Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-rdxmf Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-26T16:14:05.695Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The impact of livestock farm size on manure disposal modes: sell, give away or self-use

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  09 August 2022

Qian Li
Affiliation:
College of Economics, Beijing Technology and Business University, Beijing 100048, China
Xiaoyang Wang
Affiliation:
Department of Economics, University of New Mexico, Albuquerque NM87131, USA
Jingjing Wang
Affiliation:
Department of Economics, University of New Mexico, Albuquerque NM87131, USA
Yubin Wang*
Affiliation:
College of Economics and Management, China Agricultural University, Beijing 100083, China
*
Author for correspondence: Yubin Wang, E-mail: [email protected]

Abstract

Two prevailing trends in livestock production include increasing farm sizes and higher recycling rates of manure. Using beef cattle farms in China as a case study, we examine the impact of farm size on farmers' choice of manure disposal modes. Three forms of manure disposal modes are identified: (1) selling to neighboring farmers, (2) giving away to neighboring farmers and (3) self-use. Based on primary data from a field survey of beef cattle farmers in China, we estimate the choice of the above-mentioned three disposal modes using the constrained singular Seemingly Unrelated Regression (SUR) model. We find a significant and nonlinear impact of farm size on farmers' choice of manure disposal modes. Specifically, there is a significant and inversed U-shaped relationship between farm size and manure giving away, and a significant U-shaped relationship between farm size and manure selling or self-use. We additionally find several other factors that affect farmers' choice of manure disposal: the educational level of a farmer has a positive impact on manure selling; the better a farmer's physical health condition, the more likely the farmer self uses manure and less likely gives it away; land acquisition, as well as engagement in crop farming, increases manure self-use and reduces manure giving away and selling; the availability of manure treatment facilities reduces manure self-use; and the willingness of nearby crop growers to accept manure significantly decreases manure self-use and increases manure selling and giving away. Policy implications are also discussed.

Type
Research Paper
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s), 2022. Published by Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Adghim, M, Abdallah, M, Saad, S, Shanableh, A, Sartaj, M and Mansouri, AEE (2020) Comparative life cycle assessment of anaerobic co-digestion for dairy waste management in large-scale farms. Journal of Cleaner Production 256, 120320.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Aguirre-Villegas, HA and Larson, RA (2017) Evaluating greenhouse gas emissions from dairy manure management practices using survey data and life cycle tools. Journal of Cleaner Production 143, 169179.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
An, L, Wang, S and Jin, C (2018) The scale breeding in agriculture and no-point source pollution: based on the environment Kuznets curve. Ecological Economics 34, 176179.Google Scholar
Araya, GB (2020) Impact of Ethiopia's productive safety net program on manure use by rural households: evidence from Tigrai, Northern Ethiopia. Agricultural Economics 51, 725742.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Briukhanov, A, Vasilev, E, Kozlova, N and Shalavina, E (2021) Assessment of nitrogen flows at farm and regional level when developing the manure management system for large-scale livestock enterprises in North-West Russia. Sustainability 13, 6614.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Camilleri-Rumbau, MS, Briceno, K, Sotoft, LF, Christensen, KV, Roda-Serrat, MC, Errico, M and Norddahl, B (2021) Treatment of manure and digestate liquid fractions using membranes: opportunities and challenges. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health 18, 3107.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Chen, Q (2016) Advanced Econometrics and Stata Application, 2nd Edn. Beijing: Higher Education Press.Google Scholar
China's Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs (2021) China Animal Husbandry and Veterinary Yearbook 2021. Beijing: China Agricultural Press.Google Scholar
Cornick, J, Cox, TL and Gould, BW (1994) Fluid milk purchases: a multivariate Tobit analysis. American Journal of Agricultural Economics 76, 7482.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ding, C (2021) Land policy reform in China: assessment and prospects. Land Use Policy 20, 109120.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dos Reis, JC, Kamoi, MYT, Latorraca, D, Chen, RFF, Michetti, M, Wruck, FJ, Garrett, RD, Valentim, JF, Rodrigues, RAR and Rodrigues-Filho, S (2020) Assessing the economic viability of integrated crop-livestock systems in Mato Grosso, Brazil. Renewable Agriculture and Food Systems 35, 631642.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Du, Y, Liu, P, Ravenscroft, N and Su, S (2020) Changing community relations in southeast China: the role of Guanxi in rural environmental governance. Agriculture and Human Values 37, 833847.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Duvaleix-Tréguer, S and Gaigné, C (2016) On the nature and magnitude of cost economics in hog production. Agricultural Economics 47, 465476.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fang, D and Guo, Y (2021) Induced agricultural production organizations under the transition of rural land market: evidence from China. Agriculture 11, 881.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
General Office of the State Council (2020) Opinions of the general office of the state council on promoting the high quality development of animal husbandry. Available at http://www.gov.cn/zhengce/content/2020-09/27/content_5547612.htm?trs=1 (Accessed 10 April 2021).Google Scholar
Ghimire, S, Wang, J and Fleck, JR (2021) Inregrated crop-livestock systems for nitrogen management: a multi-scale spatial analysis. Animals 11, 100.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gowing, JW, Golicha, DD and Sanderson, RA (2020) Integrated crop-livestock farming offers a solution to soil fertility mining in semi-arid Kenya: evidence from Marsabit County. International Journal of Agricultural Sustainability 18, 113.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grossman, G and Krueger, AB (1995) Economic growth and the environment. Quarterly Journal of Economics 110, 353377.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hansen, BG (2019) CO2 – emission, costs and capacity of different manure management practices - results from an advisory project. Agricultural Systems 173, 325334.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Haupt, P and Oberhofer, W (2000) Estimation of Constrained Singular Seemingly Unrelated Regression Models. Econometric Society World Congress 2000 Contributed Papers 0398, Econometric Society.Google Scholar
Havet, A, Coquil, X, Fiorelli, JL, Gibon, A, Martel, G, Roche, B, Ryschawy, J, Schaller, N and Dedieu, B (2014) Review of livestock farmer adaptations to increase forages in crop rotations in western France. Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment 190, 120127.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
He, K, Zhang, J, Zeng, Y and Zhang, L (2016a) Households’ willingness to accept compensation for agricultural waste recycling: taking biogas production from livestock manure waste in Hubei, P. R. China as an example. Journal of Cleaner Production 131, 410420.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
He, K, Zhang, J, Feng, J, Hu, T and Zhang, L (2016b) The impact of social capital on farmers’ willingness to reuse agricultural waste for sustainable development. Sustainable Development 24, 101108.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hills, K, Yorgey, G and Cook, J (2021) Demand for bio-based fertilizers from manure in Washington state: a small-scale discrete choice experiment. Renewable Agriculture and Food Systems 36, 207214.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Huang, W, Qiao, F, Liu, H, Jia, X and Lohmar, B (2016) From backyard to commercial hog production: does it lead to a better or worse rural environment. China Agricultural Economic Review 8, 2236.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Huong, LTT, Takahashi, Y, Nomura, H, Son, CT, Kusudo, T and Yabe, M (2020) Manure management and pollution levels of contract and non-contract livestock farming in Vietnam. Science of the Total Environment 710, 136200.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Joshi, J and Wang, J (2018) Manure management coupled with bioenergy production: an environmental and economic assessment of large dairies in New Mexico. Energy Economics 74, 197207.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kong, F, Wang, Z and Pan, D (2016) Analysis on environmental pollution treatment methods of livestock and poultry large scale breeding. Jiangxi Social Science 37, 5965.Google Scholar
Kuhn, L, Balezentis, T, Hou, L and Wang, D (2020) Technical and environmental efficiency of livestock farmers in China: a slacks-based DEA approach. China Economic Review 62, 101213.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Li, Q, Wang, J, Wang, X and Wang, Y (2020) The impact of alternative policies on livestock farmers’ willingness to recycle manure: evidence from central China. China Agricultural Economic Review 12, 583594.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Li, Q, Wagan, SA and Wang, Y (2021) An analysis on determinants of farmer's willingness for resource utilization of livestock manure. Waste Management 120, 708715.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Loyon, L (2017) Overview of manure treatment in France. Waste Management 61, 516520.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Makara, A, Kowalski, Z, Lelek, L and Kulczycka, J (2019) Comparative analyses of pig farming management systems using the life cycle assessment method. Journal of Cleaner Production 241, 118305.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mccann, L, Abdalla, C, Jenner, M and Massey, R (2005) Improved manure management and utilization: a systems approach. Renewable Agriculture and Food Systems 20, 127135.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mcroberts, KC, Nicholson, CF, Parsons, D, Nam, LV, Ba, NX, Ketterings, QM and Cherney, DJR (2018) Structure and impact of cattle manure trade in crop-livestock systems of Vietnam. Renewable Agriculture and Food Systems 33, 86101.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mkuhlani, S, Mupangwa, W, Macleod, N, Gwiriri, L, Nyagumbo, I, Manyawu, G and Chigede, N (2020) Crop-livestock integration in smallholder farming systems of Goromonzi and Murehwa, Zimbabwe. Renewable Agriculture and Food Systems 35, 249260.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
National Bureau of Statistics of China (2019) China Statistical Yearbook 2019. Beijing: China Statistics Press.Google Scholar
Pan, D (2016) The design of policy instruments towards sustainable livestock production in China: an application of the choice experiment method. Sustainability 8, 610628.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pan, D, Yang, J, Guo, Q, Lu, Q and Zhang, N (2019) Toward better environmental performance in hog production in China: is intensification the answer? Ecological Indicators 105, 347354.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pan, D, Tang, J, Zhang, L, He, M and Kung, CC (2021) The impact of farm scale and technology characteristics on the adoption of sustainable manure management technologies: evidence from hog production in China. Journal of Cleaner Production 280, 124340.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pexas, G, Mackenzie, S, Wallace, M and Kyriazakis, I (2020) Environmental impacts of housing conditions and manure management in European pig production systems through a life cycle perspective: a case study in Denmark. Journal of Cleaner Production 253, 120005.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Qiu, H, Mo, H, Bai, J, Cai, Y and Wang, J (2012) Treatment methods and influencing factors of livestock manure in rural China: an empirical analysis based on survey data from five provinces. China Rural Economy 28, 7887.Google Scholar
Ramírez-Islas, ME, Güereca, LP, Sosa-Rodriguez, FS and Cobos-Peralta, MA (2020) Environmental assessment of energy production from anaerobic digestion of pig manure at medium-scale using life cycle assessment. Waste Management 102, 8596.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rao, J and Zhang, YQ (2018) An analysis of pollution control and utilization of manure of pig raising farms of different scales and types in China: take LP county of Hebei province as an example. Issues in Agricultural Economy 39, 121130.Google Scholar
Sharara, MA, Runge, T, Larson, R and Primm, JG (2018) Techno-economic optimization of community-based manure processing. Agricultural Systems 161, 117123.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sharara, MA, Owusu-Twum, MY, Runge, TM and Larson, R (2020) Planning methodology for anaerobic digestion systems on animal production facilities under uncertainty. Waste Management 104, 262269.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Shu, C and Qiao, J (2019) Research on the development of integrated mode of planting and breeding in China to treat livestock manure. Chinese Journal of Animal Science 55, 146150.Google Scholar
Shu, C, Qiao, J and Geng, N (2017) The vertical relationship selection of livestock and poultry breeding waste recycling – based on the perspective of farmers in Beijing. Resource Science 39, 13381384.Google Scholar
Si, R, Pan, S, Yuan, Y, Lu, Q and Zhang, S (2019a) Assessing the impact of environmental regulation on livestock manure waste recycling: empirical evidence from households in China. Sustainability 11, 5737.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Si, R, Wang, M, Lu, Q and Zhang, S (2019b) Assessing impact of risk perception and environmental regulation on household carcass waste recycling behaviour in China. Waste Management Research 38, 528536.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Song, M, Wu, Y and Chen, L (2020) Does the land titling program promote rural housing land transfer in China? Evidence from household surveys in Hubei Province. Land Use Policy 97, 104701.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sorathiya, LM, Fulsoundar, AB, Tyagi, KK, Patel, MD and Singh, RR (2014) Eco-friendly and modern methods of livestock waste recycling for enhancing farm profitability. International Journal of Recycling of Organic Waste in Agriculture 3, 50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Survey Office of the National Bureau of Statistics in Henan (2017) Henan Survey Yearbook 2017. Beijing: China Statistics Press.Google Scholar
Tan, M, Hou, Y, Zhang, L, Shi, S, Long, W, Ma, Y, Zhang, T, Li, F and Oenema, O (2020) Operational costs and neglect of end-users are the main barriers to improving manure treatment in intensive livestock farms. Journal of Cleaner Production 289, 125149.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Triguero, A, Alvarez-Aledo, C and Cuerva, MC (2016) Factors influencing willingness to accept different waste management policies: empirical evidence from the European Union. Journal of Cleaner Production 138, 3846.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vries, M, Middelaar, CE and Boer, IJM (2015) Comparing environmental impact of beef production systems: a review of life cycle assessments. Livestock Science 178, 279288.10.1016/j.livsci.2015.06.020CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wang, S, Tian, X and Zhang, X (2019) The influence of hog industry agglomeration on environmental efficiency. Research of Agricultural Modernization 40, 459469.Google Scholar
Wang, Y, Ghimire, S, Wang, J, Dong, R and Li, Q (2021a) Alternative management systems of beef cattle manure for reducing nitrogen loadings: a case-study approach. Animals 11, 574.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wang, Y, Wang, J, Wang, X and Li, Q (2021b) Does policy cognition affect livestock farmers’ investment in manure recycling facilities? Evidence from China. Science of the Total Environment 795, 148836.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wang, Y, Zhang, Y, Li, J, Lin, J, Zhang, N and Cao, W (2021c) Biogas energy generated from livestock manure in China: current situation and future trends. Journal of Environmental Management 297, 113324.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Welsh, R, Webb, ME, Grimberg, S and Rogers, S (2019) Measuring the results of a workshop on installing anaerobic digesters on smaller livestock farms. Renewable Agriculture and Food Systems 34, 487491.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Xu, Z, Zhang, J and Qiu, H (2016) Effects of reputation demands on farmers’ pro-environmental behavior: taking the farmers’ disposal behavior of poultry manure as an example. China Population, Resources and Environment 26, 4452.Google Scholar
Yalcinkaya, S (2020) A spatial modeling approach for siting, sizing and economic assessment of centralized biogas plants in organic waste management. Journal of Cleaner Production 255, 120040.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yan, J, Yang, Y and Xia, F (2021) Subjective land ownership and the endowment effect in land markets: a case study of the farmland “three rights sepration” reform in China. Land Use Policy 101, 105137.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yang, Y, Ni, J, Zhu, W and Xie, G (2019) Life cycle assessment of large-scale compressed bio-natural gas production in China: a case study on manure co-digestion with corn stover. Energies 12, 429.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yao, W (2015) Environmental effect from the evolution of pig breeding industrial agglomeration: a case study of Jiaxing municipal district, Zhejiang. Scientia Geographica Sinica 35, 11401147.Google Scholar
Yao, W and Zhang, L (2021) An empirical research on pig farmers’ adoption behavior of waste disposal. Natural Environment & Pollution Technology 20, 491498.Google Scholar
Zhou, L (2011) Industrial agglomeration, environmental regulation and half point source pollution of livestock and poultry breeding. China Rural Economy 27, 6073.Google Scholar
Zhuang, M, Shan, N, Wang, Y, Caro, D, Fleming, RM and Wang, L (2020) Different characteristics of greenhouse gases and ammonia emissions from conventional stored dairy cattle and swine manure in China. Science of the Total Environment 722, 137693.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
ZuBair, M, Wang, S, Zhang, P, Ye, J, Liang, J, Nabi, M, Zhou, Z, Tao, X, Chen, N, Sun, K, Xiao, J and Cai, Y (2020) Biological nutrient removal and recovery from solid and liquid livestock manure: recent advance and perspective. Bioresource Technology 301, 122823.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Supplementary material: File

Li et al. supplementary material

Appendix A

Download Li et al. supplementary material(File)
File 50.2 KB