Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-rdxmf Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-23T05:46:35.132Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Nutrition and lifestyle in relation to bowel movement frequency: a cross-sectional study of 20 630 men and women in EPIC–Oxford

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 January 2007

Miguel A Sanjoaquin ,
Paul N Appleby ,
Elizabeth A Spencer  and
Timothy J Key
Miguel A Sanjoaquin*
Affiliation:
Cancer Research UK, Epidemiology Unit, University of Oxford, Gibson Building, The Radcliffe Infirmary, Oxford OX2 6HE, UK.
Paul N Appleby
Affiliation:
Cancer Research UK, Epidemiology Unit, University of Oxford, Gibson Building, The Radcliffe Infirmary, Oxford OX2 6HE, UK.
Elizabeth A Spencer
Affiliation:
Cancer Research UK, Epidemiology Unit, University of Oxford, Gibson Building, The Radcliffe Infirmary, Oxford OX2 6HE, UK.
Timothy J Key
Affiliation:
Cancer Research UK, Epidemiology Unit, University of Oxford, Gibson Building, The Radcliffe Infirmary, Oxford OX2 6HE, UK.
*
*Corresponding author: Email [email protected]
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.
Objective:

To investigate the relationships between nutritional and lifestyle factors and bowel movement frequency.

Design:

Cross-sectional analysis using data from a prospective study. Mean numbers of bowel movements were calculated in relation to a range of factors. In addition, individuals were categorised according to frequency of bowel movements: fewer than 7 per week (‘less than daily’) versus 7 or more per week (‘daily’), and odds ratios were calculated from logistic regression models. Results for each factor were adjusted for the other factors under consideration.

Setting:

The European Prospective Investigation into Cancer and Nutrition, Oxford cohort (EPIC–Oxford), UK.

Participants:

In total, 20,630 men and women aged 22–97 years at recruitment. Thirty per cent of the subjects were vegetarians or vegans.

Results:

Women had fewer bowel movements on average than men, and were less likely to have daily bowel movements. Mean bowel movement frequency was higher in vegetarians (10.5 in men, 9.1 in women) and especially in vegans (11.6 in men, 10.5 in women) compared with participants who ate meat (9.5 in men, 8.2 in women). There were also significant positive associations between bowel movement frequency and body mass index (BMI), intakes of dietary fibre and non-alcoholic fluids, for both men and women. Vigorous exercise was positively associated with bowel movement frequency in women although results for men were less clear. Alcohol intake was positively associated with bowel movement frequency in men but not in women.

Conclusion:

Being vegetarian and especially vegan is strongly associated with a higher frequency of bowel movements. Moreover, having a high intake of dietary fibre and fluids and a high BMI are associated with an increase in frequency of bowel movements.

Keywords

ConstipationBowel movementsRisk factorsLifestyleNutrition
Type
Research Article
Information
Public Health Nutrition , Volume 7 , Issue 1 , February 2004 , pp. 77 - 83
Copyright
Copyright © CAB International 2004

References

1Hammond, EC. Some preliminary findings on physical complaints from a prospective study of 1,064,004 men and women. American Journal of Public Health 1964; 54: 11–23.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
2Everhart, JE, Go, VLW, Johannes, S, Fitzsimmons, SC, Roth, HP, White, LR. A longitudinal survey of self-reported bowel habits in the United States. Digestive Diseases and Sciences 1989; 34: 1153–62.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
3Sonnenberg, A, Muller, AD. Constipation and cathartics as risk factors of colorectal cancer: a meta-analysis. Pharmacology 1993; 47(Suppl. 1): 224–33.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
4Jacobs, EJ, White, E. Constipation, laxatives use, and colon cancer among middle-aged adults. Epidemiology 1998; 9(4): 385–91.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
5Thompson, WG, Longstreth, GF, Drossman, DA, Heaton, KW, Irvine, EJ, Müller-Lissner, SA. Functional bowel disorders and functional abdominal pain. Gut 1999; 45(Suppl. 2): 1143–7.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
6Riboli, E. Nutrition and cancer: background rationale of the European Prospective Investigation into Cancer and Nutrition (EPIC). Annals of Oncology 1992; 3: 783–91.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
7Riboli, E, Hunt, KJ, Slimani, N, Ferrari, P, Norat, T, Fahey, M, et al. European Prospective Investigation into Cancer and Nutrition (EPIC): study populations and data collection. Public Health Nutrition 2002; 5(6B): 1113–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
8Davey, GK, Spencer, EA, Appleby, PN, Allen, NE, Knox, KH, Key, TJ. EPIC–Oxford: lifestyle characteristics and nutrient intakes in a cohort of 33 883 meat-eaters and 31 546 non meat-eaters in the UK. Public Health Nutrition 2003; 6(3): 259–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
9Englyst, HN, Quigley, ME, Hudson, GJ, Cummings, JH. Determination of dietary fibre as non-starch-polysaccharides by gas liquid chromatography. Analyst 1992; 117: 1707–14.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
10Ministry of Agriculture Fisheries and Food. Food Portion Sizes, 2nd ed. London: HMSO, 1993.Google Scholar
11Holland, B, Welch, AA, Unwin, ID, Buss, DH, Paul, AA, Southgate, DAT. McCance & Widdowson's The Composition of Foods, 5th ed. Cambridge: Royal Society of Chemistry, 1991.Google Scholar
12StatCorp. Stata Statistical Software: Release 7.0. College Station, TX: Stata Corporation, 2001.Google Scholar
13Bingham, SA, Vorster, H, Jerling, JC, Magee, E, Mulligan, A, Runswick, SA, et al. Effect of black tea drinking on blood lipids, blood pressure and aspects of bowel habits. British Journal of Nutrition 1997; 78: 41–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
14Harari, D, Gurwitz, JH, Avorn, J, Bohn, R, Minaker, KL. Bowel habit in relation to age and gender. Archives of Internal Medicine 1996; 156: 315–20.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
15Longstreth, GF. Bowel patterns and anxiety: demographic factors. Journal of Clinical Gastroenterology 1993; 17: 128–32.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
16Levy, N, Stermer, E, Steiner, Z, Epstein, L, Tamir, A. Bowel habits in Israel: a cohort study. Journal of Clinical Gastroenterology 1993; 16: 295–9.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
17Sonneberg, A, Koch, TR. Epidemiology of constipation in the United States. Diseases of the Colon and Rectum 1989; 32: 1–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
18Metcalf, AM, Phillips, SF, Zinsmeister, AR, MacCarty, RL, Beart, RW, Wolff, BG. Simplified assessment of colonic segmental colonic transit. Gastroenterology 1987; 92: 40–7.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
19Wald, A, Van Thiel, DH, Hoechstetter, L, Gavaler, JS, Egler, KM, Verm, R, et al. Gastrointestinal transit: the effect of the menstrual cycle. Gastroenterology 1981; 80: 1497–500.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
20Davies, GJ, Crowder, M, Dickerson, JW. Dietary fibre intake of individuals with different eating patterns. Human Nutrition. Applied Nutrition 1985; 39(2): 139–48.Google ScholarPubMed
21Davies, GJ, Crowder, M, Reid, B, Dickerson, JW. Bowel function measurements of individuals with different eating patterns. Gut 1986; 27: 164–9.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
22Cummings, JH, Hill, MJ, Jenkins, DJA, Pearson, JR, Wigginns, HS. Changes in fecal composition and colonic function due to cereal fiber. American Journal of Clinical Nutrition 1976; 29: 1468–73.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
23Oettle, GJ. Effect of moderate exercise on bowel habit. Gut 1991; 32: 941–4.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
24Bingham, SA, Cummings, JH. Effect of exercise and physical fitness on large intestinal function. Gastroenterology 1989; 97: 1389–99.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
25Anti, M, Pignataro, G, Armuzzi, A, Valenti, A, Iascone, E, Marmo, R, et al. Water supplementation enhances the effect of high-fiber diet on stool frequency and laxative consumption in adult patients with functional constipation. Hepatogastroenterology 1998; 45: 727–32.Google ScholarPubMed