Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-r5fsc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-23T05:46:37.307Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Can eco-labels reduce carbon emissions? Market-wide analysis of carbon labeling and locally grown fresh apples

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 May 2015

Yuko Onozaka ,
Wenjing Hu  and
Dawn D. Thilmany
Yuko Onozaka
Affiliation:
UiS Business School, University of Stavanger, Norway.
Wenjing Hu
Affiliation:
Department of Agricultural and Resource Economics, Colorado State University, USA.
Dawn D. Thilmany*
Affiliation:
Colorado State University, Colorado, USA.
*
*Corresponding author:[email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Despite the heightened efforts to implement eco-labeling schemes as the market-based vehicle for improving environmental quality, the overall effectiveness of eco-labels are still uncertain due to complex and sometimes unexpected market responses. In this paper, we assess the overall changes in carbon emissions resulting from two types of labeling on fresh apples, carbon labels and location designation labels (e.g., locally grown), both of which can have mixed implications for carbon emissions due to fluctuating supply chain factors. We employ an equilibrium displacement model that integrates existing estimates of differences across production systems, and our own estimates of consumer responses to labels in order to simulate the changes in prices, trade flows and estimate carbon impacts across several scenarios in the US fresh apple market. We find that both labels ultimately affect market outcomes and overall carbon emissions. With location designation labels, consumers’ preference for local products leads to a net decrease in carbon emissions during the local growing season, while the interaction of various market dynamics results in a subsequent net increase in carbon emissions during the local off-season. The interaction of a carbon label with the location label lowers the overall attractiveness of products and reduces the quantity demanded, and thus, reduces the carbon emissions in both seasons. Overall, providing the location designation label increases annual carbon emissions, whereas providing both the location designation and carbon labeling decreases annual emissions. In short, the dynamics and interdependency of labeling strategies are important to consider in the context of eco-labeling.

Keywords

carbon footprintfood labelingequilibrium displacement welfare analysislocal food systems
Type
Research Papers
Information
Renewable Agriculture and Food Systems , Volume 31 , Issue 2 , April 2016 , pp. 122 - 138
Check for updates
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2015 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Alston, J.M., Norton, G.W., and Pardey, P.G. 1995. Science Under Scarcity: Principles and Practice for Agricultural Research Evaluation and Priority Setting, Food Systems and Agrarian Change Series. Cornell University Press in Cooperation with the International Service for National Agricultural Research, Ithaca and London.Google Scholar
Armington, P.S. 1969. A theory of demand for products distinguished by place of production. International Monetary Fund Staff Papers 16(1):159–178.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blanke, M.M. and Burdick, B. 2005. Food (miles) for thought—energy balance for locally-grown versus imported apple fruit. Environmental Science and Pollution Research 12:125–127.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Carpio, C.E. and Isengildina-Massa, O. 2009. Consumer willingness to pay for locally grown products: The case of South Carolina. Agribusiness 25(3):412–426.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Colorado Market Maker. 2012. Available at Web site https://co.foodmarketmaker.com/ (accessed January 2012).Google Scholar
Darby, K., Batte, M.T., Ernst, S., and Roe, B. 2008. Decomposing local: A conjoint analysis of locally produced foods. American Journal of Agricultural Economics 90(2):476–486.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dentoni, D., Tonsor, G.T., Calantone, R.J., and Peterson, H.C. 2009. The direct and indirect effects of ‘locally grown’ on consumers’ attitudes towards agri-food products. Agricultural and Resource Economics Review 38(3):384–396.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Duram, L. and Oberholtzer, L. 2010. A geographic approach to place and natural resource use in local food systems. Renewable Agriculture and Food Systems 25:99–108.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Godin, R., Haley, S., Johnson, J., Larsen, H., Pearson, C., Pokharel, R., and Schultz, K. 2008. Western Colorado Research Center 2007 Annual Report. Agricultural Experiment Station, Colorado State University, Hotchkiss CO.Google Scholar
Grebitus, C., Lusk, J.L., and Nayga, R.M. 2013. Effect of distance of transportation on willingness to pay for food. Ecological Economics 88:67–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hensher, D.A. and Greene, W.H. 2003. The mixed logit model: The state of practice. Transportation 30(2):133–176.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hu, W. 2012. Evaluating structural and performance dynamics of a differentiated U.S. apple industry. PhD dissertation submitted to Colorado State University. Available at Web site http://digitool.library.colostate.edu///exlibris/dtl/d3_1/apache_media/L2V4bGlicmlzL2R0bC9kM18xL2FwYWNoZV9tZWRpYS8xNzE1MzE=.pdf Google Scholar
Ibanez, L. and Grolleau, G. 2008. Can ecolabeling schemes preserve the environment? Environmental and Resource Economics 40(2):233–249.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
IEA. 2011. CO2 Emissions from Fuel Combustion Highlights 2011 Edition. International Energy Agency. Available at Web site http://www.iea.org/media/statistics/co2highlights.pdf (verified May 7, 2015).Google Scholar
Jacobsen, G.D., Kotchen, M.J., and Vandenbergh, M.P. 2010. The behavioral response to voluntary provision of an environmental public good: Evidence from residential electricity demand. National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc., NBER Working Papers: 16608.Google Scholar
Kotchen, M.J. 2005. Impure public goods and the comparative statics of environmentally friendly consumption. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 49(2):281–300.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Langpap, C. and Wu, J. 2011. Potential environmental impacts of increased reliance on corn-based bioenergy. Environmental and Resource Economics 49(2):147–171.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Martinez, S., Hand, M., Pra, M.D., Pollack, S., Ralston, K., Smith, T., Vogel, S., Clark, S., Lohr, L., Low, S., and Newman, C. 2010. Local food systems: concepts, impacts, and issues, Economic Research Report number 97. Economic Research Service, U.S. Department of Agriculture, Washington DC.Google Scholar
Mila i Canals, L., Cowell, S.J., Sim, S., and Basson, L. 2007. Comparing domestic versus imported apples: A focus on energy use. Environmental Science and Pollution Research 14(5):338–344.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mitcham, E.J., Crisosto, C.H., and Kader, A.A. 2011. Apple, Gala: Recommendations for Maintaining Postharvest Quality. Available at Web site http://postharvest.ucdavis.edu/PFfruits/AppleGala/ (accessed March 2013).Google Scholar
Morgan, D., Renzi, S., Cook, R., and Radenovic, H. 2007. Seattle Food System Enhancement Project: Green House Gas Emissions Study. Available at Web site http://faculty.washington.edu/bborn/Final_GHG_Report.pdf (accessed March 2013).Google Scholar
National Agricultural Statistics Service, United States Department of Agriculture. 2008. Noncitrus fruits and nuts 2008 summary. USDA, Washington, DC. Available at Web site http://usda.mannlib.cornell.edu/usda/nass/NoncFruiNu/2000s/2009/NoncFruiNu-07-08-2009.pdf (accessed April 2011).Google Scholar
Onozaka, Y. and McFadden, D.T. 2011. Does local labeling complement or compete with other sustainable labels? A conjoint analysis of direct and joint values for fresh produce claims. American Journal of Agricultural Economics 93(3):693–706.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Onozaka, Y., Nurse, G., and McFadden, D.T. 2011. Defining sustainable food market segments: Do motivations and values vary by shopping locale? American Journal of Agricultural Economics 93(2):583–589.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Plawecki, R., Pirog, R., Montri, A., and Hamm, M.W. 2014.Comparative carbon footprint assessment of winter lettuce production in two climatic zones for Midwestern market. Renewable Agriculture and Food Systems 29(4):310–318.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Saunders, C., Barber, A., and Taylor, G. 2006. Food miles—comparative energy/emissions: Performance of New Zealand's agriculture industry. Research Report Number 285. Lincoln University. Available at Web site http://www.lincoln.ac.nz/documents/2328_rr285_s13389.pdf (accessed March 2013).Google Scholar
Schaefer, F. and Blanke, M. 2014. Opportunities and challenges of carbon footprint, climate or CO2 labelling for horticultural products. Erwerbsobstbau 56(2):73–80.Google Scholar
Sim, S., Barry, M., Clift, R., and Cowell, S.J. 2007. The relative importance of transport in determining an appropriate sustainability strategy for food sourcing. International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment 12(6):422–431.Google Scholar
Smith, A., Watkiss, P., Tweddle, G., McKinnon, P.A., Browne, P.M., Hunt, A., Treleven, C., Nash, P.C., and Cross, S. 2005. The Validity of Food Miles as an Indicator of Sustainable Development. UK DEFRA, London.Google Scholar
Teisl, M.F., Roe, B., and Hicks, R.L. 2002. Can eco-labels tune a market? Evidence from dolphin-safe labeling. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 43(3):339–359.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
The Economist. 2011. Carbon footprint: following the footprint. Technology Quarterly Q2 (June 2). Available at Web site http://www.economist.com/node/18750670 (verified May 7, 2015).Google Scholar
Train, K.E. 2003. Discrete Choice Methods with Simulation. Cambridge University Press, New York.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
U.S. Apple Association. 2011. Market News. Production and Utilization Analysis. Available at Web site http://usapple.org/ (accessed January 2012).Google Scholar
Vanclay, J.K. 2011. Customer response to carbon labelling of groceries. Journal of Consumer Policy 34(1):153–160.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vandenbergh, M.P., Dietz, T., and Stern, P.C. 2011. Time to try carbon labelling. Nature Climate Change 1:73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weber, C.L. and Matthews, H.S. 2008. Food-miles and the relative climate impacts of food choices in the United States. Environmental Science & Technology 42(10):3508–3513.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed