Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-r5fsc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-22T04:46:35.287Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français
Accepted manuscript

How big is too big? A qualitative study of discretionary food portion size norms among Australian consumers

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  24 October 2024

Qingzhou Liu Open the ORCID record for Qingzhou Liu [Opens in a new window] ,
Leanne Wang ,
Margaret Allman-Farinelli  and
Anna Rangan Open the ORCID record for Anna Rangan [Opens in a new window]
Qingzhou Liu
Affiliation:
School of Life and Environmental Sciences, Faculty of Science, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW 2006, Australia Discipline of Nutrition and Dietetics, Susan Wakil School of Nursing and Midwifery, Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW 2006, Australia
Leanne Wang
Affiliation:
Discipline of Nutrition and Dietetics, Susan Wakil School of Nursing and Midwifery, Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW 2006, Australia Charles Perkins Centre, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW 2006, Australia
Margaret Allman-Farinelli
Affiliation:
Discipline of Nutrition and Dietetics, Susan Wakil School of Nursing and Midwifery, Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW 2006, Australia Charles Perkins Centre, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW 2006, Australia
Anna Rangan*
Affiliation:
Discipline of Nutrition and Dietetics, Susan Wakil School of Nursing and Midwifery, Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW 2006, Australia Charles Perkins Centre, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW 2006, Australia
*
*Correspondence: [email protected]; Level 4, Charles Perkins Centre D17, The University of Sydney, Camperdown, NSW 2006, Australia
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.
Objective:

The high availability of energy-dense nutrient-poor discretionary foods in large serving and package sizes may have shifted portion size norms (described as a typical perception of how much people choose to eat from a given food at a single eating occasion) towards larger sizes. Few public health recommendations exist around appropriate discretionary food portion sizes. This qualitative study aimed to explore the underlying rationale of portion size norms of discretionary foods among Australian adults 18-65 years.

Design:

Four focus group sessions were conducted. Collected data were analysed using inductive thematic analysis.

Setting:

Focus groups were held online via Zoom between September and October 2023.

Participants:

Thirty-four participants were recruited in the study (mean age 38 years, 19 females).

Results:

The key themes raised from inductive analysis were personal factors, eating context factors, and food environment factors relevant to the portion size norms. A framework was established to illustrate the interaction across these themes during the conceptualisation of the norms. For serving size availability, consumers found that there were limited serving size choices when making portion size selections and lacked the knowledge and skills in portion control.

Conclusions:

These findings highlight the need to make positive changes to the current food environment and develop relevant public health guidelines around appropriate portion sizes to promote healthier portion size norms and enable better portion control.

Keywords

Consumer behaviourNormPortion sizeDiscretionary food
Type
Research Paper
Information
Public Health Nutrition , Accepted manuscript , pp. 1 - 25
Creative Commons
Creative Common License - CCCreative Common License - BY
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution and reproduction, provided the original article is properly cited.
Copyright
© The Authors 2024