Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-tf8b9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-26T09:08:58.999Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Low-income consumers' attitudes and behaviour towards access, availability and motivation to eat fruit and vegetables

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 January 2007

LA Dibsdall ,
N Lambert ,
RF Bobbin  and
LJ Frewer
LA Dibsdall*
Affiliation:
Institute of Food Research, Norwich Research Park, Colney, Norwich, NR4 7UA, UK
N Lambert
Affiliation:
Institute of Food Research, Norwich Research Park, Colney, Norwich, NR4 7UA, UK
RF Bobbin
Affiliation:
Institute of Food Research, Norwich Research Park, Colney, Norwich, NR4 7UA, UK
LJ Frewer
Affiliation:
Institute of Food Research, Norwich Research Park, Colney, Norwich, NR4 7UA, UK
*
*Corresponding author: Email [email protected]
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.
Objective:

To determine low-income consumers' attitudes and behaviour towards fruit and vegetables, in particular issues of access to, affordability of and motivation to eat fruit and vegetables.

Design and setting:

Questionnaire survey mailed to homes owned by a large UK housing association.

Participants:

Participants were 680 low-income men and women, aged 17–100 years.

Results:

Age, employment, gender, smoking and marital status all affected attitudes towards access, affordability and motivation to eat fruit and vegetables. Few (7%) participants experienced difficulty in visiting a supermarket at least once a week, despite nearly half having no access to a car for shopping. Fruit and vegetables were affordable to this low-income group in the amounts they habitually bought; purchasing additional fruits and vegetables was seen as prohibitively expensive. Less than 5% felt they had a problem with eating healthily and yet only 18% claimed to eat the recommended 5 or more portions of fruit and vegetables every day.

Conclusions:

Supported by research, current UK Government policy is driven by the belief that low-income groups have difficulties in access to and affordability of fruit and vegetables. Findings from this particular group suggest that, of the three potential barriers, access and affordability were only a small part of the ‘problem’ surrounding low fruit and vegetable consumption. Thus, other possible determinants of greater consequence need to be identified. We suggest focusing attention on motivation to eat fruit and vegetables, since no dietary improvement can be achieved if people do not recognise there is a problem.

Keywords

Low incomeAccessAffordabilityFruit and vegetablesHealthy eating
Type
Research Article
Information
Public Health Nutrition , Volume 6 , Issue 2 , April 2003 , pp. 159 - 168
Copyright
Copyright © CABI Publishing 2003

References

1Committee on Diet and Health, Food and Nutrition Board, National Research Council. Diet and Health: Implications for Reducing Chronic Disease Risk. Washington, DC: National Academy Press, 1989.Google Scholar
2Ferro Luzzi, A, Gibney, M, Sjöström, M, eds. Nutrition and diet for healthy lifestyles in Europe: the EURODIET evidence [special issue]. Public Health Nutr. 2001: 4(2A): 437–740.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
3World Health Organization (WHO). Diet, Nutrition and the Prevention of Chronic Diseases. Report of a WHO Study Group. Technical Report Series No. 797. Geneva: WHO, 1990.Google Scholar
4Cummings, JH, Bingham, SA. Diet and the prevention of cancer. Br. Med. J. 1998; 317: 1636–40.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
5: Department of Health. The NHS Cancer Plan. London: The Stationery Office, 2000.Google Scholar
6Lambert, N. Food choice, phytochemicals and cancer prevention. In: Frewer, L, Risvik, E, Schifferstein, H, eds. Food, People and Society. A European Perspective of Consumers' Food Choices. Berlin: Springer-Verlag, 2001; 131–54.Google Scholar
7Leather, S. Fruit and vegetables: consumption patterns and health consequences. Br. Food J. 1997; 7: 10–7.Google Scholar
8Lobstein, T. Health, income and diet. In: Tackling Inequalities in Health and Diet Related Disease. Sustain Publication. London: KKS Printing, 1999.Google Scholar
9Billson, H, Pryer, JA, Nichols, R. Variation in fruit and vegetable consumption among adults in Britain. An analysis from the dietary and nutritional survey of British adults. Eur. J. Clin. Nutr. 1999; 53: 946–52.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
10Department of Health. The NHS Plan: A Plan for Investment, A Plan for Reform. London: The Stationery Office, 2000.Google Scholar
11Department of Health. National Food Survey. London: The Stationery Office, 2001.Google Scholar
12Dowler, E, Draper, A, Nelson, M, Thomas, R, Dobson, B. Scoping study for a proposed national dietary and nutritional survey of people living on low incomes in the UK. Ministry of Agriculture, Fisheries and Food Report No. An1060, 1998.Google Scholar
13Shepherd, R, Paisley, CM, Sparks, P, Anderson, AS, Eley, S, Lean, MEJ. Constraints on dietary choice: the role of income. Nutr. Food Sci. 1996; 5: 19–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
14Donkin, AJM, Dowler, EA, Stevenson, SJ, Turner, SA. Mapping access to food in a deprived area: the development of price and availability indices. Public Health. Nutr. 2000; 3: 31–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
15Brug, J, Lechner, L, De Vries, H. Psychosocial determinants of fruit and vegetable consumption. Appetite 1995; 25: 285–96.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
16National Food Alliance. Myths About Food and Low Income. London: National Food Alliance Publication, 1997.Google Scholar
17Webster, J. Developing Local Networks to Tackle Food Poverty. London: Sustain, 1999.Google Scholar
18McGlone, P, Dobson, B, Dowler, E, Nelson, M. Food Projects and How They Work. York: Joseph Rowntree Foundation Publication, 1999.Google Scholar
19Dowler, E, Blair, A, Donkin, A, Rex, D, Grundy, C. Measuring access to healthy food in Sandwell. Sandwell Health Action Zone Final Report. Sandwell: Sandwell Health Authority, June 2001.Google Scholar
20Aston-Mansfield and Newham NHS Primary Care Trust. The right to a healthy diet: sustaining the fight against food poverty [online]. Available at http://www.nfap.org.uk/Right_to_a_healthy_diet.pdf. London: Newham Food Access Partnership, 2001.Google Scholar
21Kennedy, LA, Hunt, C, Hodgson, P. Nutrition education program based on EFNEP for low-income women in the United Kingdom: ‘Friends with Food’. J. Nutr. Educ. 1998; 30: 89–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
22Chapman, H, Kendall, PA. Twenty years of EFNEP: changes and challenges. J. Nutr. Educ. 1989; 21: 6.Google Scholar
23Department for Transport, Local Government and the Regions. Statistics, 2001 [online]. Available at http://www.housing.detr.gov.uk.Google Scholar
24Dibsdall, LA, Lambert, N, Frewer, LJ. Using interpretative phenomenology to understand the experiences of a low-income group of UK women towards aspects of food choice and health. J. Nutr. Educ. 2002; 34: 298–309.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
25Lambert, N, Dibsdall, LA, Frewer, LJ. Poor diet and smoking: the big killers. Comparing health education in two hazard domains. Br. Food J. 2002; 104: 63–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
26Food Standards Agency. Consumer Attitudes to Food Standards. London: The Stationery Office, 2002.Google Scholar
27Glanz, K, Basil, M, Maibach, E, Goldberg, J, Snyder, D. Why Americans eat what they do: taste, nutrition, cost, convenience, and weight control concerns as influences on food consumption. J. Am. Diet. Assoc. 1998; 98: 1118–26.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
28Aarts, H, Verplanken, B, Van Knippenberg, A. Predicting behaviour from actions in the past: repeated decision making or a matter of habit? J. Appl. Soc. Psych. 1998; 28: 1355–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
29Povey, R, Conner, M, Sparks, P, James, R, Shepherd, R. Interpretations of healthy and unhealthy eating, and implications for dietary change. Health Educ. Res. 1998; 13: 171–83.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
30Bergadaà, MM. The role of time in the action of the consumer. J. Consumer Res. 1990; 17: 289–302.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
31Lennings, CJ. Optimism, satisfaction and time perspective in the elderly. Int. J. Aging Hum. Dev. 2000; 51: 167–81.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
32Trowler, P. Investigating Health, Welfare and Poverty, 2nd ed. London: Harper Collins Publishing, 1996; 48–69.Google Scholar
33Marmot, MG. Improvement of social environment to improve health. Lancet 1998; 351: 57–60.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed