Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-dk4vv Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-29T01:50:01.278Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Guidelines for the New Nordic Diet

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  17 January 2012

Charlotte Mithril*
Affiliation:
Department of Human Nutrition, Faculty of Life Sciences, University of Copenhagen, Rolighedsvej 30, DK-1958 Frederiksberg C, Denmark
Lars Ove Dragsted
Affiliation:
Department of Human Nutrition, Faculty of Life Sciences, University of Copenhagen, Rolighedsvej 30, DK-1958 Frederiksberg C, Denmark
Claus Meyer
Affiliation:
Meyers Madhus, Copenhagen, Denmark
Emil Blauert
Affiliation:
Meyers Madhus, Copenhagen, Denmark
Mathias Krog Holt
Affiliation:
Department of Human Nutrition, Faculty of Life Sciences, University of Copenhagen, Rolighedsvej 30, DK-1958 Frederiksberg C, Denmark
Arne Astrup
Affiliation:
Department of Human Nutrition, Faculty of Life Sciences, University of Copenhagen, Rolighedsvej 30, DK-1958 Frederiksberg C, Denmark
*
*Corresponding author: Email [email protected]
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Objective

Diet has a significant impact on health, and ensuring that the population eats a healthy diet remains a public health challenge. Research is needed in order to improve the palatability of a healthy diet and make it attractive to the consumer. It has also been suggested that dietary recommendations should be tailored to regional conditions. The OPUS (Optimal well-being, development and health for Danish children through a healthy New Nordic Diet) project investigates whether it is possible to develop a healthy New Nordic Diet (NND) that is palatable, environmentally friendly and based on foods originating from the Nordic region. The present paper describes the overall guidelines for the NND, developed and investigated in the multidisciplinary, 5-year OPUS research project. All guidelines are described in relation to the key principles: health, gastronomic potential and Nordic identity, and sustainability.

Results

The NND is described by the overall guidelines: (i) more calories from plant foods and fewer from meat; (ii) more foods from the sea and lakes; and (iii) more foods from the wild countryside. These overall guidelines result in a set of proposed dietary components which will be presented in a subsequent paper.

Conclusions

Both the guidelines and the diet are composed taking the potential health-promoting properties and Nordic identity of the NND into account, as well as concern for environmental issues and gastronomic potential.

Type
Research paper
Copyright
Copyright © The Authors 2012

Over the past two decades a New Nordic Cuisine has been developed in Scandinavia. The New Nordic Cuisine ManifestoFootnote was formulated in 2003( 1 ) and was adopted by the Nordic Council of Ministers as the ideology of the New Nordic Food programme in 2005( 2 ), with the aim of establishing Nordic cuisine as part of the gourmet world map. Restaurants and chefs focusing on Nordic food are now rated among the best in the world( 3 , 4 ), so foods from the Nordic region clearly have great gastronomic potential. As regionally produced foods they are also potentially environmentally sustainable( 1 ), the hypothesis being that transport of food from production to consumer can be minimized by increased consumption of local produce, thus minimizing some of the negative effect on the environment. Stressing regionality, the use of seasonal produce and the use of foods from the wild countryside might also be of benefit to the environment. The New Nordic Cuisine therefore has real potential with regard to sustainability in the Nordic countries.

The palatability of foods is not always in harmony with their health-promoting qualities, as some of the nutritionally dense and less beneficial elements, especially fats, are important for flavour and mouthfeel( Reference Drewnowski 5 ). A new diet needs to take health aspects into account, as diet plays a major role in the development of disease today( Reference Ezatti, Lopez and Rodgers 6 ). In Denmark, as in the rest of the world, the prevalence of overweight and obesity among both children and adults has increased dramatically over the last 60 years( Reference Bendixen, Holst and Sørensen 7 , Reference Pearson, Olsen and Hansen 8 ). Obesity increases the risk of a wide range of serious medical complications, including CVD, insulin resistance, type 2 diabetes, gallbladder disease, osteoarthritis, asthma and several cancers( Reference Haslam and James 9 ). Promoting a healthy diet is therefore an important aspect of public health policies in many countries, and the recommendations for healthful eating are very similar across countries( Reference Brug and Oenema 10 ).

Dietary recommendations have not been successful in reversing the obesity epidemic so far, and there are probably several reasons for this. Recent studies have shown that current dietary recommendations may not be effective for the control of body weight and the prevention of weight gain and obesity( Reference Larsen, Dalskov and van Baak 11 , Reference Papadaki, Linardakis and Larsen 12 ). Furthermore, palatability and gastronomic potential are not taken into account in current dietary recommendations( Reference Sørensen, Møller and Flint 13 ). Nutrition experts are often confronted with unpalatability of the recommended diet. A Danish study found that lack of sufficient focus on the gastronomic properties of the recommended diet led to increased drop-out during a course of weight maintenance following a weight-loss programme in obese individuals( Reference Astrup, Nielsen and Greve 14 ). In addition, it has been suggested that dietary recommendations should be more tailored to regional conditions( Reference Bere and Brug 15 ). Such regional tailoring may help to preserve cultural diversity in eating habits and contribute to more environmentally friendly consumption.

Both gastronomists and nutritionists are beginning to believe that there is a shared route to creating regional diets and an opportunity to develop a healthy diet that bridges gastronomy, health and sustainability. This forms the basis for the multidisciplinary, 5-year research project, OPUS (Optimal well-being, development and health for Danish children through a healthy New Nordic Diet), which aims to define and test a New Nordic Diet (NND). The hypothesis is that an optimal diet composition, based on healthy, palatable meals, may not only contribute to the prevention of excessive weight gain, obesity and other health disorders, but may also improve quality of life, learning ability, and mental and physical performance in children( Reference Benton 16 , Reference Eilander, Hundscheid and Osendarp 17 ).

The objective of the present paper is to describe the overall guidelines for the NND. All guidelines are described in relation to key principles: health, gastronomic potential and Nordic identity, and sustainability. The nutritional value and dietary composition of an NND for the Danish region will be elaborated and discussed in a subsequent paper.

Development of a New Nordic Diet

The NND is developed on the basis of input from experts in the fields of human nutrition, gastronomy, environmental issues, food culture and history, and sensory science, and from experts with knowledge about children and their food habits and preferences. This forum was gathered at the initial OPUS congress held in June 2009 in Copenhagen, and some participants were subsequently selected to form advisory boards for the OPUS working groups. The 2009 congress and the subsequent work resulted in a report published in Danish in August 2010( Reference Meyer, Mithril and Blauert 18 ).

OPUS is a Danish project and two intervention studies within the project are to be carried out in Denmark, so ‘the NND’ in this context is based on the Danish market and food culture, with references to average dietary intake in the Danish population. The overall principles and guidelines can, however, easily be translated and applied to any country in the Nordic or Northern European region.

In the development of the NND the following principles have been crucial: (i) health; (ii) gastronomic potential and Nordic identity; and (iii) sustainability. These principles are central in the guidelines for the NND and are elaborated below.

Health

A healthy diet should contribute to the prevention of weight gain, obesity, type 2 diabetes, CVD and cancer. But being healthy is more than just the absence of disease. In addition, a healthy diet should help maintain and improve general health, defined by WHO as a state of complete physical, mental and social well-being( 19 ). Health effects should be evaluated on the basis of evidence from randomized controlled trials and prospective cohort studies in human subjects. The NND is based on the existing scientific knowledge within health and nutrition. Dietary components with substantial evidence of health-promoting properties that are included in the National Food-based Dietary Guidelines (NFDG) are naturally included in the NND; e.g. fruits, vegetables, potatoes, whole grains, nuts, fish and shellfish( Reference Astrup, Andersen and Stender 20 ). The hypothesis is that being healthy is not only achieved by adding or refraining from specific nutrients, but more a condition we approach through what we actually choose to eat. Testing the hypothesis is a major aim of OPUS.

Gastronomic potential and Nordic identity

Palatability is an important consideration in the development of the NND. The New Nordic Cuisine has gained tremendous respect throughout the world because of its gastronomically excellent meals based on Nordic foods. The NND is based on food with a Nordic identity and cultural heritage, i.e. foods produced in the Nordic countries and expressing the Nordic terroir. The term ‘terroir’ means the impact of multiple conditions such as soil, climate and microclimate, location and form of cultivation on the properties of a specific food. Terroir has been elaborated in other food cultures, but is still a relatively new term for the Nordic food culture. A potato is not just a potato. It can have a range of different flavours and textures, dependent on where and how it is grown. For example, the sandy soils and coastal climate of the Danish island of Samsø give potatoes grown there a distinct flavour. Other examples of produce often associated with the specific terroir in Denmark include carrots, apples, mutton, herrings, cheeses and smoked foods based on terroir-defined produce and special technology. Such produce are found in all countries, illustrating the common understanding of the concept. The Nordic terroir can be summarized as a cool climate often leading to a slow growth rate, many hours of light during the summer and the opposite during the winter, limited differences in temperature from night to day, and a lot of coastal waters with large variations in salt content. The challenge is to identify the produce best suited to a particular terroir, and in particular any produce where its gastronomic properties are enhanced by local conditions. In the development of the NND we have been looking for foods which gain special gastronomic potential when grown in the Nordic region. The origin and historical time of entry to the local environment of the different kinds of produce do not necessarily determine whether a food can be part of the NND. The more important factor is the ability of the produce to thrive in the Nordic terroir with exceptional gastronomic properties as a result.

Sustainability

Food production and preparation affect the environment in many ways, including effects on greenhouse gases, biodiversity, landscape, environmental toxins, etc.( Reference McMichael, Powles and Butler 21 ). The impact is affected by consumer demand. The global population is growing rapidly and there is a need for food supply strategies for all regions that will ensure food security without jeopardizing the environment. Four simple considerations for sustainability were used in the formulation of the NND:

  1. 1. Focus on locally grown foods to minimize the transport of foodstuffs, thereby minimizing the negative impact of transportation on the environment.

  2. 2. Focus on foods from organic food production. The organic production principle is based primarily on consideration for nature and biodiversity, and it is an attempt to care for soil, biodiversity, quality, health and the welfare of nature, including plants, animals and humans. The current official organic labelling system in Denmark is a technical and legal guarantee that a food is grown without GM organisms, synthetic pesticides, inorganic fertilizers or other synthetic agents, and without the use of germicidal irradiation( Reference Gabriel 22 ). In addition, manufacturers of organic food products must comply with a clear set of rules regarding the use of additives. Ideally, all meals and dietary components in the NND should meet these basic criteria with a minimal use of additives. However, this would require that organic food production be fully established and integrated in society, but it is not yet fully developed and there are still many challenges to be resolved.

  3. 3. Focus on composing a proportion of the diet from foods sourced from the wild countryside, encouraging biodiversity and minimizing use of fertilizers and pesticides.

  4. 4. Focus on minimizing waste and utilizing all of every food purchased.

Guidelines for the New Nordic Diet

The road from the overall concept of the New Nordic Cuisine to an NND for the general population involved generalization and popularization. This led to the formulation of three fundamental guidelines as the basis of the NND as compared with the current average Danish diet. These are: (i) more calories from plant foods and fewer from meat; (ii) more foods from the sea and lakes; and (iii) more foods from the wild countryside. In the following each of these guidelines is elaborated with respect to the overall principles mentioned previously: health, gastronomic potential and Nordic identity, and sustainability.

More calories from plant foods and fewer from meat

Consumption of meat has almost doubled in the Nordic countries over the past 50 years, and meat intake in the Nordic population is among the highest in the world( Reference Groth and Fagt 23 ). There is evidence that high protein intake can reduce the risk of several diseases, particularly among the large proportion of sedentary and slightly overweight individuals in the population( Reference Due, Toubro and Stender 24 , Reference Larsen, Dalskov and van Baak 25 ). However, meat is among the least environmentally friendly foods, so more environmentally friendly protein sources, with greater health benefits, are to be preferred( Reference Pimentel and Pimentel 26 ).

Health

A lower intake of meat makes room for more legumes, vegetables, fruit, grains, potatoes, nuts, herbs, etc. in the daily diet, most of which have substantially better impacts on health. Studies have shown that a daily intake of 600 g or more of fruits and vegetables reduces the risk of CVD( Reference He, Nowson and MacGregor 27 , Reference He, Nowson and Lucas 28 ), overweight and obesity( Reference Hallund, Dragsted and Halkjær 29 ) and probably certain cancers( Reference Duijnhoven, Bueno-De-Mesquita and Ferrari 30 , 31 ). Studies on whole grains have found a significant inverse association between intake of whole grains and risk of CVD( Reference Kelly, Summerbell and Brynes 32 , Reference Pereira, O'Reilly and Augustsson 33 ), type 2 diabetes( Reference Liese, Roach and Sparks 34 ), cancer( Reference Egeberg, Olsen and Loft 35 ) and weight gain or risk of obesity( Reference Howarth, Saltzman and Roberts 36 ). Starchy plant foods like potatoes are an important source of dietary fibre, vitamins B6 and C, folate, Fe, K and Mg in the Danish diet( Reference Pedersen, Fagt and Groth 37 ). A replacement of some of the meat we eat today with plant foods would lead to a reduction in the intake of saturated fat and increased intakes of unsaturated fats, dietary fibres, vitamins and minerals. Most plant foods are low in calories, making it possible to eat larger amounts while lowering the energy density of the diet and still satisfying the senses and satiety. A high intake of plant foods therefore has a natural place in a diet which, together with other lifestyle changes, can reduce the risk of weight gain, obesity and the development of several lifestyle diseases.

Gastronomic potential and Nordic identity

Plant foods help in defining a regional kitchen. They provide colour and flavour variation in meals. Plant foods such as berries, cabbages, root vegetables, legumes, potatoes and herbs can maximize tastiness and help create a clear Nordic identity while being a minor burden to the environment. They can form part of everyday meals all year around, and could be the basis of many Nordic meals. These plant foods thrive in the Nordic climate and there is a long tradition of cultivating and consuming them here( Reference Boyhus 38 , Reference Skaarup and Jacobsen 39 ). Many plant foods have an as yet unexplored production potential in the Northern climate, including possibilities for cultivation across the seasonal calendar. The introduction of new or different varieties could prolong the growing season and increase the selection of plant foods grown in the Nordic countries. In the Middle Ages foods such as fresh herbs, legumes, cabbage and root vegetables played a major role in the Nordic diet, but their use has decreased significantly over recent decades and exotic dried spices, rice and pasta have partially taken their place( Reference Boyhus 38 , Reference Skaarup and Jacobsen 39 ). Nordic plant foods have a large gastronomic potential and could very well be promoted to their former importance in our food culture.

