Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-dsjbd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-22T06:51:06.286Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Glycaemic index and glycaemic load in relation to blood lipids – 6 years of follow-up in adult Danish men and women

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 January 2007

Anne Lene Oxlund  and
Berit Lilienthal Heitmann
Anne Lene Oxlund
Affiliation:
Research Unit for Dietary Studies and Danish Epidemiology Science Centre, Institute of Preventive Medicine, Copenhagen University Hospital, Øster Søgade 18, 1357 Copenhagen K, Denmark
Berit Lilienthal Heitmann*
Affiliation:
Research Unit for Dietary Studies and Danish Epidemiology Science Centre, Institute of Preventive Medicine, Copenhagen University Hospital, Øster Søgade 18, 1357 Copenhagen K, Denmark Research Centre for Prevention and Health, Glostrup University Hospital, Glostrup, Denmark
*
*Corresponding author: Email [email protected]
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.
Background

Cross-sectional studies have suggested an association between glycaemic index (GI) or glycaemic load (GL) and serum lipids. However, no prospective studies have been performed.

Objective

To examine whether GI or GL was associated with subsequent changes in serum lipids.

Design

Prospective study with 6 years of follow-up. Overall dietary GI and GL of each participant were assessed from diet history interviews.

Setting

Population-based study.

Subjects

Three hundred and thirty-five healthy men and women aged 35–65 years selected randomly from a larger sample of Danish adults.

Results

In men GI was directly related to changes in total cholesterol (ΔTC), regression coefficient (β) = 0.0044 (95% confidence interval (CI): 0.0008–0.0081) and GL was positively related to changes in low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (ΔLDL), β = 0.1554 (95% CI: 0.0127–0.2982). Furthermore, the relationship between GL and ΔTC was modified by age, being particularly strong for the younger men (P = 0.02). In women the relationship between GI and ΔLDL was modified by age and was stronger for younger rather than older women (P = 0.01). A tendency for a similar interaction was seen for GI and ΔTC (P = 0.09). Associations between GL and ΔLDL and GL and ΔTC were inverse for women with body mass index ≥ 30 kg m−2 (P = 0.03 and 0.04, respectively).

Conclusions

This is the first study to demonstrate that dietary GI and GL are related to 6-year changes in serum lipid levels. However, associations were weak and generally confined to subgroups.

Keywords

Diet history interviewCholesterolProspective population studyPreventionPublic health
Type
Research Article
Information
Public Health Nutrition , Volume 9 , Issue 6 , September 2006 , pp. 737 - 745
Copyright
Copyright © The Authors 2006

References

1Murray, CJ, Lopez, AD. Mortality by cause for eight regions of the world: Global Burden of Disease Study. Lancet 1997; 349(9061): 1269–76.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
2Grundy, SM, Pasternak, R, Greenland, P, Smith, S Jr, Fuster, V. Assessment of cardiovascular risk by use of multiple-risk-factor assessment equations: a statement for healthcare professionals from the American Heart Association and the American College of Cardiology. Circulation 1999; 100(13): 1481–92.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
3Katan, MB, Grundy, SM, Willett, WC. Should a low-fat, high-carbohydrate diet be recommended for everyone? Beyond low-fat diets. New England Journal of Medicine 1997; 337(8): 563–6.Google ScholarPubMed
4Hegsted, DM, Ausman, LM, Johnson, JA, Dallal, GE. Dietary fat and serum lipids: an evaluation of the experimental data. American Journal of Clinical Nutrition 1993; 57(6): 875–83.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
5Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO)/World Health Organization. Carbohydrates in Human Nutrition. Report of a Joint FAO/WHO Expert Consultation. Food and Nutrition Paper No. 66. Rome: FAO, 1998; 1–140.Google Scholar
6Grundy, SM, Denke, MA. Dietary influences on serum lipids and lipoproteins. Journal of Lipid Research 1990; 31(7): 1149–72.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
7Parks, EJ, Hellerstein, MK. Carbohydrate-induced hypertriacylglycerolemia: historical perspective and review of biological mechanisms. American Journal of Clinical Nutrition 2000; 71(2): 412–33.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
8Brand-Miller, J, Nantel, G, Lang, V, Slama, G. The Glycemic Index and Health; The Quality of the Evidence, Paris: John Libbey Eurotext, Danone Vitapole France, 2001.Google Scholar
9Opperman, AM, Venter, CS, Oosthuizen, W, Thompson, RL, Vorster, HH. Meta-analysis of the health effects of using the glycaemic index in meal-planning. British Journal of Nutrition 2004; 92(3): 367–81.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
10LaHaye, SA, Hollett, PM, Vyselaar, JR, Shalchi, M, Lahey, KA, Day, AG. Comparison between a low glycemic load diet and a Canada Food Guide diet in cardiac rehabilitation patients in Ontario. Canadian Journal of Cardiology 2005; 21(6): 489–94.Google Scholar
11Ebbeling, CB, Leidig, MM, Sinclair, KB, Seger-Shippee, LG, Feldman, HA, Ludwig, DS. Effects of an ad libitum low-glycemic load diet on cardiovascular disease risk factors in obese young adults. American Journal of Clinical Nutrition 2005; 81(5): 976–82.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
12Sloth, B, Krog-Mikkelsen, I, Flint, A, Tetens, I, Bjorck, I, Vinoy, S, et al. No difference in body weight decrease between a low-glycemic-index and a high-glycemic-index diet but reduced LDL cholesterol after 10-wk ad libitum intake of the low-glycemic-index diet. American Journal of Clinical Nutrition 2004; 80(2): 337–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
13Jimenez-Cruz, A, Seimandi-Mora, H, Bacardi-Gascon, M. [Effect of low glycemic index diets in hyperlipidemia]. Nutrición Hospitalaria 2003; 18(6): 331–5.Google ScholarPubMed
14Liljeberg, HG, Akerberg, AK, Bjorck, IM. Effect of the glycemic index and content of indigestible carbohydrates of cereal-based breakfast meals on glucose tolerance at lunch in healthy subjects. American Journal of Clinical Nutrition 1999; 69(4): 647–55.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
15Frost, G, Leeds, AA, Dore, CJ, Madeiros, S, Brading, S, Dornhorst, A. Glycaemic index as a determinant of serum HDL-cholesterol concentration. Lancet 1999; 353(9158): 1045–8.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
16van Dam, RM, Visscher, AW, Feskens, EJ, Verhoef, P, Kromhout, D. Dietary glycemic index in relation to metabolic risk factors and incidence of coronary heart disease: the Zutphen Elderly Study. European Journal of Clinical Nutrition 2000; 54(9): 726–31.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
17Buyken, AE, Toeller, M, Heitkamp, G, Karamanos, B, Rottiers, R, Muggeo, M, et al. Glycemic index in the diet of European outpatients with type 1 diabetes: relations to glycated hemoglobin and serum lipids. American Journal of Clinical Nutrition 2001; 73(3): 574–81.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
18Ford, ES, Liu, S. Glycemic index and serum high-density lipoprotein cholesterol concentration among US adults. Archives of Internal Medicine 2001; 161(4): 572–6.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
19Liu, S, Manson, JE, Stampfer, MJ, Holmes, MD, Hu, FB, Hankinson, SE, et al. Dietary glycemic load assessed by food-frequency questionnaire in relation to plasma high-density-lipoprotein cholesterol and fasting plasma triacylglycerols in postmenopausal women. American Journal of Clinical Nutrition 2001; 73(3): 560–6.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
20McKeown, NM, Meigs, JB, Liu, S, Saltzman, E, Wilson, PW, Jacques, PF. Carbohydrate nutrition, insulin resistance, and the prevalence of the metabolic syndrome in the Framingham Offspring Cohort. Diabetes Care 2004; 27(2): 538–46.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
21Slyper, A, Jurva, J, Pleuss, J, Hoffmann, R, Gutterman, D. Influence of glycemic load on HDL cholesterol in youth. American Journal of Clinical Nutrition 2005; 81(2): 376–9.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
22Bothig, S. WHO MONICA project: objectives and design. International Journal of Epidemiology 1989; 18(Suppl. 1): S29–37.Google ScholarPubMed
23Hollnagel, H. The health structure of 40-year-old men and women in the Glostrup area, Denmark – an epidemiological survey. General design, sampling results and referrals for further medical care. Danish Medical Bulletin 1980; 27(3): 121–30.Google ScholarPubMed
24Heitmann, BL, Garby, L. Composition (lean and fat tissue) of weight changes in adult Danes. American Journal of Clinical Nutrition 2002; 75(5): 840–7.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
25Møller, A. Levnedsmiddeltabeller, 2nd ed. [Danish food composition tables 1985, nutrient composition of Danish food]. Ministry of the Environment Publication No. 75, Søborg: National Food Agency, 1986.Google Scholar
26Grau, K, Tetens, I, Bjørnsbro, K, Heitmann, BL. Overall glycemic index of habitual diet is inversely associated with risk of heart disease in Danish men but not in women. Unpublished work, 2003.Google Scholar
27Foster-Powell, K, Holt, SHBrand-Miller, JC. International table of glycemic index and glycemic load values: 2002. American Journal of Clinical Nutrition 2002; 76(1): 5–56.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
28Jenkins, DJ, Wolever, TM, Jenkins, AL, Thorne, MJ, Lee, R, Kalmusky, J, et al. The glycaemic index of foods tested in diabetic patients: a new basis for carbohydrate exchange favouring the use of legumes. Diabetologia 1983; 24(4): 257–64.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
29Wolever, TM. The Glycemic Index [special edition]. ed. World Review of Nutrition and Dietetics 1990; 62: 120–85.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
30Jenkins, DJ, Wolever, TM, Taylor, RH, Barker, H, Fielden, H, Baldwin, JM, et al. Glycemic index of foods: a physiological basis for carbohydrate exchange. American Journal of Clinical Nutrition 1981; 34(3): 362–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
31Wolever, TM. Low carbohydrate does not mean low glycaemic index!. British Journal of Nutrition 2002; 88(2): 211–2.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
32Friedewald, WT, Levy, RI, Fredrickson, DS. Estimation of the concentration of low-density lipoprotein cholesterol in plasma, without use of the preparative ultracentrifuge. Clinical Chemistry 1972; 18(6): 499–502.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
33Greenland, S, Neutra, R. Control of confounding in the assessment of medical technology. International Journal of Epidemiology 1980; 9(4): 361–7.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
34Willett, W. Nutritional Epidemiology, 2nd ed. New York: Oxford University Press, 1998.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
35Hare, H, Flint, A, Heitman, BL. Glycemic index in relation to changes in weight and body composition after 6 years follow-up. Unpublished work, 2004.Google Scholar
36Rothman, KJ. Causes. American Journal of Epidemiology 1976; 104(6): 587–92.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
37Wolever, TM, Mehling, C. Long-term effect of varying the source or amount of dietary carbohydrate on postprandial plasma glucose, insulin, triacylglycerol, and free fatty acid concentrations in subjects with impaired glucose tolerance. American Journal of Clinical Nutrition 2003; 77(3): 612–21.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
38Jarvi, AE, Karlstrom, BE, Granfeldt, YE, Bjorck, IE, Asp, NG, Vessby, BO. Improved glycemic control and lipid profile and normalized fibrinolytic activity on a low-glycemic index diet in type 2 diabetic patients. Diabetes Care 1999; 22(1): 10–18.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
39Jenkins, DJ, Wolever, TM, Kalmusky, J, Guidici, S, Giordano, C, Patten, R, et al. Low-glycemic index diet in hyperlipidemia: use of traditional starchy foods. American Journal of Clinical Nutrition 1987; 46(1): 66–71.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
40Collier, GR, Giudici, S, Kalmusky, J, Wolever, TM, Helman, G, et al. Low glycaemic index starchy foods improve glucose control and lower serum cholesterol in diabetic children. Diabetes, Nutrition & Metabolism 1988; 1: 11–19.Google Scholar
41Jenkins, DJ, Wolever, TM, Collier, GR, Ocana, A, Rao, AV, Buckley, G, et al. Metabolic effects of a low-glycemic-index diet. American Journal of Clinical Nutrition 1987; 46(6): 968–75.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
42Fontvieille, AM, Rizkalla, SW, Penfornis, A, Acosta, M, Bornet, FR, Slama, G. The use of low glycaemic index foods improves metabolic control of diabetic patients over five weeks. Diabetic Medicine 1992; 9(5): 444–50.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
43Fontvieille, AM. A moderate switch from high to low glycaemic-index foods for 3 weeks improves the metabolic control of type 1 (IDDM) diabetic subjects. Diabetes, Nutrition & Metabolism 1988; 1: 139–43.Google Scholar
44Wolever, TM, Jenkins, DJ, Vuksan, V, Jenkins, AL, Buckley, GC, Wong, GS, et al. Beneficial effect of a low glycaemic index diet in type 2 diabetes. Diabetic Medicine 1992; 9(5): 451–8.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
45Wolever, TM, Jenkins, DJ, Vuksan, V, Jenkins, AL, Wong, GS, Josse, RG. Beneficial effect of low-glycemic index diet in overweight NIDDM subjects. Diabetes Care 1992; 15(4): 562–4.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
46Frost, G, Wilding, J, Beecham, J. Dietary advice based on the glycaemic index improves dietary profile and metabolic control in type 2 diabetic patients. Diabetic Medicine 1994; 11(4): 397–401.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
47Luscombe, ND, Noakes, M, Clifton, PM. Diets high and low in glycemic index versus high monounsaturated fat diets: effects on glucose and lipid metabolism in NIDDM. European Journal of Clinical Nutrition 1999; 53(6): 473–8.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
48Tsihlias, EB, Gibbs, AL, McBurney, MI, Wolever, TM. Comparison of high- and low-glycemic-index breakfast cereals with monounsaturated fat in the long-term dietary management of type 2 diabetes. American Journal of Clinical Nutrition 2000; 72(2): 439–49.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
49Bouche, C, Rizkalla, SW, Luo, J, Vidal, H, Veronese, A, Pacher, N, et al. Five-week, low-glycemic index diet decreases total fat mass and improves plasma lipid profile in moderately overweight nondiabetic men. Diabetes Care 2002; 25(5): 822–8.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
50Harbis, A, Perdreau, SVincent-Baudry, S, Charbonnier, M, Bernard, MC, Raccah, D, et al. Glycemic and insulinemic meal responses modulate postprandial hepatic and intestinal lipoprotein accumulation in obese, insulin-resistant subjects. American Journal of Clinical Nutrition 2004; 80(4): 896–902.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
51Jenkins, DJ, Wolever, TM, Buckley, G, Lam, KY, Giudici, S, Kalmusky, J, et al. Low-glycemic-index starchy foods in the diabetic diet. American Journal of Clinical Nutrition 1988; 48(2): 248–54.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
52Heitmann, BL, Lissner, L. Dietary underreporting by obese individuals – is it specific or non-specific? British Medical Journal 1995; 311(7011): 986–9.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
53Heitmann, BL, Lissner, L, Osler, M. Do we eat less fat, or just report so? International Journal of Obesity and Related Metabolic Disorders 2000; 24(4): 435–42.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
54Heitmann, BL, Lissner, L. Can adverse effects of dietary fat intake be overestimated as a consequence of dietary fat underreporting? Public Health Nutrition 2005; 8(8): 1322–7.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
55Black, AE, Goldberg, GR, Jebb, SA, Livingstone, MB, Cole, TJ, Prentice, AM. Critical evaluation of energy intake data using fundamental principles of energy physiology: 2. Evaluating the results of published surveys. European Journal of Clinical Nutrition 1991; 45(12): 583–99.Google ScholarPubMed
56Flint, A, Moller, BK, Raben, A, Pedersen, D, Tetens, I, Holst, JJ, et al. The use of glycaemic index tables to predict glycaemic index of composite breakfast meals. British Journal of Nutrition 2004; 91(6): 979–89.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed