Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t8hqh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-28T15:11:03.608Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

How well do Australian women comply with dietary guidelines?

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 January 2007

Kylie Ball*
Affiliation:
School of Health Sciences, Deakin University, 221 Burwood Highway, Burwood, Victoria 3125, Australia
Gita D Mishra
Affiliation:
MRC Human Nutrition Research, Elsie Widdowson Laboratory, Fulbourn Road, Cambridge CB1 9NL, UK
Christopher W Thane
Affiliation:
MRC Human Nutrition Research, Elsie Widdowson Laboratory, Fulbourn Road, Cambridge CB1 9NL, UK
Allison Hodge
Affiliation:
The Cancer Council of Victoria, Carlton, Victoria 3053, Australia
*
*Corresponding author: Email [email protected]
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.
Objective:

To investigate the proportion of middle-aged Australian women meeting national dietary recommendations and its variation according to selected sociodemographic and behavioural characteristics.

Design:

This cross-sectional population-based study used a food-frequency questionnaire to investigate dietary patterns and compliance with 13 commonly promoted dietary guidelines among a cohort of middle-aged women participating in the Australian Longitudinal Study on Women's Health.

Setting:

Nation-wide community-based survey.

Subjects:

A total of 10 561 women aged 50–55 years at the time of the survey in 2001.

Results:

Only about one-third of women complied with more than half of the guidelines, and only two women in the entire sample met all 13 guidelines examined. While guidelines for meat/fish/poultry/eggs/nuts/legumes and ‘extra’ foods (e.g. ice cream, chocolate, cakes, potatoes, pizza, hamburgers and wine) were met well, large percentages of women (68–88%) did not meet guidelines relating to the consumption of breads, cereal-based foods and dairy products, and intakes of total and saturated fat and iron. Women working in lower socio-economic status occupations, and women living alone or with people other than a partner and/or children, were at significantly increased risk of not meeting guidelines.

Conclusions:

The present results indicate that a large proportion of middle-aged Australian women are not meeting dietary guidelines. Without substantial changes in their diets, and help in making these changes, current national guidelines appear unachievable for many women.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © CAB International 2004

References

1World Health Organization (WHO). Diet, Nutrition and the Prevention of Chronic Diseases. Technical Report Series No. 797. Geneva: WHO, 1990.Google Scholar
2Department of Health. Dietary Referenc Values for Food Energy and Nutrients for the United Kingdom. Report on Health and Social Subjects No. 41. London: HMSO, 1991.Google Scholar
3National Health and Medical Research Council. Dietary Guidelines for Australian Adults. Canberra: Australian Government Printing Service, 2003.Google Scholar
4Smith, A, Kellett, E, Schmerlaib, Y. The Australian Guide to Healthy Eating. Canberra: Commonwealth Department of Health and Family Services, 1998.Google Scholar
5Worsley, A, Crawford, D. Awareness and compliance with the Australian dietary guidelines: a descriptive study of Melbourne residents. Nutrition Research 1985; 5: 1291–308.Google Scholar
6Worsley, A, Crawford, D. Who complies with the Australian dietary guidelines? Nutrition Research 1986; 6: 2934.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
7Baghurst, KI, Record, SJ, Baghurst, PA, Syrette, JA, Crawford, DA, Worsley, A. Socio-demographic determinants in Australia of the intake of food and nutrients implicated in cancer aetiology. Medical Journal of Australia 1990; 153: 444–52.Google Scholar
8Jamison, JR. Australian dietary targets in 1995: their feasibility and pertinence to dietary goals for 2000. Australian Journal of Public Health 1995; 19: 522–24.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
9Turrell, G. Compliance with the Australian dietary guidelines in the early 1990s: have population-based health promotion programs been effective? Nutrition and Health 1997; 11: 271–88.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
10Woodward, D. Dietary variation within the Australian community: differing food choices in the state capital cities. Australian Journal of Nutrition and Dietetics 1990; 47: 37.Google Scholar
11Commonwealth Department of Community Services and Health. National Dietary Survey of Adults: 1983. No. 2 Nutrient Intakes. Canberra: Australian Government Printing Service, 1987.Google Scholar
12Lester, IH. Australia's Food & Nutrition. Canberra: Australian Government Printing Service, 1994.Google Scholar
13Australian Bureau of Statistics (ABS). National Nutrition Survey: Nutrient Intakes and Physical Measurements, Australia. Catalogue No. 4805.0. Canberra: ABS, 1998.Google Scholar
14Australian Bureau of Statistics (ABS). National Nutrition Survey: Foods Eaten, Australia. Catalogue No. 4804.0. Canberra: ABS, 1999.Google Scholar
15Cook, T, Rutishauser, IHE, Seelig, M. Comparable Data on Food and Nutrient Intake and Physical Measurements from the 1983, 1985 and 1995 National Nutrition Surveys. Canberra: Commonwealth Department of Health and Aged Care, 2001.Google Scholar
16Marks, GC, Rutishauser, IHE, Webb, K, Picton, P. Key Food and Nutrition Data for Australia 1990–1999. Canberra: Australian Food and Nutrition Monitoring Unit, 2001.Google Scholar
17National Health and Medical Research Council. Recommended Dietary Intakes for use in Australia. Canberra: Australian Government Printing Service, 1991.Google Scholar
18National Health and Medical Research Council. Is There a Safe Level of Daily Consumption of Alcohol for Men and Women? Recommendations Regarding Responsible Drinking Behaviour. Canberra: Australian Government Printing Service, 1991.Google Scholar
19National Health and Medical Research Council. The Role of Polyunsaturated Fats in the Australian Diet. Canberra: Australian Government Printing Service, 1991.Google Scholar
20National Health and Medical Research Council. Dietary Guidelines for Australians. Canberra: Australian Government Printing Service, 1992.Google Scholar
21Brown, WJ, Bryson, L, Byles, JE, Dobson, AJ, Lee, C, Mishra, G, et al. Women's Health Australia: recruitment for a national longitudinal cohort study. Women & Health 1998; 28: 2340.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
22Mihelic, AH, Crimmins, EM. Loss to follow-up in a sample of Americans 70 years of age and older: the LSOA 1984–1990. Journal of Gerontology: Social Sciences 1997; 52: S3748.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
23Singh, C. A Comparative Analysis of Attrition in Household Panel Studies [online]. PACO Document No. 10. Differdange, Belgium: CEPS/INSTEAD, 1995. Available at http://www. ceps.lu/paco/pacopub.htm.Google Scholar
24Ireland, P, Jolley, D, Giles, G, O'Dea, K, Powles, J, Rutishauser, I, et al. Development of the Melbourne FFQ: a food frequency questionnaire for use in an Australian prospective study involving an ethnically diverse cohort. Asia Pacific Journal of Clinical Nutrition 1994; 3: 1931.Google Scholar
25Hodge, A, Patterson, AJ, Brown, WJ, Ireland, P, Giles, G. The Anti Cancer Council of Victoria FFQ: relative validity of nutrient intakes compared with weighed food records in young to middle-aged women in a study of iron supplementation. Australian and New Zealand Journal of Public Health 2000; 24: 576–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
