Exposure to various chemicals, either due to occupation or lifestyle, is considered to be a major contributing factor to tumour formation in man (Higginson, 1969; Doll and Peto, 1981). An important and prevalent class of potent carcinogenic compounds present in he environment is polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs), which are found in various petroleum and combustion products derived from heat and power generation and motor vehicle exhausts (Baum, 1978). Furthermore, since PAHs are generally formed by pyrolysis of organic matters such as tobacco smoking and certain procedures of food preparation, the PAH exposure to humans is extensive.

The discovery of mode-locked laser operation now nearly two decades ago has started a development which enables researchers to probe the dynamics of ultrafast physical and chemical processes at the molecular level on shorter and shorter time scales. Naturally the first applications were in the fields of photophysics and photochemistry where it was then possible for the first time to probe electronic and vibrational relaxation processes on a sub-nanosecond timescale. The development went from lasers producing pulses of many picoseconds to the shortest pulses which are at present just a few femtoseconds long. Soon after their discovery ultrashort pulses were applied also to biological systems which has revealed a wealth of information contributing to our understanding of a broadrange of biological processes on the molecular level.It is the aim of this review to discuss the recent advances and point out some future trends in the study of ultrafast processes in biological systems using laser techniques. The emphasis will be mainly on new results obtained during the last 5 or 6 years. The term ultrafast means that I shall restrict myself to sub-nanosecond processes with a few exceptions.

Writing a review gives authors a splendid opportunity to view developments in a particular area of science from a very personal angle. They are at liberty to select material, emphasize aspects of direct interest to their own work and air speculations which, wisely or not, referees have caused to have removed from their publications. Such personal accounts often make good reading, but may be somewhat misleading especially for readers seeking an introduction to the field. One remedy is to aim at a comprehensive review with equal weight given to all publications but boredom, if not bias, is then likely to creep in.