Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t7czq Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-26T05:30:49.576Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

A culture-sensitive quantitative food frequency questionnaire used in an African population: 1. Development and reproducibility

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 January 2007

UE MacIntyre ,
CS Venter  and
HH Vorster
UE MacIntyre*
Affiliation:
Department of Paediatrics and Child Health,PO Box 168, Medical University of South Africa, 0204, South Africa
CS Venter
Affiliation:
Department of Nutrition and Family Ecology, Potchefstroom University for Christian Higher Education, Potchefstroom 2520, South Africa
HH Vorster
Affiliation:
Department of Nutrition and Family Ecology, Potchefstroom University for Christian Higher Education, Potchefstroom 2520, South Africa
*
*Corresponding author: Email [email protected]
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.
Objective:

To develop and assess the reproducibility of a quantitative food frequency questionnaire (QFFQ) sensitive to the culture of the African population of the North West Province, South Africa.

Design:

A cross-sectional study.

Setting:

A community-based field study in a population stratified according to level of urbanization from deep rural to urban upper class.

Subjects:

A total of 144 (99 women and 45 men) residents of the North West Province, aged between 15 and 65 years, participated in the study.

Methods:

A culture-sensitive, 145-item interviewer-administered QFFQ was designed to cover the whole diet. Portion sizes were estimated from a food portion photograph book (FPPB) showing foods in three portion sizes. The QFFQ was administered twice, 6–12 weeks apart.

Results:

Spearman rank correlation coefficients between the two administrations varied from 0.14 for calcium to 0.75 for alcohol. The mean percentage difference between intakes was 8.5 (standard deviation = 9.9). Energy, protein, carbohydrate and calcium gave differences within 10%. Few significant differences among correlation coefficients or percentage difference for gender, age group or strata of urbanization were present. Bland–Altman plots showed significant proportional bias for protein, fibre and vitamin C. More than 70% of the participants were classified into adjacent quintiles for all nutrients. For food groups, correlation coefficients ranged from 0.25 for milk to 0.45 for vegetable and maize meal groups and 80% of participants were classified into adjacent quintiles.

Conclusions:

The QFFQ appeared to be a reproducible dietary intake assessment instrument.

Keywords

Dietary surveysCultureReproducibility
Type
Research Article
Information
Public Health Nutrition , Volume 4 , Issue 1 , February 2001 , pp. 53 - 62
Copyright
Copyright © CABI Publishing 2001

References

1Solomons, NW, Gross, R. Urban nutrition in developing countries. Nutr. Rev. 1995; 53: 90–5.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
2Gelderblom, D, Kok, P. Urbanisation: South Africa's Challenge. Vol. 1: . Pretoria: HSRC Publishers, 1994.Google Scholar
3Pelto, GH. Anthropological contributions to nutrition education research. J. Nutr. Educ. 1981; 13 (Suppl.): S2–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
4Ritenbaugh, C. An anthropological perspective on nutrition. J. Nutr. Educ. 1981; 13 (Suppl.): S12–15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
5Buzzard, IM, Sievert, YA. Research priorities and recommendations for dietary assessment methodology. Am. J. Clin. Nutr. 1994; 59 (Suppl.): S275–80.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
6Coates, RJ, Monteilh, CP. Assessment of food-frequency questionnaires in minority populations. Am. J. Clin. Nutr. 1997; 65 (Suppl.): S1108–15.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
7Romieu, I, Hernandez-Avila, M, Rivera, JA, Ruel, MT, Parra, S. Dietary studies in countries experiencing a health transition: Mexico and Central America. Am. J. Clin. Nutr. 65 (Suppl.): S1159–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
8Hankin, JH, Wilkens, LR. Development and validation of dietary assessment methods for culturally diverse populations. Am. J. Clin. Nutr. 1994; 59 (Suppl.): S198–200.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
9Gresse, A. Effects of a traditional African diet on the metabolic control of black patients with type II diabetes mellitus. DSc thesis, Potchefstroom University for Christian Higher Education, Potchefstroom, 1991.Google Scholar
10Grivetti, LE. Kalahari agro-pastoral-hunter-gatherers: the Tswana example. Ecol. Food Nutr. 1979; 84: 235–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
11Quin, PJ. Food and feeding habits of the Pedi. South Afr. Med. J. 1964; 12: 969–71.Google Scholar
12Steenkamp, A. Food habits of female Tswana agricultural migrants. MSc thesis, University of Stellenbosch, Stellenbosch.Google Scholar
13Venter, CS, MacIntyre, UE, Vorster, HH. The development and testing of a food portion photograph book for use in an African population. J. Hum. Nutr. Diet. 2000; 13: 205–18.Google Scholar
14Grant, KI, Langenhoven, ML, Stockton, MA, Day, RS, Bauermeister, P. Foodfinder dietary analysis software. Release 1.10.1992. Parowvallei: Medical Research Council, 1992.Google Scholar
15Bland, KM, Altman, DG. Comparing two methods of clinical measurement: a personal history. Int. J. Epidemiol. 1995; 24: S7–13.Google Scholar
16Bland, JMAltman, DG. Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement. Lancet 1986; i: 307–11.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
17Statsoft. Statistica for Windows. Tulsa: Microsoft Corporation, 1995.Google Scholar
18Wheeler, C, Rutishauser, L, Conn, J, O'Dea, K. Reproducibility of a meal-based food frequency questionnaire. The influence of format and time interval between questionnaires. Eur. J. Clin. Nutr. 1994; 48: 795–809.Google Scholar
19Lindroos, A-K, Lissner, L, Sjostrom, L. Validity and reproducibility of a self administered dietary questionnaire in obese and non-obese subjects. Eur. J. Clin. Nutr. 1993; 47: 461–81.Google Scholar
20O'Donnell, MG, Nelson, M, Wise, PH, Walker, DM. A computerized questionnaire for use in diet health education. 1. Development and validation. Br. J. Nutr. 1991; 66: 3–15.Google Scholar
21Männistö, S, Virtanen, M, Mikkonen, T, Pietinen, P. Reproducibility and validity of a food frequency questionnaire in a case-control study on breast cancer. J. Clin. Epidemiol. 1996; 49: 401–9.Google Scholar
22Rockett, HRH, Wolf, AM, Colditz, GA. Development and reproducibility of a food frequency questionnaire to assess diets of older children and adolescents. J. Am. Diet. Assoc. 1995; 95: 336–40.Google Scholar
23Basch, CE, Shea, S, Zybert, P. The reproducibility of data from a food frequency questionnaire among low-income Latino mothers and their children. Am. J. Public Health 1994; 84: 861–4.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
24Stevens, J, Metcalf, PA, Dennis, B, Tell, GS, Shimakawa, T, Folsom, AR. Reliability of a food frequency questionnaire by ethnicity, gender, age and education. Nutr. Res. 1996; 16: 735–45.Google Scholar
25Goldbohm, RA, van t'Veer, P, van den Brandt, PA, et al. Reproducibility of a food frequency questionnaire and stability of dietary habits determined from five annually repeated measurements. Eur. J. Clin. Nutr. 1995; 49: 420–9.Google ScholarPubMed
26Munger, RG, Folsom, AR, Kushi, LH, Kaye, SA, Sellers, TA. Dietary assessment of older Iowa women with a food frequency questionnaire, nutrient intake, reproducibility, and comparison with 24-hour dietary recall interviews. Am. J. Epidemiol. 1992; 136: 182–200.Google Scholar
27Elmståhl, S, Gullberg, B, Riboli, E, Saracci, R, Lindgårde, F. The Malmö food study, the reproducibility of a novel diet history method and an extensive food frequency questionnaire. Eur. J. Clin. Nutr. 1996; 50: 134–42.Google Scholar
28Kune, S, Kune, GA, Watson, LF. Observations on the reliability and validity of the design and diet history method in the Melbourne colorectal cancer study. Nutr. Cancer 1987; 9: 5–20.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
29Ajani, UA, Willett, WC, Seddon, JM. Reproducibility of a food frequency questionnaire for use in ocular research. Invest. Opthalmol. Vis. Sci. 1994; 35: 2725–33.Google Scholar
30Riboli, E, Toniolo, P, Kaaks, R, Shore, RE, Casagrande, C, Pasternack, BS. Reproducibility of a food frequency questionnaire used in the New York University Women's Health Study: effect of self-selection by study subjects. Eur. J. Clin. Nutr. 1997; 51: 437–42.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
31Smith, AF, Jobe, B, Mingay, DJ. Question-induced cognitive biases in reports of dietary intake by college men and women. Health Psychol. 1991; 10: 244–51.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
32Teufel, NI. Development of culturally competent food-frequency questionnaires. Am. J. Clin. Nutr. 1997; 65 (Suppl.): S1173–8.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
33Pietinen, PJ, Hartman, AM, Haapa, E, et al. Reproducibility and validity of dietary assessment instruments. II. Qualitative food frequency questionnaire. Am. J. Epidemiol. 1988; 128: 667–76.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed