Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-vdxz6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-26T00:29:18.412Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Breastfeeding in countries of the European Union and EFTA: current and proposed recommendations, rationale, prevalence, duration and trends

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 April 2001

Agneta Yngve  and
Michael Sjöström
Agneta Yngve*
Affiliation:
Unit for Preventive Nutrition, Department of Biosciences, Karolinska Institute, Stockholm County Council, Stockholm
Michael Sjöström
Affiliation:
Unit for Preventive Nutrition, Department of Biosciences, Karolinska Institute, Stockholm County Council, Stockholm
*
*Corresponding author: Email [email protected]
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Recommendations suggest exclusive breastfeeding for at least the first 4 to 6 months after birth. Paradoxically, an overwhelming proportion of breastfeeding (BF) data in Europe refers to all BF, i.e. not only exclusive but also partial BF (including formula, juices, water, sweetened water etc). This makes it difficult to estimate to what extent the recommendations are met. There is currently strong evidence for recommending exclusive breastfeeding for at least 6 months.

Exclusive BF has progressively gained scientific support. Prevention of infections, allergies and chronic diseases and a favourable cognitive development are highlighted in the recent scientific literature. Further long-term studies on the effects of BF on prevention of chronic disease in the adult are needed.

Great differences exist in BF prevalence and duration both within and between European countries. Trends point towards higher prevalence and duration, with some exceptions. Young mothers breastfeed less than older mothers; single and/or less educated mothers breastfeed less than married mothers with more education. However, inefficient and unreliable monitoring systems prevail, and the data are scarce, not only on exclusive BF but also on demographic, socio-economic, psychosocial and medical determinants of BF patterns. National BF co-ordinators have not been appointed in many countries, and only every second country has promotion of BF incorporated into their national plan of action for nutrition.

Conclusions:

Efficient surveillance systems, comparable across Europe and using common definitions and methodology, need to be developed. These should include determinants of breastfeeding. A European consensus conference should urgently be determinants of breastfeeding. A European consensus conference should urgently be organised, in which strategies for successful promotion of exclusive BF should be particularly considered. There is now strong evidence for a recommendation to breastfeed exclusively for about 6 months, which is more than the duration recommended previously.

Keywords

BreastfeedingInfant FeedingMonitoringPrevalenceHealth PolicyHealth PromotionDisease PreventionEquity
Type
Research Article
Information
Public Health Nutrition , Volume 4 , Issue 2b , April 2001 , pp. 631 - 645
Copyright
Copyright © CABI Publishing 2001

References

1WHO/UNICEF. The Innocenti Declaration on the protection, promotion and support of breastfeeding. Geneva: WHO/UNICEF, 1990.Google Scholar
2Kafatos, A, Codrington, C. Nutrition and diet for healthy lifestyles in Europe; The Eurodiet Project. Publ. Hlth. Nutr. 1999; 2: 327–8.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
3Yngve, A, Sjöström, M. Determinants for breastfeeding – suggested frame work for action in Europe. In Press.Google Scholar
4UNICEF. Facts for Life. Geneva: UNICEF, 1993.Google Scholar
5UNICEF. Breastfeeding: foundation for a healthy future. Copenhagen: UNICEF Geneva Region, 1999.Google Scholar
6Ferriman, A. WHO accused of stifling debate about infant feeding. BMJ 2000; 320: 1362.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
7WHO. The World Health Organization's Infant Feeding Recommendation. http://www.who.int/nut/. Accessed 10 30, 2000.Google Scholar
8Statement of the Standing Committee on Nutrition of the British Paediatric Association. Is Breastfeeding beneficial in the UK? Arch Dis Childhood 1994; 71: 376–80.Google Scholar
9Position of the American Dietetic Association: promotion of breast-feeding. J. Am. Diet. Assoc. 1997; 97: 662–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
10American Academy of Pediatrics. Policy Statement; Breastfeeding and the use of human milk. Pedicatrics 1997; 100(6): 1035–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
11Dewey, KG, Heinig, MJ, Nommsen-Rivers, LA. Differences in morbidity between breast-fed and formula-fed infants. J. Pediatr. 1995; 126: 696–702.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
12Howie, PW, Forsyth, JS, Ogston, SA, et al. Protective effect of breast feeding against infection. BMJ 1990; 300: 11–6.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
13Kovar, MG, Serdula, MK, Marks, JS, et al. Review of the epidemiological evidence for an association between infant feeding and infant health. Pediatrics 1984; 74: 615–38.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
14Popkin, BM, Adair, L, Akin, JS, et al. Breastfeeding and diarrheal morbidity. Pediatrics 1990; 86: 874–82.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
15Beaudry, M, Dufour, R, Marcoux, S. Relation between infant feeding and infections during the first 6 months of life. J. Pediatr. 1995; 126: 191–7.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
16Frank, AL, Taber, LH, Glezen, WP, et al. Breastfeeding and respiratory virus infection. Pediatrics 1982; 70: 239–45.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
17Saarinen, UM. Prolonged breast feeding as prophylaxis for recurrent otitis media. Acta. Paediatr. Scand. 1982; 71: 567–71.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
18Aniansson, G, Alm, B, Andersson, B, et al. A prospective cohort study on breastfeeding and otitis media in Swedish infants. Pediatr. Infect. Dis. J. 1994; 18: 183–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
19Duncan, B, Ey, J, Holberg, CJ, et al. Exclusive breastfeeding for at least 4 months protects against otitis media. Pediatrics 1993; 91: 867–72.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
20Montgomery, D, Splett, P. Economic benefit of breast-feeding infants enrolled in WIC. J. Amer. Diet. Ass. 1997; 97: 379–85.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
21Heinig, MJ, Dewey, KG. Health advantages of breast feeding for infants: a critical review. Nutr. Res. Rev. 1996; 9: 89–110.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
22Ford, RP, Taylor, HM, Mitchell, EA, et al. Breast feeding and the risk of sudden infant death syndrome. Int. J. Epidemiol. 1993; 22: 51–9.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
23Gordon, AE, Saadi, AT, Mackenzie, DA, Molony, N, James, VS, Weir, DM, Busutiil, A, Blackwell, CC. The protective effect of breast feeding in relation to sudden infant death syndrome (SIDS): I. The effect of human milk and infant formula preparations on binding of toxigenic Staphylococcus aureus to epithelial cells. FEMS Immunol. Med. Microbiol. 1999; 25: 155–65.Google Scholar
24Gordon, AE, Saadi, AT, Mackenzie, DA, Molony, N, James, VS, Weir, DM, Busuttil, A, Blackwell, CC. The protective effect of breast feeding in relation to sudden infant death syndrome (SIDS): II. The effect of human milk and infant formula preparations on binding of Clostridium perfringens to epithelial cells. FEMS Immunol. Med. Microbiol. 1999; 25: 167–73.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
25Gordon, AE, Saadi, AT, Mackenzie, DA, Molony, N, James, VSWeir, DM, Busuttil, A, Blackwell, CCThe protective effect of breast feeding in relation to sudden infant death syndrome (SIDS): III. Detection of IgA antibodies in human milk that bind to bacterial toxins implicated in SIDS. FEMS Immunol. Med. Microbiol. 1999; 25: 175–82.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
26Newcomb, PA, Storer, BE, Longnecker, MP, et al. Lactation and a reduced risk of premenopausal breast cancer. N. Engl. J. Med. 1994; 330: 81–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
27Marcus, PM, Baird, DD, Millikan, RC, Moorman, PG, Qaqish, B, Newman, B. Adolescent reproductive events and subsequent breast cancer risk. Am. J. Public Health 1999; 89(8): 1244–7.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
28Bernier, MO, Plu-Bureau, G, Bossard, N, Ayzac, L, Thalabard, JC. Breastfeeding and the risk of breast cancer: a metaanalysis of published studies. Human Reproduction Update 2000; 6(4): 374.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
29Heinig, MJ, Dewey, KG. Health effects of breast feeding for mothers: a critical review. Nutr. Res. Rev. 1997; 10: 35–56.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
30Karro, H. Abortion in the framework of family planning in Estonia. Acta. Obset. Gynecol. Scand 1997; 164(Suppl): 46–50Google ScholarPubMed
31David, HP. Abortion in Europe 1920–91: a public health perspective. Stud. Fam. Plann. 1992; 01–02; 23(1): 1–22.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
32Kovacs, L. Abortion and contraceptive practices in eastern Europe. Int. J. Gynaecol. Obstet. 1997; 07; 58(1): 69–75.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
33WHO Task Force on Methods for the Natural Regulation of Fertility. (1999) The World Health Organization Multinational Study of Breast-feeding and lactational amenorrhea. III. Pregnancy during breast-feeding. Fertility and Sterility 1997; 72(3): 431–40.Google Scholar
34Vural, B, Vural, F, Erk, A, Karabacak, O. (1999) Knowledge on lactational amenorrhoea and contraception in Kocaeli, Turkey. East African Medical Journal 1999; 76(7): 385–389.Google ScholarPubMed
35Kries, R, Koletzko, B, Sauerwald, T, Mutius, E, Barnert, D, Grunert, V, Voss, H. Breast feeding and obesity: cross sectional study. BMJ 1999; 319: 147–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
36Gerstein, HC. Cow's milk exposure and type I diabetes mellitus. A critical overview of the clinical literature. Diabetes Care 1994; 01; 17(1): 13–9.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
37Harrison, LC, Honeyman, MC. Cow's milk and type 1 diabetes: the real debate is about mucosal immune function. Diabetes 1999; 08; 48(8): 1501–7.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
38McKinney, PA, Parslow, R, Gurney, KA, Law, GR, Bodansky, HJ, Williams, R. Perinatal and neonatal determinants of childhood type 1 diabetes. A case-control study in Yorkshire, U.K. Diabetes Care 1999; 06; 22(6): 928–32.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
39Tai, TY, Wang, CY, Lin, LL, Lee, LT, Tsai, ST, Chen, CJ. A casecontrol study on risk factors for Type 1 diabetes in Taipei city. Diabetes Res. Clin. Pract. 1998; 12; 42(3): 197–203.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
40Dahlquist, GG, Patterson, C, Soltesz, G. Perinatal risk factors for childhood type I diabetes in Europe: The EURODIAB substudy 2 study group. Diabetes Care 1999; 22(10): 1698–702.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
41Pettitt, DJ, Forman, MR, Hanson, RL, Knowler, WC, Bennett, PH. Breastfeeding and incidence of non-insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus in Pima Indians. Lancet 1997; 07 19; 350(9072): 166–8.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
42Grulee, CG, Sanford, HN. The influence of breast and artificial feeding on infantile eczema. J. Pediatr. 1980; 9: 223–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
43Zeiger, RS. Prevention of food allergy and atopic disease. JR. Soc. Med. 1997; 90(Suppl 30): 21–33.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
44Vandenplas, Y. Myths and facts about breastfeeding: does it prevent later atopic disease? Acta Paediatr. 1997; 86: 1283–7.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
45Kelly, D, Coutts, AGP. Early nutrition and the development immune function of the neonate. Proc. Nut. Soc. 2000; 59: 177–85.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
46Saarinen, UM, Kajosaari, M. Breastfeeding as prophylaxis agains atopic disease: prospective follow-up study until 17 years old. Lancet 1995; 346: 1065–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
47Halken, S, Hoest, A, Hansen, LG, Østerballe, O. Effects of an allergy prevention programme on incidence of atopic symptoms in infancy. A prospective study of 159 high-risk infants. Allergy 1992; 47: 545–53.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
48Plancoulaine, S, Charles, MA, Lafay, L, Tauber, M, Thibult, NBorys, JM, Eschwège, E. Fleurbaix Laventie Ville Santé Study group. Infant-feeding patterns are related to blood cholesterol concentration in prepubertal children aged 5–11 y: The Fleurbaix-Laventie Ville Santé study. Eur. J. Clin. Nutr. 2000; 54: 114–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
49Ravelli, AJ, van der Meulen, JHP, Osmond, C, Barker, DJP, Bleker, OP. Infant feeding and adult glucose tolerance, lipid profile, blood pressure and obesity. Arch. Dis. Child 2000; 82: 248–52.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
50Bernt, KM, Walker, WA. Human milk as a carrier of biochemical messages. Acta Paediatr. 1999; 430(Suppl): 27–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
51Mennella, JA, Beauchamp, GK. Early Flavor Experiences: Research Update. Nutr. Rev. 1998; 07; 56(7): 205–11.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
52Zetterström, R. Breastfeeding and infant-mother interaction. Acta Paediatr. 1999; 430(Suppl): 1–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
53Christensson, K, Cabrera, T, Christensson, E, Uvnäs-Moberg, K, Winberg, J. Separation distress call in the human neonate in the absence of maternal body contact. Acta Paediatr. 1995; 84: 468–73.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
54Widström, AM, Wahlberg, V, Mathiesen, AS, Eneroth, P, Uvnäs-Moberg, K, Werner, S, Winberg, J. Short-term effects of early suckling and touch of the nipple on maternal behaviour. Early Human Develop. 1990; 21: 153–63.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
55Anderson, JW, Johnstone, BM, Remley, DT. Breastfeeding and cognitive development: a meta analysis. Am. J. Clin. Nutr. 1999; 70: 525–35.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
56Pohl, H, Hibbs, B. Breastfeeding exposure of infants to environmental contaminants – a public health risk assessment viewpoint: chlorinated dibenzo-p-dioxins and chlorinated dibenzofurans Toxicol. Ind. Health 1996; 12(5): 593–611.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
57Abadin, H, Hibbs, B, Pohl, H. Breastfeeding exposure of infants to environmental contaminants – a public health risk assessment viewpoint: II. Cadmium, lead, mercury. Toxicol. Ind. Health 1997; 13(4): 495–517.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
58Pohl, HR, Tylenda, CA. Breastfeeding exposure of infants to selected pesticides: a public health viewpoint. Toxicol. Ind. Health 2000; 16: 65–77.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
59WHO Regional Office for Europe. Health For All Data Base, European Region. Copenhagen: WHO, 1999.Google Scholar
60WHO Headquarters Nutrition Unit. Global Data Bank on Breast-feeding. Geneva: WHO, 1996.Google Scholar
61 Österreichisches Bundesinstitut fü r Gesundheitswesen. Stillen im Österreich, Wien: Bundesinstitut für Gesundheitswesen, 1998.Google Scholar
62VBBB, Verslag Bevordering van Borstvoeding, onderzoek op vraag van M. Colla, federaal Minister van Volksgezondheid, Bryssel: VBBB, 1997.Google Scholar
63VBBB, L' Allaitement maternel: un facteur de santé publique. Rapport de l'enquête menée auprès des services de maternité en Wallonie et à Bruxelles, entre janvier et août 1977. Bryssel: VBBB, 1997.Google Scholar
64 Sundhedsstyrelsen. Spaedbarnsernaering. Om amning og erstatninger. Rapport fra en konference den 19 marts 1996. Copenhagen: Sundhedsstyrelsen, 1996.Google Scholar
65Michaelsen, KF, Larsen, PS, Thomsen, BL, Samuelson, G. The Copenhagen cohort study on infant nutrition and growth: duration of breast feeding and influencing factors. Acta Paediatr. 1994; 83: 565–71.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
66Sundhedsstyrelsen. Regeringens Folkesundhedsprogram 1999–2008. Copenhagen: Sundhedsstyrelsen, 1999.Google Scholar
67Office for National Statistics, Infant Feeding 1995, London: Stationery Office, 1997.Google Scholar
68Blondel, B, Bré art, G, du Mazaubrun, Ch, Badeyan, G, Wcislo, W, Lordier, A, Matet, N. Santé publique; la situation pé rinatale en France. Evolution entre 1981 et 1995 J. Gynecol. Obstet. Biol. Reprod. 1997; 26: 770–80.Google Scholar
69DREES – Direction de la recherche, des études, de l'évaluation et des statistiques. Perinatal health monitoring. Paris: DREES, 1999.Google Scholar
70 Unpublished study of the Research Institute for Child Nutrition, Dortmund, On: Breastfeeding in the Federal Republic of Germany performed between II/1997 and VI/ 1998, to be published in the 2000 Nutrition Report (Ernährungsbericht) for Germany.Google Scholar
71Kersting, et al. : Studies on Breastfeeding 1981–1983 with 1500 mothers in Dortmund and Haltern. Parts I, II, III. Monatsschr Kinderheilkd 1987; 135: 204–9; 249–52; 314–9.Google Scholar
72 Kersting and Schöch: Stillen in der Geburtsklinik und Fortsetzung der Säuglingsernährung imersten Lebensjahr. In: Stillen in Deutschland. Tietze, Trumann, Sedemund (Hrsg). Berlin: RKI-Heft 8/1995, 18–32.Google Scholar
73Bergmann, et al. : Wie werden Säuglinge in Deutschland ernährt? Monatsschr Kinderheilkd 1994; 142: 412–7.Google Scholar
74Atladóttir, H. Research on infant nutrition in Iceland. A thesis submited in partial fulfillment of requirements of the degree of Master of Science in human nutrition. Supervisors: Professor Inga Thorsdottir and Gestur Palsson, Department of Food Science, Faculty of Science. Reykjavik: University of Iceland, 1998.Google Scholar
75Cattaneo, A, Davanzo, R, Ronfani, L. Are data prevalence and duration of breastfeeding reliable? The case of Italy. Acta Paediatr. 2000; 89: 88–93.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
76Faldella, G, Di Comite, A, Marchiano, E, Govoni, M, Salvioli, GP. Brestfeeding duration and current neonatal feeding practies in Emilia Romagna, Italy. Acta Paediatr. 1999; 430(Suppl) 23–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
77TNO Preventie & Gezondheid. Vierde Landelijke Groeistudie, 1998. Zeist: TNO 1998.Google Scholar
78Hay, G. Institute for Nutrition Research, University of Oslo. Personal Communication.Google Scholar
79Ferguson, AE, Tappin, DM, Girdwood, RWA, Kennedy, R, Cockburn, F. Breastfeeding in Scotland. BMJ 1994; 308: 824–5CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
80Warren, J. Breastfeeding in Scotland – where are we now? Health Bulletin 1998; 56(4): 772–9.Google Scholar
81Britten, J, Broadfoot, M. Breastfeeding in Scotland – Statistical sources. Health Bulletin 2000; 58(1): 11–9.Google ScholarPubMed
82Comité de Lactancia Materna, Asociación Espanola de Pediatria. Informe sobre Lactancia Materna en Espana. Madrid: AEP, 1998.Google Scholar
83The National Board of Health and Welfare, Centre Epidemiology, Official statistics of Sweden, Breast-feeding children born 1997, Stockholm: The National Board of Health and Welfare, 1999.Google Scholar
84Barnhälsovården, SLL. Amning av barn födda 1997. Stockholm: Barnhälsovården SLL, 1998.Google Scholar
85Socialstyrelsen. Amning och bröstmjölksersättning. Stockholm: Socialstyrelsen, 1999.Google Scholar
86Conzelmann, C. Stillhäufigkeit und Stilldauer in der Schweiz 1994. Basel: Institut für Sozial- und Präventivmedizin der Universität Basel, 1994.Google Scholar
87WHO Regional Office for Europe, Headquarters and Nations Children's Fund, Comparative Analysis of Implementation of the Innocenti Declaration in WHO European Member States, Geneva: WHO/UNICEF, 1998.Google Scholar
88WHO. Indicators for assessing breastfeeding practices. Geneva: WHO/CDD/SER/91, 14, 1991.Google Scholar
89Persson, L-Å. III Multivariate approaches in the analysis of breastfeeding habits. WHO Bulletin 1985; 63: 1129–36.Google Scholar
90WHO Europe, Nutrition Unit; Nutrition Policy in WHO European member states. Copenhagen: WHO, 1995.Google Scholar
91Buxton, KE, Gielen, AC, Faden, RR, Brown, CH, Paige, DMChwalow, AJ. Women intending to breastfeed: Predictors early infant feeding experiences. Am. J. Prev. Med. 1991; 7: 101–6.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
92Perez-Escamilla, F, Pollitt, E, Lonnerdal, B, Dewey, KG. Infant feeding policies in maternity wards and their effect on breastfeeding success: An analytical overview. Am. J. Publ. Health 1994; 84: 89–97.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
93Saadeh, R, Akré, J. Ten steps to successful breastfeeding: Summary of the Rationale and Scientific Evidence. BIRTH 1996; 23: 154–60.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed