Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-dk4vv Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-23T08:14:32.997Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

How cover crop residue management and herbicide rate affect weed management and yield of tomato (Solanum lycopersicon L.) crop

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 February 2018

Alireza Safahani Langeroodi ,
Emanuele Radicetti  and
Enio Campiglia
Alireza Safahani Langeroodi
Affiliation:
Department of Agronomy, Payame Noor University, Tehran, I.R., Iran
Emanuele Radicetti*
Affiliation:
Department of Agricultural and Forestry Sciences (DAFNE), University of Tuscia, Via San Camillo de Lellis snc, Viterbo, Italy
Enio Campiglia
Affiliation:
Department of Agricultural and Forestry Sciences (DAFNE), University of Tuscia, Via San Camillo de Lellis snc, Viterbo, Italy
*
Author for correspondence: Emanuele Radicetti, E-mail: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

In the conventional cropping systems, increased costs and resource pollution are attributed to the intensive use of chemical inputs. The adoption of cover crops could be a part of a suitable strategy for improving the sustainability of the agro-ecosystems due to their ability to affect nutrient and weed management. A 2-yr field experiments were conducted in Gorgan, North of Iran, with the aim of assessing the effect of cover crop residue management and herbicide rates on weed management and the yield of tomato crop. The treatments consisted in: (a) three winter soil management: two cover crops [annual medic (Medicago scutellata L.) and barley (Hordeum vulgare L.)] and no covered soil; (b) two soil tillage (no-tillage, where cover crop residues were left in strips on the soil surface, and conventional tillage, where cover crop residues were green manured at 30 cm of soil depth); and (c) three pre-emergence herbicide rates (no-herbicide application, half rate recommended or full rate recommended ). Cover crops were sown in early September and mechanically suppressed in March about 2 weeks before tomato transplanting. At cover crop suppression, annual medic showed the highest aboveground biomass [569 g m−2 of dry matter (DM)], while barley showed the lowest weed content (32 g m−2 of DM). At tomato harvesting, weed density and aboveground biomass ranged from 6.9 to 61.5 plants m−2 and from 33.6 and 1157.0 g m−2 of DM, respectively. Cover crop residues placed on soil surface suppressed weeds more effectively than incorporated residues, especially in barley, mainly due to the physical barrier of residues which reduced the stimulation of weed germination and establishment. As expected, herbicide rate decreased both weed density and biomass, even if the adoption of annual medic and barley cover crops before the tomato cultivation could allow a possible reduction of herbicide rate while maintaining similar fruit yield. Tomato yield was higher in annual medic than barley and no cover regardless of tillage management (on average 62.3, 51.8 and 50.1 t ha−1 of fresh matter, respectively) probably due to an abundant availability of soil nitrogen throughout the tomato cultivation. This was confirmed by high and constant values of tomato N status grown in annual medic and evaluated using SPAD chlorophyll meter. Although further research of cover crop residue management is required to obtain a better understanding on herbicide rate reduction, these preliminary results could be extended to other vegetable crops which have similar requirements of tomato.

Keywords

Annual medicbarleyintegrated weed managementmulchno tillage
Type
Research Paper
Information
Renewable Agriculture and Food Systems , Volume 34 , Issue 6 , December 2019 , pp. 492 - 500
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2018 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Barberi, P (2002) Weed management in organic agriculture: Are we addressing the right issues? Weed Research 42, 177–193.Google Scholar
Bezuidenhout, SR, Reinhardt, CF and Whitwell, MI (2012) Cover crops of oat, stooling rye and three annual ryegrass cultivars influence maize and Cyperus esculentus growth. Weed Research 52, 153–160.Google Scholar
Burgos, NR and Talbert, RE (1996) Weed control and sweet corn (Zea mays var. Rugosa) response in a no-till system with cover crops. Weed Science 44, 355–361.Google Scholar
Campiglia, E, Caporali, F, Radicetti, E and Mancinelli, R (2010) Hairy vetch (Vicia villosa Roth.) cover crop residue management for improving weed control and yield in no-tillage tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum Mill.) production. European Journal of Agronomy 33, 94–102.Google Scholar
Campiglia, E, Radicetti, E, Brunetti, P and Mancinelli, R (2014) Do cover crop species and residue management play a leading role in pepper productivity? Scientia Horticulturae 26, 166, 97–104.Google Scholar
Campiglia, E, Radicetti, E and Mancinelli, R (2015) Cover crops and mulches influence weed management and weed flora composition in strip-tilled tomato (Solanum lycopersicum). Weed Research 55, 416–425.Google Scholar
Chauhan, BS, Singh, RG and Mahajan, G (2012) Ecology and management of weeds under conservation agriculture: A review. Crop Protection 38, 57–65.Google Scholar
Dorry, MA (2008) Forage production of eight annual medic cultivars under rainfed conditions of Golestan province. Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology 10, 185–190.Google Scholar
FAO (Food and Agriculture Organization) (2012) Available at http://www.fao.org/ag/ca/doc/FLYER_Conservation_Agriculture.pdf (Accessed 18 May 2017).Google Scholar
Garnier, E and Navas, ML (2012) A trait-based approach to comparative functional plant ecology: Concepts, methods and applications for agroecology. A review. Agronomy for Sustainable Development 32, 365–399.Google Scholar
Gavazzi, C, Schulz, M, Marocco, A and Tabaglio, V (2010) Sustainable weed control by allelochemicals from rye cover crops: From the greenhouse to field evidence. Allelopathy Journal 25, 259–274.Google Scholar
Ghersa, CM and Martinez-Ghersa, MA (2000) Ecological correlates of weed seed size and persistence in the soil under different tilling systems: Implications for weed management. Field Crops Research 67, 141–148.10.1016/S0378-4290(00)00089-7Google Scholar
Grace, JB (1995) On the measurement of plant competition intensity. Ecology 76, 305–308.Google Scholar
Hoffman, ML, Regnier, EE and Cardina, J (1993) Weed and corn (Zea mays) responses to a hairy vetch (Vicia villosa) cover crop. Weed Technology 7, 594–599.Google Scholar
Kalinova, J (2010). Allelopathy and organic farming. In Lichtfouse, E (ed.). Sociology, Organic Farming, Climate Change and Soil Science. Sustainable Agriculture Reviews 3. Dordrecth, the Netherlands: Springer, pp. 379–418.10.1007/978-90-481-3333-8_14Google Scholar
Kenkel, NC, Derksen, DA, Thomas, AG and Watson, PR (2002) Multivariate analysis in weed science research. Weed Science 50, 281–292.Google Scholar
Kruidhof, HM, Bastiaans, L and Kropff, MJ (2008) Cover crop residue management for optimizing weed control. Plant and Soil 318, 169–184.Google Scholar
Lonsbary, SK, O'Sullivan, J and Swanton, CJ (2004) Reduced tillage alternatives for machine-harvested cucumbers. Hortscience 39, 991–995.Google Scholar
Moonen, AC and Barberi, P (2006) An ecological approach to study the physical and chemical effects of rye cover crop residues on Amaranthus retroflexus, Echinochloa crus-galli and maize. Annals of Applied Biology 148, 73–89.Google Scholar
Möller, K and Reents, HJ (2009) Effects of various cover crops after peas on nitrate leaching and nitrogen supply to succeeding winter wheat or potato crops. Journal of Plant Nutrition and Soil Science 172, 277–287.Google Scholar
Mortensen, DA, Bastiaans, L and Sattin, M (2000) The role of ecology in the development of weed management systems: An outlook. Weed Research 40, 49–62.10.1046/j.1365-3180.2000.00174.xGoogle Scholar
Powels, SB (2008) Evolved glyphosate-resistant weeds around the word: Lesson to be 6 learnt. Pest Management Science 64, 758–770.Google Scholar
Putnam, AR, DeFrank, J and Barnes, JP (1983) Exploitation of allelopathy for weed control in annual and perennial cropping systems. Journal of Chemical Ecology 9, 1001–1010.Google Scholar
Radicetti, E, Mancinelli, R and Campiglia, E (2013) Influence of winter cover crop residue management on weeds and yield in pepper (Capsicum annuum L.) in a Mediterranean environment. Crop Protection 52, 64–71.Google Scholar
Radicetti, E, Mancinelli, R, Moscetti, R and Campiglia, E (2016) Management of winter cover crop residues under different tillage conditions affects nitrogen utilization efficiency and yield of eggplant (Solanum melanogena L.) in Mediterranean environment. Soil & Tillage Research 155, 329–338.Google Scholar
Radicetti, E, Campiglia, E, Marucci, A and Mancinelli, R (2017) How winter cover crops and tillage intensities affect nitrogen availability in eggplant. Nutrient Cycling in Agroecosystems 108, 177–194.Google Scholar
Rosecrance, RC, McCarthy, GW, Shelton, DR and Teasdale, JR (2000) Denitrification and N mineralization from hairy vetch (Vicia villosa Roth.) and Rye (Secale cereal L.) cover crop monocultures and biculture. Plant and Soil 227, 283–290.Google Scholar
SAS (1996). SAS User's Guide: Statistics. Cary, NC: SAS Institute.Google Scholar
Shrestha, A, Knezevic, SZ, Roy, RC, Ball-Coelho, BR and Swanton, CJ (2002) Effect of tillage, cover crop and crop rotation on the composition of weed flora in a sandy soil. Weed Research 42, 76–87.10.1046/j.1365-3180.2002.00264.xGoogle Scholar
Teasdale, JR (1996) Contribution of cover crops to weed management in sustainable agricultural systems. Journal of Production Agriculture 9, 475–479.Google Scholar
Teasdale, JR and Mohler, CI (1993) Light transmittance, soil temperature, and soil 24 moisture under residue of hairy vetch and rye. Agronomy Journal 85, 673–680.Google Scholar
Trichard, A, Alignier, A, Chauvel, B and Petit, S (2013) Identification of weed community traits response to conservation agriculture. Agriculture Ecosystem and Environment 179, 179–186.Google Scholar
Wagger, MG (1989) Time of dissection effects on plant composition and subsequent nitrogen release from several winter annual cover crops. Agronomy Journal 81, 236–241.Google Scholar
Williams, II, Mortensen, MM and Doran, DAJW (1998) Assessment of weed and crop fitness in cover crop residues for integrated weed management. Weed Science 46, 595–603.10.1017/S0043174500091153Google Scholar
Wittwer, RA, Dorn, B, Jossi, W and van der Heijden, MGA (2017) Cover crops support ecological intensification of arable cropping systems. Scientific Reports 7, 41911.Google Scholar