26Department of Community Services and Health. Composition of Foods, Australia. Canberra: Australian Government Publishing Service, 1989.Google Scholar
27Department of Primary Industries and Energy, Department of Human Services and Health. Rural, Remote and Metropolitan Areas Classification: 1991 Census Edition. Canberra: Australian Government Publishing Service, 1994.Google Scholar
28Australian Bureau of Statistics. Australian Standard Classi-fication of Occupations (ASCO). 2nd ed. Catalogue No. 1220.0. Canberra: Australian Government Publishing Service, 1997.Google Scholar
29National Health and Medical Research Council. Acting on Australia's Weight: A Strategic Plan for the Prevention of Overweight and Obesity. Canberra: Australian Government Publishing Service, 1997.Google Scholar
30Brown, WJ, Bauman, AE. Comparison of estimates of population levels of physical activity using two measures. Australian and New Zealand Journal of Public Health 2000; 24: 520–5.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
31Wearne, SJ, Day, MJ. Clues for the development of food-based dietary guidelines: how are dietary targets being achieved by UK consumers? British Journal of Nutrition 1999; 81(Suppl. 2): S119–26.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
32Bolton-Smith, C, Brown, CA, Tunstall-Pedoe, H. Nutrient sources in non-manual and manual occupational groups: results from the Scottish Heart Health Study (SHHS). Journal of Human Nutrition and Dietetics 1991; 4: 291306.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
33Billson, H, Pryer, JA, Nichols, R. Variation in fruit and vegetable consumption among adults in Britain: an analysis from the Dietary and Nutritional Survey of British Adults. European Journal of Clinical Nutrition 1999; 53: 946–52.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
34Davis, MA, Murphy, SP, Neuhaus, JM, Gee, L, Quiroga, SS. Living arrangements affect dietary quality for US adults aged 50 years and older: NHANES III 1988–1994. Journal of Nutrition 2000; 130: 2256–64.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
35Roos, E, Lahelma, E, Virtanen, M, Prattala, R, Pietinen, P. Gender, socioeconomic status and family status as determinants of food behaviour. Social Science & Medicine 1998; 46: 1519–29.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
36English, RM, Najman, JM, Bennett, SA. Dietary intake of Australian smokers and nonsmokers. Australian and New Zealand Journal of Public Health 1997; 21: 141–6.Google Scholar
37Schuit, AJ, van Loon, AJ, Tijhuis, M, Ocke, M. Clustering of lifestyle risk factors in a general adult population. Preventive Medicine 2002; 35: 219–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
38US Department of Health, Education, and Welfare. Smoking and Health: Report of the Advisory Committee to the Surgeon General of the Public Health Service. Washington, DC: US Government Printing Office, 1964.Google Scholar
39US Department of Health and Human Services (DHHS). Physical Activity and Health: A Report of the Surgeon General. Atlanta, GA: US DHHS, Centers for Disease Controland Prevention, National Center for Chronic Disease Prevention and Health Promotion, 1996.Google Scholar
40World Health Organization (WHO). Obesity: Preventing and Managing the Global Epidemic. Geneva: WHO, 1997.Google Scholar
41Baghurst, KI, Worsley, A, Crawford, DA, Baghurst, PA, Record, SJ, Syrette, JA. The Victorian Nutrition Survey 1985. Adelaide: Social Nutrition and Epidemiology Programme, CSIRO Division of Human Nutrition, 1987.Google Scholar
42Baghurst, KI, Record, SJ, Syrette, JA, Baghurst, PA. The Victorian Nutrition Survey 1990. Adelaide: Social Nutrition and Epidemiology Programme, CSIRO Division of Human Nutrition, 1991.Google Scholar
43Baghurst, KI, Baghurst, PA, Record, SJ. Demographic and dietary profiles of high and low fat consumers in Australia. Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health 1994; 48: 2632.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
44Beard, TC, Woodward, DR, Ball, PJ, Hornsby, H, von Witt, RJ, Dwyer, T. The Hobart Salt Study 1995: few meet national sodium intake target. Medical Journal of Australia 1997; 166: 404–7.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
45Block, G. Dietary guidelines and the results of food consumption surveys. American Journal of Clinical Nutrition 1991; 53(suppl. 1): 356S–7S.Google Scholar
46Keenan, DP, AbuSabha, R, Robinson, NG. Consumers' understanding of the Dietary Guidelines for Americans: insights into the future. Health Education & Behavior 2002; 29: 124–35.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
47Giskes, K, Turrell, G, Patterson, C, Newman, B. Socioeconomic differences in fruit and vegetable consumption among Australian adolescents and adults. Public Health Nutrition 2002; 5: 663–9.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed