Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-7cvxr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-22T15:13:58.664Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Socio-economic pathways to diet: modelling the association between socio-economic position and food purchasing behaviour

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 January 2007

Gavin Turrell*
Affiliation:
School of Public Health, Queensland University of Technology, Victoria Park Road, Kelvin Grove, Brisbane, Queensland 4059, Australia
Anne M Kavanagh
Affiliation:
Key Centre for Women's Health in Society, School of Population Health, University of Melbourne, Victoria 3010, Australia
*
*Corresponding author: Email [email protected]
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.
Objectives

To examine the association between education level and food purchasing behaviour and the contribution of dietary knowledge to this relationship; and the association between household income and purchasing behaviour and the contribution made by subjective perceptions about the cost of healthy food.

Design and setting

The study was conducted in Brisbane City (Australia) in 2000. The sample was selected using a stratified two-stage cluster design. Data were collected by face-to-face interview from residents of private dwellings (n = 1003), and the response rate was 66.4%. Dietary knowledge was measured using a 20-item index that assessed general knowledge about food, nutrition, health and their interrelationships. Food-cost concern was measured using a three-item scale derived from principal components analysis (α = 0.647). Food purchasing was measured using a 16-item index that reflected a household's purchase of grocery items that were consistent (or otherwise) with dietary guideline recommendations. Associations among the variables were analysed using linear regression with adjustment for age and sex.

Results

Significant associations were found between education, household income and food purchasing behaviour. Food shoppers with low levels of education, and those residing in low-income households, were least likely to purchase foods that were comparatively high in fibre and low in fat, salt and sugar. Socio-economic differences in dietary knowledge represented part of the pathway through which educational attainment exerts an influence on diet; and food purchasing differences by household income were related to diet in part via food-cost concern.

Conclusions

Our findings suggest that socio-economic differences in food purchasing behaviour may contribute to the relationship between socio-economic position and food and nutrient intakes, and, by extension, to socio-economic health inequalities for diet-related disease. Further, socio-economic differences in dietary knowledge and concerns about the cost of healthy food play an important role in these relationships and hence should form the focus of future health promotion efforts directed at reducing health inequalities and encouraging the general population to improve their diets.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © The Authors 2006

References

1Billson, H, Pryer, JA, Nichols, R. Variation in fruit and vegetable consumption among adults in Britain: an analysis from the dietary and nutritional survey of British adults. European Journal of Clinical Nutrition 1999; 53: 946–52.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
2De Irala-Estevez, J, Groth, M, Johansson, L, Oltersdorf, U, Prattala, R, Martinez-Gonzalez, MA. A systematic review of socioeconomic differences in food habits in Europe: consumption of fruit and vegetables. European Journal of Clinical Nutrition 2000; 54: 706–14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
3Giskes, K, Turrell, G, Patterson, C, Newman, B. Socioeconomic differences among Australian adults in consumption of fruit and vegetables and intakes of anti-oxidants and folate. Journal of Human Nutrition and Dietetics 2002; 15: 375–85.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
4Turrell, G. Determinants of healthy food choice in a population-based sample. American Journal of Health Behavior 1998; 22: 342–57.Google Scholar
5Turrell, G. Compliance with the Australian dietary guidelines in the early 1990's: have population-based health promotion programs been effective? Nutrition and Health 1997; 11: 271–88.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
6James, WPT, Nelson, M, Leather, S. The contribution of nutrition to inequalities in health. British Medical Journal 1997; 314: 1545–9.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
7Davey Smith, G, Brunner, E. Socioeconomic differentials in health: the role of nutrition. Proceedings of the Nutrition Society 1997; 56: 7590.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
8Kaplan, GA, Keil, JE. Socioeconomic factors and cardiovascular disease: a review. Circulation 1993; 88: 1973–98.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
9Cooper, R, Cutler, J, Desvigne-Nickens, P, Fortmann, SP, Friedman, L, Havlik, R, et al. Trends and disparities in coronary heart disease, stroke and other cardiovascular diseases in the United States: findings of the national conference on cardiovascular disease prevention. Circulation 2000; 102: 3137–47.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
10Rooks, RN, Simonsick, EM, Miles, T, Newman, A, Kritchevsky, SB, Schulz, R. The association of race and socioeconomic status with cardiovascular disease indicators among older adults in the health, aging and body composition study. Journals of Gerontology. Series B, Psychological Sciences and Social Sciences 2002; 57: S247–56.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
11Tang, M, Chen, Y, Krewski, D. Gender-related differences in the association between socioeconomic status and self-reported diabetes. International Journal of Epidemiology 2003; 32: 381–5.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
12Everson, SA, Maty, SC, Lynch, JW, Kaplan, GA. Epidemiologic evidence for the relation between socioeconomic status and depression, obesity, and diabetes. Journal of Psychosomatic Research 2002; 53: 891–5.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
13Mullins, CD, Cooke, JL, Wang, J, Shaya, FT, Hsu, DV, Brooks, S. Disparities in prevalence rates for lung, colorectal, breast, and prostate cancers in Medicaid. Journal of the National Medical Association 2004; 96: 809–16.Google ScholarPubMed
14Ward, E, Jemal, A, Cokkinides, V, Singh, GK, Cardinez, C, Ghafoor, A, et al. Cancer disparities by race/ethnicity and socioeconomic status. CA Cancer Journal for Clinicians 2004; 54: 7893.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
15Turrell, G, Hewitt, B, Patterson, C, Oldenburg, B, Gould, T. Socioeconomic differences in food purchasing behaviour and suggested implications for diet-related health promotion. Journal of Human Nutrition and Dietetics 2002; 15: 355–64.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
16Shimakawa, T, Sorlie, P, Carpenter, MA, Dennis, B, Tell, GS, Watson, R, et al. Dietary intake patterns and sociodemographic factors in the Atherosclerosis Risk in Communities Study. Preventive Medicine 1994; 23: 769–80.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
17Smith, A, Baghurst, K. Public health implications of dietary differences between social status and occupational category groups. Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health 1992; 46: 409–16.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
18Crotty, P, Rutishauser, I, Cahill, M. From food to nutrients and back. Proceedings of the Nutrition Society of Australia 1991; 16: 38.Google Scholar
19National Health and Medical Research Council. Dietary Guidelines for Australian Adults. Canberra: AusInfo, 2003.Google Scholar
20Strategic Intergovernmental Nutrition Alliance. Eat Well Australia: An Agenda for Action for Public Health Nutrition. Canberra: National Public Health Partnership, 2001.Google Scholar
21Turrell, G. Structural, material, and economic influences on the food purchasing choices of socioeconomic groups. Australian and New Zealand Journal of Public Health 1996; 20: 611–7.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
22Galobardes, B, Morabia, A, Bernstein, M. Diet and socioeconomic position: does the use of different indicators matter? International Journal of Epidemiology 2001; 30: 334–40.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
23Turrell, G, Hewitt, B, Patterson, C, Oldenburg, B. Measuring socio-economic position in dietary research: is choice of socio-economic indicator important? Public Health Nutrition 2003; 6: 191200.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
24Parmenter, K, Waller, J, Wardle, J. Demographic variation in nutrition knowledge in England. Health Education Research 2000; 15: 163–74.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
25Macario, E, Emmons, KM, Sorensen, G, Hunt, MK, Rudd, RE. Factors influencing nutrition education for patients with low literacy skills. Journal of the American Dietetic Association 1998; 98: 559–64.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
26Busselman, KM, Holcomb, CA. Reading skill and comprehension of Dietary Guidelines by WIC participants. Journal of the American Dietetic Association 1994; 94: 622–5.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
27Robinson, N, Caraher, M, Lang, T. Access to shops: the views of low-income shoppers. Health Education Journal 2000; 59: 121–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
28Barratt, J. The cost and availability of healthy food choices in southern Derbyshire. Journal of Human Nutrition and Dietetics 1997; 10: 63–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
29Sooman, A, Macintyre, S, Anderson, A. Scotland's health – a more difficult challenge for some? The price and availability of healthy foods in socially contrasting localities in the West of Scotland. Health Bulletin 1993; 51: 276–84.Google Scholar
30Turrell, G, Patterson, C, Oldenburg, B, Gould, T. The socio-economic patterning of survey participation and non-response error in a multilevel study of food purchasing behaviour: area- and individual-level characteristics. Public Health Nutrition 2003; 6: 181–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
31Australian Bureau of Statistics. Socioeconomic Indexes for Areas, 1996. Catalogue No. 2039.0 Canberra: Australian Government Publishing Service, 1998.Google Scholar
32Australian Bureau of Statistics. Income Distribution 1999–2000. Catalogue No. 6523.0 Canberra: Australian Government Publishing Service, 2001.Google Scholar
33Trent, LK. Nutrition knowledge of active-duty navy personnel. Journal of the American Dietetic Association 1992; 92: 724–8.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
34Hatcher, L. A Step-by-Step Approach to Using the SAS System for Factor Analysis and Structural Equation Modelling. Cary, NC: SAS Institute Inc., 1994.Google Scholar
35Commonwealth Department of Health and Family Services. Australian Guide to Healthy Eating. Canberra: Australian Government Publishing Service, 1998.Google Scholar
36Simpson, JM, Klar, N, Donner, A. Accounting for cluster randomization: a review of primary prevention trials, 1990 through 1993. American Journal of Public Health 1995; 85: 1378–83.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
37Korn, EL, Graubard, BI. Analysis of large health surveys: accounting for the sampling design. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society 1995; 158: 263–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
38Rahbash, J, Browne, W, Goldstein, H, Yang, M, Plewis, I, Healy, M. A User's Guide to MLwiN. London: Centre for Multilevel Modelling, 2000.Google Scholar
39Stafleu, A, Van Staveren, WA, De Graaf, C, Burema, J. Nutrition knowledge and attitudes towards high-fat foods and low-fat alternatives in three generations of women. European Journal of Clinical Nutrition 1996; 50: 3341.Google ScholarPubMed
40Shepherd, R, Towler, G. Nutrition knowledge, attitudes and fat intake: application of the theory of reasoned action. Journal of Human Nutrition and Dietetics 1992; 5: 387–97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
41Wardle, J, Parmenter, K, Waller, J. Nutrition knowledge and food intake. Appetite 2000; 34: 269–75.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
42Giskes, K, Turrell, G, Patterson, C, Newman, B. Socio-economic differences in fruit and vegetable consumption among Australian adolescents and adults. Public Health Nutrition 2002; 5: 663–9.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
43Maggiore, P. Is a healthy diet affordable for families on a low income? Australian Journal of Nutrition and Dietetics 1991; 48: 38–9.Google Scholar
44Lawson, JS. Food consumption based on dietary guidelines can cost less than traditional diets. Australian Journal of Public Health 1993; 17: 397–8.Google Scholar
45Kuh, D, Ben-Shlomo, Y, eds. A Life Course Approach to Chronic Disease Epidemiology. 2nd ed. Oxford: Oxford Oxford University Press, 2004.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
46Psacharoupoulos, G. Returns to education: a further international update and implications. Journal of Human Resources 1985; 20: 583604.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
47Azuma, Y, Grossman, HI. Educational inequality. Labour 2003; 17: 317–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
48Turrell, G. Income non-reporting: implications for health inequalities research. Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health 2000; 54: 166–72.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
49Turrell, G, Najman, JM. Collecting food-related data from low socioeconomic groups: how adequate are our current research designs? Australian Journal of Public Health 1995; 19: 410–6.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed