The WHO has predicted that ageing populations will present new challenges to health care. The health of the elderly will be an important issue defining the health status of a population(1). As the number of elderly increases, so too will their health needs. Multi-morbidity associated with increasing age is common and is found to be more frequent in resource-poor countries(Reference Joshi, Kumar and Avasthi2). It is therefore required that health policy addresses this subgroup of the population as well(1).
In India, the elderly (aged 60 years and above) constitute 7·7 % of the total population of 1·04 billion and this number is increasing(3). The majority of the elderly population lives in rural India(Reference Bhat and Dhruvarajan4). With national health policy focusing on maternal health, child health and communicable diseases, the health status of the elderly has not been given due consideration(5). Since nutrition of the elderly affects immunity(Reference Lesourd6) and functional ability(Reference Stuck, Walthert and Nikolaus7, Reference Galanos, Pieper and Cornoni-Huntley8), it is an important component of elderly care that warrants further attention.
The magnitude of malnutrition among the elderly in India is under-reported. The few studies that have been done show that more than 50 % of the older population is underweight(Reference Natarajan, Shanthi and Krishnaswamy9) and more than 90 % has an energy intake below the recommended allowance(Reference Natarajan, Shanthi and Sivashanmugam10). However, only one study has been done in India using a malnutrition screening tool(Reference Baweja, Agarwal and Mathur11). The use of malnutrition screening tools for community-dwelling elderly has helped to accurately identify those with low nutritional status.
There is no gold standard for estimating malnutrition among the elderly. We used the Mini Nutritional Assessment (MNA) questionnaire to estimate the magnitude of malnutrition. It is an eighteen-item validated nutritional screening instrument(Reference Guigoz, Lauque and Vellas12, Reference Guigoz, Vellas and Garry13) that has a sensitivity of 54–90 % when compared with a detailed nutritional assessment(Reference Guigoz14). It is simple and non-invasive, which facilitates its use in the community(Reference Guigoz, Lauque and Vellas12). It correlates well with biochemical markers of malnutrition(Reference Vellas, Guigoz and Baumgartner15) and is able to detect subjects at risk of malnutrition before significant changes occur in weight or serum albumin(Reference Guigoz, Lauque and Vellas12). Using the MNA score subjects are categorised as malnourished (<17), at risk of malnourishment (17–23·5) or well nourished (>23·5).
Studies that have been done in India and other developing countries using this questionnaire have found it to be useful and accurate(Reference Baweja, Agarwal and Mathur11, Reference Kabir, Ferdous and Cederholm16). We aimed to estimate the prevalence of malnutrition among free-living elderly in a rural south Indian setting using the MNA and to look for associated risk factors.
Methods
Setting
The study was conducted in Kaniyambadi block in the state of Tamil Nadu, south India. Kaniyambadi block is a rural development block covering an area of 127·4 km2, with a population of 104 832, and is served by the Community Health Department. The elderly population (aged 60 years or more) constitutes 10·9 % of the total population and 55·5 % of the elderly are women (unpublished data as of 1 January 2007). The block consists of eighty-seven villages and the predominant occupation is farming. Health care is provided by a combination of government-run primary health centres and private clinics and hospitals. There are no nursing homes that cater to the elderly in particular; all healthy elderly live at home.
Sampling
A two-stage sampling technique was used. Each village was taken as a cluster of older persons, and eight villages were selected by probability proportional to size based on the cumulative population of all villages. Subjects in each village were chosen by door-to-door visits after starting at a random household.
Subjects aged 60 years or more, who had lived in the village for the past 6 months, were included in the study. A minimum of twenty-seven subjects were taken from each village. Elderly with a known diagnosis of malignancy or those who could not stand unsupported due to debility were excluded.
Assessment
The questionnaire was administered to the participants by the authors (A.V., V.S. and N.V.R.) after verbal informed consent. The questionnaire included sociodemographic details of the participants, the complete MNA and questions regarding previous diagnosis of diabetes and hypertension, smoking, alcohol consumption, source of income and source of food. Responses were accepted from close family members of the same household if subjects could not respond accurately as a result of cognitive impairment.
Statistical analyses
The data were collected in November and December 2008. Analyses were performed using Epi-Info version 6 (Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA, USA) and SPSS Statistics17·0 (SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL, USA) software packages. Descriptive analyses were used to estimate the prevalence of malnutrition and to present other socio-economic details. To identify possible risk factors associated with poor nutritional status, univariate linear regression analysis was performed with each factor and the total MNA score. Those factors that were found to be associated with the MNA score (P < 0·15) were included in the multivariate regression model to identify their independent effect. Age and sex were included in the final model. Statistical significance was set at P < 0·05 in the final analysis.
Results
We collected data from 227 elderly subjects, with almost equal representation from each village. Median age was 68 years, and there were more women than men. Mean heights and weights were greater among men compared with the women (see Table 1).
MNA, Mini Nutritional Assessment.
†MNA score: <17, malnourished; 17–23·5, at risk of malnourishment; >23·5, well nourished.
The MNA classified 14 % as malnourished and 49 % at risk of malnourishment. Using BMI as the only indicator, 59 % were in the normal range and 32 % were found to be underweight. Mean MNA score was identical for both men and women. Poor nutritional status (MNA score <23·5) was seen almost equally between men and women (see Table 1). Sixty-four per cent of the elderly consumed three meals daily, 35 % had two meals per day and consumption patterns varied with nutritional status (Fig. 1).
Smoking and alcohol consumption were seen only among men, at 15 % and 6 %, respectively. Previous diagnosis of diabetes or hypertension was seen in 6 % and 9 % of the elderly, respectively. The majority of the elderly had never been screened for either condition.
Most of the elderly were living with their children (66 %), while 21 % were living with another family member, often the spouse or sibling. Meals were cooked by the elderly themselves (51 %) or their children (46 %). The remaining 3 % obtained their food from neighbours or siblings living in other households.
Forty-nine per cent of the subjects had no income, while 29 % received a pension (military or government-sponsored) and 22 % were earning (daily wages or monthly salary). Twenty per cent of the elderly received a government-sponsored old-age pension (400 Rs/month; US$ 1 = 48 Rs during the study period). Retired military personnel or their spouses (8·3 %) received a military pension (2000–5000 Rs/month). One hundred and ninety-nine of the total 227 subjects were able to report the household expenditure on food. Mean per capita daily expenditure was 16·67 Rs.
Possible factors associated with MNA scores (P < 0·15) identified by univariate linear regression included age, years of schooling, number of meals per day, decline in food intake, earning a living, no income and living alone (see Table 2). Multivariate regression analysis, adjusted for age and sex, was performed with these factors using a stepwise approach. This showed that the independent factors associated with lower MNA score were increasing age (β = −0·312, P < 0·001), decline in food intake (β = −0·380, P < 0·001) and fewer meals (β = 0·302, P < 0·001). Factors such as living alone, absence of income and years of schooling were not found to be significantly associated with lower MNA score.
MNA, Mini Nutritional Assessment.
*P < 0·15 (level of significance set for factors to be included in multivariate model), **P < 0·05.
†Multivariate regression model using stepwise approach, adjusted for age and sex.
‡Number of meals consumed per day.
§Only source of income.
Discussion
Previous studies in south India have shown a high prevalence of malnutrition among the elderly(Reference Natarajan, Shanthi and Krishnaswamy9, Reference Natarajan, Shanthi and Sivashanmugam10). The only study conducted using the MNA questionnaire in India was done in western Rajasthan, and showed a higher prevalence of malnourishment and risk of malnourishment among the rural elderly compared with the urban elderly (11 % and 62 % v. 2 % and 36 %, respectively)(Reference Baweja, Agarwal and Mathur11). We found a similar prevalence of malnutrition among our population compared with the rural population of western Rajasthan (14 % v. 11 %). However, we had a smaller proportion of the population at risk of malnutrition (49 % v. 62 %). Compared with the results from a large study among rural elderly of Bangladesh(Reference Kabir, Ferdous and Cederholm16), our population shows lower rates of malnutrition.
In comparison to studies among community-dwelling or home-care elderly in developed countries, our study showed a similar prevalence of risk of malnutrition but higher rates of overt malnutrition(Reference Soini, Routasalo and Lagström17–Reference Saletti, Johansson and Yifter-Lindgren20). A large study done in Spain showed lower rates of malnutrition and risk of malnutrition (4·3 % and 25·4 %, respectively)(Reference Cuervo, García and Ansorena21) than our study.
The MNA uses a higher BMI cut-off (19 kg/m2) than that recommended by the WHO (18·5 kg/m2). Analysis of the MNA data with this lower cut-off showed a decrease in the prevalence of malnutrition and risk of malnutrition (to 11·9 % and 48·9 %, respectively) as compared with the original MNA (14 % and 49 %, respectively). Although we chose to use the MNA without any modifications, the cut-off values for BMI and malnutrition differ between populations and hence our results should be interpreted accordingly. Other studies have modified the MNA for use in their respective populations(Reference Kabir, Ferdous and Cederholm16, Reference Kuzuya, Kanda and Koike22), however, without validation of the same. Previous studies in south India have shown a high prevalence of undernutrition among the elderly(Reference Natarajan, Shanthi and Krishnaswamy9, Reference Natarajan, Shanthi and Sivashanmugam10), suggesting that our estimate appears close to the true value. However, we feel that the use of a modified MNA specific for our population would give more accurate results.
