Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-mkpzs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-22T15:15:59.909Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Stopping the rot in nutrition science

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 January 2007

Barrie Margetts
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. As you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Editorial
Information
Public Health Nutrition , Volume 9 , Issue 2 , April 2006 , pp. 169 - 173
Copyright
Copyright © The Author 2006

References

1World Association of Medical Editors (WAME). WAME recommendations on publication ethics policies for medical journals, 2005. Available at http://www.wame.orgGoogle Scholar
2Synder, E, Loring, J. Beyond fraud – stem-cell research continues. New England Journal of Medicine 2006; 354(4): 321–4.Google Scholar
3Shenkin, S, Whiteman, C, Pattie, A, Deary, I. Supplementation and the elderly: dramatic results? Nutrition 2002; 18: 364.Google Scholar
4Carpenter, K, Roberts, S, Sternberg, S. Nutrition and immune function: a 1992 report. Lancet 2003; 361(9376): 2247.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
5White, C. Three journals raise doubts on validity of Canadian studies. British Medical Journal 2004; 328(7431): 67.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
6 British Medical Journal. Rapid responses to White C [reference 5 above]. In date order: Roberts, S, Sternberg, S; Chandra, R; Smith, R; Shenkin, S; Smith, R; Meguid, M; Shenkin, A; Chandra, R; Sternberg, S. 16 January–29 February 2004. Available at http://www.bmj.comGoogle Scholar
7Chandra, R, Smith, R, Meguid, M. Validity of Canadian studies [three separate letters]. British Medical Journal 2004; 328(7437): 465.Google Scholar
8Brody, J. A top scientist's research is under attack. New York Times, 6 05 2004.Google Scholar
9Chandra, R. Effect of vitamin and trace-element supplements on immune responses and infection in elderly subjects. Lancet 1992; 340(8828): 1124–7.Google Scholar
10Chandra, R. Graying of the immune system. Can nutritional supplements improve immunity in the elderly?. Journal of the American Medical Association 1997; 277(17): 1398–9.Google Scholar
11Chandra, R. Effect of vitamin and trace-element supplementation on cognitive function in elderly subjects. Nutrition 2001; 17(9): 709–12. [retracted in 2005].Google Scholar
12Chandra, R. Can nutrient supplements improve functional outcome in the elderly?. Nutrition 2003; 19: 978–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
13Chandra, R. Nutrition, immunity and infection: present knowledge, future directions. Lancet 1983; 321(8326): 688–91.Google Scholar
14Chandra, R. Immune responses: what do we know? In: Institutes of Medicine. Military Strategies for Sustainment of Nutrition and Immune Function in the Field. Washington, DC: National Academies Press, 1999. Available at http://www.iom.orgGoogle Scholar
15deMont, J. Maclean's 1995 Honor Roll. Macleans, 18 12 1995.Google Scholar
16Chandra, R. Influence of multinutrient supplement on immune responses and infection-related illness in 50–65 year-old subjects. Nutrition Research 2002; 22(1–2): 5–11.Google Scholar
17Jain, A. Influence of vitamins and trace-elements on the incidence of respiratory infections in the elderly. Nutrition Research 2002; 22(1–2): 85–7.Google Scholar
18Meguid, M. Retraction. Nutrition 2005; 21(2): 286.Google Scholar
19Smith, R. Investigating the previous studies of a fraudulent author. British Medical Journal 2005; 331(7511): 288–91.Google Scholar
20O'Neill-Yates, C. The secret life of Ranjit Chandra. The National (Canada) [three features], 31 01–2 02 2006.Google Scholar
21Hamblin, R. The secret life of Dr Chandra. British Medical Journal 2006; 332: 369.Google Scholar
22Chandra, R, Puri, S, Hamed, A. Influence of maternal diet during lactation and use of formula feeds on development of atopic eczema in high risk infants. British Medical Journal 1989; 299(6693): 228–30. [erratum in British Medical Journal 1989; 299(6704):896].CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
23Chandra, R. Five year follow-up of high-risk infants with family history of allergy exclusively breast-fed or fed whey hydrolysate, soy and conventional cow's milk formulas. Nutrition Research 1998; 18(8): 1395–411. [reprint of paper published in Journal of Pediatric Gastroenterology and Nutrition 1997; 24(4): 380–8].CrossRefGoogle Scholar
24Chandra, R. Breast feeding, hydrolysate formulas and delayed introduction of selected foods in the prevention of food sensitivity and allergic diseases. Nutrition Research 2002; 22: 125–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
25James, L. The terror of our arms: conquest and trade in India, 1689–1815 [Chapter 4]. The Rise and Fall of the British Empire. New York: Little, Brown, 1994.Google Scholar
26Lock, S. Misconduct in medical research: does it exist in Britain?. British Medical Journal 1988; 297(6662): 1531–5.Google Scholar
27 Anon. Summary of cases submitted to COPE since its inception. In: The COPE Report 2001. Annual Report of the Committee on Publication Ethics. London: BMJ Publishing Group, 2002; 26. Available at http://www.publicationethics.org.uk/reports/2001/2001pdfcomplete.pdfGoogle Scholar
28Barnett, A. Revealed: how drug firms ‘hoodwink’ medical journals. Observer, 7 12 2003.Google Scholar
29Smith, R. Medical journals are an extension of the marketing arm of pharmaceutical companies. PLoSMedicine 2005; 2(5): e38 Available at http://medicine.plosjournals.org/periserv/?request=getdocument&doi=10.1371/journal.pmed.0020138.Google Scholar
30Horton, R. The dawn of McScience. New York Review of Books 2004; 51(4): 7–9.Google Scholar
31Bosman, J. Reporters find science journals harder to trust, but not easy to verify. New York Times, 13 02 2006.Google Scholar
32Monbiot, G. Exposed: the secret corporate funding behind health research. The Guardian, 7 02 2006.Google Scholar
33 Association for Research into the Science of Enjoyment (ARISE). 90s guilt-trap could threaten UK health, say scientists. Media release, 7 11 1996. Available at http://www.prnewswire.co.ukGoogle Scholar
34Chapman, S, Carter, S, Peters, M. ‘A deep fragrance of academia’: the Australian Tobacco Research Foundation. Tobacco Control 2003; 12(Suppl. 3): 38–44.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
35 Fishburn Hedges Boys Williams. ARISE (Associates for Research into the Science of Enjoyment): overseas agency brief, 08 1994. Philip Morris. Bates No. 2504092395/2405. Available at http://www.legacy.library.ucsf.edu/tid/umh29e00Google Scholar
36Bok, D. Scientific research [Chapter 4]. Universities in the Marketplace. The Commercialization of Higher Education. Princeton, NJ: University Press, 2003.Google Scholar
37Yngve, A, Hambraeus, L, Lissner, L, Serra Majem, L, Vaz de Almeida, MD, Berg, C, et al. The Women's Health Initiative. What is on trial: nutrition and chronic disease? Or misinterpreted science, media havoc and the sound of silence from peers? [invited commentry]. Public Health Nutrition 2006; 9(2): 269–72.Google Scholar
38Committee on Publications Ethics, http://www.publicationethics.org.ukGoogle Scholar
39Butler, S. Thoughts upon various subjects. In: Remains, Vol. 2. London: J and R Tonson, 1759 [written 1667–1669, published posthumously].Google Scholar