Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-p9bg8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-22T16:03:57.940Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Nutrition interventions by primary care staff: a survey of involvement, knowledge and attitude

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 January 2007

Helen Moore  and
Ashley J Adamson
Helen Moore*
Affiliation:
Centre for Research in Primary Care, University of Leeds, Hallas Wing, Nuffield Institute, 71–75 Clarendon Road, Leeds LS2 9PL, UK
Ashley J Adamson
Affiliation:
Human Nutrition Research Centre, University of Newcastle upon Tyne, UK
*
*Corresponding author: Email [email protected]
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.
Objective:

To undertake a survey to investigate the quality and format of nutrition health promotion in UK primary care. Data from both primary care practitioners – i.e. level of nutritional knowledge and attitude towards nutrition interventions – and patients – i.e. the format and quality of dietary consultations – are presented.

Design:

A self-completion questionnaire was used to assess nutritional knowledge and attitude of primary care staff towards nutrition interventions. Data regarding the format and quality of the dietary consultation were collected from patients using a screening question and follow-up questionnaire.

Setting:

Twelve general practices in a city in north-east England.

Subjects:

One hundred and nine primary care staff, and 2400 consecutive patients recruited from the 12 practices.

Results:

Seventy-seven per cent of primary care staff completed the questionnaire. Sixty-five per cent of the knowledge questions were answered correctly by most practitioners. Questions containing complex nutritional terminology were answered poorly. Most practitioners believed primary care teams have an essential role in giving dietary advice. Thirteen per cent of patients reported that they had discussed diet. Of these, 40% were asked to make dietary changes; 20% discussed how they cooked or prepared food; and 33% were asked to make a follow-up appointment.

Conclusion:

Encouraging signs included good levels of nutritional knowledge and belief amongst staff that they should be involved in nutrition interventions. Patients reported that they understood and felt able to achieve the dietary changes suggested. Less encouraging were little evidence of discussion about the practical aspects of food and fairly low rates of follow-up being arranged.

Keywords

Primary careNutrition educationDietary consultation
Type
Research Article
Information
Public Health Nutrition , Volume 5 , Issue 4 , August 2002 , pp. 531 - 536
Copyright
Copyright © CABI Publishing 2002

References

1 Department of Health. National Service Framework for Coronary Heart Disease. Modern Standards and Service Models. Department of Health, London, 2000.Google Scholar
2Silagy, C, Muir, J, et al. Lifestyle advice in general practice: rates recalled by patients. Br. Med. J. 1992; 305: 871–4.Google Scholar
3Wallace, PG, Brenin, PL, et al. Are general practitioners doing enough to promote healthy lifestyle? Findings of the Medical Research Council's general practice research framework study on lifestyle and health. Br. Med. J. 1987; 294: 940–2.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
4Cade, J, O'Connell, S. Management of weight problems and obesity: knowledge, attitudes and current practice of general practitioners. Br. J. Gen. Pract. 1991; 41: 147–50.Google ScholarPubMed
5Buttriss, JL. Food and nutrition: attitudes, beliefs and knowledge in the United Kingdom. Am. J. Clin. Nutr. 1997; 65(Suppl.): 1985S–95S.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
6Mant, D. Effectiveness of dietary intervention in general practice. Am. J. Clin. Nutr. 1997; 65(Suppl.): 1933S–8S.Google Scholar
7Atkin, K, Hirst, M, Lunt, N, Parker, G. The role and self-perceived training needs of nurses employed in general practice: observations from a national census of practice nurses in England and Wales. J. Adv. Nursing 1994; 20: 46–52.Google Scholar
8Gallagher, M. Patients' views. Practice Nursing 1994; 15: 8–12.Google Scholar
9Department of Health, Committee on Medical Aspects of Food Policy. Nutritional Aspects of Cardiovascular Disease. Report on Health and Social Subjects No. 46, London: HMSO, 1994.Google Scholar
10Francis, J, Roche, M. Would primary health care workers give appropriate dietary advice after cholesterol screening? Br. Med. J. 1989; 298: 1620–2.Google Scholar
11Murray, OS, Narayan, V, et al. Study of dietetic knowledge among members of the primary health care team. Br. J. Gen. Pract. 1993; 43: 229–31.Google ScholarPubMed
12Cadman, L, Wiles, R. Nutrition advice in primary care: evaluation of practice nurse nutrition training programmes. J. Hum. Nutr. Diet 1996; 9: 147–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
13 Health Education Authority (HEA). Helping People Change. HEA, London, 1993Google Scholar
14Stewart, M. Effective physician–patient communication and health outcomes: a review. Can. Med. Assoc. J. 1995; 152: 1423–33.Google ScholarPubMed
15NHS Centre for Reviews and Dissemination. The prevention and treatment of obesity. Effective Health Care 1997; 3(2): 4.Google Scholar
16 National Audit Office. Tackling Obesity in England. Report by the Comptroller and Auditor General No. HC220. National Audit Office, February 2001.Google Scholar
17Ley, P, Bradshaw, PW, Eaves, D, Walker, CM. A method for increasing patients' recall of information presented by doctors. Psychol. Med. 1973; 3: 217–20.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
18Oppenheim, AN. Questionnaire Design, Interviewing and Attitude Measurement. London: Pinter Publishers Limited, 1997; 140.Google Scholar
19Kushner, RF. Barriers to providing nutrition counselling by physicians: a survey of primary care practitioners. Prev. Med. 1995; 49(11): 842–51.Google Scholar
20Van Weel, C. Morbidity in family medicine: the potential for individual nutritional counselling, an analysis from the Nijmegan Continuous Morbidity Registration. Am. J. Clin. Nutr. 1997; 65(Suppl.): 1928S–32S.CrossRefGoogle Scholar