Our results showed more elderly at risk of malnourishment than actually malnourished. This finding has been seen among community-dwelling elderly from India and other parts of the world(Reference Baweja, Agarwal and Mathur11, Reference de Groot, Beck and Schroll18, Reference Saletti, Johansson and Yifter-Lindgren20, Reference Cuervo, García and Ansorena21, Reference Beck, Ovesen and Osler23, Reference Iizaka, Tadaka and Sanada24). This is primarily due to the fact that the MNA is better at identifying those at risk of malnourishment among healthy elderly in the community(Reference Guigoz, Lauque and Vellas12). More importantly, this emphasises the fact that among the elderly, there is high prevalence of deficient protein–energy intake without obvious malnutrition.
Older age was associated with lower MNA scores in our population. This finding has been shown in some previous studies(Reference Kabir, Ferdous and Cederholm16, Reference Cuervo, García and Ansorena21), while others have shown that age has no effect on nutritional status(Reference Soini, Routasalo and Lagström17, Reference Iizaka, Tadaka and Sanada24). We observed that the older subjects were less active and often reported reduced appetite and decreased food intake. It is apparent that increased focus on nutritional status is required as the age of the elderly increases.
Our analysis showed that lower MNA scores were associated with those subjects who had fewer than three meals per day. A similar finding was reported in Bangladesh, where most of the elderly who were malnourished or at risk of malnourishment consumed only two meals daily(Reference Kabir, Ferdous and Cederholm16). Other studies involving community-dwelling elderly have shown that chewing problems and difficulty preparing or eating full meals contribute to poor nutritional status(Reference Baweja, Agarwal and Mathur11, Reference Soini, Routasalo and Lagström17, Reference Iizaka, Tadaka and Sanada24). Thirty-eight per cent of elderly in our study reported moderate to severe decline in food intake. The majority of these subjects indicated that decreased appetite was the cause for low food intake. Decreased appetite can be attributed to physiological changes during ageing as well as medical conditions in the elderly(Reference Donini, Savina and Cannella25, Reference Morley26). Previous studies have linked depression and malnutrition among free-living elderly(Reference Iizaka, Tadaka and Sanada24, Reference Cabrera, Mesas and Garcia27). Geriatric depression in Kaniyambadi block was found to be associated with decreased nourishment(Reference Rajkumar, Thangadurai and Senthilkumar28) and it may be an important factor affecting food intake in our population. In our population, lunch was the major meal of the day and dinner was often omitted. A previous study in a similar population had shown that insufficient income and inadequate knowledge of nutrient requirements were possible factors associated with low energy intake(Reference Natarajan, Shanthi and Sivashanmugam10). We observed that economic pressure did influence dietary patterns to a large extent, but we did not assess knowledge or attitudes of the elderly towards nutrition.
Since our study was aimed primarily at studying the prevalence of malnutrition, identifying risk factors in greater detail would have benefited from a larger sample size. In rural India, elderly subjects often do not know their own age and so an estimate based on age at marriage, age of their children or age recorded on government-issued ration cards is used. This was not a major problem in our study but may be a significant point for future researchers targeting particular age groups among the elderly. Only two subjects could not participate in the study because they were unable to stand and this did not affect our results. However, exclusion of a sizeable number of debilitated subjects in future studies can give an incomplete picture of the nutritional status in a community, as disease is an important predictor of malnutrition among free-living elderly(Reference Kabir, Ferdous and Cederholm16). We also found that subjects had difficulty stating their daily food expenditure primarily because rice, which constitutes the largest part of any meal, is bought once monthly, while vegetables and pulses were bought once or twice weekly. Also, in households where elderly lived with their children, the member of the household with knowledge of the finances was often not available for response. A detailed analysis of the diet, which was lacking in our study, would have given a more complete picture of the nutritional status. Future research in this area should include diet analysis, economics of nutrition, feasibility and effects of nutritional intervention programmes.
In conclusion, we present the first study in south India that uses the MNA to assess malnutrition in the elderly. Our results have shown that more than 60 % of the rural elderly had low MNA scores. Low MNA scores were associated with older age, decreased food intake and consuming fewer meals. Considering the high prevalence of poor nutritional status in the elderly, more focus on diet and possible nutritional interventions is required.
Acknowledgements
No funding was obtained for the present study. There are no conflicts of interest. A.V., V.S., and N.V.R. were involved in data collection and analysis. A.V., V.S. and K.R.J. wrote the manuscript and all authors read and approved the final version. We would like to thank Rajiv Sarkar and Pearline Suganthy, Christian Medical College, Vellore, for assistance with statistical analysis. We are also grateful to the people of Kaniyambadi block for their cooperation and willingness to participate.