Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-rcrh6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-22T16:47:11.841Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Is space a neglected topic in mainstream economics?

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  17 August 2016

Jacques-François Thisse  and
Bernard Walliser
Jacques-François Thisse
Affiliation:
CORE, Université Catholique de Louvain CERAS, École Nationale des Ponts et Chaussées
Bernard Walliser
Affiliation:
CERAS, École Nationale des Ponts et Chaussées CREA, École Polytechnique
Get access

Summary

This paper aims at providing a possible explanation for the seemingly peripheral role played by spatial economics in modern economic theory. It considers successively five points of view according to which space is introduced in economic models and assesses their contributions and limits.

Cet article vise à proposer une explication de la place en apparence secondaire que l'économie géographique occupe dans I'analyse économique moderne. Il examine successivement cinq modalités d'introduction de l'espace dans les modèles économiques et évalue leurs apports et limites.

Keywords

B40R10B40R10
Type
Research Article
Information
Recherches Économiques de Louvain/ Louvain Economic Review , Volume 64 , Issue 1: Space and economics in retrospect , 1998 , pp. 11 - 22
Copyright
Copyright © Université catholique de Louvain, Institut de recherches économiques et sociales 1998 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

(*)

The autors thank Hubert Beguin, Pierre-Henri Derycke, Jean-Yves Hanin and Masa Fujita for useful discussions. The first author thanks PIR-Villes for financual support.

References

Abdel-Rahman, H. & Fujita, M. [1990], Product variety, Marshallian externalities, and city sizes, Journal of Regional Science, 30, pp. 165–183.Google Scholar
Allais, M. [1943], A la recherche d'une discipline économique, Paris, A compte d'auteur. Reprinted [1952R] as Traité d'économie pure, Paris, Imprimerie nationale.Google Scholar
Alonso, W. [1964], Location and Land Use, Cambridge (Mass.), Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Arrow, K. & Debreu, G. [1954], Existence of an equilibrium for a competitive economy, Econometrica, 22, pp. 265–290.Google Scholar
Derycke, P.-H. [1997], Le péage urbain – Histoire, analyse, politiques, Paris, Economica.Google Scholar
Dixit, A.K. & Stiglitz, J.E. [1977], Monopolistic competition and optimum product diversity, American Economic Review, 67(3), pp. 297–308.Google Scholar
Eaton, B.C. & Lipsey, R.G. [1977], The introduction of space into the neoclassical model of value theory, in Artis, M. and Nobay, A. (eds.), Studies in Modern Economies, Oxford, Basil Blackwell, pp. 59–96.Google Scholar
Enelow, J.M. & Hinich, M.J. [1984], The Spatial Theory of Voting: An Introduction, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Fischer, Cl. [1982], To Dwell Among Friends: Personal Networks in Town and City, Chicago, University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Flatters, F., Henderson, V. & Mieszkowsi, P. [1974], Public goods, efficiency, and regional fiscal equalization, Journal of Public Economics, 3(2), pp. 99–112.Google Scholar
Fujita, M. [1989], Urban Economic Theory. Land Use and City Size, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Fujita, M. & Thisse, J.-F. [1996], Economics of agglomeration, Journal of the Japanese and International Economies, 10(4), pp. 339–378.Google Scholar
Gabszewicz, J.J. & Thisse, J.-F. [1986], Spatial competition and the location of firms, in Gabszewicz, J.J., Thisse, J.-F., Fujita, M. and Schweizer, U. (eds.), Location Theory, Chur, Harwood Academic Publishers, pp. 1–71.Google Scholar
George, H. [1879], Progress and Poverty, New York, Doublebay.Google Scholar
Grimaud, A. & Laffont, J.-J. [1989], Existence of a spatial equilibrium, Journal of Public Economics, 25(2), pp. 213–218.Google Scholar
Hakimi, S.L. [1964], Optimum location of switching centers and the absolute centers and medians of a graph, Operations Research, 13, pp. 462–475.Google Scholar
Hansen, P., Labbé, M., Peeters, D. & Thisse, J.-F. [1987], Facility location analysis in Hansen, P., Labbé, M., Peeters, D., Thisse, J.-F. and Henderson, J.V. (eds.), Systems of Cities and Facility Location, Chur, Harwood Academic Publishers, pp. 1–70.Google Scholar
Helpman, E. & Krugman, P. [1985], Market Structure and Foreign Tradre, Cambridge (Mass.), MIT Press.Google Scholar
Hotelling, H. [1929], Stability in competition, Economic Journal, 39, pp. 41–57.Google Scholar
Huriot, J.-M. [1994], Von Thünen: économie et espace, Paris, Economica.Google Scholar
Huriot, J.-M. & Perreur, J. [1990], Distances, espaces et représentations. Une revue, Revue d'économie régionale et urbaine, pp. 197–237.Google Scholar
Hurter, A.P. & Martinich, J.S. [1989], Facility Location and the Theory of Production, Dordrecht, Kluwer Academic Publishers.Google Scholar
Isard, W. [1956], Location and Space Economy, Cambridge (Mass.), MIT Press.Google Scholar
Jacobs, J. [1984], Cities and the Wealth of Nations, New York, Random House.Google Scholar
Kaldor, N. [1935], Market imperfection and excess capacity, Economica, 2, pp. 35–50.Google Scholar
Koopmans, T.C. [1957], Three Essays on the State of Economic Science, New York, McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
Koopmans, T.C. & Beckmann, M.J. [1957], Assignment problems and the location of economic activities, Econometrica, 25, pp. 1401–1414.Google Scholar
Krugman, P.R. [1991], Increasing returns and economic geography, Journal of Political Economy, 99(3), pp. 483–499.Google Scholar
Launhardt, W. [1882], Die Bestimmung des zwekmässigsten Standorts einer gewerblichen Anlage, Zeitschrift des Vereins Deutscher Ingenieure, 26, pp. 106–115.Google Scholar
Launhardt, W. [1885], Mathematische Begründung der Volkwirtschafslehre, Leipzig, B.G. Teubner.Google Scholar
Lerner, A. & Singer, H.W. [1937], Some notes on duopoly and spatial competition, Journal of Political Economy, 45, 145–186.Google Scholar
LÖSch, A. (1940), Die Räumliche Ordnung der Wirtschaft, Iena, Gustav Fisher Verlag.Google Scholar
Lucas, R. [1988], On the mechanics of economic development, Journal of Monetary Economics, 22(1), pp. 3–42.Google Scholar
Mills, E.S. [1972], Studies in the Structure of the Urban Economy, Baltimore, The Johns Hopkins Press.Google Scholar
Mills, E.S. & Mackinnon, J. [1971], Notes on the new urban economics, Bell Journal of Economics, 4(2), pp. 593–601.Google Scholar
Ohlin, B. [1933], Interregional and International Trade, Cambridge (Mass.), Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Ponsard, C. [1983], History of Spatial Economic Theory, Heidelberg, Spinger Verlag.Google Scholar
Romer, P. [1986], Increasing returns and long-run growth, Journal of Political Economy, 94(5), pp. 1002–1037.Google Scholar
Starrett, D. [1978], Market allocations of location choice in a model with free mobility, Journal of Economic Theory, 17(1), pp. 21–37.Google Scholar
Stiglitz, J.E. [1977], The theory of local public goods, in Feldstein, M.S. and Imman, R.P. (eds.), The Economics of Public Services, London, Macmillan, pp. 273–334.Google Scholar
Tirole, J. [1988], The Theory of Industrial Organization, Cambridge (Mass.), MIT Press.Google Scholar
Vickrey, W.S. [1963], Pricing in urban and suburban transports, American Economic Review, 53, pp. 452–465.Google Scholar
Von Thünen, J.H. [1826], Der isolierte Staat in Beziehung auf Landwirtschaft und Nationalökonomie, Hamburg, Perthes.Google Scholar
Weber, A. [1909], Über den Standort der Industrien, Tübingen, J.C.B. Mohr.Google Scholar