Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-tf8b9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-22T03:55:02.212Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Holy, holy, holy: divine holiness and divine perfection

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 July 2018

MARK C. MURPHY Open the ORCID record for MARK C. MURPHY [Opens in a new window]
MARK C. MURPHY*
Affiliation:
Department of Philosophy, Georgetown University, Washington, DC, 20057, USA
*
e-mail: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Despite being emphatically ascribed to God in Scripture, holiness is little examined in the current literature on the divine attributes. This article defends a normative theory of holiness, taking as its point of departure Rudolf Otto's classic account of the phenomenology of the experience of holiness as that of a mysterium tremendum et fascinans. To be holy is to merit this dual response, that is, to merit both the overwhelming attraction and distinctive sort of repulsion that is characteristic of the experience of holiness. It is plausibly an implication of this account that a supremely holy being – one who is holy, holy, holy – must be the most perfect possible being.

Type
Original Article
Information
Religious Studies , Volume 56 , Issue 2 , June 2020 , pp. 231 - 255
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2018

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Adams, Marilyn McCord (1987) ‘Duns Scotus on the goodness of God’, Faith and Philosophy, 4, 486–505.10.5840/faithphil19874445CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Adams, Marilyn McCord (1999) Horrendous Evils and the Goodness of God (Ithaca: Cornell University Press).Google Scholar
Adams, Marilyn McCord (2004) ‘Cur Deus Homo? Priorities among the reasons’, Faith and Philosophy, 21, 141–158.10.5840/faithphil20042121CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cupit, Geoffrey (1996) Justice as Fittingness (Oxford: Clarendon Press).Google Scholar
D'arms, Justin & Jacobson, Daniel (2000) ‘The moralistic fallacy: on the “appropriateness” of emotions’, Philosophy and Phenomenological Research, 61, 1, 65–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Davies, Brian (2011) Thomas Aquinas on God and Evil (Oxford: Oxford University Press).10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199790890.001.0001CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Diller, Jeanine (1999) ‘A proposal to change the tradition of perfect being theology’, Southwest Philosophy Review, 15, 233–240.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Duns Scotus, John (1962) Philosophical Writings, Allan Wolter (tr.) (Edinburgh: Nelson).Google Scholar
Harrington, Hannah K. (2001) Holiness: Rabbinic Judaism and the Graeco-Roman World (London: Routledge).Google Scholar
Hart, H. L. A. (1961) The Concept of Law (Oxford: Clarendon Press).Google Scholar
Jacobson, Daniel (2011) ‘Fitting attitude theories of value’, Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, <https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/fitting-attitude-theories/>..>Google Scholar
Jones, O. R. (1961) The Concept of Holiness (London: G. Allen Unwin).Google Scholar
Kant, Immanuel (2015 [1788]) Critique of Practical Reason, Gregor, Mary (tr.) (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).Google Scholar
Kraut, Richard (2007) What is Good and Why (Cambridge: Harvard University Press).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kyle, Brent G. (2017) ‘Hiddenness, holiness, and impurity’, Religious Studies, 53, 239–259.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Leftow, Brian (2011) ‘Why perfect being theology?’, International Journal for Philosophy of Religion, 69, 103–118.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mariña, Jacqueline (2010) ‘Holiness’, in A Companion to Philosophy of Religion, Taliaferro, Charles, Draper, Paul, & Quinn, Philip (eds) (Malden: Wiley-Blackwell), 235–242.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McHugh, Conor & Way, Jonathan (2016) ‘Fittingness first’, Ethics, 126, 575–606.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Morris, Thomas V. (1987) Anselmian Explorations (Notre Dame: University of Notre Dame Press).Google Scholar
Muilenberg, James (1962) ‘Holiness’, in The Interpreter's Dictionary of the Bible, II (New York: Abingdon Press).Google Scholar
Murphy, Mark C. (2017) God's Own Ethics: Norms of Divine Agency and the Argument from Evil (Oxford: Oxford University Press).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Murphy, Mark C. (forthcoming-a) ‘Is an absolutely perfect being morally perfect?’, in Draper, Paul (ed.) Current Controversies in Philosophy of Religion, (New York: Routledge).Google Scholar
Murphy, Mark C. (forthcoming-b) ‘The perfect goodness of God in the Hebrew Scriptures’, in Peterson, Michael L. & VanArragon, Raymond J. (eds) Contemporary Debates in Philosophy of Religion, 2nd edn (Malden: Wiley-Blackwell).Google Scholar
Nagasawa, Yujin (2017) Maximal God: A New Defence of Perfect Being Theism (Oxford: Oxford University Press).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Otto, Rudolf (1923) The Idea of the Holy: An Inquiry into the Non-Rational Factor in the Idea of the Divine and Its Relation to the Rational, Harvey, John W. (tr.) (Oxford: Oxford University Press).Google Scholar
Peacocke, Christopher (1985) Sense and Content: Experience, Thought, and their Relations (Oxford: Oxford University Press).Google Scholar
Ringgren, Helmer (1948) The Prophetical Conception of Holiness (Uppsala: Uppsala University Press).Google Scholar
Rogers, Katherin (2000) Perfect Being Theology (Edinburgh: University of Edinburgh Press).Google Scholar
Schroeder, Mark (2008) Being For: Evaluating the Semantic Program of Expressivism (Oxford: Oxford University Press).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smith, Quentin (1988) ‘An analysis of holiness’, Religious Studies, 24, 511–527.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sproul, R. C. (1985) The Holiness of God (Carol Stream: Tyndale House).Google Scholar
Stump, Eleonore (2010) Wandering in Darkness: Narrative and the Problem of Suffering (Oxford: Clarendon Press).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stump, Eleonore (forthcoming) Atonement (Oxford: Oxford University Press).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sumner, L. W. (1996) Welfare, Happiness, and Ethics (Oxford: Oxford University Press).Google Scholar
Swinburne, Richard (2004) The Existence of God, 2nd edn (Oxford: Oxford University Press).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Swinburne, Richard (2016) The Coherence of Theism, 2nd edn (Oxford: Oxford University Press).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
VanGemeren, Willem A. (ed.) (1997) The New International Dictionary of Old Testament Theology and Exegesis, IV (Grand Rapids: Zondervan).Google Scholar
van Inwagen, Peter (2006) The Problem of Evil (Oxford: Oxford University Press).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Williams, Thomas (2000) ‘A most methodical lover? On Scotus's arbitrary creator’, Journal of the History of Philosophy, 38, 169–202.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yetter-Chappell, Richard (2012) ‘Fittingness: the sole normative primitive’, Philosophical Quarterly, 62, 684–704.CrossRefGoogle Scholar