Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t7fkt Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-26T03:18:41.575Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Potential of the Radiocarbon Method for Dating Known Historical Events: The Case of Yaroslavl, Russia

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  18 July 2016

A V Engovatova ,
G I Zaitseva ,
M V Dobrovolskaya  and
N D Burova
A V Engovatova*
Affiliation:
Institute of Archaeology of the Russian Academy of Sciences, Moscow, Russia
G I Zaitseva
Affiliation:
Institute for the History of Material Culture of the Russian Academy of Sciences, St. Petersburg, Russia
M V Dobrovolskaya
Affiliation:
Institute of Archaeology of the Russian Academy of Sciences, Moscow, Russia
N D Burova
Affiliation:
Institute for the History of Material Culture of the Russian Academy of Sciences, St. Petersburg, Russia
*
Corresponding author. Email: [email protected]
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

We address here the methodological question of potentially using the radiocarbon method for dating historical events. The archaeological investigations in Yaroslavl (central Russia) provide an example. The Institute of Archaeology of the Russian Academy of Sciences (IARAS) has been conducting excavations at the site for many years, and many archaeological complexes dating to different times have come to light. The most interesting of these are connected with the founding of the city by Prince Yaroslav the Wise in AD 1010 (the first fortifications) and with the devastation of the city by the Tatar Mongols in 1238 (evidenced by sanitary mass burials of Yaroslavl's inhabitants). We have conducted a certain experiment, a “reverse” investigation of the chronology of the events. The dates of the events are known from chronicles, archaeological materials, and dendrochronological data for several assemblages. We have taken a large series of 14C samples from the same assemblages, dated them in 2 different laboratories, and compared the data. The accuracy of the 14C dates proved to be compatible with dates found via the archaeological material. The article shows the potential for 14C dating of archaeological assemblages connected with known historical events. The results of the research conducted by the authors serve as an additional argument for the broader use of the 14C dating method in studies of archaeological sites related to the Middle Ages in Russia.

Type
Articles
Information
Radiocarbon , Volume 54 , Issue 3-4 , 2012 , pp. 615 - 624
Copyright
Copyright © 2012 by the Arizona Board of Regents on behalf of the University of Arizona 

References

Arslanov, KhA. 1987. Radiocarbon: Geochemistry and Geochronology. Leningrad: Leningrad University Press, p 112–45. In Russian.Google Scholar
Bronk Ramsey, C. 2009. Bayesian analysis of radiocarbon dates. Radiocarbon 51(1):337–60.Google Scholar
Buzhilova, A, Goncharova, N. 2009. A mass grave from a Medieval Russian town: the anthropological evidence of a social catastrophe. In: Vers une anthropologie des catastrophes. Actes des 9e journees d'antropologie de Valbonne. p 286.Google Scholar
Buzhilova, A, Goncharova, NA, Engovatova, A. 2008. Mass graves from a Medieval Russian town: bio-cultural context of remains. In: Abstracts of 17th Paleopathological Association Meeting “Diseases in the Past.” Copenhagen, 25–27 August 2008. p 27.Google Scholar
Engovatova, AV. 2008. Report on the 2007 rescue archaeological excavations in the town of Yaroslavl at Volzhskaya embankment, building 1. Moscow: IARAS. p 1–308. In Russian.Google Scholar
Engovatova, AV. 2009. Report on the 2008 rescue archaeological excavations in the town of Yaroslavl at Volzhskaya embankment, building 1. Moscow: IARAS. p 1–408. In Russian.Google Scholar
Engovatova, AV, Yaganov, AV. 2008. To the topography of the Rubleniy gorod in Yaroslavl (based on the materials of the 2007 archaeological investigations). In: Moscow Rus': Archaeology and the History of Architecture. On the 60th Anniversary of Leonid Andreevich Beliaev. Moscow: IARAS. p 90–7. In Russian.Google Scholar
Faradzheva, NN, Osipov, DO. 2007. Archaeological investigations in the historical center of the town of Yaroslavl (Uspenskiy excavation site 2004–2006). Moscow: IARAS. In Russian.Google Scholar
Karpukhin, AA. 2009. Preliminary results. Tree-ring chronology from excavations in Yaroslavl in 2008. Appendix 6 to the “Report on the conservation of archaeological excavations in Yaroslavl by address: the area limited the Chelyuskin's square and Kotorosl embankment, building 1 (on the construction site) (Rublenniy gorod II - 2008).” Volume 5. Moscow: Archive IARAS. p 30–2.Google Scholar
Karpukhin, AA, Soloveva, LN, Engovatova, AV. 2011. Dendrochronological dating of the structures of XIII century from excavations in Yaroslavl. Analytical Research Laboratory of Natural Science. Moscow: IARAS. p 92–115.Google Scholar
Leont'yev, AE, Yakovlev, AV. 2005. Report on the 2004 excavations in the town of Yaroslavl on the site scheduled for reconstruction of the Cathedral of the Dormition. Uspenskiy-1 excavation site. Moscow: IARAS. In Russian.Google Scholar
Nikitin, SA. 2009. Act of the medico-forensic and portrait investigations N 31-66/09. Appendix 7 to the “Report on the conservation of archaeological excavations in Yaroslavl by address: the area limited the Chelyuskin's square and Kotorosl embankment, building 1 (on the construction site) (Rublenniy gorod II -2008).” Volume 5. Moscow: Archive IARAS. p 33–59.Google Scholar
Osipov, DO. 2006. Rescue architectural and archaeological investigations on the site scheduled for reconstruction of the Cathedral of the Dormition in Yaroslavl, 2005 [report]. Moscow: IARAS. In Russian.Google Scholar
Osipov, DO, Faradzheva, NN. 2007. Rescue architectural and archaeological investigations on the site scheduled for reconstruction of the Cathedral of the Dormition in Yaroslavl, 2006 [report]. Moscow: IARAS. In Russian.Google Scholar
Polach, HA, Golson, J. 1966. Collection of specimens for radiocarbon dating and interpretation of results. In: Australian Institute of Aboriginal Studies Manual No. 2. Canberra: Australian National University.Google Scholar
Reimer, PJ, Baillie, MGL, Bard, E, Bayliss, A, Beck, JW, Blackwell, PG, Bronk Ramsey, C, Buck, CE, Burr, GS, Edwards, RL, Friedrich, M, Grootes, PM, Guilderson, TP, Hajdas, I, Heaton, TJ, Hogg, AG, Hughen, KA, Kaiser, KF, Kromer, B, McCormac, FG, Manning, SW, Reimer, RW, Richards, DA, Southon, JR, Talamo, S, Turney, CSM, van der Plicht, J, Weyhenmeyer, CE. 2009. IntCal09 and Marine09 radiocarbon age calibration curves, 0–50,000 years cal BP. Radiocarbon 51(4):1111–50.Google Scholar
Renfrew, C, Bahn, P. 2000. Archaeology: Theories, Methods, and Practices. 3rd edition. London: Thames & Hudson.Google Scholar
Waterbolk, HT. 1971. Working with radiocarbon dates. Proceedings of the Prehistoric Society 37:15–33.Google Scholar