Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gxg78 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-22T15:40:54.508Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Two important exceptions to the relationship between energy density and fat content: foods with reduced-fat claims and high-fat vegetable-based dishes

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 January 2007

Helen A La Fontaine*
Affiliation:
School of Health Sciences, Deakin University, 221 Burwood Highway, Melbourne, Victoria 3125, Australia
Timothy C Crowe
Affiliation:
School of Health Sciences, Deakin University, 221 Burwood Highway, Melbourne, Victoria 3125, Australia
Boyd A Swinburn
Affiliation:
School of Health Sciences, Deakin University, 221 Burwood Highway, Melbourne, Victoria 3125, Australia
Carl J Gibbons
Affiliation:
School of Health Sciences, Deakin University, 221 Burwood Highway, Melbourne, Victoria 3125, Australia
*
*Corresponding author: Email [email protected]
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.
Objective:

To test the hypothesis that many foods with reduced-fat (RF) claims are relatively energy-dense and that high-fat (HF) vegetable-based dishes are relatively energy-dilute.

Design:

Nutrient data were collected from available foods in Melbourne supermarkets that had an RF claim and a full-fat (FF) equivalent. Nutrient analyses were also conducted on recipes for HF vegetable-based dishes that had more than 30% energy from fat but less than 10% from saturated fat. The dietary intake data (beverages removed) from the 1995 National Nutrition Survey were used for the reference relationships between energy density (ED) and percentage energy as fat and carbohydrate and percentage of water by weight.

Statistics:

Linear regression modelled relationships of macronutrients and ED. Paired t-tests compared observed and predicted reductions in the ED of RF foods compared with FF equivalents.

Results:

Both FF and RF foods were more energy-dense than the Australian diet and the HF vegetable-based dishes were less energy-dense. The Australian diet showed significant relationships with ED, which were positive for percentage energy as fat and negative for percentage energy as carbohydrate. There were no such relationships for the products with RF claims or for the HF vegetable-based dishes.

Conclusion:

While, overall, a reduced-fat diet is relatively energy-dilute and is likely to protect against weight gain, there appear to be two important exceptions. A high intake of products with RF claims could lead to a relatively energy-dense diet and thus promote weight gain. Alternatively, a high intake of vegetable-based foods, even with substantial added fat, could reduce ED and protect against weight gain.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © The Authors 2004

References

1Bray, GA, Popkin, BM. Dietary fat intake does affect obesity! American Journal of Clinical Nutrition 1998; 68(6): 1157–73.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
2Astrup, A, Grunwald, GK, Melanson, EL, Saris, WH, Hill, JO. Therole of low-fat diets in body weight control: a meta-analysisof ad libitum dietary intervention studies. InternationalJournal of Obesity and Related Metabolic Disorders 2000; 24(12): 1545–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
3Sigman-Grant, M. Can you have your low-fat cake and eat it too? The role of fat-modified products. Journal of theAmerican Dietetic Association 1997; 97(Suppl. 7): S76–81.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
4Weimer, J. Accelerating the trend toward healthy eating.In: America's Eating Habits: Changes and Consequences. Washington, DC: US Department of Agriculture, EconomicResearch Service, 1999; 385401.Google Scholar
5Astrup, A. The American paradox: the role of energy-densefat-reduced food in the increasing prevalence of obesity. Current Opinion in Clinical Nutrition and Metabolic Care 1998; 1(6): 573–7.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
6Heini, AF, Weinsier, RL. Divergent trends in obesity and fatintake patterns: the American paradox. American Journal ofMedicine 1997; 102(3): 259–64.Google Scholar
7National Health and Medical Research Council. Acting onAustralia's Weight. Canberra: National Health and MedicalResearch Council, 1997.Google Scholar
8Stubbs, RJ, Harbron, CG. Covert manipulation of the ratio ofmedium- to long-chain triglycerides in isoenergeticallydense diets: effect on food intake in ad libitum feedingmen. International Journal of Obesity and Related MetabolicDisorders 1996; 20(5): 435–44.Google Scholar
9Rolls, BJ, Bell, EA, Castellanos, VH, Chow, M, Pelkman, CL, Thorwart, ML. Energy density but not fat content of foodsaffected energy intake in lean and obese women. AmericanJournal of Clinical Nutrition 1999; 69(5): 863–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
10Bell, EA, Rolls, BJ. Energy density of foods affects energyintake across multiple levels of fat content in lean and obesewomen. American Journal of Clinical Nutrition 2001; 73(6): 1010–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
11Bell, EA, Castellanos, VH, Pelkman, CL, Thorwart, ML, Rolls, BJ. Energy density of foods affects energy intake in normalweightwomen. American Journal of Clinical Nutrition 1998; 67(3): 412–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
12Saltzman, E, Dallal, GE, Roberts, SB. Effect of high-fat and lowfatdiets on voluntary energy intake and substrate oxidation:studies in identical twins consuming diets matched forenergy density, fibre, and palatability. American Journal ofClinical Nutrition 1997; 66(6): 1332–9.Google Scholar
13Blundell, JE, King, NA. Over-consumption as a cause ofweight gain: behavioural–physiological interactions in thecontrol of food intake (appetite). Ciba FoundationSymposium 1996; 201: 138–54, discussion 154–8, 188–93.Google Scholar
14 Food Standards Australia New Zealand. AustralianFood and Nutrient Database [online], 1999. Availableat http://www.foodstandards.gov.au/recallssurveillance/foodcompositionprogram/ausnut1999/ausnutguideexplanatorynotes/index.cfm.Google Scholar
15National Health and Medical Research Council. Dietary Guidelines for Australians. Canberra: National Health andMedical Research Council, 1992; 21–7.Google Scholar
16DiMeglio, DP, Mattes, RD. Liquid versus solid carbohydrate: effects on food intake and body weight. InternationalJournal of Obesity and Related Metabolic Disorders 2000; 24(6): 794800.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
17Yao, M, Roberts, SB. Dietary energy density and weightregulation. Nutrition Reviews 2001; 59(8 Pt 1): 247–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
18Stubbs, RJ, Johnstone, AM, O'Reilly, LM, Barton, K, Reid, C. Theeffect of covertly manipulating the energy density of mixeddiets on ad libitum food intake in ‘pseudo free-living’humans. International Journal of Obesity and RelatedMetabolic Disorders 1998; 22(10): 980–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
19Stubbs, RJ, Johnstone, AM, Harbron, CG, Reid, C. Covertmanipulation of energy density of high carbohydrate diets in ‘pseudo free-living’ humans. International Journal ofObesity and Related Metabolic Disorders 1998; 22(9): 885–92.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
20Poppitt, SD. Energy density of diets and obesity. InternationalJournal of Obesity and Related Metabolic Disorders 1995; 19(Suppl. 5): S20–6.Google ScholarPubMed
21Oakes, ME, Slotterback, CS. What's in a name? A comparisonof men's and women's judgements about food names andtheir nutrient contents. Appetite 2001; 36(1): 2940.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
22Miller, DL, Castellanos, VH, Shide, DJ, Peters, JC, Rolls, BJ. Effect of fat-free potato chips with and without nutrition labels onfat and energy intakes. American Journal of ClinicalNutrition 1998; 68(2): 282–90.Google ScholarPubMed
23Shide, DJ, Rolls, BJ. Information about the fat content ofpreloads influences energy intake in healthy women. Journal of the American Dietetic Association 1995; 95(9): 993–8.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
24Stubbs, J, Ferres, S, Horgan, G. Energy density of foods: effectson energy intake. Critical Reviews in Food Science and Nutrition 2000; 40(6): 481515.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
25Allred, JB. Too much of a good thing? An overemphasis oneating low-fat foods may be contributing to the alarmingincrease in overweight among US adults. Journal of theAmerican Dietetic Association 1995; 95(4): 417–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar