Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-2brh9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-25T09:01:38.381Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Relative validity of a food frequency questionnaire among tin miners in China: 1992/93 and 1995/96 diet validation studies

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 January 2007

MR Forman*
Affiliation:
Cancer Prevention Studies Branch, Division of Clinical Sciences, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD 20892-7326, USA
J Zhang
Affiliation:
Labor Protection Institute, Yunnan Tin Mine Corporation, Gejiu, Yunnan, PR China
L Nebeling
Affiliation:
Division of Cancer Control and Population Studies, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD 20892-7326, USA
S-X Yao
Affiliation:
Labor Protection Institute, Yunnan Tin Mine Corporation, Gejiu, Yunnan, PR China
MJ Slesinski
Affiliation:
WESTAT, 1850 Research Boulevard, Rockville, MD 20850-3129, USA
Y-L Qiao
Affiliation:
Department of Cancer Epidemiology, Cancer Institute, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Beijing 100021, PR China
S Ross
Affiliation:
Cancer Prevention Studies Branch, Division of Clinical Sciences, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD 20892-7326, USA
S Keith
Affiliation:
Information Management Sciences, Silver Spring, MD 20904, USA
M Maher
Affiliation:
Cancer Prevention Studies Branch, Division of Clinical Sciences, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD 20892-7326, USA
C Giffin
Affiliation:
Information Management Sciences, Silver Spring, MD 20904, USA
M Barrett
Affiliation:
Information Management Sciences, Silver Spring, MD 20904, USA
PR Taylor
Affiliation:
Cancer Prevention Studies Branch, Division of Clinical Sciences, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD 20892-7326, USA
BI Graubard
Affiliation:
Biostatistics Branch, Division of Cancer Epidemiology and Genetics, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD 20892, USA
*
*Corresponding author: Email [email protected]
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.
Objective

Diet validation research was conducted to compare the respondents' reporting of dietary intake in a food frequency questionnaire (FFQ) with intake reported in food recalls. Because the population received annual salary increments that could modify food intake, diet validation studies (DVSs) were conducted during two time intervals.

Design

A 99-item FFQ was administered by an interviewer twice in a 1-year interval, and responses to each FFQ item were compared with 28 days of interviewer-administered food recalls that were collected in four 1-week intervals during each season of 1992/93. The second validation study in 1995/96 had a similar design to the earlier one.

Setting

A prospective cohort study of lung cancer among tin miners in China was initiated in 1992, with dietary and other risk factors updated annually.

Subjects

Among a cohort of high risk tin miners for lung cancer, two different samples (n = 141 in 1992/93, and n = 113 in 1995/96) for each diet validation study were randomly selected from four mine units, that were representative of all worker units.

Results

Miners reported a significantly higher average frequency of intake of foods in the food recalls than the FFQ, with few exceptions. Deattenuated Pearson correlation coefficients of the frequency of food intake between the FFQ and food recalls were in the range of –0.40 to 0.72 in both studies, with higher positive correlations for beverages and cereal staples than for animal protein sources, vegetables, fruits and legumes. The percentage of individuals with exact agreement in the extreme quartiles of intake in the food recalls and FFQ ranged from 0 to 100% in both studies.

Conclusions

Among Chinese miners, the range in correlations between the food recalls and the FFQ were due to: (i) market availability of foods during the food recall weeks compared to their annual reported intake in the FFQ; (ii) cultural perception of time; and (iii) differences in how the intake of mixed dishes and their multi-ingredient foods were reported in the recalls vs. the FFQ. The range in the percentage of agreement in the same quartiles and the changes in food intake over time may have implications for the analysis of the diet-disease relationship in this cohort.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © CABI Publishing 1999

References

1Lee, MM, Lee, F, Ladenla, SW, Nude, R. A semiquantitative history questionnaire for Chinese Americans. Ann. Epidemiol. 1994; 4: 188–97.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
2Forman, MR, Hundt, GL, Berendes, HW, et al. Undernutrition among Bedouin Arab children: a follow-up of the Bedouin Infant Feeding Study. Am. J. Clin. Nutr. 1995; 61: 495500.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
3Li, L, Lu, F, Zhang, S, et al. Analysis of cancer mortality and distribution in China 1990–1992: an epidemiologic study. Chin. J. Oncol. 1996; 18(6): 404–5.Google Scholar
4Qiao, YL, Taylor, PR, Yao, SX, et al. Risk factors and early detection of lung cancer in a cohort of Chinese tin miners. Ann. Epidemiol. 1997; 7: 533–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
5Forman, MR, Yao, SX, Graubard, BI, et al. The effect of dietary intake of fruits and vegetables on the odds ratio of lung cancer among Yunnan tin miners. Int. J. Epidemiol. 1992; 21: 437–41.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
6Swanson, CA, Mao, BL, Li, JY, et al. Dietary determinants of lung-cancer risk: results from a case–control study in Yunnan Province, China. Int. J. Cancer 1992; 50: 8689.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
7Rosner, B, Willett, WC. Interval estimates for correlation coefficients corrected for within-person variation. Implications for study design and hypothesis testing. Am. J. Epidemiol. 1988; 127: 377–86.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
8Willett, WC, Sampson, L, Stampfer, MJ, et al. Reproducibility and validity of a semiquantitative food frequency questionnaire. Am. J. Epidemiol. 1985; 122: 5165.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
9Salvini, S, Hunter, DJ, Sampson, L, et al. Food-based validation of a dietary questionnaire: the effects of week-to-week variation in food consumption. Int. J. Epidemiol. 1989; 18: 858–67.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
10Goldbohm, RA, van den Brandt, PA, Brants, HAM, et al. Validation of a dietary questionnaire used in a large-scale prospective cohort study of diet and cancer. Eur. J. Clin. Nutr. 1994; 48: 253–65.Google Scholar
11Rimm, EB, Giovannucci, EL, Stampfer, MJ, et al. Reproducibility and validity of an expanded self-administered semiquantitative food frequency questionnaire among male health professionals. Am. J. Epidemiol. 1992; 135: 1114–26.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
12Feskanich, D, Rimm, RE, Giovannuci, EL, et al. Reproducibility and validity of food intake measurements from a semiquantitative food frequency questionnaire. J. Am. Diet. Assoc. 1993; 93: 790–6.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
13Pisani, P, Faggiano, F, Krogh, V, et al. Relative validity and reproducibility of a food frequency dietary questionnaire for use in the Italian EPIC centres. Int. J. Epidemiol. 1997; 26 (Suppl.): S152–60.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
14Ocke, MC, Bueno-de-Mesquita, HBGoddijn, HE, et al. The Dutch EPIC food frequency questionnaire. I. Description of the questionnaire, and relative validity and reproducibility for food groups. Int. J. Epidemiol. 1997; 26 (Suppl. 1): S3748.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
15EPIC Group of Spain. Relative validity and reproducibility of a diet history questionnaire in Spain. I. Foods. Int. J. Epidemiol. 1997; 26 (Suppl. 1): S91–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
16Date, C, Yamaguchi, M, Tanaka, H. Development of a food frequency questionnaire in Japan. J. Epidemiol. 1996; 6: S131–5.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
17Van Liere, M, Lucas, F, Clavel, F et al. Relative validity and reproducibility of a French dietary history questionnaire. Int. J. Epidemiol. 1997; 26 (Suppl. 1): S128–36.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
18Bohlscheid-Thomas, S, Hoting, I, Boeing, H, Wahrendorf, J. Reproducibility and relative validity of food group intake in a food frequency questionnaire developed for the German part of the EPIC project. Int. J. Epidemiol. 1997; 26 (Suppl. 1): S5970.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
19Thompson, FE, Byers, T. Dietary assessment resource manual. J. Nutr. 1994; 124: S245317.Google ScholarPubMed
20Ziegler, RG. A review of epidemiologic evidence that carotenoids reduce the risk of cancer. J. Nutr. 1989; 119: 116–22.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
21Sporn, MB, Newton, DL. Chemoprevention of cancer with retenoids. Fed. Proceed. 1979; 38: 2528–34.Google Scholar
22Steinmetz, KA, Potter, JD. Vegetables, fruit, and cancer. I: Epidemiology. Cancer Causes Control 1991; 2: 325–57.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed