Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t8hqh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-22T03:00:12.407Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Religious experience and desire

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  19 March 2018

FIONA ELLIS
FIONA ELLIS*
Affiliation:
Department of Humanities, University of Roehampton, Roehampton Lane, London SW15 5PU
*
e-mail: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

I offer a new approach to the old question of the epistemic value of religious experience. According to this approach, religious experience is a species of desire, desire in this context involving a kind of experience which is cognitive and unmediated. The account is inspired by Levinas and Heidegger, and it involves a conception of experience which is shared by a disjunctivist account of perception. Perceptual disjunctivism is my starting point, and it provides the ground for the ensuing discussion of desire. In the final section of the article I argue that the parallel between perceptual disjunctivism and a Levinasian conception of desire points to a further strength in the account of desire here presented, namely, by suggesting the possibility of a disjunctive style response to scepticism about religious experience.

Type
Original Article
Information
Religious Studies , Volume 55 , Special Issue 3: Religious Experience and Desire , September 2019 , pp. 355 - 373
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2018 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Alston, William P. (1991) Perceiving God: The Epistemology of Religious Experience (Ithaca NY: Cornell University Press).Google Scholar
Alvarez, Maria (2010) Kinds of Reasons: An Essay in the Philosophy of Action (Oxford: Oxford University Press).Google Scholar
Brewer, Talbot (2006) ‘Three dogmas of desire’, in Chappell, Timothy (ed.) Values and Virtues: Aristotelianism in Contemporary Ethics (Oxford: Oxford University Press), 257–284.Google Scholar
Brewer, Talbot (2009) The Retrieval of Ethics (Oxford: Oxford University Press).Google Scholar
Coakley, Sarah (2009) ‘Dark contemplation and epistemic transformation: the analytic theologian re-meets Teresa of Ávila’, in Crisp, Oliver D. & Rea, Michael C. (eds) Analytic Theology: New Essays in the Philosophy of Theology (Oxford: Oxford University Press), 280–311.Google Scholar
Crane, Tim (2001) Elements of Mind (Oxford: Oxford University Press).Google Scholar
Dorsch, Fabian (2011) ‘The diversity of disjunctivism’, European Journal of Philosophy, 19, 304–314.Google Scholar
Ellis, Fiona (2014) God, Value, and Nature (Oxford: Oxford University Press).Google Scholar
Goldstick, Daniel (2006) ‘Beliefs, desires, and moral realism’, Philosophy, 81, 153–160.Google Scholar
Griffin, James (1996) Value Judgement (Oxford: Clarendon Press).Google Scholar
Haddock, Adrian & Macpherson, Fiona (eds) (2008) Disjunctivism: Perception, Action, Knowledge (Oxford: Oxford University Press).Google Scholar
Hampton, Jean (1992) ‘Hobbes and ethical naturalism’, Philosophical Perspectives, 6, 333–353.Google Scholar
Heidegger, Martin (1962) Being and Time, MacQuarrie, John & Robinson, Edward (trs) (Oxford: Blackwell Publishers Ltd).Google Scholar
Heidegger, Martin (1966) Discourse on Thinking: A Translation of ‘Gelassenheit’, Anderson, John M. & Freund, E. Hans (trs) (New York: Harper and Row).Google Scholar
Heidegger, Martin (1969) Identity and Difference, Stambaugh, Joan (tr.) (Chicago: HarperCollins).Google Scholar
Heidegger, Martin (1978) ‘Letter on humanism’, Capuzzi, F. A. (tr.), in Basic Writings, Krell, David Farrell (ed.) (London: Routledge Press).Google Scholar
Hinton, J. M. (1967) ‘Visual experiences’, Mind, New Series, 76.302, 217–227.Google Scholar
Hinton, J. M. (1973) Experiences: An inquiry into some ambiguities (Oxford: Oxford University Press).Google Scholar
Levinas, Emmanuel (1969) Totality and Infinity: An Essay on Exteriority, Lingis, Alphonso (tr.) (Pittsburgh: Duquesne University Press).Google Scholar
Levinas, Emmanuel (1990) ‘A religion for adults’, in Difficult Freedom: Essays on Judaism, Hand, Séan (tr.) (Baltimore: John Hopkins University Press), 11–23.Google Scholar
Levinas, Emmanuel (1993) ‘Philosophy and the idea of the infinite’, in To the Other: An Introduction to the Philosophy of Emmanuel Levinas (West Lafayette: Purdue University Press), 88–115.Google Scholar
Levinas, Emmanuel (1998) ‘God and philosophy’, in Of God Who Comes to Mind, Bergo, Bettina (tr.) (Stanford: Stanford University Press), 55–78.Google Scholar
Maimonides, Moses (1928) The Guide for the Perplexed, Friedländer, M. (tr.) (London: Routledge).Google Scholar
Marion, Jean-Luc (1998) Reduction and Givenness: Investigations of Husserl, Heidegger, and Phenomenology, Carlson, Thomas A. (tr.) (Chicago: Northwestern University Press).Google Scholar
Marion, Jean-Luc (2002) Being Given: Towards a Phenomenology of Givenness, Kosky, Jeffrey L. (tr.) (Stanford: Stanford University Press).Google Scholar
McDowell, John (1998a) ‘Are moral requirements hypothetical imperatives?’, in Mind, Value, and Reality (Cambridge MA: Harvard University Press), 77–94.Google Scholar
McDowell, John (1998b) ‘Criteria, defeasibility, and knowledge’, in Meaning, Knowledge, and Reality (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press), 369–394.Google Scholar
McDowell, John (1998c) ‘Singular thought and the extent of inner space’, in Meaning, Knowledge, and Reality (Cambridge MA: Harvard University Press), 228–259.Google Scholar
McDowell, John (2008) ‘The disjunctive conception of experience as material for a transcendental argument’, in Haddock, Adrian & Macpherson, Fiona (eds) Disjunctivism: Perception, Action, Knowledge (Oxford: Oxford University Press), 376–389.Google Scholar
Min, Anselm (2006) ‘Naming the Unnameable God: Levinas, Derrida, and Marion’, International Journal for Philosophy of Religion, 60.1/3, Self and Other: Essays in Continental Philosophy of Religion, 99–116.Google Scholar
Moser, Paul (2008) The Elusive God (New York: Cambridge University Press).Google Scholar
Overgaard, Søren (2011) ‘Disjunctivism and the urgency of scepticism’, Philosophical Explorations, 14, 5–21.Google Scholar
Platts, Mark (1991) Moral Realities: An Essay in Philosophical Psychology (London: Routledge).Google Scholar
Smith, Michael (1994) The Moral Problem (Oxford: Blackwell).Google Scholar
Swinburne, Richard (1979) The Existence of God (Oxford: Oxford University Press).Google Scholar
Westphal, Merold (2006) ‘Vision and voice: phenomenology and theology in the work of Jean-Luc Marion’, International Journal for Philosophy of Religion, 60.1/3, Self and Other: Essays in Continental Philosophy of Religion, 117–137.Google Scholar
Wiggins, David (1990–1991) ‘Moral cognitivism, moral relativism, and motivating moral beliefs’, Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society, New Series, 91, 61–85.Google Scholar
Wiggins, David (1998) ‘Truth, invention, and the meaning of life’, in Needs, Values, Truth (Oxford: Clarendon Press), 87–138.Google Scholar
Williams, Rowan (2002) ‘The deflections of desire: negative theology in trinitarian disclosure’, in Davies, Oliver and Turner, Denys (eds) Silence and the Word: Negative Theology and the Word (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press), 115–135.Google Scholar
Wolfe, Judith (2013) Heidegger's Eschatology: Theological Horizons in Martin Heidegger's Early Work (Oxford: Oxford University Press).Google Scholar
Wright, Crispin (1988) ‘Moral values, projection, and secondary qualities’, Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society, Supplementary Volumes, 62, 1–26.Google Scholar
Zahavi, Dan (2003) Husserl's Phenomenology (Stanford: Stanford University Press).Google Scholar
Zahavi, Dan (2016) ‘Analytic and Continental philosophy: from duality through plurality to (some kind of) unity’, in Sonja Rinofner-Kreidl & Harald A. Wiltsche (eds) Analytic and Continental Philosophy: Methods and Perspectives, Proceedings of the 37th Wittgenstein Symposium (Berlin: De Gruyter), 79–94.Google Scholar
Zangwill, Nick (2004) ‘The myth of religious experience’, Religious Studies, 40, 1–22.Google Scholar