Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-dzt6s Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-22T16:21:16.116Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Sociodemographic determinants of perceived influences on food choice in a nationally representative sample of Irish adults

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 January 2007

M Kearney ,
JM Kearney ,
A Dunne  and
MJ Gibney
M Kearney*
Affiliation:
Institute of European Food Studies, Trinity College, Dublin 2, Ireland
JM Kearney
Affiliation:
Institute of European Food Studies, Trinity College, Dublin 2, Ireland
A Dunne
Affiliation:
Department of Statistics, University College Dublin, Belfield, Dublin 4, Ireland
MJ Gibney
Affiliation:
Institute of European Food Studies, Trinity College, Dublin 2, Ireland
*
*Corresponding author: Email [email protected]
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.
Objective

To identify the most important motivations for food choice from the point of view of the consumer in the Irish population, and to characterize those subjects who do and do not regard nutrition as a significant consideration in food choice.

Design

As part of a pan-European Union (EU) survey on consumer attitudes to food, nutrition and health, a quota-controlled, nationally representative sample of Irish adults (n = 1009) aged 15 years upwards, completed an interview-assisted, close-ended questionnaire. Subjects selected three factors, from a list of 15, which they believed had the greatest influence on their food choice.

Setting

The interviews for the survey were conducted in subjects' homes.

Results

‘Quality/freshness of food’ was the most frequently selected food choice factor (51%) followed by ’taste‘ (43%) and ‘trying to eat a healthy diet’ (36%). Female gender, increasing age and higher levels of education were found to be independent sociodemographic factors affecting the selection of ‘trying to eat a healthy diet’ as an important factor in food choice.

Conclusions

Although included in the top five most frequently selected factors affecting food choice, nutrition/healthy eating does not appear to have top priority for the majority of Irish adults. There are differences between the various sociodemographic groups within the population; males and younger subjects appear to require specific nutrition promotion messages.

Keywords

Food choicePerceived influencesSociodemographics
Type
Research Article
Information
Public Health Nutrition , Volume 3 , Issue 2 , June 2000 , pp. 219 - 226
Copyright
Copyright © CABI Publishing 2000

References

1Smith, AM, Baghurst, K, Owen, N.Socio-economic status and personal characteristics as predictors of dietary change. J. Nutr. Educ. 1995; 27: 173–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
2Drenowski, A.Taste preferences and food intake. Annu. Rev. Nutr. 1997; 17: 237–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
3Vaandrager, HW, Koelen, MA. Consumer involvement in nutritional issues: the role of information. Am. J. Clin. Nutr. 1997; 65: S1980–4.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
4Nestle, M, Wing, R, Birch, L, et al. Behavioural and social influences on food choice. Nutr. Rev. 1998; 56: S50–64.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
5Harnack, L, Block, G, Lane, S.Influence of selected environmental and personal factors on dietary behaviour for chronic disease prevention: a review of the literature. J. Nutr. Educ. 1997; 29: 306–12.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
6Johansson, L. Nutrition education: the Norwegian experience. In: van der Heij, DG, Lowik, MRH, Ockhuizen, Th, eds. Food and Nutrition Policy in Europe. Proceedings of the Second European Conference on Food and Nutrition Policy, The Hague21–24 April 1992WageningenPuduc Scientific Publishers, 1993; 157–69.Google Scholar
7Gibney, MJ, Kearney, M, Kearney, JM. Introduction: IEFS pan-EU survey of consumer attitudes to food, nutrition and health. Eur. J. Clin. Nutr. 1997; 51: S2.Google Scholar
8Lennernas, M, Fjellstrom, C, Becker, W, et al. Influences on food choice perceived to be important by nationally-representative samples of adults in the European Union. Eur. J. Clin. Nutr. 1997; 51: S8–15.Google ScholarPubMed
9Kearney, M, Kelly, A, Gibney, MJ. Attitudes towards and beliefs about nutrition and health among a nationally-representative sample of Irish adults: application of logistic regression modelling. J. Nutr. Educ. 1998; 30: 139–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
10Kearney, M, Kearney, JM, Gibney, MJ. Methods used to conduct the survey on consumer attitudes to food, nutrition and health on nationally-representative samples of adults from each member state of the European Union. Eur. J. Clin. Nutr. 1997; 51: S3–7.Google ScholarPubMed
11Margetts, BM, Martinez, JA, Saba, A, Moles, A, Holm, L, Kearney, M.Definitions of ‘healthy’ eating: a pan-EU survey of consumer attitudes to food, nutrition and health. Eur. J. Clin. Nutr. 1997; 51: S23–9.Google ScholarPubMed
12DeAlmeida, MDV, Graca, P, Lappalainen, R, et al. . Sources used and trusted by nationally-representative adults in the European Union for information on healthy eating. Eur. J. Clin. Nutr. 1997; 51: S16–22.Google Scholar
13Kearney, M, Gibney, MJ, Martinez, JA, et al. . Perceived need to alter eating habits of adults from all member states of the European Union. Eur. J. Clin. Nutr. 1997; 51: S30–5.Google ScholarPubMed
14DeGraaf, C, VanderGaag, M, Kafatos, A, Lennernas, M, Kearney, JM. Stages of dietary change among nationally-representative samples of adults in the European Union. Eur. J. Clin. Nutr. 1997; 51: S47–56.Google Scholar
15Zunft, HJF, Friebe, D, Seppelt, B, et al. Perceived benefits of healthy eating among a nationally-representative sample of adults in the European Union. Eur. J. Clin. Nutr. 1997; 51: S41–6.Google ScholarPubMed
16Lappalainen, R, Saba, A, Moles, A, Holm, L, Mykkanen, H, Gibney, MJ. Difficulties in trying to eat healthier: descriptive analysis of perceived barriers for healthy eating. Eur. J. Clin. Nutr. 1997; 51: S36–40.Google ScholarPubMed
17Market Research Society. Occupation Groupings. A Job Dictionary, 3rd edn. Bishop's Stortford, UK: Market Research Society, 1991.Google Scholar
18ICC/ESOMAR. International Code of Marketing and Social Research Practice. Paris, Amsterdam: ICC/ESOMAR, 1995.Google Scholar
19Barnett, V. Sample Survey: Principles and Methods. London: Arnold, 1991.Google Scholar
20Kent, R. Sampling cases. In: Kent, R, ed. Marketing Research in Action. London: Routledge, 1993; 53.Google Scholar
21Central Statistics Office. Census 1991. Vol. 1 Population. Dublin: Stationery Office, Government Publications, 1993.Google Scholar
22Central Statistics Office. Census 1991. Vol. 2 Ages and Marital Status. Dublin: Stationery Office, Government Publications, 1993.Google Scholar
23Glanz, K, Basil, M, Maibach, E, Goldberg, J, Snyder, D.Why Americans eat what they do: taste, nutrition, cost, convenience and weight control concerns as influences on food consumption. J. Am. Diet. Assoc. 1998; 98: 1118–26.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
24Hunt, MK, Stoddard, AM, Glanz, K, et al. Measures of food choice behaviour related to intervention messages in worksite health promotion. J. Nutr. Educ. 1997; 29: 3–11.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
25Dittus, KL, Hillers, VN, Beerman, KA. Benefits and barriers to fruit and vegetable intake – relationship between attitudes and consumption. J. Nutr. Educ. 1995; 27: 120–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
26Lloyd, HM, Paisley, CM, Mela, DJ. Barriers to the adoption of reduced-fat diets in a UK population. J. Am. Diet. Assoc. 1995; 95: 316–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
27Cox, DN, Anderson, AS, Lean, MEJ, Mela, DJ. UK consumer attitudes, beliefs and barriers to increasing fruit and vegetable consumption. Public Health Nutr. 1998; 1: 61–8.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
28Lechner, L, Brug, J, DeVries, H.Misconceptions of fruit and vegetable consumption: differences between objective and subjective estimation of intake. J. Nutr. Educ. 1997; 29: 313–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
29Devine, CM, Olson, CM. Women's dietary prevention motives: life stage influences. J. Nutr. Educ. 1991; 23: 267–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
30Jeffrey, RW, French, RW, Raether, C, Baxter, JE. An environmental intervention to increase fruit and salad purchases in a cafeteria. Prev. Med. 1994; 23: 788–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
31French, SA, Jeffrey, RW, Story, M, Hannan, P, Snyder, MP. A pricing strategy to promote low-fat snack choices through vending machines. Am. J. Public Health. 1997; 87: 849–51.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
32Drenowski, A, Holden, Wiltse J. Taste responses and food preferences in obese women: effects of weight cycling. Int. J. Obes. 1992; 16: 639–48.Google Scholar
33Turrell, G.Socioeconomic differences in food p and their influence on healthy food purchasing choices. J. Hum. Nutr. Diet. 1998; 11: 135–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
34Brug, J, Lechner, L, DeVries, H.Psychosocial determinants of fruit and vegetable consumption. Appetite 1995; 25: 285–96.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
35FAO/WHO. Preparation and Use of Food-based Dietary Guidelines. Report of a Joint FAO/WHO Consultation. Geneva: World Health Organization, 1996.Google Scholar