Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-l7hp2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-22T03:56:32.179Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Theist concept-nominalism and the regress problem

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 July 2018

TIEN-CHUN LO
TIEN-CHUN LO*
Affiliation:
Faculty of Theology and Religion, University of Oxford, OX2 6GG, UK
*
e-mail: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Leftow's theist concept-nominalism is proposed as a theory of properties which is compatible with God's aseity and sovereignty. In this article, I focus on the question of whether theist concept-nominalism is successful in answering a notorious problem in the literature on properties, i.e. the regress problem. In the second section, I summarize TCN by illustrating what its ontology is and how its theory works. In the third section, the regress problem is recast within the framework of TCN. In the fourth section, I present my solution to this problem. In the final section, several objections to my solution are addressed and replied.

Type
Articles from the 2018 Postgraduate Essay Prize
Information
Religious Studies , Volume 55 , Issue 2 , June 2019 , pp. 199 - 213
Check for updates
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2018 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Armstrong, D. M. (1978) Universals and Scientific Realism: Nominalism and Realism (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).Google Scholar
Armstrong, D. M. (1997) A World of States of Affairs (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).Google Scholar
Armstrong, D. M. (2004) Truth and Truthmakers (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).Google Scholar
Bergmann, Michael & Brower, Jeffrey (2006) ‘A theistic argument against Platonism (and in support of truthmakers and divine simplicity)’, in Zimmerman, Dean (ed.) Oxford Studies in Metaphysics, II (Oxford: Oxford University Press), 357–386.Google Scholar
Bigelow, John (1988) The Reality of Numbers: A Physicalist‘s Theory of Mathematics (Oxford: Oxford University Press).Google Scholar
Brower, Jeffrey (2008) ‘Making sense of divine simplicity’, Faith and Philosophy, 25, 3–30.Google Scholar
Craig, William Lane (2017) God and Abstract Objects (Cham: Springer International Publishing).Google Scholar
Fine, Kit (2012) ‘A guide to grounding’, in Correia, Fabrice & Schnieder, Benjamin (eds) Metaphysical Grounding: Understanding the Structure of Reality (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press), 37–80.Google Scholar
Leftow, Brian (2006) ‘God and the problem of universals’, in Zimmerman, Dean (ed.) Oxford Studies in Metaphysics, II (Oxford: Oxford University Press), 325–356.Google Scholar
Leftow, Brian (2011) ‘One step toward God’, Royal Institute of Philosophy Supplement, 68, 67–104.Google Scholar
Leftow, Brian (2012) God and Necessity (Oxford: Oxford University Press).Google Scholar
Lewis, David (1983) ‘New work for a theory of universals’, Australasian Journal of Philosophy, 61, 343–377.Google Scholar
Martin, C. B. (1996) ‘How it is: entities, absences and voids’, Australasian Journal of Philosophy, 74, 57–65.Google Scholar
Merricks, Trenton (2007) Truth and Ontology (Oxford: Oxford University Press).Google Scholar
Morris, Thomas & Menzel, Christopher (1986) ‘Absolute creation’, American Philosophy Quarterly, 23, 353–362.Google Scholar
Pearce, Kenneth L. (2017) ‘Foundational grounding and the argument from contingency’, in Kvanvig, Jonathan L. (ed.) Oxford Studies in Philosophy of Religion, VIII (Oxford: Oxford University Press), 245–265.Google Scholar
Rodriguez-Pereyra, Gonzalo (2000) ‘What is the problem of universals?’, Mind, 109, 255–273.Google Scholar
Rosen, Gideon (2010) ‘Metaphysical dependence: grounding and reduction’, in Hale, Bob & Hoffman, Aviv (eds) Modality: Metaphysics, Logic, and Epistemology (Oxford: Oxford University Press), 109–136.Google Scholar
Smith, Barry (1999) ‘Truth-maker realism’, Australasian Journal of Philosophy, 77, 274–291.Google Scholar
van Inwagen, Peter (2009) ‘God and other uncreated things’, in Timpe, Kevin (ed.) Metaphysics and God: Articles on the Foundation of Ontology (Oxford: Clarendon Press), 472–506.Google Scholar