Hostname: page-component-f554764f5-nt87m Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-04-09T16:16:29.163Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Definitions for public health nutrition: a developing consensus

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  16 August 2007

Roger Hughes
Roger Hughes*
Affiliation:
Nutrition Unit, School of Health Science, Griffith University, Gold Coast, Queensland 4217, Australia
*
*Corresponding author: Email [email protected]
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.
Objectives:

To assess the level of agreement amongst a panel of public health nutrition leaders regarding the key descriptors used to define the field of public health nutrition.

Design:

Cross-sectional survey requiring quantitative and qualitative responses representing the first round of a consensus development Delphi technique.

Setting:

International.

Subjects:

Expert panel of 24 public health nutrition leaders from nine countries in the European Union, the USA and Australia.

Results:

All but one of the panel agreed it was important to have a consensus definition for public health nutrition to describe the field consistently. Opinion about the length and complexity of this definition tended to vary depending on the intended use of the definition. The large majority (18/24) supported the inclusion of specific reference to physical activity in a definition of public health nutrition, although there was not consensus (>83% agreement as criterion) on this point. Consensus descriptors regarded as important in a definition of public health nutrition included: population-based, focus on health promotion, food and nutrition systems focus, wellness maintenance, primary prevention, applies public health principles, education, environmental and political descriptors. Treatment as a descriptor was rated as unimportant by a majority (14/24) of panellists, delineating public health nutrition from clinical practice.

Conclusions:

There is strong international agreement amongst public health nutrition leaders in Europe, the USA and Australia about a range of descriptors that can be used to define public health nutrition. The limitations of using word-for-word definitions between and within countries may be overcome by explicit use of the consensus descriptors identified in this process.

Keywords

Public health nutritionDefinitionConsensus development
Type
Research Article
Information
Public Health Nutrition , Volume 6 , Issue 6 , September 2003 , pp. 615 - 620
Copyright
Copyright © The Authors 2003

References

1Hughes, R, Somerset, S. Definitions and conceptual frameworks for public health and community nutrition: a discussion paper. Australian Journal of Nutrition and Dietetics 1997; 54: 40–5.Google Scholar
2Rogers, B, Schlossman, N. ‘Public nutrition’: the need for cross-disciplinary breadth in the education of applied nutrition professionals. Food and Nutrition Bulletin 1997; 18: 120–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
3Landman, J, Buttriss, J, Margetts, B. Curriculum design for professional development in public health nutrition in Britain. Public Health Nutrition 1998; 1: 69–74.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
4Yngve, A, Sjostrom, M, Warm, D, Margetts, B, Perez Rodrigo, C, Nissinen, A. Effective promotion of healthy nutrition and physical activity in Europe requires skilled and competent people; European Master's Programme in Public Health Nutrition. Public Health Nutrition 1999; 2: 449–52.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
5Johnson, D, Eaton, D, Wahl, P, Gleason, C. Public health nutrition practice in the United States. Journal of the American Dietetic Association 2001; 101: 529–34.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
6Landman, J. Training in Public Health Nutrition: symposium at the 17th International Congress of Nutrition, Vienna. Public Health Nutrition 2001; 4: 1301–2.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
7Strategic Intergovernmental Nutrition Alliance. Eat Well Australia: An Agenda for Action for Public Health Nutrition 2000–2010. Canberra: Department Health and Aged Care, 2001.Google Scholar
8Murphy, M, Black, N, Lamping, D, McKee, C, Sanderson, C, Askham, J, et al. Consensus development methods, and their use in clinical guideline development. Health Technology Assessment 1998; 2: 3.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
9Jones, J, Hunter, D. Qualitative research: consensus methods for medical and health services research. British Medical Journal 1995; 311: 376–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
10Hughes, R. Public health nutrition workforce composition, core functions, competencies and capacity: perspectives of advanced-level practitioners in Australia. Public Health Nutrition 2003; 6: 607–14.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
11Mackerras, D. Viewpoint article: definitions and conceptual framework for public health and community nutrition – letter to editor. Australian Journal of Nutrition and Dietetics 1998; 55: 37–8.Google Scholar
12Niall, M, O'Dea, K. Viewpoint article: definitions and conceptual framework for public health and community nutrition – letter to editor. Australian Journal of Nutrition and Dietetics 1997; 54: 208.Google Scholar
13Coveney, J. Practical placements for dietetic students. Australian Journal of Nutrition and Dietetics 1998; 55: 146.Google Scholar
14Hughes, R, Somerset, S. In reply to Mackerras. Australian Journal of Nutrition and Dietetics 1998; 55: 39.Google Scholar