Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-2plfb Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-22T17:52:38.286Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Globalisation and income growth promote the Mediterranean diet

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 January 2007

Anita Regmi ,
Nicole Ballenger  and
Judy Putnam
Anita Regmi*
Affiliation:
Economic Research Service, US Department of Agriculture, 1800 M Street NW, Washington, DC 20036, USA
Nicole Ballenger
Affiliation:
Economic Research Service, US Department of Agriculture, 1800 M Street NW, Washington, DC 20036, USA
Judy Putnam
Affiliation:
Economic Research Service, US Department of Agriculture, 1800 M Street NW, Washington, DC 20036, USA
*
*Corresponding author: Email [email protected]
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.
Objective:

To examine global food demand patterns and how changing diets may stimulate demand for and trade of Mediterranean diet products.

Design:

Literature review. Trends in global and US food consumption patterns are examined and trade data are reviewed to evaluate the impact of changing diets on trade of Mediterranean diet products. Market access issues are also addressed briefly to highlight the role of policy in the trade of Mediterranean diet products.

Results:

Diets are shifting towards higher-value products such as meats, fruits and vegetables, and a wider array of packaged food products. Trade in these products has also grown in the past two decades, with several non-traditional importers and exporters becoming increasingly active in the global market.

Conclusions:

Income-driven demands for quality and variety are likely to increase the demand for Mediterranean diet products globally. While the middle-income countries appear to be the best growth prospects, the USA remains a potential growth market if these products can meet the growing consumer demand for variety, quality and convenience. Although consumer trends globally indicate growth in demand for Mediterranean diet products, the additional demand may not be reflected by a corresponding growth in trade. Trade in Mediterranean diet products continues to be hampered by higher than average trade barriers and high transportation costs for perishables.

Keywords

ConsumptionIncomeTradeMediterranean diet
Type
Research Article
Information
Public Health Nutrition , Volume 7 , Issue 7 , October 2004 , pp. 977 - 983
Copyright
Copyright © The Authors 2004

References

1Regmi, A, ed. Changing Structure of Global Food Consumption and Trade. Agriculture and Trade Report WRS-01–1. Washington, DC: US Department of Agriculture, Economic Research, Service, 2001.Google Scholar
2Seale, J, Regmi, A, Bernstein, J. International Evidence on Food Consumption Patterns. Technical Bulletin. Washington, DC: US Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service, 2003.Google Scholar
3Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO). FAOSTAT Database. Rome: FAO, 2001.Google Scholar
4Rosegrant, M, Paiser, M, Meijer, S, Witcover, J. Global Food Projections to 2020. 2020 Vision Series. Washington, DC: International Food Policy Research Institute, 2001.Google Scholar
5Blisard, N, Lin, B-H, Cromartie, J, Ballenger, N. America's changing appetite: food consumption and spending to 2020. Food Review 2002; 25(1). Washington, DC: US Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service.Google Scholar
6Cromartie, J. Population growth and demographic change, 1980–2020. Food Review 2002; 25(1). Washington, DC: US Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service.Google Scholar
7Young, E, Gehlhar, M, Nelson, F, Burfisher, M, Mitchell, L. Options for reducing the Aggregate Measurement of Support (AMS) in OECD countries. In: Burfisher, M, ed. Agricultural Policy Reform in the WTO: The Road Ahead. Agricultural Economic Report No. 802. Washington, DC: US Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service, 2001; 70–9.Google Scholar
8 Agricultural Market Access Database. Available at http://www.amad.orgGoogle Scholar
9Donovan, J, Krissoff, B. Trade Issues Facing US Horticulture in the WTO Negotiations. Washington, DC: US Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service, 2001. Electronic Outlook Report VGS–285–01. Available at http://www.ers.usda.gov/publications/vgs/Aug01/vgs285-01Google Scholar
10World Trade Organization (WTO). Report (2001) of the Committee on Safeguards to the Council for Trade in Goods. G/L/494. Geneva: WTO, 09 2001.Google Scholar
11World Trade Organization (WTO). Report (2000) of the Committee on Safeguards. G/L/409 Geneva: WTO, 11 2000.Google Scholar