Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-t5tsf Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-19T15:37:58.122Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Horticultural auction markets: Linking small farms with consumer demand

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 February 2007

Laura Tourte  and
Mark Gaskell
Laura Tourte*
Affiliation:
University of California Cooperative Extension, Santa Cruz County, 1432 Freedom Blvd, Watsonville, CA 95076, USA.
Mark Gaskell
Affiliation:
University of California Cooperative Extension, Santa Barbara County, 624 West Foster Road, Suite A, Santa Maria CA, 93455, USA.
*
*Corresponding author: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Small farmers face more challenges in farming than ever before. Examples include competition and consolidation within the global marketplace and low and unpredictable product prices. Evaluation and development of alternative market outlets is one means of helping small farms to become more economically sustainable. From 2000 to 2020 the US population is expected to increase by between 50 and 80 million people. A concomitant increase in consumer demand for local, fresh, specialty and organic produce is also projected. Alternative market outlets that skillfully link local or regional small-scale production with evolving consumer demand are currently lacking. We hypothesize that there is considerable potential for helping small farmers sustain or improve their economic position and fulfill consumer needs by exploiting these connections in the marketplace. This investigation draws from the literature to ascertain whether horticultural auction markets may provide such a link for small farms. The paper characterizes horticultural auction markets using current and historical examples, discusses marketplace changes with special reference to consumer demand, and appraises the value of this market model with respect to the dual challenge of meeting both farmers' and consumers' needs. Current marketplace research and characteristics suggest measured optimism for horticultural auction markets to provide a small farm–consumer link.

Keywords

alternative marketsconsumer demandcooperativeseconomic sustainabilityhorticultural marketsmarket managementproduce auctionssmall farms
Type
Research Article
Information
Renewable Agriculture and Food Systems , Volume 19 , Issue 3 , September 2004 , pp. 129 - 134
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2004

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1Dimitri, C. and Richman, N. 2000. Organic food markets in transition. Policy Study Report Number 14. Henry, A. Wallace Center for Agricultural and Environmental Policy. Winrock International, Greenbelt, MD.Google Scholar
2Cook, R.L. 2002. The, U.S. fresh produce industry: an industry in transition. In Kader, A.A. (ed.). Postharvest Technology of Horticultural Crops. 3rd ed. Publication Number 3311. University of California Division of Agriculture and Natural Resources, Oakland, CA. p 5–30.Google Scholar
3Davis, D. and Stewart, H. 2002. Changing consumer demands create opportunities for U.S. food system. United States Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service. Food Review 25(1): 19–23.Google Scholar
4Dimitri, C. and Greene, C. 2002. Recent growth patterns in the U.S. organic foods market. Agriculture Information Bulletin Number 777. United States Department of Agriculture. Economic Research Service, Market and Trade Economics Division and Resource Economics Division, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
5Martinez, S. and Davis, D. 2002. Farm business practices coordinate production with consumer preferences. United States Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service. Food Review 25(1): 33–37.Google Scholar
6Ballenger, N. and Blaylock, J. 2003. Consumer-driven agriculture: changing, U.S. demographics influence eating habits. United States Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service. Amber Waves 1(2): 28–33.Google Scholar
7Sexton, R.J., Richards, T.J. and Patterson, P.M. 2002. Retail consolidation and produce buying practices: a summary of the evidence and potential industry and policy solutions. Giannini Foundation Monograph Number 45. University of California Division of Agriculture and Natural Resources. California Agriculture Experiment Station, Oakland, CA.Google Scholar
8Meulenberg, M.T.G. 1989. Horticultural auctions in the Netherlands: a transition from price discovery institution to marketing institution. Journal of International Food and Agribusiness Marketing 1(3/4): 139–165.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
9Barendse, H.F.J. 1988. The conditions for a successful introduction of the auction system in horticulture. Acta Horticulturae 223: 17–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
10Contini, A. and Paz, A. 1982. Auction selling. Ontario Ministry of Agriculture, Food and Rural Affairs Fact Sheet. Ontario, Canada.Google Scholar
11Kee, E. 2000. Where buyer and seller meet: sixty years of the Laurel auction market: 1940 to 2000. University of Delaware and The Southern Delaware Truck Growers Association, Inc., Georgetown, DE.Google Scholar
12Blaine, T.W., James, R.E. and Hames, B.H. 1997. The effects of a wholesale fruit and vegetable auction on produce marketing and distribution. Journal of Food Distribution Research 1: 62–65.Google Scholar
13Ernst, M. 2000. Fairview produce auction, Inc. Profiles in Agricultural Entrepreneurship. University of Kentucky Cooperative Extension Service, Lexington, KY.Google Scholar
14Tubene, S. and Hanson, J. 2002. The wholesale produce auction: an alternative marketing strategy for small farms. American Journal of Alternative Agriculture 17(1): 1–6.Google Scholar
15Campbell, D. 1993. A bloomin' business: how low can you go? That's the big question at a Dutch auction. Farmer Cooperatives Dec:4–6.Google Scholar
16Gungor, G. and Gungor, H. 2000. The general structure of cut flowers marketing in Turkey and the role of auctions in marketing functions. XIV International Symposium on Horticultural Economics. Acta Horticulturae 536: 599–606.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
17Kobayashi, K. and Vining, G. 1995. Comparison of wholesale vegetable prices in Japan—auction market—and Australia—negotiating market. Acta Horticulturae 340: 355–362.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
18Van Heck, E. and Ribbers, P.M. 1997. Experiences with electronic auctions in the Dutch flower industry. Electronic Markets 7(4): 29–34. http://www.electronicmarkets.org/netacademy/publicatons.nsf/all_pk/716 (verified 18 April 2004).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
19Echikson, W. 2001. A flower crusade that's going nowhere. Business Week Online International. http://www.businessweek.com/magazine/content/01_17/b3729155.htm#top (verified 18 April 2004).Google Scholar
20Laffont, J., Monier-Dilhan, S., and Ossard, H. 1995. Price analysis of a vegetable auction market. XII International Symposium on Horticultural Economics. Acta Horticulturae 340: 375–380.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
21Dos Santos, J.C., Nayga, R.M. Jr, Govindasamy, R., and Thatch, D.W. 1996. Sales and price trends of the ten most prominent commodities at the Vineland produce Auction (1994 season). P-02264–1–96. New Jersey Agricultural Experiment Station. Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey, New Brunswick, NJ.Google Scholar
22Karg, P.J. 2004. Wisconsin co-op offers fresh approach to produce auctions. http://www.rurdev.usda.gov/rbs/pub/jan04/fresh.html (verified 18 April 2004).Google Scholar
23Epperson, J.E. and Estes, E.A. 1999. Fruit and vegetable supply-chain management, innovations, and competitiveness: cooperative regional research project S-222. Journal of Food Distribution November: 38–.Google Scholar
24Park, K.S. and McLaughlin, E.W. 2000. The U.S. wholesale produce industry: structure, operations and competition. XXV International Horticultural Congress Proceedings Part 14. Acta Horticulturae 514: 197–204.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
25Blisard, N., Biing-Hwan, L., Cromartie, J. and Ballenger, N. 2002. America's changing appetite: food consumption and spending to 2020. United States Department of Agriculture. Economic Research Service. Food Review 25(1): 2–9.Google Scholar
26United States Department of Agriculture 1998. A time to act: a report of the USDA national commission on small farms. Miscellaneous Publication 1545. United States Department of Agriculture, Washington, DC.Google Scholar