Sustainability

The suggestion of reducing intake of meat should be seen in the light of the fact that the meat intake of the Nordic populations is among the highest in the world( Reference Groth and Fagt 23 ). It has been estimated that the climate impact of the Danish diet alone could be reduced by approximately 30 % compared with the current average Danish diet if the population were to consume a diet in accordance with the NFDG (less meat and more plant foods and fish)( Reference Astrup, Andersen and Stender 20 ) and choose their foods with more consideration for the environment( Reference Fonnesbech and Hagedorn-Rasmussen 40 ). Meat is among the least environmentally friendly foods and a 30 % reduction in meat intake for the Danish population would correspond to a reduction of 6·6 million tonnes of CO2 equivalents per annum( Reference Fonnesbech and Hagedorn-Rasmussen 40 ). Plants such as cabbage, potatoes and root vegetables can easily be grown using organic farming methods in the Nordic countries. For example, compared with producing 1 kg of beef, fifty-seven times less greenhouse gases are emitted when producing 1 kg of potatoes( Reference Fiala 41 ). In order to ensure adequate protein content in the diet while reducing meat intake, the NND includes larger amounts of alternative protein sources such as legumes and fish. In this way protein intake can be maintained and the environmental burden reduced.

More foods from the sea and lakes

The Nordic countries are surrounded by water, and high-quality fish and shellfish are abundant here. A large proportion of the Nordic fishing catch is currently exported, so there is good potential for increasing local consumption. Furthermore, the Nordic countries have vast amounts of seaweed, a source of nutrition that has mostly been overlooked in the Western world, except for a few Nordic regions where its use has been traditional. Fish and shellfish have a significant health-promoting potential, as does seaweed. However, there are some safety issues in the use of seaweed in the human diet that still remain to be clarified( Reference Olesen, Ravn-Haren and Hansen 42 ). Increasing the proportion of freshwater and sea foods in the diet has a large potential to improve health, provides variation in meals and can contribute as an environmentally friendly protein source in the NND.

Health

Fish and shellfish have a significant health-promoting potential. Studies have shown that n-3 fatty acids, present in significant amounts in fatty fish, may improve child brain development and help prevent heart disease and nervous disorders in adults( Reference Andersen, Büchert and Koch 43 ). In addition, fish and shellfish have high contents of valuable vitamins and minerals, including vitamin D, iodine and Se, which are difficult to find naturally in other foods. Low vitamin D status, especially during the winter, is relatively common in Denmark and can lead to osteoporosis( Reference Mejborn, Andersen and Bredsdorff 44 ). Some studies also suggest that a high intake of Se is associated with a reduced risk of cancer( Reference Taylor and Greenwald 45 ). Fish and shellfish contain high amounts of protein and an increased intake may help to prevent weight gain and obesity, type 2 diabetes, and sarcopenia in the elderly( Reference Astrup 46 , Reference Paddon-Jones, Westman and Mattes 47 ). Different species of fish and shellfish contain different amounts of vitamins, minerals and fatty acids. The intake should therefore be alternated between fatty and lean species, and between catches from different origins (Atlantic, Baltic, fresh water, etc.) in order to get the full health benefits while minimizing risks of toxicity from pollution with organohalides and heavy metals.

Seaweed has high contents of essential minerals, protein, dietary fibre, vitamins (A, B, C, E) and essential fatty acids( Reference Mouritsen 48 ). It also contains a range of bioactive compounds which may play a role in the prevention of CVD and possess certain antiviral and anticancer effects( Reference Cooksley 49 ). Seaweed is a relatively unknown food in Denmark and it deserves greater attention here. Exploration of variations between species and origin in nutrient composition, including evaluation of risks from relatively high content of iodine in some species, is warranted.

Gastronomic potential and Nordic identity

Catch Area 27 is the sea around Denmark and the Nordic countries, where the so-called arctic fish and shellfish are found. The Nordic countries are characterized by long coastlines, and several of the countries have a huge number of freshwater lakes, providing extensive access to large amounts of locally caught high-quality fish and shellfish with very distinctive flavours. The waters of the North Sea, Baltic Sea and the Bothnic Bay vary greatly in salinity and mineral content, making distinct terroirs for fish such as herring and salmon, which vary in texture and taste according to locality. The majority of the fish caught is currently exported. A greater knowledge of the richness of these foods from the seas, coastal waters and lakes could encourage increased local use and contribute to a more distinct Nordic identity of our meals. The same considerations apply to seaweed. Historically, seaweed was part of the poor man's diet along most Nordic coastlines( Reference Mouritsen 48 ). Seaweed has a broad application in the kitchen and can be eaten raw, boiled, baked, roasted, puréed, dried, granulated or deep fried. The taste and texture of seaweed are very dependent on how it is treated. Seaweed can have a broad palette of flavours ranging from a strong and robust taste to sweet or salty, mild or spicy sea-notes. A supply chain would need to be established before Nordic seaweed is commonly available as a food.

Sustainability

It is important to consider the environment when proposing an increased consumption of fish and shellfish. Raising fish in fish farms is less environmentally friendly than catching fish in the wild( Reference Shahidul and Tanaka 50 ). Farmed fish are often fed partly on vegetable oils because there is not enough trash fish for feed, resulting in a reduced amount of healthy fish oils in the fish sold for consumption as a consequence( Reference Skog, Hylland and Torstensen 51 , Reference Fernandez-Jover, Jimenez and Sanchez-Jerez 52 ). The NND therefore focuses on wild-living species, which can be fished in a sustainable manner. One way to ensure a sustainable fishery is to choose fish that are MSC (Marine Stewardship Council) labelled, where the following criteria must be met: (i) the stock of fish should be sustainably fished, or evidently on its way to becoming so; (ii) fishing must not damage the ecosystem or marine environment; and (iii) fishing should be managed effectively so that sustainability and the ecosystem are guaranteed( 53 ).

There is a great potential for sustainable harvesting of seaweed, both wild and cultivated, in large quantities in the Nordic seas. It is also possible to create aquacultures where, together with clams and fish, seaweed can be cultivated in sustainable ecosystems( Reference Mouritsen 48 ).

More foods from the wild countryside

In the Nordic countries the population has reasonable access to large quantities of foods from the wild countryside, e.g. plants, mushrooms, berries, fruits and meat. Foods foraged from the wild are interesting because of their possible health potential, their firm gastronomic potential and their minimal impact on the environment. They can be collected by the individual or systematic gathering and distribution could be established, making them available for all. In this way some of the greatest gastronomic experiences could be made accessible for all. Foods from the wild countryside differ from country to country and are an important part of the identity of a regional cuisine.

Health

It seems that wild plants contain higher amounts of vitamins, minerals, secondary plant metabolites and n-3 fatty acids than conventionally grown plants( Reference Simopoulos 54 ). It has been found that wild plants have higher contents of vitamin C, vitamin E, phenols and other compounds that increase the antioxidant level in plants( Reference Simopoulos 54 ). Purslane and white goosefoot, usually regarded as weeds, have been described as two of the most nutritious plants in the world. Purslane contains large amounts of α-linolenic acid, while white goosefoot is rich in protein, vitamin A, Ca, P and K( Reference Simopoulos, Norman and Gillaspy 55 ). However, some caution should be exercised before including wild plants in the diet as many have a high content of bioactive components, the composition of some is still unknown and or not well understood, and some can be toxic if ingested in large quantities.

It is not only plant foods from the wild that seem to have a health-promoting potential. Meat from wild animals and fowl generally contains less fat and has a healthier fatty acid composition, with less saturated fat and more polyunsaturated fat, than meat from commercially reared animals, kept inside with no access to pasture. Moreover, a significantly higher content of n-3 fatty acids has been found in meat from animals caught in the wild( Reference Cordain, Watkins and Florant 56 ). Access to game and fowls is limited in the Nordic region, but studies have shown that meat from domestic animals that graze in open pastures also has a healthier fatty acid composition, with less saturated fat and more polyunsaturated fat, than meat from animals reared indoors without access to herbs and grass( Reference Cordain, Watkins and Florant 56 , Reference Scollan, Hocquette and Nuernberg 57 ). The NND therefore focuses on game from the wild, but includes meat from free-range animals.

Gastronomic potential and Nordic identity

Current dietary recommendations advise the population to eat a diet that satisfies the body's need for a wide range of nutrients and with a certain energy composition, while the importance of the individual's needs for pleasure and taste are not taken into consideration. A lean diet is often experienced as tiresome, without satisfying the need for pleasure, taste and sensory stimulation. The NND aims to include foods that bring taste and volume to a meal. Foods such as fresh herbs, wild plants and mushrooms are highly aromatic and can provide taste and volume to a meal containing less fat, helping to compensate for the deprivation some people might experience when exposed to a reduction of fat in the diet( Reference Astrup and Meyer 58 ).

Wild herbs, berries, etc. vary from region to region, depending on the local climate and soil conditions. Salt meadows, heath land and beech forests are examples of habitats which provide distinctive foods, each with a distinct taste and aroma. Meat from game shot in the wild is highly prized in gastronomy, because the animals have fed on wild plants that impart characteristics specific to the region to the meat. Although perhaps mostly on the symbolic and cultural level, game and wild plants play a role in the NND in that they display a maximum of diversity and local variation and at the same time differentiate Nordic cuisine from other food cultures.

Sustainability

Fungi such as chanterelles and Portobello mushrooms, and plants such as nettles, ground elder, wild garlic, meadowsweet and goosefoot, can be gathered freely in season in the countryside by everyone. The mileage from soil to table can be reduced significantly when produce is collected from our own backyard. Wild plants and fungi grow without fertilizers, pesticides or the expense of external energy, making a very small negative impact on the environment compared with conventional food production. However, there is a limit to how much food the population can gather from the wild before making a negative impact on the environment. Even so, it is estimated that only 2–4 % of the berries growing wild in the Nordic region are collected and consumed by humans( Reference Battino, Beekwilder and Denoyes-Rothan 59 , Reference Bere 60 ) and that only a limited part of the remaining 96–98 % is consumed by birds and wild animals. The same can be assumed for many other plants and foods, so these could (and should) be exploited to a greater extent.

Concluding remarks

The current paper presents the principles and guidelines behind the formulation of a healthy NND. These guidelines have been used to identify specific components for the NND and suggestions for intake. The resulting diet will be detailed in a subsequent publication. The diet is currently being tested in two intervention studies in the OPUS project, one in adults and one in schoolchildren. The NND is a prototype regional diet taking health, food culture, palatability and the environment into account. The principles and guidelines could be applied in any region, including any other specific region within the Nordic countries.

Acknowledgements

Sources of funding: The present study is a part of the OPUS project. OPUS is an acronym of the Danish title of the project ‘Optimal well-being, development and health for Danish children through a healthy New Nordic Diet’. The OPUS Centre is supported by grant from the Nordea Foundation, Denmark, and is independent of all commercial interests. Conflict of interest: C. Mithril, L.O.D. and M.K.H. have no conflicts of interest. C. Meyer is an owner of restaurants, food companies and a cooking school. As a food ideology, the New Nordic Cuisine is the brainchild of one of these restaurants, noma, and today the New Nordic Cuisine is a theme in most of C. Meyer's companies. E.B. is employed at Meyers Madhus. A.A. is an advisor, an advisory board member or a scientific board member for the Communications and Scientific Advisory Board of The Global Dairy Platform (Chicago, IL, USA), the Kraft Health & Wellness Advisory Council (Glenview, IL, USA), the Beer Knowledge Institute (Amsterdam, The Netherlands), the Pathway Genomics Corporation (La Jolla, CA, USA) and Jennie Craig (Carlsbad, CA, USA); and receives honoraria as a speaker and research funding from a wide range of Danish and international concerns. Authors’ contributions: The draft paper was elaborated by C. Mithril based on an OPUS report on the NND, which was developed by C. Mithril in close collaboration with C. Meyer, E.B., M.K.H., L.O.D. and A.A. L.O.D. helped C. Mithril shape the draft paper into its final form which was then approved with minor corrections by the other co-authors. Acknowledgements: The authors thank the Advisory Boards assisting OPUS Work Package 1 and the participants at the OPUS congress held in June 2009 in Copenhagen for their valuable input and help in the development of the NND.

Footnotes

The aims of the New Nordic Cuisine are to: (i) express the purity, freshness, simplicity and ethics we wish to associate with our region; (ii) reflect the changing of the seasons in the meals we make; (iii) base our cooking on ingredients and produce whose characteristics are particularly excellent in our climates, landscapes and waters; (iv) combine the demand for good taste with modern knowledge of health and well-being; (v) promote Nordic products and the variety of Nordic producers, and spread the word about their underlying cultures; (vi) promote animal welfare and a sound production process in our seas, on our farmland and in the wild; (vii) develop potentially new applications of traditional Nordic food products; (viii) combine the best in Nordic cookery and culinary traditions with impulses from abroad; (ix) combine local self-sufficiency with regional sharing of high-quality products; and (x) join forces with consumer representatives, other cooking craftsmen, agriculture, the fishing, food, retail and wholesale industries, researchers, teachers, politicians and authorities on this project for the benefit and advantage of everyone in the Nordic countries ( 1 ) .

References

1. Välimäki H, Sørensen L, Dahlgren M et al. (2004) Manifesto for the New Nordic Kitchen. http://www.clausmeyer.dk/en/the_new_nordic_cuisine_/manifesto_.html (accessed September 2011).Google Scholar
3. The S.Pellegrino World's 50 Best Restaurants (2011) The World's 50 Best Restaurant Awards 1–50. http://www.theworlds50best.com/awards/1-50-winners (accessed September 2011).Google Scholar
4. Bocuse d'Or (2011) The Bocuse d'Or winners’ academy 2011. http://www.academie-bocusedor.com/uk/chefs/liste-chef.html?annee=2011 (accessed September 2011).Google Scholar
5. Drewnowski, A (1997) Why do we like fat? J Am Diet Assoc 97, Suppl. 7, S58S62.Google Scholar
6. Ezatti, M, Lopez, AD, Rodgers, A et al. (2002) The comparative risk assessment collaborating group. Selected major risk factors and global and regional burden of disease. Lancet 360, 13471360.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
7. Bendixen, H, Holst, C, Sørensen, TIA et al. (2004) Major increase in prevalence of overweight and obesity between 1987 and 2001 among Danish adults. Obes Res 12, 14641472.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
8. Pearson, S, Olsen, LW, Hansen, B et al. (2005) Increase in overweight and obesity amongst Copenhagen schoolchildren, 1947–2003. Ugeskr Læger 167, 158162.Google Scholar
9. Haslam, DW & James, PT (2005) Obesity. Lancet 366, 11971209.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
10. Brug, J & Oenema, A (2006) Healthful nutrition promotion in Europe: goals, target populations, and strategies. Patient Educ Couns 63, 255257.Google Scholar
11. Larsen, TM, Dalskov, S, van Baak, M et al. (2010) The diet, obesity and genes (Diogenes) dietary study in eight European countries – a comprehensive design for long-term intervention. Obes Rev 11, 7691.Google Scholar
12. Papadaki, A, Linardakis, M, Larsen, TM et al. (2010) The effect of protein and glycemic index on children's body composition: the DiOGenes randomized study. Pediatrics 126, e1143e1152.Google Scholar
13. Sørensen, LB, Møller, P, Flint, A et al. (2003) Effect of sensory perception of foods on appetite and food intake: a review of studies on humans. Int J Obes Relat Metab Disord 27, 11521166.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
14. Astrup, A, Nielsen, CM, Greve, T et al. (2003) Randomized comparison of gourmet cooking course versus behaviour modification treatment of obesity. Ugeskr Læger 165, 49584961.Google Scholar
15. Bere, E & Brug, J (2009) Towards health-promoting and environmentally friendly regional diets – a Nordic example. Public Health Nutr 12, 9196.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
16. Benton, D (2008) The influence of children's diet on their cognition and behaviour. Eur J Nutr 47, Suppl. 3, S25S37.Google Scholar
17. Eilander, A, Hundscheid, DC, Osendarp, SJ et al. (2007) The effect of n-3 long chain polyunsaturated fatty acid supplementation on visual and cognitive development throughout childhood: a review of human studies. Prostaglandins Leukot Essent Fatty Acids 76, 189203.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
18. Meyer, C, Mithril, C, Blauert, E et al. (2010) Grundlag for Ny Nordisk Hverdagsmad (Principles of the New Nordic Diet). Copenhagen: Department of Human Nutrition, Faculty of Life Sciences, University of Copenhagen.Google Scholar
19. World Health Organization (2006) Constitution of the World Health Organization – Basic Documents, 45th ed. Geneva: WHO.Google Scholar
20. Astrup, A, Andersen, NL, Stender, S et al. (2005) Kostrådene 2005 (National Food Based Dietary Guidelines 2005). Copenhagen: Danish Nutrition Council & Danish Institute for Food and Veterinary Research.Google Scholar
21. McMichael, AJ, Powles, JW, Butler, CD et al. (2007) Food, livestock production, energy, climate change, and health. Lancet 370, 12531263.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
22. Gabriel, S (2007) Council Regulation (EC) No 834/2007 of 28 June 2007 on Organic Production and Labelling of Organic Products and Repealing Regulation (EEC) No 2092/91. Luxembourg: The Council of the European Union.Google Scholar
23. Groth, MV & Fagt, S (2001) Trends in dietary habits in Denmark and Sweden since the 1960's. Ugeskr Læger 163, 425429.Google Scholar
24. Due, A, Toubro, S, Stender, S et al. (2005) The effect of diets high in protein or carbohydrate on inflammatory markers in overweight subjects. Diabetes Obes Metab 7, 223229.Google Scholar
25. Larsen, TM, Dalskov, SM, van Baak, M et al. (2010) Diets with high or low protein content and glycemic index for weight-loss maintenance. N Engl J Med 363, 21022113.Google Scholar
26. Pimentel, D & Pimentel, M (2003) Sustainability of meat-based and plant-based diets and the environment. Am J Clin Nutr 78, 660663.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
27. He, FJ, Nowson, CA & MacGregor, GA (2006) Fruit and vegetable consumption and stroke: meta-analysis of cohort studies. Lancet 367, 320326.Google Scholar
28. He, FJ, Nowson, CA, Lucas, M et al. (2007) Increased consumption of fruit and vegetables is related to a reduced risk of coronary heart disease: meta-analysis of cohort studies. J Hum Hypertens 21, 717728.Google Scholar
29. Hallund, J, Dragsted, LO, Halkjær, J et al. (2007) Fruits, Vegetables and Health. Søborg: Department of Nutrition, National Food Institute, Technical University of Denmark.Google Scholar
30. Duijnhoven, FJB, Bueno-De-Mesquita, HB, Ferrari, P et al. (2009) Fruit, vegetables, and colorectal cancer risk: the European prospective investigation into cancer and nutrition. Am J Clin Nutr 89, 14411452.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
31. World Cancer Research Fund/American Institute for Cancer Research (2007) Food, Nutrition, Physical Activity and the Prevention of Cancer: A Global Perspective. Washington, DC: AICR Press.Google Scholar
32. Kelly, SA, Summerbell, CD, Brynes, A et al. (2007) Wholegrain cereals for coronary heart disease. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 18, issue 2, CD005051.Google Scholar
33. Pereira, MA, O'Reilly, E, Augustsson, K et al. (2004) Dietary fiber and risk of coronary heart disease. Arch Intern Med 164, 370376.Google Scholar
34. Liese, AD, Roach, AK, Sparks, KC et al. (2003) Whole-grain intake and insulin sensitivity: the Insulin Resistance Atherosclerosis Study. Am J Clin Nutr 78, 965971.Google Scholar
35. Egeberg, R, Olsen, A, Loft, S et al. (2010) Intake of wholegrain products and risk of colorectal cancers in the Diet, Cancer and Health cohort study. Br J Cancer 103, 730734.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
36. Howarth, NC, Saltzman, E & Roberts, SB (2001) Dietary fiber and weight regulation. Nutr Rev 59, 129139.Google Scholar
37. Pedersen, AN, Fagt, S, Groth, MV et al. (2010) Dietary Habits in Denmark, 2003–2008. Søborg: Department of Nutrition, National Food Institute, Technical University of Denmark.Google Scholar
38. Boyhus, E (1996) Grønsager – en køkkenhistorie (Vegetables – A Kitchen History). Copenhagen: Gyldendalske Boghandel, Nordisk Forlag AS.Google Scholar
39. Skaarup, B & Jacobsen, H (1999) Middelaldermad (Medieval Food). Copenhagen: Nyt Nordisk Forlag A/S.Google Scholar
40. Fonnesbech, B & Hagedorn-Rasmussen, P (2009) The IDA Climate Plan 2050. Copenhagen: The Danish Society of Engineers.Google Scholar
41. Fiala, N (2009) The greenhouse hamburger. Scientific American 300, issue 2, 7275.Google Scholar
42. Olesen, PT, Ravn-Haren, G, Hansen, M et al. (2011) Tang kan indeholde sundhedsskadelige stoffer (Seaweed May Contain Compounds Harmful to Health). Søborg: Department of Toxicology and Risk Assessment, National Food Institute, Technical University of Denmark.Google Scholar
43. Andersen, JK, Büchert, A, Koch, B et al. (2003) Helhedssyn på fisk og fiskevarer (General View of Fish and Fish Products). Søborg: Danish Veterinary and Food Administration.Google Scholar
44. Mejborn, H, Andersen, R, Bredsdorff, L et al. (2010) D-vitamin. Opdatering af videnskabelig evidens for sygdomsforebyggelse og anbefalinger (Vitamin D. Update of Scientific Evidence for Disease Prevention and Recommendations). Søborg: Department of Nutrition, National Food Institute, Technical University of Denmark.Google Scholar
45. Taylor, PR & Greenwald, P (2005) Nutritional interventions in cancer prevention. J Clin Oncol 23, 333345.Google Scholar
46. Astrup, A (2005) The satiating power of protein – a key to obesity prevention? Am J Clin Nutr 82, 12.Google Scholar
47. Paddon-Jones, D, Westman, E, Mattes, RD et al. (2008) Protein, weight management, and satiety. Am J Clin Nutr 87, issue 5, 1558S1561S.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
48. Mouritsen, OG (2009) Tang (Seaweed). Copenhagen: Nyt Nordisk Forlag Arnold Busck.Google Scholar
49. Cooksley, VG (2007) Seaweed. New York: Harry N. Abrams, Inc.Google Scholar
50. Shahidul, IM & Tanaka, M (2004) Impacts of pollution on coastal and marine ecosystems including coastal and marine fisheries and approach for management: a review and synthesis. Mar Pollut Bull 48, 624649.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
51. Skog, T, Hylland, K, Torstensen, BE et al. (2003) Salmon farming affects the fatty acid composition and taste of wild saithe, Pollachius virens L. Aquacult Res 34, 9991007.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
52. Fernandez-Jover, D, Jimenez, JAL, Sanchez-Jerez, P et al. (2007) Changes in body condition and fatty acid composition of wild Mediterranean horse mackerel (Trachurus mediterraneus, Steindachner, 1868) associated to sea cage fish farms. Mar Environ Res 63, 118.Google Scholar
53. Marine Stewardship Council (2011) Marine Stewardship Council homepage. http://www.msc.org/?set_language=en (accessed September 2011).Google Scholar
54. Simopoulos, AP (2004) Omega-3 fatty acids and antioxidants in edible wild plants. Biol Res 37, 263277.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
55. Simopoulos, AP, Norman, HA, Gillaspy, JE et al. (1992) Common purslane: a source of omega-3 fatty acids and antioxidants. J Am Coll Nutr 11, 374382.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
56. Cordain, L, Watkins, BA, Florant, GL et al. (2002) Fatty acid analysis of wild ruminant tissues: evolutionary implications for reducing diet-related chronic disease. Eur J Clin Nutr 56, 181191.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
57. Scollan, N, Hocquette, JF, Nuernberg, K et al. (2006) Innovations in beef production systems that enhance the nutritional and health value of beef and their relationship with meat quality. Meat Sci 74, 1733.Google Scholar
58. Astrup, A & Meyer, C (2007) Spis igennem (Eat Your Fill). Copenhagen: Politikens Forlag.Google Scholar
59. Battino, M, Beekwilder, J, Denoyes-Rothan, B et al. (2009) Bioactive compounds in berries relevant to human health. Nutr Rev 67, Suppl. 1, S145S150.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
60. Bere, E (2007) Wild berries: a good source of omega-3. Eur J Clin Nutr 61, 431433.Google Scholar