Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-tf8b9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-26T07:30:18.388Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Validation of an estimated food record

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 January 2007

Anne Chinnock
Anne Chinnock*
Affiliation:
School of Nutrition, University of Costa Rica, Apartado Postal 28-2050, San Pedro Montes de Oca, San José, Costa Rica, Central, America
*
*corresponding author: Email [email protected]
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.
Objective

To validate an estimated food record (EFR), using a weighed food record (WFR) as the reference method, for the determination of food consumption and nutrient intakes in a group of Costa Rican adults.

Design

For the WFR, all foods consumed by subjects during seven consecutive days were weighed and recorded by nutrition students. Two EFRs (a 4-day and a 3-day record) were recorded by subjects with the use of home measures and photographs to estimate amounts.

Setting

Costa Rica.

Subjects

Sixty adults: 30 men and 30 women; 30 living in urban and 30 in rural areas.

Results

The EFR gave statistically significant lower average intake estimates for energy and 12 of the 22 nutrients examined. The correlation coefficients ranged from 0.68 (polyunsaturated fats) to 0.87 (calcium). The percentage of subjects classified into the same quartile ranged from 45.0% (polyunsaturated fats) to 68.3% (vitamin B12). For all nutrients except vitamin C, 0 or 1.7% were misclassified into extreme quartiles. For food group consumption, the EFR gave statistically significant lower estimates for six of the 17 groups and correlation coefficients ranged from 0.22 (fish) to 0.93 (beverages). Greater differences in estimates of mean energy and nutrient intakes were detected among subjects from rural areas, caused in part by a tendency to underestimate the amounts of rice and beans consumed.

Conclusion

Validation of the EFR using a WFR as the reference method gave results that compare favourably with those reported by other authors, and support the use of the EFR for dietary surveys among Costa Rican adults.

Keywords

Estimated food recordDietary assessment methodsNutritional epidemiology
Type
Research Article
Information
Public Health Nutrition , Volume 9 , Issue 7 , October 2006 , pp. 934 - 941
Copyright
Copyright © The Authors 2006

References

1Organización Panamericana de la Salud (OPS)/Organización Mundial de la Salud (OMS). La Salud en las Américas, Vol. 2. Scientific Publication No. 569. Washington, DC: OPS/OMS, 1998.Google Scholar
2Broitman Tropper, I, Elizondo Salas, M, León León, H, León Orozco, S. Patrón alimentaria, densidad energética y de nutrientes de la dieta de niños menores de tres años con retardo en el crecimiento y/o con anemia ferropénica. Thesis presented for Licentiate degree, University of Costa Rica, San José, 1996; [unpublished]Google Scholar
3Campos, H, Mata, L, Siles, X, Vives, M, Ordovas, J, Schaefer, EJ. Prevalence of cardiovascular risk factors in rural and urban Costa Rica. Circulation 1992; 85: 648–58.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
4Kabagambe, EK, Baylin, A, Siles, X, Campos, H. Individual saturated fatty acids and nonfatal acute myocardial infarction in Costa Rica. European Journal of Clinical Nutrition 2003; 57: 1447–57.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
5Herrero, R, Potischman, N, Brinton, LA, Reeves, WC, Brenes, MM, Tenorio, F. A case–control study of nutrient status and invasive cervical cancer 1. Dietary indicators. American Journal of Epidemiology 1991; 134: 1335–46.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
6Potischman, N, Herrero, R, Brinton, LA, Reeves, WC, Stacewicz-Sapuntzakis, M, Jones, CJ. A case–control study of nutrient status and invasive cervical cancer. II. Serologic indicators. American Journal of Epidemiology 1991; 134: 1347–55.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
7Potischman, N, Brinton, LA, Laiming, VA, Reeves, WC, Brenes, MM, Herrero, R. A case–control study of serum folate levels and invasive cervical cancer. Cancer Research 1991; 51: 4785–9.Google ScholarPubMed
8Sierra, R, Barrantes, R. Epidemiología y ecología del cáncer gástrico en Costa Rica. Boletin de la Oficina Sanitaria Panamericana 1983; 95: 495–506.Google Scholar
9Sierra, R, Barrantes, R. Aspectos ecológicos del cáncer gástrico en Costa Rica. Revista de Biología Tropical 1983; 31: 11–8.Google ScholarPubMed
10Sierra, R, Chinnock, A, Ohshima, H, Pignatelli, B, Malaveille, C, Gamboa, C. In vivo nitrosoproline formation and other risk factors in Costa Rican children from high- and low-risk areas for gastric cancer. Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers & Prevention 1993; 2: 563–8.Google ScholarPubMed
11Sierra, R, Rosero, L, Antich, D, Muñoz, G. Cáncer en Costa Rica, Epidemiología Descriptiva. San José: Editorial de la Universidad de Costa Rica, 1995.Google Scholar
12Sierra, R, Salas, P, Mora-Zúñiga, F, Sanabria, M, Chinnock, A, Peña, S. et al. Erradicación de Helicobacter pylori en una población de alto riesgo de cáncer gástrico. Acta Médica Costarricense 1998; 40: 30–5.Google Scholar
13 International Agency for Research on Cancer. GLOBOCAN 2002; homepage: http://www-dep.iarc.fr/. Accessed 10 February 2005.Google Scholar
14Instituto de Nutrición de centroamérica y Panamá (INCAP)/Oficina de Investigaciones Internacionales de los Institutos Nacionales de Salud. Evaluación nutritional de la población de Centro América y Panamá. INCAP Vol. 28. INCAP: Guatemala City, 1969.Google Scholar
15Flores, M, Menchú, MT, Guzmán, MA. Evaluación dietética de familias y preescolares mediante la aplicación de diferentes métodos y técnicas – área rural de Nicaragua. Archivos Latinoamericanos de Nutrición 1973; 23: 325–34.Google Scholar
16Chinnock, A. Tamaño de la porción de algunos alimentos y preparaciones para preescolares y adultos de un área rural y una comunidad urbana del Valle Central de Costa Rica. San José: Universidad de Costa Rica, 1992.Google Scholar
17Chaverri, MA, Rodríguez, AM, Chinnock, A. Peso de medidas caseras y porciones de alimentos y preparaciones comunes en Costa Rica. San José: Escuela de Nutrición, Facultad de Medicina, Universidad de Costa Rica, 2001.Google Scholar
18Chinnock, A, Sedó Masis, P. Porciones de alimentos y preparaciones comunes en Costa Rica y equivalencias del sistema de listas de intercambio. San José: Oficina de Publicaciones Universidad de Costa Rica, 2001.Google Scholar
19Menchú, MT, Méndez, H, Barrera, MA, Ortega, L. Tabla de composición de alimentos de Centroamérica: primera sección. Guatemala City: Institute of Nutrition of Central America and Panama/Pan American Health Organization, 1996.Google Scholar
20Menchú, MT, Méndez, H, Lemus, J. Tabla de composición de alimentos de Centroamérica: segunda sección. Guatemala City: Institute of Nutrition of Central America and Panama/Pan American Health Organization, 2000.Google Scholar
21Dean, AG, Arner, TG, Sangam, S, Sunki, G, Friedman, R, Lantinga, M, et al. Epi Info 2002. Atlanta, GA: Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, 2002.Google Scholar
22Bransby, ER, Daubney, CG, King, J. Comparison of results obtained by different methods of individual dietary survey. British Journal of Nutrition 1948; 2: 89–110.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
23Edington, J, Thorogood, M, Geekie, M, Ball, M, Mann, J. Assessment of nutritional intake using dietary records with estimated weights. Journal of Human Nutrition and Dietetics 1989; 2: 407–14.Google Scholar
24Todd, KS, Hudes, M, Calloway, DH. Food intake measurement: problems and approaches. American Journal of Clinical Nutrition 1983; 37: 139–46.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
25Bingham, SA, Gill, C, Welch, A, Day, K, Cassidy, A, Khaw, KT. Comparison of dietary assessment methods in nutritional epidemiology: weighed records v. 24 h recalls, food-frequency questionnaires, and estimated-diet records. British Journal of Nutrition 1994; 72: 619–43.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
26Bonifacj, C, Gerber, M, Scali, J, Daures, JP. Comparison of dietary assessment methods in a Southern French population: use of weighed records, estimated-diet records and a food-frequency questionnaire. European Journal of Clinical Nutrition 1997; 51: 217–31.Google Scholar
27Karvetti, R, Knuts, L. Validity of the estimated food dietary: comparison of 2-day recorded and observed food and nutrient intakes. Journal of the American Dietetic Association 1992; 92: 580–4.Google Scholar
28Crawford, PB, Obarzanek, E, Morrison, J, Sabry, ZI. Comparative advantage of 3-day records over 24-hour recall and 5-day food frequency validated by observation of 9- and 10-year-old girls. Journal of the American Dietetic Association 1994; 94: 626–30.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
29Nettleton, PA, Day, KC, Nelson, M. Dietary survey methods 2: a comparison of nutrient intakes within families assessed by household measures and the semi-weighed method. Journal of Human Nutrition 1980; 34: 349–54.Google Scholar
30Ministerio de Salud. Encuesta Nacional de Nutrición: Fascículo 3 Consumo Aparente. San José, Costa Rica: Ministerio de Salud, 1996.Google Scholar
31Bingham, SA. The dietary assessment of individuals; methods, accuracy, new techniques and recommendations. Nutrition Abstracts and Reviews (Series A) 1987; 57: 705–42.Google Scholar
32Seale, JL, Rumpler, WV. Comparison of energy expenditure measurements by diet records, energy intake balance, doubly labeled water and room calorimetry. European Journal of Clinical Nutrition 1997; 51: 856–63.Google Scholar
33Black, AE, Prentice, AM, Goldberg, GR, Jebb, SA, Bingham, SA, Livingstone, MBE. Measurements of total energy expenditure provide insights into the validity of dietary measurements of energy intake. Journal of the American Dietetic Association 1993; 93: 572–9.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
34Hill, RJ, Davies, PSW. The validity of a four day weighed food record for measuring energy intake in female classical ballet dancers. European Journal of Clinical Nutrition 1999; 53: 752–4.Google Scholar