Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-rcrh6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-27T14:58:51.305Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Absolute Dating of the Bronze Age Defensive Settlement in Horodnianka (NE Poland)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  18 July 2016

Marek Krapiec ,
Monika Bolka  and
Jerzy Brzozowski
Marek Krapiec*
Affiliation:
Dendrochronological Laboratory, Faculty of Geology, Geophysics and Environmental Protection, AGH – University of Science and Technology, Al. Mickiewicza 30, 30-059 Kraków, Poland Laboratory of Absolute Dating, Cianowice 225, 32-043 Skała, Poland
Monika Bolka
Affiliation:
Dendrochronological Laboratory, Faculty of Geology, Geophysics and Environmental Protection, AGH – University of Science and Technology, Al. Mickiewicza 30, 30-059 Kraków, Poland
Jerzy Brzozowski
Affiliation:
Regional Museum in Suwałki, T. Kościuszki 81, 16-400 Suwałki, Poland
*
Corresponding author. Email: [email protected]
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

In 2008–2009, during construction of the ring road around the town of Sztabin in NE Poland, archaeological rescue excavations were carried out at site no. 12 in Horodnianka. The excavations revealed the remains of a defensive settlement from the Bronze Age, with a total surface of 3 ha. Concentric wooden palisades reinforcing the settlement were situated on sandy, elevated embankments of the Biebrza River. Altogether, 189 samples of archaeological wood, mainly oak (Quercus sp.), were collected. Dendrochronological analysis demonstrated that the trees were cut down within a relatively short period of only 22 yr. On the basis of 22 contemporaneous dendrochronological sequences, the average curve HOR_AA1 (89 yr long) was constructed. However, attempts at dating the average curve against the chronologies from adjacent areas were unsuccessful. Therefore, determination of the time interval represented by the palisade oaks was attempted with the wiggle-matching method. Radiocarbon dating using liquid scintillation counting (LSC) was conducted for 6 suitable samples selected from the average curve. The 14C results, after calibration, suggest the dates of cutting the oaks outlining the Horodnianka chronology most probably fall in the time interval 870–795 cal BC. This means that Horodnianka could be the furthest northeastern defensive fortification of the Lusatian culture.

Type
Articles
Information
Radiocarbon , Volume 54 , Issue 3-4 , 2012 , pp. 993 - 1001
Copyright
Copyright © 2012 by the Arizona Board of Regents on behalf of the University of Arizona 

References

Baillie, MGL, Pilcher, JR. 1973. A simple crossdating program for tree-ring research. Tree-Ring Bulletin 33:7–14.Google Scholar
Bednarz, M, Brzozowski, J. 2009. Sprawozdanie z ratowniczych badań wykopaliskowych w Horodniance, stanowisko nr 12 (AZP 26–86/72) gmina Suchowola, powiat sokólski, województwo podlaskie, na trasie budowy obwodnicy Sztabina [Report on an archaeological rescue works in Horodnianka, the site no. 12 (AZP 26–86/72) Suchowola municipality, sokólski district, podlaskie voivodship, from construction the ring road around the town Sztabin]. Sztabin–Suwałki. p 1–10. In Polish.Google Scholar
Bronk Ramsey, C. 2009. Bayesian analysis of radiocarbon dates. Radiocarbon 51(1):337–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bronk Ramsey, C, van der Plicht, J, Weninger, B. 2001. ‘Wiggle-matching’ radiocarbon dates. Radiocarbon 43(2A):381–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brzozowski, J, Ejdulis, A, Maskowicz, R, Siemaszko, J. 2008. Wyniki archeologicznych badań rozpoznawczych w ciągu drogi krajowej nr 8 na trasie projektowanej obwodnicy m. Sztabin, maszynopis w archiwum Muzeum Okrgowego w Suwałkach [Results of archaeological reconnaissance surveys within the national road no. 8 on the proposed ring road around the town Sztabin, typescript in the archives of the Regional Museum in Suwałki]. In Polish.Google Scholar
Galimberti, M, Bronk Ramsey, C, Manning, SW. 2004. Wiggle-match dating of tree-ring sequences. Radiocarbon 46(2):917–24.Google Scholar
Holmes, RL. 1999. User's Manual for Program COFECHA. Laboratory of Tree-Ring Research, University of Arizona, Tucson.Google Scholar
Imamura, M, Ozaki, H, Mitsutani, T, Niu, E, Itoh, S. 2007. Radiocarbon wiggle-matching of Japanese historical materials with a possible systematic age offset. Radiocarbon 49(2):331–7.Google Scholar
Krawczyk, A, Krąpiec, M. 1995. Dendrochronologiczna baza danych [Dendrochronological database]. Materiały II Krajowej Konferencji: Komputerowe wspomaganie badañ naukowych [Proceedings of The Second Polish Conference: Computers in Scientific Research]. Wrocław. p 247–52. In Polish.Google Scholar
Krąpiec, M. 1992. Skale dendrochronologiczne pónego holocenu południowej i centralnej Polski [Dendrochronological scales of the Late Holocene of southern and central Poland]. Kwartalnik AGH – Geologia 18(3):37–119. In Polish.Google Scholar
Krąpiec, M. 1998. Oak dendrochronology of the Neoholocene in Poland. Folia Quaternaria 69:5–134.Google Scholar
Krąpiec, M. 2001. Holocene dendrochronological standards for subfossil oaks from the area of southern Poland. Studia Quaternaria 18:47–63.Google Scholar
Krąpiec, M, Walanus, A. 2011. Application of the triple-photomultiplier liquid spectrometer Hidex 300SL in radiocarbon dating. Radiocarbon 53(3):543–50.Google Scholar
Kruse, HH, Linick, TW, Suess, HE, Becker, B. 1980. Computer-matched radiocarbon dates of floating tree-ring series. Radiocarbon 22(2):260–6.Google Scholar
Linick, TW, Suess, HE, Becker, B. 1985. La Jolla measurements of radiocarbon in south German oak tree-ring chronologies. Radiocarbon 27(1):20–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pearson, GW. 1986. Precise calendrical dating of known growth-period samples using a ‘curve fitting’ technique. Radiocarbon 28(2A):292–9.Google Scholar
Reimer, PJ, Baillie, MGL, Bard, E, Bayliss, A, Beck, JW, Blackwell, PG, Bronk Ramsey, C, Buck, CE, Burr, GS, Edwards, RL, Friedrich, M, Grootes, PM, Guilderson, TP, Hajdas, I, Heaton, TJ, Hogg, AG, Hughen, KA, Kaiser, KF, Kromer, B, McCormac, FG, Manning, SW, Reimer, RW, Richards, DA, Southon, JR, Talamo, S, Turney, CSM, van der Plicht, J, Weyhenmeyer, CE. 2009. IntCal09 and Marine09 radiocarbon age calibration curves, 0–50,000 years cal BP. Radiocarbon 51(4):1111–50.Google Scholar
Skripkin, VV, Kovalyukh, NN. 1994. An universal technology for oxidation of carbon-containing materials for radiocarbon dating. Conference on Geochronology and Dendrochronology of Old Town's and Radiocarbon Dating of Archaeological Findings. 31 October–4 November 1994, Vilnius University Press. p 37–42.Google Scholar
Slusarenko, IY, Christen, JA, Orlova, LA, Kuzmin, YV, Burr, GS. 2001. 14C wiggle matching of the “floating” tree-ring chronology from the Altai Mountains, southern Siberia: the Ulandryk-4 case study. Radiocarbon 43(2A):425–31.Google Scholar
Vasiliev, SS, Bokovenko, NA, Chugunov, KA, Dergachev, VA, Sementsov, AA, Sljusarenko, JU, Zaitseva, GI. 2001. Tree-ring, “wiggle-matching” and statistics in the chronological studies of Scythian Age sites in Asia. Geochronometria 20:61–8.Google Scholar
van der Plicht, J, Jansma, E, Kars, H. 1995. The “Amsterdam Castle”: a case study of wiggle-matching and the proper calibration curve. Radiocarbon 37(3):965–8.Google Scholar
Walanus, A. 2005. Program Quercus. Instrukcja obsługi [Program Quercus. User's manual]. Kraków. In Polish.Google Scholar
Zielski, A, Krąpiec, M. 2004. Dendrochronologia. Warsaw: PWN. In Polish.Google Scholar