Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-p9bg8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-22T15:21:12.866Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Defining and addressing the nutritional needs of populations

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 January 2007

Ricardo Uauy*
Affiliation:
Instituto de Nutricion y Tecnología de los Alimentos (INTA), University of Chile, Santiago, Chile, and London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, UK
*
*Corresponding author: Email [email protected]
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.
Objective

To examine the present methods used to define nutritional needs, and to analyse the intrinsic limitations of the reductionist chemical, biological and medical approaches to assess requirements. To establish the necessity to incorporate the complexities emerging from a broader understanding of the biological sciences as well as to include environmental and social dimensions in addressing nutritional needs.

Method

Examples of the limitations of current approaches and the implications of these in defining potential solutions and policy options to address present nutritional problems are presented and discussed.

Conclusion

The chemical and biological sciences have provided a strong base for nutrition and have been essential in establishing nutrition as a science with public health relevance. However, these approaches are clearly insufficient to address the main challenges that confront nutrition science now in the twenty-first century. There is a pressing need to include the social, economic and human rights aspects in order to define future policies that will secure the right to safe and nutritious food for all.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © The Authors 2005

References

1Leitzmann, C. Wholesome nutrition: suitable diets for the new nutrition science. Public Health Nutrition 2005; 8(6A): 753–9.Google Scholar
2Uauy, R, Hertrampf, E, Dangour, AD. Food-based dietary guidelines for healthier populations: international considerations [Chapter 107]. In: Shils, ME, Ross, CA, Shike, M, Caballero, B, Weinsier, RL, Cousins, JC, eds. Modern Nutrition in Health and Disease, 10th ed. Baltimore, MD: Williams & Wilkins, 2005; in press.Google Scholar
3Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO)/World Health Organization (WHO). Preparation and Use of Food-based Dietary Guides. Report of a Joint FAO/WHO Expert Consultation, Nicosia, Cyprus. WHO/NUT/96.6 Geneva: WHO, 1996.Google Scholar
4Nestle, M. Food Politics: How the Food Industry Influences Nutrition and Health. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press, 2002.Google Scholar
5Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO)/World Health Organization (WHO). Energy and Protein Requirements. Report of a Joint FAO/WHO Ad Hoc Expert Committee. FAO Nutrition Meetings Report Series No. 52; WHO Technical Report Series No. 522. Rome/Geneva: FAO/WHO, 1973.Google Scholar
6World Health Organization (WHO). Energy and Protein Requirements. Report of a Joint Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations/WHO/United Nations University Expert Consultation. Technical Report Series No. 724. Geneva: WHO, 1985.Google Scholar
7Rand, WM, Uauy, R, Scrimshaw, NS, eds. Protein-Energy Requirements in Developing Countries Results of Internationally Coordinated Research. Tokyo: United Nations University Press, 1984.Google Scholar
8McLaren, DS. The great protein fiasco. Lancet 1974; 2: 93–6.Google Scholar
9James, WPT, Smitasiri, S, Ul Haq, M, Tagwiyeri, J, Norum, K, Uauy, R, et al. Ending malnutrition by 2020 – an agenda for change in the millennium. WHO Food and Nutrition Bulletin 2000; 21S: 1S76S.Google Scholar
10Garrod, A. The incidence of alkaptonuria: a study in chemical individuality. Lancet 1902; 2: 1616–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
11World Health Organization (WHO). Diet, Nutrition and the Prevention of Chronic Diseases. Report of a Joint WHO/Food and Agriculture Organization Expert Consultation. Technical Report Series No. 916. Geneva: WHO, 2003. Also available at www.who.int.hprGoogle Scholar
12Kang, JX, Wang, J, Wu, L, Kang, ZB. Transgenic mice: fat-1 mice convert n–6 to n–3 fatty acids. Nature 2004; 427: 504.Google Scholar