Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-s2hrs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-06T04:02:30.062Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Characterization of Different Chemical Procedures for 14C Dating of Buried, Cremated, and Modern Bone Samples at Circe

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  18 July 2016

Isabella Passariello ,
Pasquale Simone ,
Joseph Tandoh ,
Fabio Marzaioli ,
Manuela Capano ,
Nicola De Cesare  and
Filippo Terrasi
Isabella Passariello*
Affiliation:
Department of Environmental Sciences, Second University of Naples, Caserta, Italy Centre for Isotopic Research on Cultural and Environmental heritage (CIRCE) and INNOVA, Caserta, Italy
Pasquale Simone
Affiliation:
Department of Environmental Sciences, Second University of Naples, Caserta, Italy Centre for Isotopic Research on Cultural and Environmental heritage (CIRCE) and INNOVA, Caserta, Italy
Joseph Tandoh
Affiliation:
Department of Environmental Sciences, Second University of Naples, Caserta, Italy Centre for Isotopic Research on Cultural and Environmental heritage (CIRCE) and INNOVA, Caserta, Italy
Fabio Marzaioli
Affiliation:
Department of Environmental Sciences, Second University of Naples, Caserta, Italy Centre for Isotopic Research on Cultural and Environmental heritage (CIRCE) and INNOVA, Caserta, Italy
Manuela Capano
Affiliation:
Centre for Isotopic Research on Cultural and Environmental heritage (CIRCE) and INNOVA, Caserta, Italy Dipartimento di Studio delle Componenti Culturali del Territorio, Seconda Università degli Studi di Napoli, Santa Maria Capua Vetere (Caserta), Italy
Nicola De Cesare
Affiliation:
Centre for Isotopic Research on Cultural and Environmental heritage (CIRCE) and INNOVA, Caserta, Italy Dipartimento di Scienze della Vita, Seconda Università degli Studi di Napoli, Caserta, Italy
Filippo Terrasi
Affiliation:
Department of Environmental Sciences, Second University of Naples, Caserta, Italy Centre for Isotopic Research on Cultural and Environmental heritage (CIRCE) and INNOVA, Caserta, Italy
*
Corresponding author. Email: [email protected]
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Bone chemical treatment for radiocarbon dating has drawn the attention of different laboratories because dates of bones and charcoals found in the same layer often disagree. Excluding diet-related reservoir effects, this observation is likely due to a nonoptimized procedure of contaminant removal from the extracted collagen. In this study, systematic work on the bone chemical treatment was performed with the aim to investigate the effect of each known procedure (i.e. AAA, GEL, and ULTR) on the collagen used for 14C dating. Isolation and purification of lipids from animal tissues were performed to estimate eventual offsets induced by the applied methods, by comparing the 14C ages of lipids with those of collagen. Moreover, cremated bones were treated for the first time at CIRCE. Measured 14C isotopic ratios on these samples were used to evaluate the accuracy of the applied procedure by comparing against the results for charcoals found in the same archaeological context as the bones.

Type
Articles
Information
Radiocarbon , Volume 54 , Issue 3-4 , 2012 , pp. 867 - 877
Copyright
Copyright © 2012 by the Arizona Board of Regents on behalf of the University of Arizona 

References

Arslanov, KA, Svezhentsev, YS. 1993. An improved method for radiocarbon dating fossil bones. Radiocarbon 35(3):387–91.Google Scholar
Brock, F, Bronk Ramsey, C, Higham, TFG. 2007. Quality assurance of ultrafiltered bone dating. Radiocarbon 49(2):187–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bronk Ramsey, C. 2009. Bayesian analysis of radiocarbon dates. Radiocarbon 51(1):337–60.Google Scholar
Bronk Ramsey, C, Higham, T, Bowles, A, Hedges, R. 2004. Improvements to the pretreatment of bone at Oxford. Radiocarbon 46(1):155–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brown, TA, Nelson, DE, Vogel, JS, Southon, JR. 1988. Improved collagen extraction method by modified Longin method. Radiocarbon 30(2):171–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Colombo, D, Stanislao, I. 2011. Gli etruschi e la Campania settentrionale. In: Atti del XXVI Convegno di studi etruschi ed italici. Serra Editore. In press.Google Scholar
Folch, J, Lees, M, Sloane Stanley, GH. 1957. A simple method for the isolation and purification of the total lipides from animal tissues. Journal of Biological Chemistry 226:497.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hüls, CM, Grootes, PM, Nadeau, M-J. 2007. How clean is ultrafiltration cleaning of bone collagen? Radiocarbon 49(2):193–200.Google Scholar
Hüls, CM, Grootes, PM, Nadeau, M-J. 2009. Ultrafiltration: boon or bane? Radiocarbon 51(2):613–25.Google Scholar
Hüls, CM, Erlenkeuser, H, Nadeau, M-J, Grootes, PM, Andersen, N. 2010. Experimental study on the origin of cremated bone apatite carbon. Radiocarbon 52(2–3):587–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lanting, JN, Aerts-Bijma, AT, van der Plicht, J. 2001. Dating of cremated bones. Radiocarbon 43(2A):249–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Longin, R. 1971. New method of collagen extraction for radiocarbon dating. Nature 230(5291):241–2.Google Scholar
Marzaioli, F, Borriello, G, Passariello, I, Lubritto, C, De Cesare, N, D'Onofrio, A, Terrasi, F. 2008. Zinc reduction as an alternative method for AMS radiocarbon dating: process optimization at CIRCE. Radiocarbon 50(1):139–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marzaioli, F, Fiumano, V, Capano, M, Passariello, I, Terrasi, F. 2011. Forensic applications of 14C at CIRCE. Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research B 269(24):3171–5.Google Scholar
May, S. 1998. The Archaeology of Human Bones. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Minami, M, Muto, H, Nakamura, T. 2004. Chemical techniques to extract organic fractions from fossil bones for accurate 14C dating. Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research B 223–224:302–7.Google Scholar
Mook, WG, Streurman, HJ. 1983. Physical and chemical aspects of radiocarbon dating. PACT 8:31–53.Google Scholar
Naysmith, P, Scott, EM, Cook, GT, Heinemeier, J, van der Plicht, J, Van Strydonk, M, Bronk Ramsey, C, Grootes, PM, Freeman, PSHT. 2007. A cremated bone intercomparison study. Radiocarbon (49):403–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Passariello, I, Marzaioli, F, Lubritto, C, Rubino, M, D'Onofrio, A, De Cesare, N, Borriello, G, Casa, G, Palmieri, A, Rogalla, D, Sabbarese, C, Terrasi, F. 2007. Radiocarbon sample preparation at the CIRCE AMS Laboratory in Caserta, Italy. Radiocarbon 49(2):225–32.Google Scholar
Reimer, PJ, Baillie, MGL, Bard, E, Bayliss, A, Beck, JW, Blackwell, PG, Bronk Ramsey, C, Buck, CE, Burr, GS, Edwards, RL, Friedrich, M, Grootes, PM, Guilderson, TP, Hajdas, I, Heaton, TJ, Hogg, AG, Hughen, KA, Kaiser, KF, Kromer, B, McCormac, FG, Manning, SW, Reimer, RW, Richards, DA, Southon, JR, Talamo, S, Turney, CSM, van der Plicht, J, Weyhenmeyer, CE. 2009. IntCal09 and Marine09 radiocarbon age calibration curves, 0–50,000 years cal BP. Radiocarbon 51(4):1111–50.Google Scholar
Scott, E, Cook, G, Naysmith, P. 2010. The Fifth International Radiocarbon Intercomparison (VIRI): an assessment of laboratory performance in stage 3. Radiocarbon 53(2–3):859–65.Google Scholar
Shipman, P, Foster, G, Schoeninger, M. 1984. Burnt bones and teeth: an experimental study of color, morphology, crystal structure and shrinkage. Journal of Archaeological Science 11(4):307–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smith, EL, Hill, RL, Lehman, IR, Lefkowitz, RJ, Handler, P, White, A. 1983. Principles of Biochemistry: Mammalian Biochemistry. 7th edition. New York: McGraw-Hill Book Co.Google Scholar
Stafford, TW, Jull, AJT, Brendell, K, Duhamel, RC, Donahue, D. 1987. Study of bone radiocarbon dating at the University of Arizona NSF Accelerator facility for radioisotope analysis. Radiocarbon 29(1):24–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stuiver, M, Polach, HA. 1977. Discussion: reporting of 14C data. Radiocarbon 19(3):355–63.Google Scholar
Terrasi, F, De Cesare, N, D'Onofrio, A, Lubritto, C, Marzaioli, F, Passariello, I, Rogalla, D, Sabbarese, C, Borriello, G, Casa, C, Palmieri, A. 2008. High precision 14C AMS at CIRCE. Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research B 266(10):2221–4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Van Strydonck, M, Boudin, M, Hoefens, M, De Mulder, G. 2005. 14C-dating of cremated bones—Why does it work? Lunula 13:3–10.Google Scholar
Van Strydonck, M, Boudin, M, De Mulder, G. 2010. The carbon origin of structural carbonate in bone apatite of cremated bones. Radiocarbon 52(2–3):578–86.Google Scholar
Wild, EM, Arlamovsky, KA, Golser, R, Kutschera, W, Priller, A, Puchegger, S, Rom, W, Steier, P, Vycudilik, W. 2000. 14C dating with the bomb peak: an application to forensic medicine. Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research B 172(1–4):944–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar