Management 68(4):343–353.Google Scholar
51de Graaff, J., Amsalu, A., Bodnár, F., Kessler, A., Posthumus, H., and Tenge, A. 2008. Factors influencing adoption and continued use of long-term soil and water conservation measures in five developing countries. Applied Geography 28(4):271–280.Google Scholar
52Khandker, S.R. and Faruqee, R.R. 2003. The impact of farm credit in Pakistan. Agricultural Economics 28(3):197–213.Google Scholar
53Jabbar, M.A., Ehui, S.K., and Von Kaufmann, R. 2002. Supply and demand for livestock credit in Sub-Saharan Africa: Lessons for designing new credit schemes. World Development 30(6):1029–1042.Google Scholar
54Giné, X. 2011. Access to capital in rural Thailand: An estimated model of formal vs. informal credit. Journal of Development Economics 96(1):16–29.Google Scholar
55Baumüller, H. 2013. Mobile Technology Trends and their Potential for Agricultural Development. ZEF Working Paper Series. Center for Development Research, University of Bonn, Bonn.Google Scholar
56Subramanian, A. and Qaim, M. 2009. Village-wide effects of agricultural biotechnology: The case of Bt cotton in India. World Development 37(1):256–267.Google Scholar
57Hutmacher, R.B., Vargas, R.N., and Wright, S.D. 2006. Methods to Enable the Coexistence of Diverse Cotton Production Systems. Agricultural Biotechnology in California Series Publication 8191. Division of Agriculture and Natural Resources, University of California, Oakland, California.Google Scholar
58Frey, B.S. and Busenhart, I. 1995. Kooperatives Umwelthandeln. In Diekmann, A. and Franzen, A. (eds). Kooperatives Umwelthandeln: Modelle, Erfahrungen, Massnahmen. Rüegger Verlag, Chur/Zurich, Switzerland.Google Scholar
59Eyhorn, F., Ramakrishnan, M., and Mader, P. 2007. The viability of cotton-based organic farming systems in India. International Journal of Agricultural Sustainability 5(1):25–38.Google Scholar
60Bargawi, H.K. 2008. Cotton Price Fluctuations at the Ground-level: Assessing the Difference in Impact in Rural Tanzania. NCCR Working Paper No. 11. Swiss National Centre of Competence in Research, Berne, Switzerland.Google Scholar