Hostname: page-component-669899f699-ggqkh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-05-04T03:09:59.120Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

A quantitative environmental impact assessment of Australian ultra-processed beverages and impact reduction scenarios – ERRATUM

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 May 2025

Kim Anastasiou ,
Michalis Hadjikakou ,
Ozge Geyik ,
Gilly A Hendrie ,
Phillip Baker ,
Richard Pinter  and
Mark Lawrence
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content. As you have access to this content, full HTML content is provided on this page. A PDF of this content is also available in through the ‘Save PDF’ action button.
Type
Erratum
Information
Public Health Nutrition , Volume 28 , Issue 1 , 2025 , e72
Check for updates
Creative Commons
Creative Common License - CCCreative Common License - BY
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution and reproduction, provided the original article is properly cited.
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2025. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of The Nutrition Society

Cambridge University Press apologise for an error in the labelling of the y-axis of Figure 5 in the above article. The correct version of the figure is below.

Published Figure:

Figure 5. Modelled environmental impacts of water-based beverages sold in Australia under different policy-based scenarios based on sales projections to 2027. All results are presented as percentage environmental savings compared with a 2022 baseline. Scenario descriptions are found in Table 1. PET , polyethylene terephthalate.

Correct Figure:

Figure 5. Modelled environmental impacts of water-based beverages sold in Australia under different policy-based scenarios based on sales projections to 2027. All results are presented as percentage environmental savings compared with a 2022 baseline. Scenario descriptions are found in Table 1. PET , polyethylene terephthalate.

References

Anastasiou, K, Hadjikakou, M, Geyik, O, Hendrie, GA, Baker, P, Pinter, R, and Lawrence, M (2025). A quantitative environmental impact assessment of Australian ultra-processed beverages and impact reduction scenarios. Public Health Nutrition 28: e51, 1–10. doi: 10.1017/S1368980025000187 Google ScholarPubMed
Figure 0

Figure 5. Modelled environmental impacts of water-based beverages sold in Australia under different policy-based scenarios based on sales projections to 2027. All results are presented as percentage environmental savings compared with a 2022 baseline. Scenario descriptions are found in Table 1. PET , polyethylene terephthalate.

Figure 1

Figure 5. Modelled environmental impacts of water-based beverages sold in Australia under different policy-based scenarios based on sales projections to 2027. All results are presented as percentage environmental savings compared with a 2022 baseline. Scenario descriptions are found in Table 1. PET , polyethylene terephthalate.