Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-dsjbd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-26T02:45:21.784Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Under-reporting in dietary surveys – implications for development of food-based dietary guidelines

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 April 2001

W Becker*
Affiliation:
National Food Administration, Uppsala, Sweden
D Welten
Affiliation:
TNO Nutrition, Zeist, the Netherlands
*
*Corresponding author: Email [email protected]
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.
Objective:

To illustrate issues related to under-reporting in dietary surveys relevant for development of food-based dietary guidelines

Setting:

Food and nutrient intakes in two national dietary surveys are analysed in relation to under-reporting using the concept of cut-off values for the ratio between energy intake and basal metabolic rate as well as biochemical markers of nutritional status.

Results:

Subjects with an implausibly low EI/BMR ratio had dietary patterns more close to recommended levels, e.g. lower fat intake and higher fibre intake, than those with acceptable energy intakes. Intakes of micronutrients were lower. This was due to both general and selective under-reporting of foods. Under-reporting was due to less frequent consumption, larger proportion of non consumers and smaller portion sizes. Low EI/BMR ratios did not influence the characterisation of protein and micronutrient intake of low and high consumers of fruit and vegetable intake.

Conclusions:

Under-reporting can influence the usefulness of dietary data as a tool for developing food-based dietary guidelines, and the extent of under-reporting should be assessed using appropriate methods.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © CABI Publishing 2001

References

1Goldberg, GR, Black, AE, Jebb, SA, Cole, TJ, Murgatroyd, PR, Coward, WA, Prentice, AM. Critical evaluation of energy intake data using fundamental principles of energy physiology: 1. Derivation of cut-off values to identify under-reporting. Eur. J. Clin. Nutr. 1991; 45: 569–81.Google Scholar
2Haraldsdóttir, J, Becker, W, Hulshof, K, Johansson, L, Hermann-Kunz, E. Assessment of vitamin and mineral adequacy may be biased by implausibly low energy intakes. Results from five European countries. Abstract. Eur. J. Clin. Nutr. 1999; 52(Suppl. 2): S82.Google Scholar
3Becker, W. Food habits and nutrient intake in Sweden 1989 (in Swedish with English summary). National Food Adminstration, Uppsala: 1994.Google Scholar
4Becker, W. Dietary guidelines and patterns of food and nutrient intake in Sweden. Br. J. Nutr. 1999; 82(Suppl. 2): S113–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
5Becker, W, Foley, S, Shelley, E, Gibney, M. Energy under-reporting in Swedish and Irish dietary surveys: implications for food-based dietary guidelines. Br. J. Nutr. 1999; 81(Suppl. 2): S127–31.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
6Brussaard, JH, Brants, HA-M, Löwik, MRH. Nutritional status among adults with special reference to micronutrients (Dutch Nutrition Surveillance System). Eur. J. Clin. Nutr. 1997; 51(suppl. 3): S1–66.Google Scholar
7Löwik, MRH, Hulshof, KFAM, Van der Heijden, LJM, Brussaard, JH, Burema, J, Kistemaker, C, De Vries, PJF. Changes in the diet in the Netherlands 1987–1988 to 1992 (Dutch Nutrition Surveillance System). International Journal of Food Sciences and Nutrition 1998; 49(suppl. 1): S1–68.Google Scholar
8Commission of the European Communities. Reports of the Scientific Committe for Food (Thirty-first series). Nutrient and energy intakes for the European Community. Luxembourg, 1993.Google Scholar
9Sandström, B, Lyhne, N, Pedersen, JI, Aro, A, Thorsdóttir, I, Becker, W. Nordic Nutrition Recommendations. Scand. J. Nutr./Näringsforskning 1996; 40: 161–5.Google Scholar
10Sandström, B, Lyhne, N, Pedersen, JI, Aro, A, Thorsdóttir, I, Becker, W. Nordiska Näringsrekommendationer 1996 (Nordic Nutrition Recommendations). Copenhagen: Nordic Council of Ministers, Nord, 1996: 28.Google Scholar