Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-94fs2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-07T18:36:38.386Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Induced Socio-economic Behavior in Long Waves: The Recurrence of Normal and Revolutionary Economic Science

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  17 August 2016

Orley M. Amos Jr  and
Edward O. Price III
Orley M. Amos Jr
Affiliation:
Oklahoma State University
Edward O. Price III
Affiliation:
Oklahoma State University
Get access

Summary

This research empirically examines the relationship between economic development and the progression of economic thought. It is based on three propositions: 1) economic development progresses by long waves, 2) long waves induce a cyclical pattern of general entrepreneurial and managerial socio-economic behavior, and 3) economists pursue alternating periods of revolutionary and normal economic science as part of the general socio-economic pattern of behavior. The general hypothesis of this study is that prosperity periods induce economic thought concerned with maintaining the status quo (Kuhnian normal science) and depressionary periods induce the development of new theories (Kuhnian revolutionary science). The specific hypothesis is that long waves generate a cyclical pattern in the average age of journal article citations. This hypothesis is supported when tested with a random sampling of articles published in the American Economic Review from 1911 to 1987.

Résumé

Résumé

Notre étude examine le lien entre le développement économique et l'évolution de la pensée économique. Elle se fonde sur trois propositions: 1) le développement économique progresse sous la forme de longues ondes, 2) celles-ci induisent une structure cyclique de comportement des entrepreneurs et des managers, 3) la science économique manifeste une alternance de phases normales et révolutionnaires, comme concrétisation de cette structure de comportement. L’hypothèse générale de l’article est que les périodes de prospérité induisent une pensée économique tendant a maintenir le statu quo (science normale au sens de Kuhn), alors que les périodes de récession voient le développement de nouvelles théories (révolution scientifique). Plus spécifiquement, l’hypothèse d’une structure cyclique de l’âge moyen des citations d’article déterminée par les ondes longues est mise en avant. Cette hypothèse est testée a partir d’un échantillon aléatoire d’articles publiés dans l'American Economie Review de 1911 a 1987.

Keywords

031112031112
Type
Research Article
Information
Recherches Économiques de Louvain/ Louvain Economic Review , Volume 57 , Issue 1 , 1991 , pp. 61 - 75
Copyright
Copyright © Université catholique de Louvain, Institut de recherches économiques et sociales 1991 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

*

An earlier version of this paper was presented at the Southwest Economic Association Meetings, March 25, 1988, Houston, Texas. This research was undertaken in cooperation with the Southwest Center for Economic Development, with financial support provided in part through funding from Deans Excellence Fund, College of Business Administration, Oklahoma State University. The authors would like to extend appreciation to Kevin Courrier for his assistance in developing the theoretical framework of this study and Everett Beadford for his efforts in collecting the necessary empirical data, and two anonymous reviewers.

References

Adelman, I. (1965), Long Cycles-Fact or Artifact?, American Economic Review, vol. 55, n° 3, pp. 444–463.Google Scholar
Amos, O.M. (1989), A Re-evaluation of Long Cycle Theories: Development as the Satisfaction of Hierarchial Needs, Social Science Quarterly, vol. 70, n° 2, pp. 341–355.Google Scholar
Booth, D.E. (1986), Long Waves and Uneven Regional Growth, Southern Economic Journal, vol. 53, n° 2, pp. 448–460.Google Scholar
Bordo, M.D. and Landau, D. (1979), The Pattern of Citations in Economic Theory 1945-68: An Exploration Towards a Quantitative History of Thought, History of Political Economy, vol. 11, n° 2, pp. 240–253.Google Scholar
Burns, A. (1934), Production Trends in the United States Economy Since 1870, New York, National Bureau of Economic Research.Google Scholar
Eklund, K. (1980), Long Waves in the Development of Capitalism, Kyklos, vol. 33, n° 3, pp. 383–419.Google Scholar
Garvy, G. (1943), Kondratieff’s Theory of Long Cycles, The Review of Economics and Statistics, vol. 25, n° 4, pp. 203–220.Google Scholar
Kitchin, J. (1923), Cycles and Trends in Economic Factors, Review of Economics and Statistics, vol. 5, n° 1, pp. 10–15.Google Scholar
Kleinknecht, A. (1987), Innovation Patterns in Crisis and Prosperity: Schumpeter’s Long Cycle Reconsidered, New York, St. Martin’s Press.Google Scholar
Klotz, B.p. and Neal, L. (1973), Spectral Analysis of the Long-Swing Hypothesis, The Review of Economics and Statistics, vol. 55, n° 3, pp. 291–298.Google Scholar
Kondratieff, N.D. (1926/1984), The Long Wave Cycle, (Translated by Daniels, Guy), New York, Richardson and Snyder.Google Scholar
Kuhn, T. (1962), The Structure of Scientific Revolution, Chicago, University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Mensch, G. (1979), Stalemate in Technology, Cambridge, Ballinger Publishing Company.Google Scholar
Mitchell, W.C. (1927), Business Cycles: The Problem and Its Setting, New York, National Bureau of Economic Research.Google Scholar
Pope, D. (1984), Rostow’s Kondratieff Cycle in Australia, Journal of Economic History, vol. 44, n° 3, pp. 729–753.Google Scholar
Quandt, R.E. (1976), Some Quantitative Aspects of the Economics Journal Literature, Journal of Political Economy, vol. 84, n° 4, pp. 741–755.Google Scholar
Rostow, W W. (1975), Kondratieff, Schumpeter and Kuznets: Trend Periods Revisited, Journal of American History, vol. 25, pp. 719–753.Google Scholar
Schumpeter, J.A. (1934/1984), The Theory of Economic Development, (Paperback edition), New Brunswick, Transaction Books, (Original translation), Cambridge, Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Schumpeter, J.A. (1939), Business Cycles: A Theoretical, Historical, and Statistical Analysis of the Capitalist Process, Volumes I and II, New York, McGraw-Hill Book Company, Inc.Google Scholar
Soper, J.C. (1975), Myth and Reality in Economic Time Series: The Long Swing Revisited, Southern Economic Journal, vol. 41, n° 4, pp. 570–579.Google Scholar
Stigler, G. J. and Friedland, C., (1975), The Citation Practices of Doctorates in Economics, Journal of Political Economy, vol. 83, n° 3, pp. 477–507.Google Scholar
Van Duijn, J.J. (1983), The Long Wave in Economic Life, London, George Allen and Unwin.Google Scholar
Van Ewijk, C. (1982), A Spectral Analysis of the Kondratieff Cycle, Kyklos, vol. 35, n° 3, pp. 468–499.Google Scholar